Get help from the best in academic writing.

DOC 660 Trident University The Social Implications of Driverless Cars Case Study

DOC 660 Trident University The Social Implications of Driverless Cars Case Study.

Remember sim score must be 15 and below.Module 4 – CaseDISRUPTIVE INNOVATIONAssignment OverviewAs a focal example for this module, we will consider the case of a disruptive innovation that is roaring down on society at nearly the speed of light, despite common acknowledgment that we really do not know what its effects will be. This is so-called “automated driving” or “driverless vehicles.” There is no question that within the next 5 to 10 years, the bulk of vehicles on the roads will switch from being directly human controlled to being largely robotically controlled, with only sporadic if any human intervention. For all of human history, transportation has required the direct involvement of a human being, whether that be the driver of an oxcart or the driver of a Mercedes 18-wheeler. Management of vehicles has been one of the central preoccupations of humans for at least the last 100 years. Giant industries are based on this technological framework. The introduction of robotically controlled vehicles promises to disrupt these giant industries in critical ways, even eliminating some of them entirely and reshaping others to be almost unrecognizable.How will society deal with these issues? What will survive this disruptive transition, and what will not? What will our society look like when it is completely transformed by this virtually inevitable technology? Who will the winners and losers be? Any look at disruptive innovation always generates more questions than answers, but by examining those questions we may begin to formulate better ones and eventually arrive at a more complete understanding. If we do not, then we will be simply whipsawed by our own technologies whose underlying values may be significantly different from those we would like to see our society enact.Case AssignmentAfter reading the required background material and finding at least two other resources on your own, write a 5- to 7-page paper discussing the topic:“Self-driving vehicles as a disruptive technology”You should begin your paper by summarizing what is currently known about disruptive innovations and their effects. Then provide a brief description of the self-driving vehicle technology and where it currently stands today. You should then proceed to address the questions posed in the case discussion above: namely, how will society deal with these issues? What will survive this disruptive transition, and what will not? What will our society look like when it is completely transformed by this virtually inevitable technology? Who will the winners and losers be? Conclude your paper with a couple of paragraphs summarizing your views on self-driving vehicles in particular, and how society and organizations might to deal more effectively and productively with disruptive technologies generally.Assignment ExpectationsLength: The written component of this assignment should be 5-7 pages long (double-spaced) without counting the cover page and reference page.Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to the questions.Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity. We encourage you to use tools such as and proofread your paper before submission.As you complete your assignment, make sure you do the following:Answer the assignment questions directly.Stay focused on the precise assignment questions. Do not go off on tangents or devote a lot of space to summarizing general background materials.Use evidence from your readings to justify your conclusions.Cite at least five credible resources.Reference your sources of information with both a bibliography and in-text citations. See the Student Guide to Writing a High-Quality Academic Paper, including pages 11-14 on in-text citations. Another resource is the “Writing Style Guide,” which is found under “My Resources” in the TLC Portal.Your assignment will be graded using the following criteria:Assignment-driven Criteria: Student demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment.Critical Thinking/Application to Professional Practice: Student demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem, and analyzing information. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice in an exceptional manner.Business Writing and Quality of References: Student demonstrates mastery and proficiency in written communication and use of appropriate and relevant literature at the doctoral level.Citing Sources: Student demonstrates mastery applying APA formatting standards to both in text citations and the reference list.Professionalism and Timeliness: Assignments are submitted on time.Module 4 – BackgroundDISRUPTIVE INNOVATIONVideo material ReadingLitman, T. (2017) Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved on October 21, 2017, from, W.C. & Mauborgne, R. (2019 Spring). Nondisruptive creation: Rethinking innovation and growth. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 46-55. Retrieved from ProQuest databKing, A. A. & Baatartogtokh, B. (2015) How Useful Is the Theory of Disruptive Innovation? MIT Sloan Management Review. Fall. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from, M. (2015) Disruptive Innovation and the Impact of Fully Autonomous Vehicles on the Auto Insurance Industry. Kalamazoo College. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from, D., Schuessler, J. & Dubinsky, A. (2015) Defining and identifying disruptive innovations. Industrial Marketing Management. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from
DOC 660 Trident University The Social Implications of Driverless Cars Case Study

Summary In common practice, majority of scientists have a notion that, when comparing between the republican and the democrat’s ruling principles, the republican’s ruling orientation under Bush caused many impairments to the practice of science. For instance, subjects under Bush messed up with information on changing climatic conditions. As far as this was not enough, there were clear biases in resource allocation to some scientific departments; a practical case being the fish and wildlife department. On the other hand, driven by his political sense of self, president bush stopped some scientific researches that were going on for example the stem cell research (Kancler p.1). Sometimes, it is very strange what republicans did in that, to them scientific developments were of less importance, hence their disregard for any attempt to improve on scientific knowledge. To prove their egoistic views that disregarded scientific innovations, they applied vague political theories instead of facing the real facts that related to the issue. For sure it is clear that, republicans had negative impressions on anything relating to science because, not only did they oppose scientific innovations, but also they promoted anti-intellectualism; something that was clear in the Goldwater’s administration Critical analysis of republican’s views on scientific developments clearly showed that, there was abuse of science for political sustainability and achievement. It is funny how these ruling elites neglected the field of science something that they should taken responsibility to promote. Even in some instances, the same elites disregarded university’s efforts in scientific development because of the notion held that, such innovations promote immorality. Although there was oppositions from republican as far as scientific development was concerned, due to the majority number of democrats (in the congress), in the Reagan administration, there was support for scientific developments for example, support of missile stabilization and combating global warming. It is important to note that, the same was contrary in the Bush’s administration where science innovations received little support. Clear proves of this was the altering of information on environmental issues; as presented by the Environmental Protection Agency, and the changing of certain clauses that touched on the issue of global warming by white house. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Reactions The alteration of records and information on environmental issues was a major setback to science in that, the well-being of the environment is what primarily makes science. This in many ways made most individuals to lack trust on the government as far as environmental well-being was concerned. This is because naturally, it was very abnormal for a government that is supposed to ensure its citizens stay in good environments, puts at stake their health living by frustrating scientific efforts. In addition, this made many to question the competence of decision makers as far as their intentions were, in that the same people trusted by citizens to ensure there was improvement in scientific innovations were jeopardizing what the citizens’ mandated them to do. This was because they were collaborating in twisting crucial scientific information. To some extent, some of the republicans’ views were right that is, science also had its negative impacts on the quality of life. However, frankly speaking without it life will have no meaning; hence, more benefits as compared to negative impacts resulting from adoption of scientific innovations. In this regard, it was important for republicans to base there disapproval of scientific innovations on professionalism, rather that mere vague theoretical assumptions, which they based on personal ego. Due to the importance of science, there was need for both the federal government and different industrial sections to support scientific development, because it was the only way of ensuring globalization and improved lifestyle of all citizens. In addition, because support of such innovations depended on the importance the ruling elites put on scientific innovations; there was need for ideological changes as far as republicans were concerned. By giving such support, there was a guarantee of scientific evolution, something that could translate to alleviation of the conflicts of interests that existed among different worrying groups as far as scientific development was concerned. In addition, due to media influences on scientific issues, there was need for journalist to get clear facts on scientific development instead of using fake detachments. On the other hand, although in the past, the same ruling elites abolished the technology and assessment department, to prove what the media presents; it is advisable for all individuals to confirm such facts from the National academy of sciences. In conclusion, to avoid the politicization of science, it is important for governments to look at the numerous benefits that result from scientific innovations rather than capitalizing on few negative impacts of such innovations. We will write a custom Essay on Republican War of Science specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Works Cited Kancler, Erik. The republican war on science. Mother Jones, 2 Oct. 2oo5. Web.
MGT 422 SEU Business Ethics & Organization Social Responsibility Case Questions.

Read the following case and answer the questionsAs a counselor in an outplacement firm, you’ve been working with Irwin for six months to find him a new position. During that time, he has completed extensive assessment work, to determine if he’s in an appropriate profession or if he might benefit from a career change. The results of the assessment indicate that Irwin has low self-esteem, probably could benefit from psychotherapy, and is most likely ill-suited for his current profession. Irwin has been actively interviewing for a position that’s very similar to two others he has held and lost. He desperately wants and needs this job. The company where he is interviewing happens to be one of your most important clients. You receive a call from the head of human resources at the company, who tells you that Irwin suggested she call you for information about his abilities, interests, and personality style as measured by the assessment process. She also asks you for a reference for Irwin. Since he has, in effect asked that you share information with this woman.Assignment Question(s):1. Identify and explain the ethical dilemma in this case? What are your obligations to Irwin, who is your client in this case?(minimum 400 words)2. The HR asks you to share information with her, is it okay for you to give her an honest assessment of Irwin? (minimum 400 words)3. Is there a way for you to be honest, yet not hurt Irwin’s chances to obtain this job? Or is that important? What will you do? ( minimum 200 words)…Support your answer with different references.write your answer on the same word file I uploaded
MGT 422 SEU Business Ethics & Organization Social Responsibility Case Questions

HSS 420 CTUO Global Health Systems in Developing Countries Discussion.

Your first task is to post your own Key Assignment Outline to the discussion area so that other students are able to review your plan. Attach your document to the main discussion post, and include any notes you feel are appropriate. The purpose of this assignment is to help improve the quality of the Key Assignment Draft you will complete next week.From the Prof.Your first task is to post your Key Assignment Outline to the discussion area so that other students can review your plan. Attach your document to the main discussion post, and include any notes you feel are appropriate. The purpose of this assignment is to help improve the quality of the Key Assignment Draft you will complete next week.The key assignment is Unit 4 IP4. Students are to submit a detailed outline of the IP4 assignment for Unit4: DB4.Make sure your outline follows a specific structureMake sure you are consistent with the outlineContact me if you have any questions and concernse.g 1. Main idea a) b) c) d)2. Main idea a) b) c) d)
HSS 420 CTUO Global Health Systems in Developing Countries Discussion

Essay on Nursing Education

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp As the profession of nursing continues to evolve, from a profession of ensuring that patients are well fed, clean and are healing in a clean environment to one of technical and life-saving interventions, nursing education must also change from a face to face experience to one that delivers information quickly and with a dash of entertainment (Ridley, 2007), Nursing educators today have many different means at their disposal to accomplish this, they can use simulations, distance learning and games to teach skills and technology needed in nursing today. Educational Games One of the fastest growing areas of teaching is the use of educational games. Educational games are drawing a great deal of attention and funding and can allow educators another avenue to explore in the constantly changing area of technological education (McGonigle

Power point on Sickle cell anemia

research paper help Power point on Sickle cell anemia. I’m studying for my Powerpoint class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

For the Week 6 Course Project Peer Review, create and develop the bullet points for the Course Project Final Narrated Presentation and begin to create the narration. The maximum number of slides for the presentation is 10 slides.

1 slide: 1 Cover Slide in APA format: Title, name, name of school
1 slide: Introduction: A brief introduction of the bodily system for audience understanding
4–6 slides: Content of the presentation: Includes the relevant details on your topic
1 slide: Conclusion: A summary of the main topics of the presentation
1 slide: References: In APA format, a list of sources used to create the content of the presentation

Power point on Sickle cell anemia

Valencia College Module 3 Philosophy Opening Discussion

Valencia College Module 3 Philosophy Opening Discussion.

Module 3 Opening Discussion 1212 unread replies.1212 replies.PurposeThe purpose of the Opening Discussion is to allow us to directly think about a philosophical question or problem without the bias that might result from prior knowledge of the ideas and arguments of important philosophers.This direct approach to a philosophical question or problem sets the stage for our inquiry into the philosophical theories and arguments covered in the module. It furthermore is the first step toward a greater self-awareness of our own individual intellectual biases and assumptions.The Opening Discussion MUST be completed at the beginning of the module during the timeframe specified in the course calendar. Please make sure to carefully follow the directions provided and adhere to the deadlines specified in the course calendar.DirectionsClick on ‘Reply’ to create your Opening Discussion POST in response to the prompts below. In your post, please address the following:Consider the following claims: “The purpose of the heart is to pump the blood through the body.” Or; “The purpose of a tiger’s stripes is to break up the outline of the animal for better camouflage.” Do you consider these claims *scientific* claims? (Remember our requirements for scientific explanation.) Carefully explain your reasoning.In general, do you think that there is *purpose* in nature? That living things are ‘designed’ to function as they do? Why? Why not? Please make sure to provide an example, and carefully explain your reasoning?Respond to at least two of your classmates. In order to respond to a classmate, open the classmate’s post and click ‘Reply’. Carefully explain why you agree or disagree with their views on purpose in nature (and concrete examples are always helpful). Make sure to be specific and carefully explain your reasoning.You must create your POST before you can reply to your classmates. Therefore, you should create your POST a day or two before the discussion deadline.Your initial post should be about 200-300 words in length, and your responses to classmates should each be about 100-200 words in length, but feel free to be as detailed as you wish.Your post and your responses must be written in proper English (correct spelling and grammar, and appropriate style). It is recommended to write your post and responses using a word processing program and copy and paste the completed post and responses. This will avoid losing work in case of internet outage, etc. You are encouraged to comment on your classmate’s feedback to your initial post and keep the (civilized!) discussion going.
Valencia College Module 3 Philosophy Opening Discussion

Drone Applications in the Aftermath of the Upcoming Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake

Drone Applications in the Aftermath of the Upcoming Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake. It’s All Up in the Air: Drone Applications in the Aftermath of the Upcoming Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake Abstract: Drones are becoming an increasingly popular resource for emergency management and disaster relief due to their range in capabilities, accessibility, and benefits over piloted aircraft and satellites. They aid in situational awareness, search and rescue, supply transportation, and communication in immediate post-disaster environments as previously demonstrated in the aftermath of landslides, hurricanes, fires and earthquakes. With the upcoming magnitude 9 Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake (CSZ), this technology is expected to assist affected communities up and down the Pacific coast. Federal, state, and local governments as well as humanitarian organizations are currently using and further developing drone technology and policy to utilize in emergencies and disasters. Further work on policy implementation, information, and ethics is required prior to the occurrence of CSZ event. Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………. 2 1.1 Drone Benefits…………………………………………………………………. 2 1.2 Previous Use in Post-disaster Environments……………………………………2 Research Methods ……………………………………………………………………….. 5 Results ……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 3.1 Situational AwarenessDrone Applications in the Aftermath of the Upcoming Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake