Get help from the best in academic writing.

ENG 120 GCCCD Creating a Annotated Bibliography Essay

ENG 120 GCCCD Creating a Annotated Bibliography Essay.

I’m working on a english multi-part question and need an explanation to help me learn.

I have this assignment due in 3 days but I want the assignment to be for 2 persons. There is 2 articles that deals with “Struggle for Democracy,” so the topic you going to choice it should be for 2 persons and should be 2 different answers for each person and I will upload the articles as well that deals with this assignment. Annotated Bibliographies on Research Paper Topic30 points Due Sunday, May 2, 11:59 pmCreate 3 annotated bibliographiesEach on a separate pageMLA formattedOVERVIEW Learning how to create an Annotated Bibliography is very useful whenever you write an essay or paper because it enables you to keep a record of your sources with information about each source that is pertinent to the topic of your paper. Carefully read the Annotated Bibliography Guidelines to learn what it is and what information you should include in it. When deciding on a protest movement, think about what you could argue. Since this is an argument research paper, consider a controversial aspect of a movement and take a position as your argument. For example, the March for our Lives movement advocates for stricter gun control laws, but many Americans claim the Second Amendment protects gun owners against any restrictions. You could argue on either side.INSTRUCTIONSDecide on your research paper topic.The topic will be one of the protest movements we have discussed.Or, you may choose a different movement, but please check with me for approval.Choose reliable sources. Websites that are dot org or dot net are usually neutral, unbiased; some dot com sites are reliable, like newspapers and news outlets (CBS, PBS, NBC); online videos from YouTube or TED. Do not use Wikipedia. You will need to find at least five sources for your paper.Choose three sources and create an annotated bibliography for each source.Submit three annotated bibliographies, each on a separate page.Follow the guidelines and example in 11.3.
ENG 120 GCCCD Creating a Annotated Bibliography Essay

Microchips have been implanted in pets and used to identify lost animals for a while and they have also been used in humans to some extent. If someone is dead or unconscious and in need of medical attention a microchip can identify them (Cheung). The technology has also been used as an anonymous version of a debit card (Quinn). It’s also much more of a challenge to steal even if you know whether a person has been implanted or not. This just sounds like a great technology with no downsides. It seems like the kind of thing that should be distributed to every human being on the face of the Earth. But is that really the case? Revelation 13:16-17 in the Bible talks about a mark that “all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond” are forced to receive in or on their right hand or their forehead without which no one can buy or sell anything. Verse 15 along with chapter 20 verse 4 equate receiving the mark with worshipping the “beast” which is apparently someone in a ruling position over the whole world. Refusal to worship him, and therefore refusal of this mark, is punishable by death. Many believe that microchip technology could very easily be used to serve this purpose and that this mark will probably be based on this or similar technology. The idea sounds attractive for several reasons. The technology can be used to simplify a lot of things. For example, people are having microchips implanted under their skin that a scanner can read and figure out who the person is even if they’re dead or unconscious. Such chips are also used for tracking pets and some children. Some might argue that the Bible specifically calls it a mark implying that it’s a visible imprint like a tattoo on the surface of the skin, and that John would have been able to give a more specific description of an implanted chip when he wrote the book of revelation. However I don’t think that’s the case. Chapter 11 verses 8 through 10 mentions the bodies of two witnesses in Jerusalem being left to rot in the streets for three and a half days and the whole world sees them. It has not been possible for the whole world to watch something that happens in a three day period until this last century, yet there is no explanation of how this was accomplished. Roughly 1,850 or 1,900 years would pass before anyone had any clue how it could be accomplished. In light of that I see no reason to doubt that this mark may very well be some relatively new technology. Really, it seems that the only significant potential problem is the concern for Christians. Those that accept this mark are worshipping this man rather than God and therefore give up their opportunity to live and reign with Christ and are instead condemned. This issue doesn’t really deal with the physical world and therefore secular ideas of morality and ethics have no way of analyzing it except by the idea that people have a right to believe what they want. As many people in the world claim a religion, I find it very difficult to believe that a global government could work without supporting freedom of religion. However, in order to impose such a system that some would believe is against their religion, the government would have to either make some sort of an exception (which, based to revelation 13:16, isn’t going to happen) or find some reason to disregard the issue. Based on other information in the book of revelation it seems there will be a global religious organization as well as a global government. This will most likely not be some single global religion as some believe but it seems more likely that it will be some kind of community aiming for tolerance and coexistence between all religions. Based on this idea I think I have an idea of one great use for such an organization from a secular viewpoint besides the pursuit of peace between religions. There are many religious organizations often considered cults that are dangerous. Other organizations may pose conflicts with certain things the government would like to do, such as imposing this microchip system. Such an organization could be used do decide which religions could be considered legitimate by which religious groups request and are granted membership based on criteria which would likely focus on inter-religious peace. Many Christian organizations seem more concerned peace and love and such than with knowing and following everything the Bible lays out for them. The Bible does say to live peaceably with all men when possible (Romans 12:18) but it also calls us to be separated from the world (2 Corinthians 4:16, and 6:17). There are Christian organizations that cannot join such an inter-religious organization without going against their doctrine. As a result, such an organization might be considered illegitimate by the government and therefore the conflict between the members of that organization and the government would not be recognize by the government as anything they need to deal with. By this method, the religious beliefs would not be disregarded directly by the government and so this inter-religious organization would provide a nice loophole for them. The dilemma If the government were to impose this mandatory system to control all buying and selling globally, whether it involves microchips or not, religious beliefs would be violated. Even if there is an inter-religious organization providing a loophole for the government, people’s right to their religion would be violated. Is it therefore worthwhile for such a government to impose such a system? Should these beliefs be disregarded for the sake of the government’s ease of control over the global economy? Analysis Consequentialism If this economic system is imposed, those whose faith it contradicts would suffer because they have to choose between, on the one hand, their faith and their eternal soul while having to find themselves completely bankrupt in this world, and on the other hand, giving up their faith for the sake of survival in this mortal life. If they believe this then they are also aware that such things are signs of the end of this world as we know it and that the benefits of opting for the mark would be very short lived, lasting very few years. They also know that the consequence for rejecting this mark is death. This seems extreme for most modern governments to consider such punishment for rejecting this system. On the other hand they might call it something like euthanasia. Since it wouldn’t take them long to realize that some people couldn’t accept the mark, they could easily see these people as useless to society and allow them to refuse the mark provided they opt for death to avoid suffering starvation from being totally bankrupt. The government may also suffer somewhat. They have to deal with these people somehow, and killing them could result in loss of respect from many people. That would be another thing the government would have to deal with. If this system is imposed the benefits would be much like those of creating the Euro. There would be no need to exchange currencies anywhere in the world. Also, as with the example in the book, purchases could be made anonymously and still be tracked by the government. By not imposing this system, really the only benefit is avoiding the issues that would come with it. Rights and duties In the U.S. at least there is a freedom to practice religion. A global government organization similar to the E.U. and U.N. may not hold the same ideals but some member nations (like the U.S.) would still. Therefore, by imposing this system the government would violate that right, even if they use an inter-religious organization as a loophole to disregard a religious organization. Kant Is the system is imposed, the government would disregard and disrespect those people that refuse it and, as a result, those people would disrespect the government, as would many others if the government imposes a death penalty. If it is not imposed there is no resulting disrespect as far as I can tell and, therefore, not imposing it is the obvious choice. Also, if the system is imposed, those Christians will be treated differently then everyone else. If things are left how they are now, unequal treatment remains as it is now. Disregarding that the death penalty is that unequal treatment, it seems that imposing the system is the better choice since more people would be treated equally than they are now. The benefits of imposing it are doing away with currency exchange and the ability for the government to track all transactions. The benefit of not imposing it is merely to avoid the issues. Therefore again, if the sanctity of life and freedom of religion are disregarded then imposing the system may be the better choice. Conclusion If the souls or the lives and the religious freedom of people are worth more than the benefits of globalization, as they should be, then there is not much of a dilemma. This system will only bring trouble and it should not be implemented while life is still sacred and while freedom of religion still exists. Dealing with the issue Many people in power all over the world, in political and religious systems alike, have been pushing for many years for globalization of government and economy. There is little doubt that it will happen and probably quite soon. Many Bible scholars project these things all happening in the next couple decades and it’s becoming easier and easier to see it happening without looking to the Bible. According to Professor Peter Stoner, the probability of anyone fulfilling just 8 of the roughly 300 prophecies that pertain to Jesus’ life are about 1 in 1017 and yet there is plenty of extra biblical historical information to support many of those 300 prophecies (Reagan). Therefore it seems highly unreasonable to doubt that what’s predicted concerning the end times will happen. I point this out to show that I don’t believe there really is anything that can avoid these things happening. I believe it will happen. The Bible doesn’t give specific dates, probably primarily as an incentive for everyone to stay prepared at all times, but there is some indication that these things would all happen about 2,000 after Jesus’ death and resurrection. That combined with modern tendency toward globalization and the development of technologies allowing prophecy to be fulfilled that, until recently, has been impossible suggests that we have very little time left. Now, Jesus was crucified around 29 AD so it seems probable that all these things could happen in about the next two decades, so the situation is not something that can be put off for future generations too deal with anymore. If, however, there were a way to deal with the situation, international governments would have to be heavily persuaded to maintain that religious freedoms be extended to all religions and not just those with membership in some inter-religious organization. They should also be made aware of the fact that not everyone can accept the system and that there would be these issues to deal with and what it would mean. Conclusion Although I don’t believe there’s anything that can really be done about it, imposing system like this would be a bad idea because of those few of us who choose to worship our God rather than this man regardless of the threat of death as a result. The thing about religious people is that our eternal life is more important than our physical lives.
Week 5 case study. Paper details Please read the case, “Collective Bargaining on the UMass Amherst Campus download ” that begins on Page 9 of the Society for Human Resource Management document, “Employee and Labor Relations Student Workbook” and answer the questions on Page 10 (also listed below) relating to the topic. Please prepare a 2 – 3 page summary, fully addressing all of the questions and fully supporting your views with the appropriate references, which should be included via in-text citations and listed on a reference page. Please review and follow the Case Analysis Guidelines download . The assignment should be submitted as an MS Word document. Case Questions: Why didn’t employees at UMass Amherst engage in collective bargaining after the passage of the NLRA in 1935? Why did the passage of the Massachusetts General Law in 1973 have such a big effect on union organizing at UMass Amherst? What role does labor law play in encouraging or discouraging unionization? Do you think teaching assistants should be considered employees? Do you think management’s reaction to employee interest in unionization differs if the employee already has high union density among other employee groups? case attached. Week 5 case study

ECNS203 Montana Tech Ch 7 & 8 Markets Still Supply and DemandQuestions

ECNS203 Montana Tech Ch 7 & 8 Markets Still Supply and DemandQuestions.

Please answer the questions in each chapter.Chapter 7, questions 3,4 See CH7 notes for help Chapter 8, questions 1,8 See CH8 notes for help Write a brief discussion about the following.1- Prior to the the 1970s, Major League Baseball operated with a reserve clause where players were bound to a single team for their entire playing career and free agency was not an option. In 1974, the courts allowed baseball players to become free agents, and sign with any team. The union, representing the players, devised a system so that only a few players would be eligible for free agency in any one year. Using economic reasoning, explain why the player’s union would be interested in a system where only a limited number of players would be eligible for free agency in a given year.2- A few years ago, the magazine Rolling Stone published an article stating the actual price of a gallon of gasoline was actually close to $12.00 a gallon. Use your understanding of chapter 8 to explain the economic logic behind this statement.
ECNS203 Montana Tech Ch 7 & 8 Markets Still Supply and DemandQuestions

INTL 101 UCSD Translation & Languages Cult & Society International Perspective Essay

programming assignment help INTL 101 UCSD Translation & Languages Cult & Society International Perspective Essay.

INTL 101 — Cult & Society/International Perspective Linguistic Autobiography
For this assignment, you are being asked to write a short paper about some form of language policy – looking at issues learned about in class that have had some impact on you or your ancestors, your language (learning/use) goals, and your current beliefs about issues around some language policy. (e.g., should English be the de facto lingua franca of international commerce?), etc.
Connect your experience as a user of one or more language to concepts covered throughout this course. Think about how your experience as a speaker of a language (or languages) has been formed and about who or what has been part of this formation. You should contextualize your experiences in the larger social setting and explore how these experiences have shaped your own attitudes about language and language policy. To do this, apart from your academic research, I encourage you to interview family members and friends with whom you have grown up.
INTL 101 UCSD Translation & Languages Cult & Society International Perspective Essay

Iraq-Iran War and Saddam Hussain’s Motivations Report (Assessment)

Introduction War has been plaguing the world since the start of our time. And among the various kinds of war, politics-related war was the most dominant one. Good examples of this kind of war were World War 1, World War II, and even the various wars which Iraq has been into. One of the most unforgettable wars we can trace in our history was the battle between Iraq and Iran which lasted for 8 long years (from 1980-1988). Many thought that the cause of such war could have been easily solved but because the two leaders of both countries did not want to be dominated or did not even consider peaceful talks at first, a war took off. The impact of such a war was a tremendous loss for both countries. Hundreds of people (both civilians and soldiers) died fighting for both countries. Billions of dollars of properties were lost also because of the war. Proposed Research Questions, Aims, and Objectives of the Study Many thought that after the Iran-Iraq war, Saddam Hussein, the then leader of Iraq, would feel the loss and thus prevent his country from going into another war. But they were wronged. The Iran-Iraq war only resulted in more and further wars between Iraq and the other nation. This prompted a big question to most, what has Saddam Hussein been thinking then? Has he had so much support that Iraq could continue its war against other countries? Specifically, this paper aims to answer the following questions: What were the primary sources of income of Iraq during the time of the Iran-Iraq war? What was the political scenario in Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s time? What kind of leader was he? What was the line of thinking of Hussein during his time? Why is he so adamant about conquering and/or invading other nations, such as Iran? What was his agenda? Who were Hussein’s or Iraq’s allies? What kind of support were these countries would be willing to give to Iraq amidst war and economical crises? This paper is then aimed at analyzing the political, economical, and physical structure of Iraq and its leader, Saddam Hussein, and his possible sources of support to continue with the war against Iran. This paper’s primary objective is to: Identify the various factors leading to Saddam Hussein’s initiation of war against Iran Classify the sources of support that Iraq is getting while the country was fighting against Iran Categorize the said support and analyze whether or not these have become Hussein’s reasons for getting into more war, even to the war against the US. Dissertation Positioning Much research has been done in analyzing various types of political leadership being practiced in different countries. There is also enough studies conducted correlating specific type of leadership to the political and economical outcome of the country. In the same manner, there are also hundreds of articles, books, and journals available analyzing the kinds of wars those different countries have been involved with, particularly Saddam Hussein and the whole of Iraq. As there is a number of possible resources available, it is then important to assess the common denominator between these resources, hence this study. The suggested theoretical framework to successfully analyze the political, economical, and physical structure of Iraq and its leader, Saddam Hussein, and his possible sources of support to continue with the war against Iran is: Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Methodology Structure This study will conduct an in-depth literature review regarding Saddam Hussein’s leadership and the whole structure of Iraq during its war against Iran. At the same time, an in-depth literature review of Iran’s political and military structure will also be analyzed and will be compared against Iraq. Credible journals, news articles, peer-reviewed- journals, and/or web references tackling both Iran and Iraq at the onset of the war will be sourced out, summarized, and analyzed. This will be used as an integral part of coming up with the desired conclusion. Ethics This paper will target history books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, and web references that are published and/or presented on the covered before and after the Iran-Iraq war (which is 1980 and beyond). All information that will be gathered will be analyzed summarized and will be used as a significant aspect for conclusion and recommendation. Research Time Schedule This paper will consume a minimum of four weeks to finalize. The first 3 weeks will be attributed to an in-depth literature review. From this literature review, the researcher will be able to identify Saddam Hussein’s line of thoughts which made him decide to start a war against Iran. It is also hoped that the various support (emotional, political, and even financial support) that Iraq was getting will also be established. The last week will be spent on generalization and analysis. Information gathered from the in-depth literature review will be summarized. Conclusion and recommendations will all be based on the summarized analysis. Resources and Support Needed (From the Suprvisor) Letters from the university and from the supervisor may be needed so that the researcher will be allowed access to various history books, journals, and/or articles. More so, from time to time, the researcher will need to consult the supervisor if the research is on the right track and if everything is flowing smoothly. A once-a-week meeting between the teacher and the supervisor is ideal. Possible Bibliography Alfoneh, Ali (2007), “Iran’s Suicide Brigades Terrorism Resurgent“, Middle East Quarterly. Web. Battle (editor), Joyce (2003), Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein: The U.S. Tilts toward Iraq, 1980-1984, vol. National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 82, George Washington University National Security Archive. Web. We will write a custom Assessment on Iraq-Iran War and Saddam Hussain’s Motivations specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More BBC. Web. Cordesman, Anthony, and Wagner,Abraham R. (1990). The Lessons of Modern War: Volume Two – The Iran-Iraq Conflict. Westview, 102. Cruze, Gregory S. (1988), Iran and Iraq: Perspectives in Conflict, vol. research report, U.S. Marine Corps Command and Staff College. Web. Deutsche Welle report. Web. Hunter, Jane (1986), “Special Report: Israeli Arms Sales to Iran“, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Web. Iran: Air Force. Web. Johns,Richard. “Arms Embargo Which Cannot Withstand The Profit Motive”, 1987. Kelley, Stephen Andrew (2007), Better Lucky than Good: Operation Earnest Will as Gunboat Diplomacy, vol. Master’s Thesis, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School Not sure if you can write a paper on Iraq-Iran War and Saddam Hussain’s Motivations by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More King, John (2003), Arming Iraq: A Chronology of U.S. Involvement, Iran Chamber Society. Web. Mackey, Sandra (1996). The Iranians : Persia, Islam and the Soul of a Nation. Dutton, 317. Martins, Mark S. (1994), “Rules of Engagement for Land Forces: A Matter of Training, Not Lawyering“, Military Law Review: 43-46. Web. Rajaee, Farhang. The Iran-Iraq War: The Politics of Aggression. University Press of Florida. “Who started the Iran-Iraq war?, Virginia Journal of International Law 33: pp. 69-89, Fall 1992. Web. Wright, Robin (1989). In the Name of God : The Khomeini Decade. Simon and Schuster, 126. Wright, Sacred Rage, 2001, p.37.

Florida State University Proton Pump Inhibitors Discussion

Florida State University Proton Pump Inhibitors Discussion.

From the assigned website found in this module/week, there are several significant issues with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Discuss the symptoms for which PPIs are prescribed and the intended target of these drugs. Next, address an organelle that would also be affected by these drugs. Based on the function of that organelle, do the issues in the website make biological sense? Lastly, propose an alternative approach for a patient with these symptoms that would not require him or her to remain on PPIs long-term. Does your approach address the source of their symptoms?MIN 500 WORD AND IT SHOULD BE IN APA FORMAT PLEASE
Florida State University Proton Pump Inhibitors Discussion

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: