Module 3 – SLPSECURITY AND DOMESTIC ANTI-TERRORISMCops on the Front Lines; The First Defense Against a Strike, Foreign or HomegrownPolice have been told a group of terrorists has just launched a series of coordinated attacks targeting the L.A. subway system. We know that there are hostages, and there are reports of injuries, but most alarmingly, they have detected the presence of a device which appears to have dispersed some sort of chemical agent.Watch the terrorism response simulation: Intense Counterterrorism Training With L.A. County Sheriff’s Department – Crime Watch Daily and answer the following questions:1.How many life-threatening situations are represented here?2.Besides the “Elite Counterterrorism Unit,” what other teams/ agencies, more than likely, would be involved in this scenario? Explain.3.Does your town/city have a terrorism response component? If so, how is it structured?I’m located in the City of Burlington, New Jersey. http://www.burlingtonnj.us or Trenton City in New Jersey.SLP Assignment ExpectationsLength: This SLP Assignment should be at least 5-7 pages not counting the title page and references.References: At least three references should be included from academic sources (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles). Required readings are included. Quoted material should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it MUST be enclosed in quotes. The references should be cited within the text and also listed at the end of the assignment in the References section (preferably in APA format).Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to question.Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity.The following items will be assessed in particular:Relevance: All content is connected to the question.Precision: Specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate.Depth of discussion: Present and integrate points that lead to deeper issues.Breadth: Multiple perspectives and references, multiple issues and factors considered.Evidence: Points are well-supported with facts, statistics and references.Logic: Presented discussion makes sense, conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information.Clarity: Writing is concise, understandable, and contains sufficient detail or examples.Objectivity: Avoid use of first person and subjective bias.__________________________________________________________________________________________Module 3 – BackgroundSECURITY AND DOMESTIC ANTI-TERRORISMRequired ReadingBjelopera, J. P. (2013, April 24). The Federal Bureau of Investigation and terrorism investigations. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from http://fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/R41780.pdfDepartment of Justice (n.d.). The USA PATRIOT Act: Preserving life and liberty. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/what_is_the_patr…National Response Framework (2019, October 28). FEMA. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1572366339…Los Angeles Police Department’s Counter-Terrorism and Criminal Intelligence Bureau (n. d.). “Counter-Terrorism and Crime Fighting in Los Angeles.” LAPDBLOG. Retrieved from http://lapdblog.typepad.com/files/ctcib-approach-a…Congressional Research Service (2016, April 13). Surveillance of foreigners outside the United States under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R444…McAdams, J. G. (2007), Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA): An overview, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center [Online ]. Retrieved from https://www.fletc.gov/sites/default/files/imported…Required WebsitesJoint Regional Intelligence Center (JRIC): https://www.jric.org/?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=…State and Major Urban Area Fusion Centers, DHS: https://www.dhs.gov/state-and-major-urban-area-fus…Optional ReadingLiu, E. C., & Doyle, C. (2015). Government collection of private information: Background and issues related to the USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization in brief. CRS. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R44042.pdfMorris, L.W. (2014). Three steps to safety: Developing procedures for active shooters. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning. 7(2), 238-244. Available in the Trident Online Library.Intense Counterterrorism Training With L.A. County Sheriff’s Department – Crime Watch Daily
EDM 501 TIU Module 3 Security and Domestic Anti Terrorism Paper
After reading this journal article regarding ethics of internet research, I have discovered different viewpoints of research and determined some ethical concerns. As this type of “web-based” research grows, researchers will face ethical concerns that are different from traditional research ethical issues, (Denissen, Neumann & Van Zalk, 2010)The main attribute of internet research, as I see it, is the ability to have a global footprint; meaning almost any one that has a computer and connectivity can access all types of information and data. Along with this power, comes great responsibility. The web can be a wonderful tool which can afford individuals, organizations, communities, and others tremendous access into good and bad places. This access can afford humans into medical breakthroughs, how to guides on repairs and building, how to get from city to city, and a multitude of positive ways to learn and grow. Internet research use is growing at a fast pace and consequently, is creating ethical dilemmas.At the same time, it can be a way to link terrorists’ organizations, promote child pornography etc. As you can see, internet research can be used for the greater good, or to our detriment. This is where the ethics comes into play, and guidelines are set up to monitor ethical issues which occur due to this process. Institutional Review Boards at institutions conducting this type of researchneed specific guidelines for researchers to follow in order to maintain the integrity of research. (Williams) 2012)Denissen, J. J. A., Neumann, L. & van Zalk, M. (2010). How the internet is changing the implementation oftraditional research methods, people’s daily lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 564-575. DOI: 10.1177/0165025410383746.Williams, S. G. (2012). The Ethics of Internet Research. Online Journal Of Nursing Informatics, 16(2), 38-48.2.With the rapid increase of technology has come tremendous opportunity. Information is more easily accessible than ever before, which also creates ethical concerns. This week’s lecture describes research that is ethical as one “that the researchers are protecting the privacy of the participants and any research data collected about them.” The journal article, “The Ethics of Internet Research” examines internet research and the ethical issues that arise. The advantages of internet research over traditional methods are that it is less costly, less of a time commitment, more controlled by the researcher, higher accuracy in data collection, and the ability to easily provide follow up and feedback (Williams, 2012). In a lot of aspects, internet research can be more efficient and less costly. However, there are many disadvantages that the article addresses on internet research. One is lack of control over the test setting (Williams, 2012). It is difficult to verify if the subject is in fact who they say they are. There are also ethical concerns about the data trail that is left behind (Williams, 2012). Personal information could end up being used in a public forum when the study is complete. The article concludes with strategies on how to address particular ethical concerns. One significant challenge is that research that is global has different privacy and freedom values from country to country (Williams, 2012). The Association of Internet Research (AOIR) offers guidelines on ethics in internet research (Williams, 2012). As internet research continues to grow, ethical considerations must be investigated in order for the research to carry the same weight as traditional methods.ReferenceWilliams, S. G. (2012). The ethics of internet research. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 16(2). Retrieved from http://ojni.org/issues/?p=1708
DB response needed in 6 hours
I’m working on a communications discussion question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.
We’ve discussed Cultural Appropriation in this module. The articles listed below focus on the harms of Cultural Appropriation. The first article lists nine potential harms and the second article lists 5 potential harms. For each article, choose two of the harms listed and explain it in your own words and provide one of your own examples of where it happens in society. These examples can either come from your own experience or research.As with all of the other discussions, make sure that you respond to at least two of your classmates. Your initial post will be worth up to 15 points and your responses to classmates will be worth up to 10 points. As always, responses to classmates must go beyond “I agree” or “I like this too” and should be respectful. https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/06/cultural-appropriation-wrong/https://www.bustle.com/articles/160328-how-cultural-appropriation-hurts-us-all
Moorpark College Harms of Cultural Appropriation Discussion
Savannah State University Child Protective Services & Agency Website Discussion
Savannah State University Child Protective Services & Agency Website Discussion.
Proposed Agency Project-5 Slides Each Learning Community Group (LCG) will be responsible for developing a proposed health or human service program designed to meet an organizational or community need. Each LCG will prepare a total of three items for their proposed agency or service. Proposed Agency Brochure The program brochure must be professional in nature and clearly outline the agency name, mission and vision, service(s) provided and fee structure, service location(s), contact information, and days/hours of operation of the proposed agency or program. Students must obtain written permission to use logos from existing agencies and/or organizations.2. Proposed Agency Website The website should be an extension of the brochure. The website must clearly outline (1)agency name, (2) mission and vision, (3) service(s) provided and fee structure, (4) about us section with organizational chart, (5) Key Staff bios and job description, (6) resource/referral page with a minimum of 5 working links, (7) service location(s), (8) contact us information, and (9) days/hoursof operation. Students must obtain and submit written permission to use logos from existing agencies and/or organizations.3.Proposed Agency PPT The PPT proposal should provide a detailed overview of the program and must include (1) description the need and rationale for the program. (2) value and benefit(s) in developing and program with client/constituent population, (3) theory of change and explanation of how and why the proposed service components are expected to change or enhance client or constituent functioning, (4) clear and detailed discussion of program services and components, (5) comprehensive evaluation for all program service components, (6) review of relevant scholarly and professional literature (approximately 8 to 12 articles) that validate and support the proposed program services/components, and (7) a logic model of the proposed program.
Savannah State University Child Protective Services & Agency Website Discussion
The Drug War on Black America
research paper help Introduction The history of the United States government has implemented several policies that have in many ways affected our way of life. The subject I have chosen is ” The War on Drugs ” or the Drug War on Black America as my research shows. The policies in the “war on drugs ” in America have led to social inequalities, mass incarceration and show how disturbingly the U.S. government has used this agenda as a policy-making tool to target and imprison African Americans. This “drug war ” has broken up families, destroy Black neighborhoods and has created overcrowding in prisons. It is important to inform the public about this subject. This is not a real war on drugs, but on a group of people. Drugs continue to enter this country and we have seen an increase in both heroin and opioid use, creating an overdose epidemic. I want to find out what issues does the “war on drugs” address and it is with even greater importance to show the disparity that exists between Blacks and Whites. Decades later, the same propaganda here about the war on drugs resulted in billions of dollars spent, mass incarcerations and the Black communities that were too largely targeted by this drug war have been the most affected. Today the United States has the highest prison population. There are currently well over 2 million people incarcerated. Information provided by www.pewresearch.org shows that 33% of African Americans are in prison. They only make up 13% of the nation’s population. Since this initiative was launched, Blacks have been disproportionately been arrested and convicted of drug offense more than any other race. A breakdown of this agenda shows that it maintains a long-standing war against Blacks. Literature Review The War on Drugs: How President Nixon Tied Addiction to Crime The United States government’s initiative on the war on drugs began in June of 1971 when then-President Richard Nixon coined the term the “war on drugs.” He claimed that drug abuse was America’s public enemy number one. The agenda being promoting by Nixon’s war on drugs was to reduce the illegal drug trade in the United States. The policy of this government initiative was to prevent the production, sale, and use of illegal drugs. Nixon started a drug war which labeled young hippies and African Americans, not as young people whose addiction was caused by a lack of resources in society or trauma from serving in Vietnam, yet as hoodlums attacking the morality of the country, depicting them as individuals who deserved incarceration and punishment. This criminalization of drug abusers pushed a pattern; Nixon’s administration misinterpreted the numbers that linked drug addiction to crime. Nixon did so to create this tough on crime agenda. He didn’t hold the white working class responsible for any drug-related violence in urban communities. He changed the public’s general view of the drug abuser into one that is of danger to the American development. Nixon needed this to strengthen the need for the war on drugs. By changing the public’s perception, which he did, he was able to strengthen the need of the drug war. Drug abusers were no longer regarded as sick victims of a society that systematically excluded addicts, no one cared if they were simply locked up. Incarceration was for the country’s best interest. Nixon’s federal policy in the war on drugs would continue to last decades after his presidency. Nixon, aside from being infamous for the Watergate Scandal, only legacy would be that of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), which he created as a result of this initiative. Other presidents have used the “war on drugs” propaganda to maintain a tough stance on drugs and crime, basically to win elections. The motives behind Nixon’s War on Drugs were later revealed by one of his former chief domestic advisers John Ehrlichman, in an interview with Dan Baum, in which he described that the purpose of this initiative was to target anti-war activists, better known as Hippies and African Americans for which Nixon had considered as enemies. Which considering President Nixon did have an enemies list. This should not be surprising the measures taken by this administration. The Nixon Administration knew that they couldn’t just single out these two groups because that would be illegal so instead, they associated them with certain drugs to then criminalize both groups. He created a new agenda to mask his actual agenda. Nixon distracted the people to get an easier and aggressive way to target Hippies and African Americans. Race and the War on Drugs Despite the false motives being pushed by the Nixon administration, his efforts in tackling this issue were very small compared to the efforts of President Ronald Reagan. President Reagan expanded his focus on criminal punishment rather than drug treatment and rehabilitation, creating a zero-tolerance policy on drugs and its abusers. President Reagan used drug resources from healthcare agencies and sent those resources to the Department of Justice instead. He also had a hand in encouraging to passing the worst federal mandatory minimum drug laws. His initiative went on to create mass incarcerations for non-violent drug offenses in the United States. (www.thedrugpolicy.org). In 1986, Reagan signed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which, in addition to strengthening the mandatory minimum sentencing policies, using $1.7 billion to fund the war on drugs, by also shifting the federal supervised release program from a rehabilitative focus to a punitive one. The controlled release program refers to the measures which prisoners must take when released on probation. These programs consisted of regular drug tests and probation counselors’ meetings. The 1986 Anti -Drug Abuse Act reinforced the mandatory minimum sentencing system and added provisions for other drug types. Minimum mandatory sentences were criticized for being inflexible and unfair and contributed to the overall trend of prison overcrowding in the United States. With the passing of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, possession of 28 grams of crack cocaine warrants a five-year mandatory minimum sentence for a first-time offender. In order to get the same sentence for possession of powder form cocaine, someone would have to have 500 grams. There are critics and experts who state the crack cocaine is more addictive and therefore should carry a higher sentence. The legal disparity between crack cocaine and powder is deeply rooted in racist beliefs, because crack cocaine had been the most common drug used by African Americans, and cocaine being the common drug of use for White people. Discussion I understand from the readings that the idea behind the war on drugs is a complete shim sham. It was never intended to get rid of the drugs in this country. As drugs are still very prominent in the United States. The government has continued to use this to cover a less acceptable reality. To make the general public believe that the purpose of it all is to reduce illegal drugs and make the streets of America safer. The reality is that drugs are continuing to come in, drug cartels are still making a lot of money, and it’s a legal course of discrimination aimed to incarcerate African Americans. It can be minimally compared to how genocide is created. Gather a particular set of people; incarcerate them for a long of time. We’ve seen this before, where this discrimination leads to continued acceptance of combating drugs in the United States. There is no other group of people that have been largely affected by this. The whole tough on crime stance has been used to promote the idea that the government is taking matters into their hands by preventing drugs from entering the country and that drug abuse is a crime rather than a health issue. People who are addicted and/or dependent on drugs should not be deemed as criminals. The War on Drugs should be that of its title. An attack on those people in cartels, and any other entities that look to profit from the distribution of illegal drugs. That is really the problem. Looking at the neighborhood that I am from which is Park Slope, Brooklyn. In the early 90’s there was a lot of crack cocaine use going on. I recall not being able to play at the local park because my Mother feared I’d get poked with a syringe. I do remember the police rounded up a bunch of users that were hiding in the park. The irony was that the drug dealers would watch from the corner as Police hauled off some local druggies. That is how I view the war on drugs. It targets the person using the drugs, not the person who is supplying the drugs. I am aware that there are plenty of drug laws aim to target people who get caught selling drugs. We know the existing laws have been successful. But what about the drug supplier. The person providing the drugs. It just a ploy to get someone to pay usually someone who really doesn’t have anything instead of the top person on the drug food chain. The United States spend millions of dollars in its “war on drugs” yet there have been more reported overdoses since 2016. The flow of drugs has only increased. More money is being spent housing people for non-violent drug offenses. The U.S. government refrain on spending money on imprisoning non-violent drug offenses and shift that money into schools, and school programs that would help the youth stay in a positive environment. This “war” has only put more people in prison, more drugs on the street, cartels even more rich. Creating mandatory minimum sentencing and the three strikes laws has only guarantee that the U.S. will continue to hold top spot on mass incarceration. I find it absurd, that our government can spend so much on keeping Blacks in prison, but I cannot afford to keep my child enrolled in Public School After School Program because the school wants too much money. What I have notice in the media in the past two years now that involve several cases of heroin or opioid overdose. Politicians want to have a softer approach on handling the overdose epidemic. The reason why is because it’s images of White people overdosing. I highly doubt that if it were the images of lack people, these politicians wouldn’t feel so sympathy for them. The racial bias that exists in the criminal justice system is very overwhelming. The criminal justice system framework actually protects racial order and it continues to keep Black people in what they believe in their place: confined, enslaved, incarcerated. Despite of the fact that drug use is moving at an equal rate between racial lines. Blacks are unquestionably bound to be pulled over, searched, arrested, prosecuted and subsequently convicted for drug offense that White people commit as well. Conclusion Our country needs to seriously reformat its approach on our drug policies. They need to create a more humane and efficient strategies. Not target particular groups, increase the prison population all the while drugs are still making it into our neigborhoods. A key conclusion is that drug abusers should not be catergorized as criminal but should be provided with the assistance for treatment and prevention. Drug addiction should be viewed as exactly what it is, a disease. The governemnt needs to work more effectively with all communities but especially urban communities to be able to reall address the issues involving drugs. There are more Americans who recognize that the war on drugs is a failure. This war on drugs is ineffective at reducing illegal drugs but it is counterproductive in keeping minorities in prison. My hope for the future is that policy makers make the necessary changes needed to actually reduced the illegal drugs being smuggled into this country but to also maintain that addiction is a disease that should be helped not punished. If there aren’t alternatives to this, then a solution would be too far fetched. Reference Page Alexander, M. (2010). The War on Drugs and the New Jim Crow. Race, Poverty
Watch each of the videos below on the Internet. Using the videos as sources, write a 2-page essay on:
Watch each of the videos below on the Internet. Using the videos as sources, write a 2-page essay on:. I’m working on a Writing question and need guidance to help me study.
Watch each of the videos below on the
. Using the videos as sources, write a 2-page essay on:
Description of the Internet and a brief history of the Internet.
What did you learn about the Internet? What was new to you?
Do you think internet
is a human right?
Any other thoughts?
What is the Internet Really? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE_FPEFpHt4
The History of the Internet
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UStbvRnwmQ
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CsPHKJWiw0
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYkXD_cGUYU
Watch each of the videos below on the Internet. Using the videos as sources, write a 2-page essay on:
Quality answers get the most points-skipping over parts of the question and submitting a few minutes before the due
Quality answers get the most points-skipping over parts of the question and submitting a few minutes before the due date usually is not quality work. 1. As you are aware, the Magna Carta is deemed to be the founding document for many of the western civilization’s nation’s basis for a criminal justice system. Given the current climate and world events, do you feel that the ideas put forth in the Magna Carta would/will be adopted by Middle East countries whose governments are undergoing dramatic change? Why or why not? 2. If you could either add or subtract to the Bill of Rights, what changes would you make and why? Provide a rationale as to why it would be a benefit to the nation. 3. Do you feel that those people declared “enemy combatants’ should be provided the same rights under the criminal justice system as United States citizens? Why or why not? Provide a rationale as to the basis of your decision. 4.In jury trials, the parties are generally entitled to strike any prospective juror for cause, such as some relation to the defendant, or already-formed opinions about guilt. Do you feel that this process protects the integrity of the trial process in coming to a just verdict, or is it possible that the side with the most able and talented attorney is able to manipulate the jury composition in such a manner as to slant the jury one way or another before the trial even starts? Why or why not?
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service