A report on Johann Strauss II: The Waltz King Report
Biography Johann Strauss II was also known as Johann Baptist Strauss, Johann Strauss Jr., the Younger, or the Son. He was born on 25th October 1825 and died on 3rd June 1899 (Gartenberg 123). Strauss who was also the most prominent of the Strauss family was born in St. Ulrich and died in Vienna where he was buried at the Zentralfriedhof. As Crittenden indicates, “the composer was of an Austrian nationality and mainly did light music in particular dance music and even operettas” (89). He is also known to have composed quadrilles, polkas, waltzes, ballets, operettas, opera and marches. Even though his father opposed his pursuit of music, he secretly involved himself in studying the art. He is mostly remembered for some of his great waltz pieces such as “tales from the Vienna woods”, “Kaiser-Walzer”, and “The Blue Danube”. In polka, he is well known for pieces like “Tritsh–Tratsh” and “Pizzicato”. Some of his best-known operettas are “Die Fledermaus” and “Der Zigeunerbaron”. Chosen pieces Some of the songs that were incorporated in this report are: Die Fledermaus (The Bat), overture to the operetta (RV 503-1) (8:31) Conductor: Martin Sieghart, Genre: waltz. Geschichten aus dem Wienerwald (Tales from the Vienna Woods), waltz for orchestra, Op. 325 (RV 325) (11:59) Conductor: Ondrej Lenard. Genre: waltz Annen-Polka, for orchestra, Op. 117 (RV 117) (4:31) Conductor: Johannes Wildner: Genre: Polka Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Wiener Blut (Vienna Blood), waltz for orchestra, Op. 354 (RV 354) (8:29) Conductor: Ondrej Lenard. Genre: waltz Rosen aus dem Suden (Roses from the South), waltz for orchestra, Op. 388 (RV 388) (8:25) Conductor: Ondrej Lenard. Genre: waltz Sources The main sources of reading are: Jacob, H. E. Johann Strauss, Father and Son: A Century of Light Music. The Greystone Press. 1940. Gartenberg, Egon . Johann Strauss — End of an Era. Pennsylvania State University Press. 1972 Traubner, Richard. Operetta: A theatrical history. Routledge. p. 131 Crittenden, Camille. Johann Strauss and Vienna. Cambridge University Press. p. 89. We will write a custom Report on A report on Johann Strauss II: The Waltz King specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Fantel, Hans. The Waltz Kings. William Morrow
will require you to write your own argument on the subject of your choice. Do you have a strong opinion on something? (Exotic animals as pets? Universal healthcare? Gun laws? School lunches? Etc.) If so, that might be a good thing to write about! This is your chance to get on your soapbox and really preach about that subject you’re always thinking about and talking about. Your friends and family members might be annoyed that you won’t shut up about “that one thing”, but I won’t be. I promise. :-b After you’ve decided on a subject, make sure you know exactly what side you’d like to take. (Are you for or against this thing? If you’re arguing that something is better than something else, why is that so? If you’re arguing that something should be different, how so? Etc.)
essay order Your argument essay will be graded according to the following criteria: Format: Your paper should use MLA style (if you don’t know what this is, look it up! Or, you can see an example of MLA style in the Grammar Lecture slideshow.) 3 full pages in length (minimum!) Times New Roman font, 12 point Numbered pages Double-spaced throughout. (Please DO NOT include extra spacing between your title and introduction, between paragraphs, etc.) First line of each paragraph should be indented 1 tab space 1″ margins (please don’t mess with the margins to make your essay appear longer… I wasn’t born yesterday!) Include an original title (not just “Argument Essay.”) First page (only!) should have a full header, either at the top left or top right (doesn’t matter to me) Your outside sources should be properly cited within the essay and referenced on a Works Cited page. If you include sources but don’t cite them, you’re accidentally plagiarizing! Essay Structure: An introduction (1 paragraph in length) that gives some context for your issue and includes your thesis statement. (Thesis should be the last sentence of the introduction.) Body paragraphs that deal (one at a time!) with your main points. Ideally, your body paragraphs will address your main points in the same order in which your thesis statement lists these main points. Please have AT LEAST 3 body paragraphs. (So, at the very least, this will be a 5-paragraph essay, including your introduction and conclusion.) Make sure that your body paragraphs are clear and easy to follow. That means you need topic sentences, supporting sentences, and concluding/transitioning sentences. (If you’ve forgotten what these things mean, refer to the “Parts of an Essay” video lecture.) You should also include a conclusion, where you summarize your main points and state the significance of the issue. (Why should we care?) What else will I be looking for? In addition to stating your own points, be sure to also refute opposing viewpoints! You can do this either within your body paragraphs (perhaps before or after stating your own points), or you can do this all at once, perhaps in your very last body paragraph (before your conclusion.) However you choose to do it, it is vital that I see you acknowledging and addressing the fact that there are opposing views out there! In your proposal, you told me what kind of audience you’ll be addressing. (Since your audience, in reality, is *me*, I’m asking you to make up an audience instead. You can pretend your audience is supportive, wavering, or hostile.) The point of your being asked to choose an audience is so that you can decide on your rhetorical strategies accordingly! Is your audience supportive? Use pathos in your arguments! Is your audience hostile? Use mostly logos and a little bit of ethos! Please be sure to incorporate the appropriate types of rhetorical appeals into your argument, depending on your selected audience. Before submitting this essay, please carefully revise it for spelling errors, grammar errors, punctuation errors, typos, formatting issues, etc. I’ve been pretty lenient in this regard in the past, but I’m expecting you to present your best work this time! If you’re having trouble editing your own work (maybe you don’t know exactly what you’re doing wrong), please take the time to visit one of HCC’s writing centers! The writing tutors are very helpful, and tutoring is free with your tuition. You can also make use of HCC’s online tutoring services. NOTES: Please don’t plagiarize this assignment… I’ve attached turnitin.com software to the dropbox, so if you copy from somewhere (anywhere!), I’ll see it and I’ll have no choice but to give you a “0.” You won’t be able to re-write this essay, so please don’t plan to get a “0” and then ask for another chance. If you have questions/comments/concerns, please email me!
Critique Article and Instructions Attachment
Critique Article and Instructions Attachment. Can you help me understand this Statistics question?
Assignment: Article Critique
The practice of quantitative research not only involves statistical calculations and formulas but also involves the understanding of statistical techniques related to real-world applications. You might not become a quantitative researcher nor use statistical methods in your profession but as a consumer, citizen, and scholar-practitioner, it will be important for you to become a critical consumer of research, which will empower you to read, interpret, and evaluate the strength of claims made in scholarly material and daily news.
For this Assignment, you will critically evaluate a scholarly article related to reliability, validity, and scale analysis.
To prepare
Review the Article Critique Assignment Guide in the Walden Library, listed in the Week 2 Learning Resources.
Search the Walden Library for a quantitative article that utilizes scales.
post
The Assignment
Write a 2- to 3-page critique of the research you found in the Walden Library that includes responses to the following prompts:
Did the authors construct scales in a clear, concise manner?
Were the authors’ explanations clear regarding the reliability and validity of their measures?
What information did the authors provide about establishing reliability and validity?
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Weeks 10 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Critique Article and Instructions Attachment
Airbus Company’s Operations and Design Management Report
Role of Systems and Operation Management in Airbus “In to-day’s global manufacturing environment the challenges companies face are significantly different than what they did decades ago” (Aberdeen Group, 2008). Effective operation management is one of the tools to meet these challenges. The scope of operations management in any organization includes the transformation of materials and other resources into the final output. Such conversion process normally uses physical resources. The objective of managing the operations is to derive the desired utilities to the customer. At the same time, operation management has to meet the organizational objectives of effectiveness and efficiency. Operation management differs from other activities of the organization. Operation management encompasses the processes where inputs are turned into outputs. Management of manufacturing involves executing different tasks by different people. To coordinate all the tasks and activities manufacturing must be viewed as a system. “A system is the action of two or more parts as they operate together,” (De Luca and Sanders, 2009). Generally, the manufacturing system model is described as consisting of four subsystems namely input, process, output, and control.” The following figure illustrates the “input-process-output” model of a manufacturing system. Figure: Input-Process-Output Model. Source: (De Luca and Sanders, 2009). In the case of Airbus, the manufacturing system consists of the inputs from two broad systems of design and manufacture. Therefore, in the design and manufacturing of the A380 aircraft, there are two subsystems involved. Each of these subsystems represents an “input-process-output” model. The inputs of the design subsystem include the human resources being the technicians from Germany and France assisted by other lower-level workers. Software used in the completion of designing the aircraft represents an input. The process includes using the technical expertise of the technicians from both the countries and the use of software for finalizing the design. A complete and efficient design of the aircraft is the output of this model. Because of reasons of brevity, this report considers only the design subsystem, as the manufacturing subsystem consists of several inputs and processes. The delay in launching the aircraft was due to a lack of coordination. There was a total lack of integration in the two processes involved in the manufacture. The design team and manufacturing team did not coordinate their activities, which led to the delay in launching the A380 as per schedule. The reason for the lack of integration was the use of incompatible software used by the German and French factories to design the wiring requirements of the aircraft. The company instead of streamlining the process of design by efficient processes used less temporary and less efficient processes, which hindered the progress of design development greatly. There was the need to share data at the initial stage to gain time savings (Tennant and Roberts, 2003; Ainscough et al, 2003; Baba and Nobeoka, 1998). Virtual collaborations greatly benefit information sharing (Chudoba et al, 2005; Majchrzak et al, 2005; Mertins and Jochem, 2005) However, the lack of coordination between design and manufacturing processes in Airbus A380 was because of the weakness in the decision-making process in Airbus organization. Decision-making in a manufacturing environment may be strategic, operational, or tactical. Strategic decisions are of long-term nature and they set the direction for the entire organization (Scribd.com 2011). While strategic decisions are broad in scope the tactical decisions are narrower in scope. Tactical decisions are those, which focus on specific departments and tasks. Tactical decisions cover the specific day—to—day issues and they are concerned with quantities and timings of accumulation and provision of specific resources to aid production. These decisions in the context of a manufacturing organization are routine and are taken more frequently than strategic decisions. Tactical decisions are medium-term decisions aimed at arriving at ways of implementing strategic decisions. Operational decisions are short-term decisions covering the implementation of tactical decisions (Tutor2u). Organizational members at different levels are expected to take decisions to achieve the overall organizational objectives. The following figure illustrates the levels of decision-making. Figure: Levels of Decision-making. Source: Tutor2u. In the Airbus design system; there has been a severe deficiency in strategic decision making on how the system could be carried out. The weakness in the tactical decision-making process has resulted in corresponding weakness in the operational decision-making process and in the end, the entire design subsystem suffered. This resulted in a serious delay in launching the aircraft. For instance, the decision to use compatible software was a tactical one. On the other hand installation of different software in Germany and France, which were incompatible with each other was a wrong operational decision that delayed the design process. There was no control on information flow among the different constituents involved in the system. This clearly shows the need for systems thinking in the organization. Subsequently, Airbus decided to transfer German professionals to France. This was an operational decision. Even this decision was not an effective operational decision. This led to a weakness in the design subsystem. Therefore, the need for systems thinking in Airbus can be seen clearly. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Updating of Information System and Operation Management Information system and operation management in Airbus can be improved by systems thinking. “Systems thinking” is a skill for planning and controlling. There are different models, which can be employed to help managers and supervisors organize and control a system (Mackie, 2008). “Systems thinking” helps in improving organizational performance by providing an orderly way of thinking, showing the interrelationship of parts identifying sources of problems and how problems affect the performance of the entire system” (De Luca and Sanders, 2009). It is important that the information systems and operation management of Airbus need to be improved for enhancing organizational performance. One of the tools that the management of Airbus can employ is the “Soft System Methodology” (SSM). SSM is a modeling tool, which compares the real world, as it is with some models developed based on the perceptions of what the world should be (Williams 2005). This tool provides the opportunities to develop various ideas for improvement. Soft System Methodology (SSM) deals with soft problems as distinct from other methodologies that deal with ‘hard’ problems (Checkland, 1981). Soft problems are difficult to define and in soft problems, the analysts do not think of problems but problem situations. Under soft system methodology, problem situation is analyzed to infer why things are not working the way one wants to and is there anything that can be done to improve upon the situation. In essence, it is a classic situation of not looking at a ‘problem’ but exploring an ‘opportunity’. (Couprie et al, 2007) Stages in Soft System Methodology There are different stages in the process of soft system methodology: Identifying the basics of the Problem Situation Under this step, the basic research into the problem area is undertaken. In this step, the important players and the method of executing the process are decided. Expression of the problem situation through Rich Pictures When the problem on hand is presented in the form of a picture, it reveals more information and knowledge on the problem and the picture gives rise to alternative solutions, which are suitable to solve the problem. Naming the Relevant System Once the problem is identified in its fullest detail it is possible to arrive at the root definition of the model. “The purpose of the root definition is to express the core purpose of some purposeful activity system,” (Peter Checkland and Jim Scholes 1990). The root definition should involve the perspectives of the players of the world connected with the problem situation. The definition of the worldview has a considerable influence on the decision regarding the proposal that is eligible for selection. Nevertheless, at the same time, it is not necessary to consider all the worldviews with the same intent. Different persons and agencies like the company executives, project members, workers, and even competing organizations may present the views on the problem situation. All these views will have a bearing on the root definition of the proposed solution. CATWOE in Soft System Methodology The CATWOE is a key element in the soft system methodology. The first letters of the various actors, involved in the problem situation make this expression. We will write a custom Report on Airbus Company’s Operations and Design Management specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Customer – this denotes any person who will stand to gain from the benefits of the intended system. Actor – actors represent the agencies, which do the activities explained by the system. Transformation Process – this is the conversion of input into the output. Weltanschaung – is the German word for the Worldview (Wilson, 1990). This is the one, which makes the transformation process meaningful in the problem situation. Owner – means the proprietor of the system who enjoys the power to open and shut the system. Environmental Constraints – these represent the factors, which are situated outside the system that is being studied. CATWOE can be applied to deal with the situations, which are covered by the root definition. It is also possible that various factors covered under CATWOE can become the building blocks for defining the root definition. It is better to take into consideration the worldviews of the parties connected with the designing of the aircraft, especially about the issues connected with the wiring involved. Development of Conceptual Model It is easier to draw a conceptual model once the root definitions are evolved. A conceptual model represents a human activity model, which conforms to the root definitions. Systems thinking is the foundation on which the conceptual model is developed. Systems thinking is an iterative process that takes into account the perceived world, ideas, and methodology. Application of Soft System Methodology in Designing Airbus A380 Soft system methodology when used will result in improved efficiency of the designing of A380. This method has the analytical ability to deal with problem situations, where the social and political interactions of the actors are necessary. The first and second stage in the application of the SSM model deals with the identification of the basics of the problem situation. In the first stage, the problem is not defined but the general area that interests the development of a solution is identified. In the second stage, the issue involved is expressed in some way. According to the guidelines, “structures, processes, climates, people, issues expressed by the people, conflicts” are addressed. While considering the use of SSM in Airbus, the design department becomes the structure. Designing for proper wiring is the process involved in the SSM. The key players in the issues relating to the development of the design are the German engineers and technicians associated with the design department. The issue expressed by the people is the bad design of the wiring and lack of integration between the French and German plants. Conflicts arise because of the incompatible software used by both plants. The third stage is the root definition of the relevant system (Wilson, 1984). Every other thing grows from this stage. The root definition is a process of transformation that takes an input and produces a new form of output. Therefore, the starting point is a “Transformation”, implying how the input is transformed into an output (Checkland