Get help from the best in academic writing.

ENGL 102 Idaho State University The Donkey Skin Folktale Cycle Discussion

ENGL 102 Idaho State University The Donkey Skin Folktale Cycle Discussion.

Analysis Exercise: This exercise asks that you apply analytic principles found in the readings in Chapter 14 to folktales, films, historical events, or other stories from your research or from your experience. Please choose ONE of these options:  Choose a key insight (analytical tool) from Bettleheim, Baum, Hurley, Zipes, Morrison, Panttaja, or Orenstein as a tool for analyzing a folktale or fairy tale other than “Cinderella.” You can choose from among the folktales posted on the Grimm Brothers tales link posted to Moodle, or you can use one from your own research (or your own collection!). Don’t forget to cite the subject of your analysis.  Using the description of the type 510A and type 510B folktale (pages 519-520) as your analytic tool, analyze a modernized version of the Cinderella tale—this can be written or on film. Your analysis should determine to what extent the retelling would still classify as a tale of this type according to the classification. Be sure to cite your outside source.  Using one of the four variants of Cinderella in Chapter 15 (pages 484-504) as an analytic tool, explain why a specific historical event, or non-folktale story or film, could be described as “a Cinderella story.” You might consider the worlds of politics, sports, or other areas if you choose this prompt. If you find it helpful, you can incorporate the work of Bettleheim, Baum, Hurley, Zipes, Morrison, Panttaja, or Orenstein here. Be sure to cite any outside sources you use for this exercise. The earlier you begin your reading of the stories and articles in Chapter 14, the more clear your purpose will become. Please jump right in! Criteria:  Must employ the analysis structure described in Chapter 6.  Must clearly identify and articulate an analytic principle or definition.  While it should contain summary, it should contain overall more analysis (application of a specific analytic tool) than summary.  Must accurately represent source material. Mechanical Requirements:  Clear, effective, thorough use of analysis structure: your essay must contain: o a clear introduction which introduces, contextualizes, and summarizes the situation or situations you have chosen to analyze; o a section which introduces and summarizes your analytic principle or principles; o a systematic application of that analytic principle to the situation or situations (this will be the longest section of your essay); o a conclusion which indicates what new/different understanding your analysis can bring to the individual situation and the subject of obedience and authority in general. o The sections of the essay should appear in that order. Please remember that these are sections of your essay, not paragraphs. (Continued on next page) Mechanical Requirements, continued:  Detailed support of claims  Quotes and paraphrases accurately cited  Strong organization throughout  Clear introduction, transitions, and conclusion  Must conform to the general standards of Written Standard English (spelling, usage, grammar, punctuation) Formal requirements:  MLA citation style throughout  See syllabus for formatting guidelines Due: Via Moodle, 11:59 pm, October 4.doc file
ENGL 102 Idaho State University The Donkey Skin Folktale Cycle Discussion

Hillsborough Community College CompTIA CASP Presentations.

Hey I have to do a presentation on CompTIA CASP+. Can you leave presentation notes on each slide of my PowerPoint presentations that I can use to present with. This is due by Thursday please. Will tip high for this one. I will provide all the PowerPoint slide and the official book that follows each slide. I need done is for you to skim through the book and leave me bulleted presentation notes for each slide that I can just read off of.Here is the google drive link to all the PowerPoints and official book:…
Hillsborough Community College CompTIA CASP Presentations

Counterfactual Thinking and Need for Cognition: Appointing Culpability paper.

****This paper will cover both study one (including the literature review, methods section, results section, and brief discussion from that study) and the introduction literature review to study two. This paper essentially tells the literature oriented story of your semester long project thus far. Your main job is to justify your study two predictions, and you do that by both showing how study one influenced your choice of variables in study two as well as citing prior research that supports your second independent variable in study two. At the end of the study two literature review section, you will provide your own study two predictions.********Paper III is intended to help you take your original Seflie study one step further by lettingyou predict how a second independent variable of your lab’s choosing impacts participants. In this replication with extension study, you have a greater role in a). choosing which articles to include in your follow-up literature review as well as b). identifying how this new variable influences your hypotheses. The bulk of your points in Paper III will come from a new paper “literature review”, but—similar to journal articles you might have read—this second literature review comes between the discussion from study one and before the methods for study two. That is, your Paper III will include your original literature review from study one (revised based on feedback from Paper I), your study one methods, results, and discussion (revised based on feedback from Paper II), and a new literature review that both focuses on the results of study one but adds in new information and references for study two. In other words, Paper III includes: 1). Your original title page (though feel free to change the title)2). Your revised study one literature review (ending in the study one hypotheses).3). Your revised study one methods section. 4). Your revised study one results section.5). Your revised study one discussion section. 6). Your new study two literature review (ending in the study two hypotheses).7). References for all citations in the paper (minimum 10 references required) 8). Your appendices from study oneThe largest number of Paper III points are provided for your new study two literature review. Unlike your study one literature review, your study two literature review will essentially pick up after study one. Think of it as a “sequel” of sorts. It builds on and extends study one’s Selfie focus, using two levels of your original independent variable (either Selfie vs. Groupie, or Selfie vs. Professional) and similar dependent variables (e.g. impressions of Emma, etc.) but altering or extending them into a new study design. The good news here is that you can refer to study one as you write your study two literature review. In fact, that is something I encourage. You can also refer back to your study one literature review sources. The bulk of this study two literature review concerns a second independent variable that you and your lab will manipulate during the second part of the semester. You will need to find up to five references for this second independent variable, hopefully finding sources that build a bridge between studies one and two. In other words, in Paper III you will answer the following question: “Given our findings in study one, how will the presence of a second independent variable impact participant decisions?”Like Paper I, you should end your literature review by noting your specific hypotheses for study two. Here, you will address both main effects (outcomes associated with each independent variable alone) and interactions (the combined impact of your independent variables). 2). APA Formatting PurposeThe second purpose of Paper III: Literature Review is to once again teach you proper American Psychological Association (APA) formatting. In the pages below, I will tell you how to format your paper using APA style. There are a lot of very specific requirements in APA papers, so pay attention to the instructions below as well as Chapter 14 in your book!3). Writing PurposeFinally, this paper is intended to help you refine your writing. My hope is that you will use feedback from Paper I and Paper II to improve your grammar, spelling, and content in Paper III. At the end of the semester, you will actually use Paper III as the opening section for your final course paper, so doing a good writing job Paper III will be very beneficial as you revise your papers for Paper V. Many students use Paper V as their writing sample for graduate programs, so make sure you write clearly and precisely for an educated reader!Note that the plagiarism limit for Paper III is 50%. This is a bit higher given the overlap in the Paper II material, but your Paper I and new literature review in Paper III should be very unique to you. As usual, references, citations, and the predictions are not included in the plagiarism limit.
Counterfactual Thinking and Need for Cognition: Appointing Culpability paper

MGT 301 Saudi Electronic University Apple Functional Structure Case Study.

Reference Source:Textbook:-Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational behaviour: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed). Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Case Study: -Case: ApplePlease read the case “Apple” from Chapter 15 “Organizational Structure” Page: – 503 given in your textbook – Organizational behaviour: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed). by Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019) and Answer the following Questions:Assignment Question(s): 1. Why do you think Apple’s functional structure has been so important for their products? (1.25 Marks ) (Min words 150-200)2.What are the outside forces that might make Apple change their organizational structure in the future? (1.25 Marks ) (Min words 150-200)3.How might Apple change their structure in a way that allows them to have the best of both worlds? (1.25 Marks ) (Min words 200)Part:-2 Discussion question: Page: – Please read Chapter 15 “Organizational Structure” carefully and then give your answers on the basis of your understanding.4.Which of the organizational forms described in this chapter do you think leads to the highest levels of motivation among workers? Why?(1.25 Marks ) (Min words 150-200)Important Note: – Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.Due date for the submission of Assignment:- 3Assignment-3 should posted in the Black Board by end of Week-11. The due date for the submission of Assignment-3 is end of Week-13.Answer:
MGT 301 Saudi Electronic University Apple Functional Structure Case Study

LOG 430 Grantham University New Product Development Discussion

LOG 430 Grantham University New Product Development Discussion.

Complete an SCM product development paper using either a personal experience or select a fortune 500 company that elaborates on the New Product Development (NPD) risks, customer driven marketing initiatives, and financial measure as discussed this week.
The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.Use font size 12 and 1” margins.Include cover page and reference page.At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.LECTURE:Property Management Collaboration and Systems ThinkingEffective process mapping within an organization requires leadership strategies that lead up, down, and across to formulate step-by-step processes to achieve objectives and goals. Another term well recognized is systems thinking. The term encompasses information variables, teamwork, establishing core goals and objectives, along with mutually supportive relationships and distinct boundaries. Fawcett, Ellram, and Ogden (2007) illustrate a well-recognized process for a systems thinking approach to map or remap processes in achieving efficiencies as demonstrated in figure one below:ILS Certification Process IssueThe rotation of management or promotion of new leadership always sponsors operational changes and desired behaviors. Our discussion will focus on the Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) certification process, which is “to validate that the planned logistics support for each fielded system or capability is mature, available, and ready for delivery not later than four months prior to the start” of ship, submarine, or operations center availability (SPAWAR, 2014, P. 3). In other words, the product, software, or combination of the two along with a complete Product Support Strategy (PSS) to include joint-military service training must be delivered by a predetermined date established earlier in the program acquisition life cycle. A recent process constraint I encountered arose as a new senior logistics manager was promoted to a submarine program office who disagrees with the current process at hand. The process disagreement has led the organization’s executive staff becoming involved as I am now leading Working Group (WG) to resolve the conflict. This narrative is important because I have mapped the process, incorporating key stakeholders to objectively analyze the current process and potential solutions.Space and Naval Warfare System Command (SPAWAR) Organizational StructureTo better understand the issue at hand a transparent view of the organization must be presented. The SPAWAR organization consists of seven competencies to include finance, contracts, legal, logistics and fleet support, engineering, acquisition and program management, and corporate operations. Under the SPAWAR headquarters competencies Program Executive Officers (PEOs) were established and segmented by satellite communications, tactical networks, and national security systems amongst two PEOs, as depicted by figure two.Our discussion will narrow to focus on undersea integration specifically related to submarines under the Program Management Warfare (PMW) 770 office. The specific issue includes that the PMW 770 office currently retains responsibility for writing and consolidating risk messages for all submarine vessels that will not meet their ILS certification scheduled date. Products may be unavailable, incomplete technical manuals, non-finalized maintenance plans, software deficiencies, training gaps, or a combination by which the pertinent military organization must be notified. In this case, an ILS Risk Message is submitted to the responsible military Commanding Officer for assessment and acceptance of the applicable risk to either receive a partial system or shift the installation date. Secondly, the time to disseminate a risk message is approximately two months, which itself is an issue and needs to be shortened to meet mission objectives.Systems Thinking ApproachIn considering the issue from a systems thinking approach my core goal is to effectively execute a streamlined risk message process that benefits the military customer, while subscribing to PMWs and PEOs process concerns. This goal includes objectives focused on logistics functions, personnel and technology resources to strategically link past bottlenecks as process improvement opportunities. The boundaries include PMW 770 in its entirety, other encompassing programs that sponsor submarine programs, and PEO executives who support, manage, and finance logistics and personnel resources.Working Group FormationBeginning with a project charter I began with the purpose of the working group followed by selecting members based on their technical expertise or level of involvement. Subsequently I included the following categories to keep the tiger team on track:Objectives Ground rules and guidelinesCommunicationProblem-solvingDecision-makingConflict managementExpectationsCollaboration and contribution expectationsI concluded with the project work schedule to ensure everyone clearly understood the task priorities to meet the organization’s deliverables.Considerations and ToolsTo maximize everyone’s time and effort my agenda included assessing the current process, identifying causes of submarine ILS risk message conflicts, and evaluating the pros and cons of alternative SPAWAR groups helping to consolidate future messages. By further eliminating miscellaneous correspondence and templates, I was able to alleviate contentions with military customers across the Department of Navy and United States Marine Corps. By analyzing the submarine ILS risk root issues and process, it was evident that differing process steps exist in comparison to surface ships. Some individuals were also unaware of submission timelines due to a lack of internal training. Furthermore, the PMWs are funded to execute the roles and responsibilities of developing risk messages as per the fiscal year funding obligated under the PEOs by headquarters. The organizational structure was evaluated using a cause and effect diagram (Ishikawa Chart) to determine an improved process continuum to posture the organization risk message dissemination periods as illustrated in figure three.By further conducting a pros and cons assessment of the Fleet Readiness Directorate (FRD) and SPAWAR System Center Pacific (SSC PAC) the WG determined the SSC PAC entity would be best to help in consolidating future risk messages based on the following:Hosts an innate ILS requisite Subject Matter Expert (SME) knowledge databaseIntegrated process knowledge existing among ILS professionalsReview and authenticate capabilities that exists to validate databases against risk messages to determine accuracies or necessary changesILS risk message training becoming available for all PMWs as neededIn contrast, currently no funding exists under SSC PAC to execute the improvement initiatives listed, which will enhance the process; therefore, PMWs who are currently funded to conduct this work and are not performing their function lose funds in support of a Full Time Employee (FTE) to assist PMW 770 as well as other stakeholders in their process efforts.Legal standards and compliance are another consideration as all considerations formulated surround the Navy Modernization Process Management and Operation Manual and SPAWAR Instruction for Integrated Logistics Support Certification Process for SPAWAR System Fielded Afloat. Each of these instructions designate certain time frame parameters for submitting ILS certifications and risk messages along with conformance standards associated with product support activities.Process Map and Resource PlanningTo simplify the process map for lecture purposes the applicable PMW retains responsibility for completing a standardized risk message template, which is then submitted to the ILS Certification Manager for processing under the Logistics and Fleet Support competency. Upon adjudicating discrepancies, the message is submitted by the lead logistics executive to the message center for distribution to pertinent military activities affected. Lastly, the applicable PMW is accountable to provide monthly updates ensuring that product support discrepancies are mitigated in a timely manner and that the military receives their systems in accordance with acquisition standards.The process map is in accordance with a standardized format to alleviate ambiguities, decreased message release periods to one week versus two months, and an authentication process to ensure message accuracy prior to official release. Positive process outcomes include that the military Commanding Officers are more likely to accept risk with a better-defined process, and internal productivity increases when other stakeholders are overseeing your work efforts. Cost margins will need to be corrected in reprogramming funds to support the new initiatives; however, productivity levels have already increased by reducing the message release from 60 days to seven days.Benchmarking OutcomesAs this process is now one of my career deliverables I manage performance trends each month to determine outstanding PMW risks along with message distribution accuracy. An overall improved logistics posture now exists across the PMWs and PEOs, while less risk is now associated with product packages amongst the programs due to higher visibility at the executive leadership level.ReferencesFawcett, S., Ellram, M. L., & Ogden, J. A. (2007). Supply chain management: from vision to implementation. Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
LOG 430 Grantham University New Product Development Discussion

Drug Addiction & Brain Diseases Behavioral and Substantial Changes Discussion

assignment helper Drug Addiction & Brain Diseases Behavioral and Substantial Changes Discussion.

I’m working on a writing exercise and need a sample draft to help me study.

5 pages, 12 points, Times New Roman, and double spaced with one-inch margin. This Explanation Essay will be about drug addiction. If there is a need for outsources here is the only links you can use :The Overtaken – Top Documentary Films Drug Addiction Documentary – Bing video and there is one source I’ll send once I find the writer. The most important thing is the thesis statement. also, you have to mention three causes in the body paragraphs. the last thing is to write down the sources if you can ( not included in the five pages ). Thank you
Drug Addiction & Brain Diseases Behavioral and Substantial Changes Discussion

Complications Of Skeletal Traction Health And Social Care Essay

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp In the last two decades, there have been major changes in the management of lower limb long bone fractures, surgical management has become the norm. Skeletal traction is now rarely used as the definitive form of management. Most of the patients admitted to our hospitals have skeletal injuries, and these patients have prolonged length of stay as they are initially managed non- operatively. Complications of traction have been looked at since 1947 and have been published but literature from the developing countries is lacking. This study is being conducted to evaluate the prevalence of complications associated with skeletal traction with lower extremity fractures. Objective : – To determine the proportion of patients with Lower Extremity fractures who develop complications associated with skeletal traction. Study Design:- This is a Hospital based Prospective Descriptive study, that will be carried out from December 2010 to March 2011. Study Setting :- The study will be carried out at the KNH orthopaedic wards. Materials and Methods :- Patients who are put on lower limb skeletal traction will be recruited into the study, They will be reviewed weekly for complications namely pin tract infection, pressure sores, venous thrombo-embolism, orthostatic pneumonia and knee stiffness, until upto the point they are taken off traction. The data will be collected using pre-designed questionnaires. INTRODUCTION Fractures of the femur are almost always the result of great violence and are sometime a threat to the patients life, not only because of the immediate complications such as bleeding or associated injuries but also because of subsequent complications related either to the treatment of the fracture or to the complications of the associated injuries. Immobilization of the fracture was recognised as essential for union. The development of splints, such as the Thomas splint and the subsequent combinations of the splints with traction methods either fixed or balanced, allowed for better control of the fracture, patients never the less had to remain in traction for three months or longer before the fracture was sufficiently stable to allow ambulation. Skeletal traction is seldom used in modern practice, usually it is only a temporary mode of treatment. Internal Fixation is still the treatment of choice for most closed injuries, this is because of higher union rates, lower rates of complications, earlier weight bearing, shorter hospital stays and early return to daily activites. In KNH majority of the patients admitted with femoral fractures are managed initially on skeletal traction. Patients with proximal femoral fractures are on Russel Hamilton’s traction while patients with femoral shaft fractures are on Perkins traction. When the patient is managed on skeletal traction the patient is on prolonged bed rest and hospital stay increases also nursing care is difficult and the patient is at risk of developing morbidities due to the skeletal traction and prolonged immobilisation. The cost of care is increased and as seen in our setting most of the patients we manage come from a low socio-economic background who have difficulties in financing their healthcare. The prolonged confinements of the patients on traction is associated with certain complications, such as pin tract infections, decubitus ulcers, which can be overcome by better nursing care, but the complications of prolonged bed rest such as bladder and bowel derangements, deep venous thrombosis, osteoporosis, muscle wasting, to mention only a few cannot be prevented hence the need for early internal fixation. Literature Review Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death in adolescents and young adults (1,2,3,4) and of the estimated 856 000 road deaths occurring annually worldwide, 74% are in developing countries (5). In both Nigeria (6,7) and Kenya (8), for example, a fivefold increase in traffic-related fatalities was observed over the last 30 years. Injuries cause profound morbidity and are one of top 10 causes of death and disability in both developing and developed economies (9). Kenya, like other developing countries, lacks organised efforts to reduce the burden of injuries. Although there is debate as to whether trauma systems in high-income countries are transferable to developing economies, baseline studies providing accounts of injury and injury trends in least developed countries are scanty.(10) Media reports have raised concern over rising road accident injuries in Kenya. Most of these occur in the capital city, Nairobi (11). Those injured mainly receive treatment at the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) the city’s main hospital. The city lacks a systematic pre-hospital care and the patients arrive at the institution at any time and unannounced. As demonstrated in Saidi’s study, the injured are transported to hospital by private vehicles in the majority of cases. Ninety two per cent of the casualties arrive at KNH without any pre-hospital optimisation. (10) Saidi et al (12)found 31.0% of all admissions at KNH are due to injury indicating that a large volume of trauma admissions is handled at this public hospital. The average length of hospital stay of 14 days is from Saidi’s study is much longer than in reports from established trauma facilities. At the Vancouver General and Teaching Hospital, Canada, the length in 1997 was 9.14 days despite caring for patients with severer injuries (24% with ISS > 16) than in Saidi’s (12) cohort of patients (13.4% with ISS > 15) [12,13]. The excess length of hospital stay at KNH is caused by the predominance of skeletal injuries. Long bone fracture fixation is usually performed late, a practice occasioned by the local economic environment and a limiting factor for external validity of this outcome measure. An initial period of nonoperative care, which may last up to 4 weeks, is inevitable. The delay is caused by time spent to raise funds for desired implants. Many patients (90%) pay for the services out of their pockets [14]. If a policy of early fracture treatment incorporating a care reimbursement system that does not delay the operative intervention is introduced, the average length of stay may improve. This early fixation would additionally prevent pulmonary failure state, alleviate pain, ease nursing care, reduce complications [15], and allow early rehabilitation and return to work. The principles of traction are a pulling force that is applied to part of the body i.e. the limbs, the pelvis or spine and another force applied in the opposite direction called counter traction. The forces involved in traction are based on Newton’s third law of motion, which states for every action there has to be an equal and opposite reaction. Malgaigne characterized as the greatest surgical historian, and author of the 1st comprehensive work on the diagnosis and the treatment of fractures (18), credits Guy de Chauliac with the introduction of continuous, isotonic traction in the treatment of fractures of the femur. This was accomplished by suspending a weight, attached to the leg by a cord over a pulley at the foot of the bed. The use of traction dates as far back as 3000 yrs. The Aztecs and the ancient Egyptians used manual traction and made splints out of tree branches and bark. (19) In 1847, Malgaigne introduced the first effective device which grasped the bone itself, these hooks were designed for the Rx of displaced patella fractures, the hooks were pressed through the skin and subcutaneous tissue to engage the proximal and distal fragment of the patella.(18) During World War One there was a rapid spread of the use of skeletal traction by application of tongs to the femoral condyles. After the war the tongs were extensively used in the United States but their popularity gradually decreased because of the complications, particularly infection associated with their use, tongs are now mainly reserved for skull traction.(21,22,23,24,25) Skeletal traction by means of the Steinman pin was popularized by Bohler and his students. Isotonic traction still remains an essential element in the closed treatment of many fractures. In many places worldwide it is standard practice to apply skeletal or skin traction to the injured limb following acute fractures prior to surgery Billsten 1996; Brink, 2005 (41). Traction may be either skin or skeletal. The main theoretical advantages of traction are that it will reduce pain at the fracture site and assist the reduction of the fracture thereby making the subsequent operation easier to perform. For intracapsular fractures reduction in circulatory complications has been proposed as traction may reduce any tamponade effect (Pressure caused by build up of excess fluid) which will compress blood vessels and block blood flow within the joint. Traction however has potential disadvantages, it makes nursing of the patients more difficult for e.g. use of a bed pan by the patient, pressure area care prior to surgery. Other adverse effects especially of skeletal traction include complications of sepsis at the pin site, pulmonary complications and knee stiffness because of the prolonged immobilization. In the last two decades there have been major changes in the management of lower limb long bone fractures, where resources permit, surgical management of open

Economics homework help

Economics homework help. This is a paper that is focusing on complete Part 1 of the project charter using the Project Charter. The paper also provides additional guidelines to use in writing the assignment paper well.,Complete Part 1 of the project charter using the Project Charter,Instructions,Complete Part 1 of the project charter using the Project Charter Template. Be succinct but be sure to include all required information. Include evidence-based rationale and cite appropriately using APA. Include the reference list on the last page.,The following criteria will be used to evaluate your work:,Justify selection of departmental and executive sponsors., Describe the overarching aim of the project, including the impact on a process or systems change., Summarize the specific project strategy or intervention that will be used to accomplish the aim., Describe the project team members and reasons they were chosen., Describe the impact the project will have on stakeholders, including patient safety and quality., Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and ,scholarly writing standards,., Additional Requirements,Your assessment should meet the following requirements:,Written communication: Write clearly, accurately, and professionally, incorporating sources appropriately.;Even though this is a template, you are to write in complete sentences unless indicated otherwise. Avoid the use of bulleted lists or incomplete sentences., Length: Complete all fields of Part 1 of Project Charter Template., Resources: Include sources where appropriate within the template, and provide a reference list on the last page., APA format: Cite your sources using current APA format., Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point,Remember, ensure  that the paper pages are exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.,Attachments,Click Here To Download,Economics homework help