I need a research paper using research methods ” Does Hand Washing among Healthcare Workers Reduce Hospital Acquired infections? I have uploaded the assignment guidelines, an example of what the paper should look like and the theoretical framework that is in part of the paper. I also have the 5 primary resources that are to be included with the paper it is listed under the uploaded file as LM 2, that upload includeds the 5 primary article references for the research. I will need at least 2 more articles included in the research. Please make sure they are from “primary resources only.”
Does Hand Washing among Healthcare Workers Reduce Hospital Acquired Infections?
https://youtu.be/Bp6LqSgukOU https://youtu.be/iP2qQT6MuBQ https://youtu.be/OCdHpKXw_Tg https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/doc/Oth_GenIntro/index.html http://www.shakespeare-online.com/plays/othello/stagehistoryothello.html https://www.bl.uk/shakespeare/articles/racism-misogyny-and-motiveless-malignity-in-othello UNIT 3: OTHELLO Unit 3 looks at the Renaissance in England. We are moving from epic poems to plays. The plays of this time period were written in poetic form, however, and the playwrights of the time were called poets.Here are your reading and content assignments for Unit 3 (written assignments such as discussion forums will be discussed in RED below):Read all materials in the READINGS folder.Explore the OTHELLO CONTEXTS Folder. Unit 3 Written AssignmentsWritten assignments and due dates for Unit 3 are listed below. The individual assignments, instructions, and submission links can be found by scrolling further down the page. Be sure to double check the requirements for discussion forums in the syllabus. And remember that all due dates and times are Eastern time, and late assignments will not be accepted.Note also that all discussion forums in Unit 3 require that you include at least one quotation from the literature along with accompanying intext citations. Participate in Discussion Forum C (Othello).Submit your initial post no later than 11:59pm on January 1.Submit your responses to classmates no later than 11:59pm on January 3.
Northampton Community College Othello English Literature Discussion Board
The Successful Experiment Classification Essay
When designing experiments, researchers always find themselves needing to control certain variables to ensure the success of the research. According to Sytsma (2009), a variable is defined as almost anything found on the face of the earth. Variables are a real concern for researchers (Sytsma, 2009). When these variables are of definite experimental interests they are known as factors. However, the term factor is generally used when an experiment includes more than just one variable (Sytsma, 2009). Variables that Researchers can Control Among the variables that a researcher can control while designing the experiment are history, maturation and pre-testing (Key, 1997). The environment of the experiment and the actual variable to be used in the experiment may also be controlled by the researcher (Student of Fortune, 2011). As a factor, history can easily affect the results of a study when a researcher takes further measurements to the experimental variables that had not been taken earlier before the onset of the research. An example, consider a case where a researcher collects data before and after a certain event happens. If not properly controlled, this may greatly affect the results of a study as measurements or data collected could greatly differ (Key, 2009). Maturation refers to the process of an individual moving on to maturity either in age or otherwise during the life period of the research. The data collected at different stages of the research may be affected by change in time and hence the need for effective controls (Key, 2009). Pre-testing on the other hand requires that the researcher notes down some parameters before the actual research begins. The challenge faced by the researcher has to do with the fact that experimental conditions could change drastically in the process in such a way that the results of any post-test may end up be being skewed (Key, 2009). It is very typical for respondents to give completely different responses at a later stage of the research leading to invalid results (Key, 2009). Limit the Effects of Extraneous Variables According to Sytsma (2009), when variables are external with regard to the experiment, they are referred to as being extraneous. Without proper control, these variables end up influencing or affecting the results of the research. To limit the effect of extraneous variables, a researcher may need to control the degree of randomness of the experimental variable (Student of Fortune, 2011). Randomization commonly refers to the fact that the outcome of a research is not at all predictable. A researcher’s confidence has been known to come from understanding that a random approach was taken at the time of assigning experimental variables (Sytsma, 2009). Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Extraneous variables can also be dealt with by means of Control Groups. This involves the use of a matched group that is not exposed to the experimental variables. The control groups can help greatly in reducing the effect of factors such as history and maturation. Generally, the control group is subjected to every other experimental condition but not to the experimental variable (Key, 1997). Another approach to addressing the effect of extraneous variables is to use additional groups. These are groups that were neither tested in advance nor exposed to the experimental preparations and can thus be used in tackle the effects of pre-tests (Key, 1997). They are used together with the pre-tested groups or other factors that affect the results of a study.
Using the GCU Library, locate a journal article about capital budgeting. In the subject line of your post, include Essay
best assignment help Using the GCU Library, locate a journal article about capital budgeting. In the subject line of your post, include the name of the article that you read. Then, in your initial post, provide a link to the article and a summary followed by your reaction to the article. The summary should be approximately 250 words and the reaction should be approximately 150 words. The summary should describe the major points of the article, and the reaction should demonstrate your interpretation of the article and how you can apply that knowledge. Do not choose an article that one of your classmates has already posted. To participate in follow-up discussion, choose one of the articles that a classmate has posted and provide your own reaction to it. Note: It will be challenging to find a relevant article if you do not use the library. Please include proper citations in your discussion post. Points will be deducted if proper citations are not used.
Help in 1000–1250 words paper
Help in 1000–1250 words paper.
Select a peer-reviewed concept analysis article of your choice and write a response of 1,000–1,250 words. Use the following guidelines: Include an introduction.Describe the method of analysis, using the article and Chapter 3 of Theoretical Basis for Nursing.Describe the steps of process and the results for each step.Apply the concept to a practice situation.Include a conclusion. Prepare this assignment according to guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Rubric: Benchmark Assignment – Application of Concept Analysis to Clinical Practice 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 80.00% 3 Satisfactory 88.00% 4 Good 92.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 5.0 % Introduction Introduction is either not present or not evident to the reader. Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear, and paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Introduction is present but lacks clarity and/or depth. Introduction is clear, forecasting development of paper. Introduction is comprehensive; reader knows exactly what to expect. 30.0 % Description of method, steps in process, and results using the chosen article and chapter 3 of the textbook. Description of method, steps in process, and results using the chosen article and chapter 3 of the textbook is either not present or not evident to the reader. Description of method, steps in process, and results using the chosen article and chapter 3 of the textbook is present, but is vague or insufficiently developed. Addresses the primary elements of the concept but fails to paint a clear picture of the concept analysis. Primary elements of the concept are present and evident to the reader. Clear picture of concept analysis can be easily detected by the reader. Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail. 30.0 % Application to Practice Application to practice is either not present or not evident to the reader. Application to practice is present but insufficiently developed. Application to practice is present but development is cursory and lacks depth. Application to practice is evident to the reader. Arguments are cogent to thesis and support claims. Thoroughly presents the application to practice with rich detail and supporting arguments. 5.0 % Conclusion Conclusion is either not present or not evident to the reader. Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague and lacks any discernible purpose. Conclusion is present, but statements lack depth of understanding. Conclusion is clear and identifies key ideas regarding application of the concept to practice. Conclusion is comprehensive and paints a clear picture of the application concept to practice. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format 5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 100 % Total Weightage
Help in 1000–1250 words paper
UOPX Bedside Handoff A Change Project for Improving Quality of Patient Care PPT
UOPX Bedside Handoff A Change Project for Improving Quality of Patient Care PPT.
Assignment ContentLeaders seek out change opportunities regularly. Innovation, critical thinking, and decision-making are key to making an impact on an organization. This assignment is designed to help you look at aspects of your own clinical practice and become a change agent in your organization. Use your current or past experience to identify a change project to implement.Step 1: Select a topic for a change project.Review the following resources for potential change topic or process ideas:Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Transforming Care at the BedsideInstitute for Healthcare Improvement: Hospital Inpatient Waste Identification ToolFor process change resources: TeamSTEPPS® Pocket GuideStep 2: Identify the context for your change.Describe the setting where the change will take place. For example, clinical, insurance, home health, or public and community.Explain who is affected: patients, nurses, leadership, and other stakeholders in the organization.Step 3: Review the literature to find possible solutions and evidence to address your topic.Research sources that guide evidence-based practice to improve outcomes related to your selected topic.Find a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles directly related to addressing your change topic.Step 4: Create a draft implementation plan.Summarize each article to explain how the evidence you gathered will help address your change topic.Explain how you could use the information in the research to carry out the change in your identified setting.Format your assignment as a 700- to 1,050-word paper or 10- to 15-slide presentation.Include an APA-formatted reference page.Submit your topic, review, and executive summary.
UOPX Bedside Handoff A Change Project for Improving Quality of Patient Care PPT