please provide answers to below questions.Its a 10 point question.
CHAPTER 1 QUESTIONS:
What is competitive advantage, and how does it relate to a company’s business model?
Describe the strategic planning model, and who is involved in the strategy-making process
Describe the SWOT analysis, its components, and how it aids a company in making strategic decisions. Provide examples of each component in the SWOT analysis.
What are the various levels of management, and how do they participate in the process of strategic decision making?
CHAPTER 2 QUESTIONS:
Define “Industry”, “Business” and “Sector”. How are these related?
How can Porter’s five-forces model aid in strategic decision making?
Describe how “Risk of Entry”, “Bargaining Power of Buyers”, “Bargaining Power of Suppliers”, and industry competition (“Threat of Substitutes”) affect the external threats a company faces. Provide examples of each.
Describe the industry life cycle, what strategic groups are, and what mobility barriers are.
AIDA Model and 4 A’s of AdvertisingReview headlines, copy and taglines for each ad I choose the printed ad one for logietch , one for pepsi.Find TWO print advertising examples and determine For each do the following 3. Paragraph 5-6 – Review headlines, copy and taglines for each ad– Are they effective? What do they accomplish? Persuade, grab attention, surprise?In a paragraph explain if they are or are not effective and substantiate with reasons for your opinion. Explain if advertising visual reflects understanding of visual strategy of today? (e.g. diversity, inclusion, positive, gender, bias, other etc. ). Provide rationale for your opinion.
Ashford University Analysis Printed Ads Pepsi Discussion
Please reply to both parts with 150 words a piece.
Research questions provide a map to assist the researcher in the navigation of thoughts, literature-based foundation, design strategy, and interpretive lens through which to draw conclusions (Williams, 2007). When taking a quantitative approach, the goal is to conduct an empirical investigation into reality using numerical measurements and statistical analyses to emphasize objectivity (Leedy & Ormrod, 2016; Williams, 2007). As illustrated in Figure 1 below (also attached as a separate image to this discussion post), quantitative research questions can be categorized as either descriptive, comparative, or relationship-based (Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006). The distinction among these categories hinges on the underlying motivation and whether the objective is to measure a descriptive response, detect a comparative difference, or uncover a trend in relationship (Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006). The type of research question also drives the choice of analysis method, as some techniques are more appropriate for a certain setting (Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006; Williams, 2007). An ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis, for example, is best suited to find trends among continuous or dichotomous predictors of a continuous response (Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006).
Figure 1 . Categories of Quantitative Research Questions. (Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006).
For my own research that is focused on the statistical analysis of adaptive clinical trials, software efficiency is one aspect on which I intend to concentrate. A research question tailored to this goal could be: Is there a difference in efficiency among statistical software packages? To translate this into a simplified and testable analysis, I could create a dataset that contains the run-times (measured in milliseconds) that it takes for each considered package (SAS and R) to process the same program. Various types of adaptive programs would be run, and the associated number of probability dimensions of each program would also be recorded. My null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in run-time between the two packages. My alternative hypothesis is that programs with higher dimensions will take a longer time to run in SAS than in R. This is a directional, or one-tailed, alternative hypothesis because it is specifying that not only is there an expected difference, but that the difference is intended to go in a specific direction (Pallmann et al., 2018). Tested with an analysis of variance model, the dependent variable would be run-time, and the independent variables would be statistical package, program dimension, and the interaction between package and dimension.
Quantitative research questions and hypotheses go together for researchers using quantitative research methods. Quantitative research questions focus a research study on the relationships between independent and dependent variables being studied by the researcher (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). There are three categories of quantitative research: (1) comparing groups on an independent variable to see the impact on a dependent variable, (2) relating or correlating one or more independent variables to one or more dependent variables, and (3) describing responses to the independent, mediating or dependent variables (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).
Research Question: How does using emerging technologies for cross-project knowledge transfer enable project managers to assimilate cross-project knowledge and use that knowledge for problem solving on their project?
The purpose of my proposed quantitative study is to analyze how using new and emerging technologies for project knowledge transfer enables project managers to assimilate knowledge and use the knowledge to solve problems on their projects. The research study looks at technology factors enabling the transfer and assimilation of project knowledge across projects in the same organization. The two types of cross-project knowledge transfer methods to be studied are technology-formal and technology-informal (Landaeta, 2003; 2008). The study participants should be current, practicing project managers across all disciplines.
Null Research Hypothesis: There is no relationship between the use of emerging technologies for project knowledge transfer and the project manager’s ability to assimilate the cross-project knowledge and use the knowledge to solve problems.
Quantitative hypotheses predict the outcomes of the relationships between the variables being studied (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). The study hypothesis as constructed is nondirectional and does not make a directional prediction about the study’s outcome (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). The variables in my research study are emerging technologies for cross-project knowledge transfer (independent variable) cross-project knowledge assimilation by the project manager (dependent or independent variable depending on whether or not the study manipulates two independent variables versus one relative to the outcome) and the project manager’s use of assimilated knowledge for decision making and problem solving (dependent variable). Identifying dependent and independent variables does not guarantee your research data will support a cause and effect relationship (Leedy and Ormrod, 2016).
LB management replies
Culture Subculture and Counterculture Video Discussion
Culture Subculture and Counterculture Video Discussion.
Assignment Description: This paper is designed to allow you to analyze both an intellectual understanding of the information in the module. More importantly I look for you to analyze what this class has meant to you on a personal level. In this sense, the paper is part intellectual and part self-reflective. This means you must write from the personal I perspective. I want you all to take time to understand the significance of what you have learned. I also hope you can find yourself adopting a new perspective of reinforcing a previous perspective. This assignment is also about feelings. I look for you to take a chance to explore your feelings—past and present and how do your feelings relate to what you learn. * You are to choose one of the modules covered during the quarter and analyze the impact the information has had on you. Do not choose more than one module to write about, but you can select as essay from another module to include in your paper. * You treat this as a research paper with you as the topic of research. This means there needs to be a working thesis either explicit or implicit. * You are to go back over all the readings, notes and quizzes from one of the modules and select one or two related concepts and analyze what it is you have learned about the concepts and how these concepts affect your perceptions about you and/or society. * I will be evaluating on both the intellectual understanding and the personal impact. * I will look for definitions of the terms or concepts used in the paper taken from the readings. Do not provide definitions from sources outside of the readings unless there is no definition within the readings. Page length Requirements: *At least 5 pages in length, 12 font and double spaced. If you submit less than five complete pages, you will get graded down. My advice, shoot for six pages, and you should be fine Sources: * Must include quotes from more than one source in the module (readings, videos, and discussion forum). * You must include quotes from the required readings in the module. * You can include sources from other modules. You can bring in outside sources, but be aware Wikipedia and Dictionary.com and sites like these are not considered credible sources. The additional sources must be from peer reviewed academic journals. You must provide a works cited page if you bring in outside sources. * If you don’t bring in outside sources, then you don’t have to provide a works cited page. However, make sure you use quotation marks and cite the author or the essay for any quotes used in your paper. The three basic ideas to address I have broken down three keys ideas I look for in this paper. What has affected you, how has it affected you, and why is the affect significant. Some less skilled writers may want to use these as subheadings in your paper. Most students write about what impacted them but not the other two. Be careful about this. What: What is/are the topic(s) in the module that affected you? I look for your intellectual understanding of what topic(s) affected you. I look for quotes from multiple sources and definitions of terms. How: How have these topics affected you? I look for an analysis of the changes the topics have had on you or your beliefs. How have your ideas changed or how are you interacting with others differently. Why: Why is the change significant? I look for an analysis of why this impact is significant in your life or in your ideas. I look for an analysis of why is the topic so meaningful in the changes you have gone through? There are three basic ways to approach the personal: Analyze how the information affects how you see yourself Analyze how the information affects how you see society Analyze how the information has allowed you to understand an experience you had Opinion vs. Self-Refection This is where many students have problems with this writing assignment. They feel stating their opinion is the same as self-reflection. It is not. Opinion is stating how you feel about the topic; self-reflection is about how the topic affects you or your ideas. While I do not want to discourage opinions, opinions are best said in the discussion forums. I look for how well you begin to analyze your ideas not necessarily how you express your opinions. Additional Considerations: Since most writing has an element of the subjective, I bring this into my grading. I have come to realize I reward those papers that tell a story that relates to the topic. This means I reward those papers that stray away from dividing the paper into two parts: intellectual and personal. I found those papers that blend the intellectual and personal into a single narrative generally receive a higher score. This type of paper usually begins the personal and then uses the sources to explain the significance of the experience and how the understanding of this significance impacts the writer’s perspective and subjectivity.
Culture Subculture and Counterculture Video Discussion
COM 200 American Univ Diffusion of Innovation & Technology Adoption Curve Discussion
order essay cheap COM 200 American Univ Diffusion of Innovation & Technology Adoption Curve Discussion.
Week 1 Discussion 2ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 2Link (online article): Diffusion of Innovation TheoryFile (PDF): Presentation (Straubhaar, 10e) – Chapter 2 (attached)One scholarly source referenced (at minimum) in the initial post IntroductionWith technology changing almost daily, it becomes a challenge to keep up with these changes and to take advantage of the benefits of these new technologies. This discussion asks you to assess your comfort level with technology and innovation and to specifically categorize yourself on the Diffusion of Innovations Curve. Initial Post InstructionsPlease review pages 42-45 of your text and the article posted above. Regarding your own personal use of technology, where do you see yourself on the Diffusion of Innovations curve? Are you an innovator, early adopter, part of the early majority, or a laggard? In your opinion, are traditional college students, in general, more frequently innovators, early adopters, etc.? What about non-traditional college students? Why do you feel this way? Secondary Post InstructionsRead and respond to posts made by at least two peers. Respond in one of the following ways:Ask a probing question.Share an insight from having read your peer’s post.Offer and support an opinion.Validate an idea with your own experience.Make a suggestion. Writing Requirements In addition to one initial post, respond to at least two peers.Initial Post Length: minimum of 250 wordsSecondary Post Length: minimum of 200 words per postUsing APA formatting, cite the article provided in the resources above as well as the additional scholarly source that was used in the initial post
COM 200 American Univ Diffusion of Innovation & Technology Adoption Curve Discussion
Kelly Kennedy: “They fought for Each Other: Triumph and Tragedy of the Hardest Hit Unit in Iraq” Critical Essay
Kelly Kennedy: “They fought for Each Other: Triumph and Tragedy of the Hardest Hit Unit in Iraq” Critical Essay. There are many books devoted to the Iraq conflict. They explore the reasons and consequences of the Iraq war depict struggles and attempts of the American soldiers to preserve piece and stop the war. One of the books devoted to this war is the book by Kelly Kennedy They fought for Each Other: Triumph and Tragedy of the Hardest Hit Unit in Iraq. However, to be more specific, it should be mentioned that this book is devoted not to the war, but to the American soldiers that fought their battles and died for piece during that war. It is another marvelous book that is worth reading. It gives a clear insight into the battles and military companies. Moreover, it clearly describes people’s relations and realities of soldiers’ life and combats. It is not only a true historic writing, but a great psychological analysis of peoples’ souls. At the same time, this book is easy and difficult to read. On the one hand, it captures, as it is interesting and gives you a real presentation of events that occurred. On the other hand, you cannot hold your tears reading it as it is so difficult to realize that all those events really took place and each time you read that somebody was killed, you realize that a real life was ruined. Briefly, it is a wonderful book that presents a vivid and true portrait of a terrible realty of war. One, who wants to see how American soldiers sacrificed their life and fates, must read this book. Iraq war was a real mass destruction and terrible page in the history of both nations that ruined lives of thousands innocent people. USA, Germany, France and Russia fought against Iraq terrorists. Many mistakes were done. However, those mistakes are nothing in comparison with the consequences that they brought. The most terrible consequence is the horror that this war brought to peoples’ lives and the number of people who were killed. The reality of that war will follow fates of many people for many years as mothers lost their sons, wives lost their husbands and children lost their fathers. The sorrow for the killed men follows the readers of the book by Kelly Kennedy. Reading it, we believe to its author because this woman took part in that war and all her memories, so bright and fresh, produce a great impression on the reader. Kelly Kennedy is a journalist and a former soldier that created the book on the basis of her series of article about war in Iraq in Armi Times. May be that is why the book is written in a newspaper manner and begins as an article, rather than a literary work. At any rate, it does not spoil an overall impression about the story told in the book. So, the book is telling a story of a company that was engaged in one of the most hostile regions of Baghdad, Adhamiya’s costs. The story reveals the Charlie Company, first Battalion, 1/26th Infantry Division that was involved in the Iraq deployment in 2007. It is a story of friendship, mutual support, despair and honor. It is also a heartbreaking conclusion of the sacrifices in Iraq. As it has already been mentioned, the book is based on real events. The author spend with the Charlie Company only few days, but “all the quotes in this book come directly from the interviews with the men, beyond a couple of jokes and exclamations” (Kennedy 2). Group of young men survived a terrible time and those memories are described in their own words. They got not only physical injuries, but deep mental wounds. They had to overcome their fears, nightmares when they saw their friend died. And they had to take care and look after each other, this mutual support brought the company through. The title of the book perfectly describes its sense. They fought for each other. Of course, they came to that country because they got the order. However, soon young men understood that only together, only taking care about each other they can survive. The most terrible thing that we bump into from the very first page is that the division consisted of young men who hardly saw anything in their lives. And understanding of the fact that they all can be killed makes the reader’s heart stop beating. Especially, when we read the very first lines: “At their tiny combat outpost in the Adhamia neighborhood of Baghdad, the soldiers of second platoon acted like kids going t an amusement park: jumping, grabbing gears, punching shoulders” (Kennedy 5). Later on, when we read the book and see how these “kids” die, the sorrow grabs our souls. The line of friendship and duty runs through the entire story. The author shows how one of the soldiers died to save his friend’s life and first sergeant shoot himself in front of the troops. Terrible pictures of deaths emerge in front of us. “In 15 months, 31 men of the 1-26 were killed and 122 wounded, making it the hardest-hit battalion since the Vietnam War. Charlie Company suffered the most, with 14 men killed. Second Platoon lost nine men.” (Kennedy 280). But we admire soldiers who fought with clear hears because they understood the defense policy as the main aim to preserve peace. They got along well with children who lived in the area playing with them and giving them candies. The soldiers understood that children are not guilty. Such actions of the soldiers did, actually, a big job. Children saw that foreign people are not enemies and, maybe, when children will grow, they will not be so hostile. The book also states that “many of the guys believed the two words were interchangeable without understanding the philosophy behind the new counterinsurgency manual written by Gen. David Petraeus and his aides” (Kennedy 1) First, young soldiers believed that all they had to do is to restore connection with local people, however, later they understood the reality of the company and their main task was to survive. Mission and friendship were the prime preoccupations of the soldiers. The author also present vivid characteristics of those who had passed through that horror and how young people brought their lives to that company and how they protected each other form danger in the time when they did everything possible to perform their mission, thought they even did not have enough equipment and troops. One more thing that revolves when reading a book is the way the wounded soldiers were treated. Actually, they were left on their own, without help and with the support of their friends only. Another irritating thing about the story is how the whole system left them and failed those soldiers while not providing them with necessary support. But so many lives could be saved if there were at least a bit concern for them. What can be said about the book and what advice can be given to soldiers who fight their battles. Just one thing comes to mind. The example of devotion, firmness and mutual support in the book can tell more than any person. These trait supported young people in difficult situations and these traits can be really helpful. As at all times only love for motherland, brave heart and friendship helped people survive war. This book is not only a literary work. It is a requiem for people who died during that company in particular and during the Iraq war in general. It has a great historical and spiritual meaning. It gives to all readers a possibility to feel the atmosphere of war in our present days. First of all, it depicts historical events, none of the words are an untruth. All that was for real. Second, it is a story of friendship that can teach a great lesson for future generations how one should support each other and how one should preserve honor and devotion to duty. One more important meaning of the book lies in the fact that it is a warning for all people to preserve peace, as there is nothing so terrible as war and death of people. The book claims that there should not be the same mistakes and terrible combats in future. This is the main intention of the author indeed. Works cited Kennedy, Kelly. They fought for Each Other: Triumph and Tragedy of the Hardest Hit Unit in Iraq. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2010. Kelly Kennedy: “They fought for Each Other: Triumph and Tragedy of the Hardest Hit Unit in Iraq” Critical Essay
Sytrayer University Oil Industry Workplace Place Ethics Discussion
Sytrayer University Oil Industry Workplace Place Ethics Discussion.
This assignment will give you the opportunity to choose an article and then write about the ethical implications and the impact of the events that are described. Read and reflect on one of the following articles.Oil IndustryToy MakerWrite a 5-7 page paper in which you:Analyze the following questions associated with your chosen article, and discuss them using concepts you learned in this course.What ideals, effects, and consequences are at stake?Have any moral rights been violated?What would a Utilitarian recommend?What would a Kantian recommend?Explain your rationale for each of your answers for your chosen article, with supporting evidence.This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Evaluate the ethical implications and impact of the events of selected business situations using predominant ethical theories and concepts.
Sytrayer University Oil Industry Workplace Place Ethics Discussion