Get help from the best in academic writing.

EC Law – Social Policy – Working Time Directive 93/104 devry tutorcom essay help Religion and Theology essay help

This paper deals with the working time Directive 93/104, gives hypothetical examples of employee’s situations and discusses how they are (or not) protected by Directive 93/104.

The following paper discusses the way in which three British employees working in the UK (all hypothetical examples ) were ordered to work 60 hours a week. This paper discusses their refusal to work these hours and looks at the ways and reasons for their subsequent dismissal. The writer explain what rights (if any) these persons have under EC Law to claim against their former employer.
As Valentina works as a trainee doctor in a teaching hospital, her Employers would be able to derogate from the Directive 93/104 article 6 (2), as stated in 93/104, article 17 (2). As doctors in training are omitted from directive 93/104, Derogations may be adopted by means of laws, regulations or administrative provisions or by means of collective agreements or agreements between the two sides of industry provided that the workers concerned are afforded equivalent periods of compensatory rest or that, in exceptional cases in which it is not possible, for objective reasons, to grant such equivalent periods of compensatory rest, the workers concerned are afforded appropriate protection.

Corporate Law and Governances

Corporate Law and Governances.

Question: The principle established in Salomon v. Salomon Ltd continues to underpin company law in England Wales. However, the courts are prepared to ignore the veil of incorporation in order to prevent abuse. Assess the circumstances in which the veil of incorporation may be ignored and the effectiveness of such exemptions to the general rule. Instructions: Prepare a short essay (approximately 500-800 words) on the above topic. Please use the leading case of Salomon v. Salomon and the recent decisions of Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd[2013] UKSC 34 and VTB Capital plc (Appellant) v Nutritek International Corp and others (Respondents) to support and discuss your essay. Please use OSCOLA referencing. Below you can find important points to include in your essay: You should begin by clearly setting out the doctrine of corporate personality and explaining the decision in Salomon. This should be followed by an explanation of the effects of limited liability and its attraction to shareholders and directors, together with a description of the ‘veil of incorporation’. Having established the principle of corporate personality you should then address the exceptions to the general rule, which are all based on a desire to prevent the corporation from being abused. Through the statutory and common law exemptions and try not only to state what the exemption is but also to offer some view on how effective or otherwise you consider it to be. Finally, provide a conclusion which addresses the questions and which provides some opinion on the central proposition – the effectiveness of the exceptions.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/