Get help from the best in academic writing.

Discussion on World Making Stories

Discussion on World Making Stories. Can you help me understand this English question?

I would like you to consider the reading you’ve been assigned over the past week, World Making Stories edited by Eleanor Nevins. One of the primary topics the book covers is the connection between landscape and culture, especially the Maidu, who are one of the Native American tribes of California. I would like you, with at least three quotes from Nevins’ book, explain the strategies of community renewal by the Maidu today. What is the role of stories(we’ve been calling them myths, as well) for them, especially when it comes to keeping their culture, and identity, alive?
Discussion on World Making Stories

BUS 475 University of Phoenix Week 5 Evaluating Strategic Plans Paper.

I’m working on a business discussion question and need an explanation to help me understand better.

Post a total of 3 substantive responses. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: Keeping in mind the aspects of planning, leading, organizing, and controlling, explain how you would evaluate the effectiveness of a strategic plan.What do you think is the most important piece of information to consider when determining effectiveness? Why? Be constructive and professional.Student 1 (SR)The effectiveness of a strategic plan is measured by how well the set goals were reached. The more measurable a goal is set, the easier it is to measure how effective the plan that is being executed is. If the goal is not met then a closer look is needed to find out why and where the adjustments needed to be made. I think the most important piece of information to consider when determining effectiveness is how the goal will be measured in the first place. The goal and date used to measure the goal need to be specifically stated.For example, the urgent care I work for has a goal of seeing more patients with the expectation of making more money. After noticing that the patient count increased but the money was not coming in, the manager had to go back and find out why that was so. Had the company’s goal been to bring in more HMO contracted patients (higher paying insurance patients) and not just more patients in general, the facility would be making more money. The money was spent prematurely on advertising that we accept the “lower-paying” insurance and we saw an influx in the patients but not so much in the money. The data and goal need to be specific and measurable to better measure the effectiveness of the strategy.Student 2 (AP)While planning, leading, organizing, and controlling are key aspects of strategic planning, they need to be monitored to ensure that you aren’t just spinning your wheels. I was part of a team that was working on a big project and we used a chart to graph our progress. It was similar to the thermometer charts that are used to measure progress. This gave us a visual that we could quickly read and understand to see what stages were completed and the work that was left to do. Each individual was given a task to take on and we would meet every 2 weeks to check progress and see if there were any speed bumps that slowed us down. At that point, we would figure out how to overcome the bump in the road in order to progress to the next goal. They’re just about always needs to be a backup plan just in case something goes awry. In our case, we had our regular jobs to do on top of working on this project, so sometimes we were unable to make the progress that we had planned to. We made it a point to have a couple of conference calls a week, just to check on everyone and see if another team member needed any help. That was our back up plan; help each other. In the end, we were able to finish our project ahead of our goal date, which was pretty cool. I think that the most important part of determining the effectiveness of any job is having a way to monitor your progress. You can’t just give someone an objective without any direction. That would work out about as well as telling your dog to go cook dinner; it ain’t gonna work.
BUS 475 University of Phoenix Week 5 Evaluating Strategic Plans Paper

PHI 208 Ashford University CH3 Utilitarian Ethics Symposium Discussion Prompt.

Week 2 Symposium [WLOs: 2, 3] [CLOs: 3, 4, 5]<If you are having trouble starting this video, please access it here (Links to an external site.).Video transcript can be accessed here.(attach below is the script of the video)In the Ancient Greek world (the world of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, often regarded as the birthplace of philosophy) a “symposium” was a banquet held after a meal, an “after party” of sorts that usually included drinking, dancing, recitals, and engaging conversations on the topics of the day.For our purposes in this course, the Symposium discussions will not involve dancing, recitals, or a banquet, but they will provide food for thought on current ethical issues and direct application of the ethical theory discussed in each of these weeks.It is almost impossible these days to turn on the news or log onto social media without encountering a controversy that cries out for ethical discussion. For these Symposium discussions, your instructor will choose a topic of current ethical interest and a resource associated with it for you to read or watch. Your task is to consider how the ethical theory of the week might be used to examine, understand, or evaluate the issue.This week, you will consider how utilitarianism applies to a controversy, dilemma, event, or scenario selected by your instructor. It is a chance for you to discuss together the ethical issues and questions that it raises, your own response to those, and whether that aligns with or does not align with a utilitarian approach. The aim is not to simply assert your own view or to denigrate other views, but to identify, evaluate, and discuss the moral reasoning involved in addressing the chosen issue.Your posts should remain focused on the ethical considerations, and at some point in your contribution you must specifically address the way a utilitarian would approach this issue by explaining and evaluating that approach.If you have a position, you should strive to provide reasons in defense of that position. additional requirements: Symposium Discussion PromptPlease read the description above and/or watch the video explaining the symposium and its requirements. 1. This symposium is a chance for us to discuss ethical issues in a more informal way. For this discussion, make an initial post on an example of your own choosing that represents utilitarian ethics in action. This idea can be drawn from places such as films, books, Internet sources, or your personal experience. For full credit, be sure to sufficiently describe the situation you are referring to in your post, and include a link if possible.2. In your post, describe the utilitarian thinking that is involved, and show how the ethical point of view reflects your understanding of Utilitarianism. Remember, Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that states laws and actions should be judged as good and bad based on their utility, that is, the RESULTS they produce (the consequences). For a utilitarian, the best actions or laws are those that produce the greatest good for the most people and the least amount of pain. In your reply to a classmate, determine whether or not you agree with the utilitarian approach put forth in their post, and offer reasons why/why not.*****See my example post below these instructions for a more detailed view of what is required!*****A current example of the use of utilitarian ethics can be found in the technology of self-driving cars. The ethical problem involved in self-driving cars (and very reminiscent of the famous ‘trolley problem’ in ethics) revolves around the car’s computer being forced into a situation where it must choose to save the life of the driver or the life of pedestrians. In the article (Links to an external site.) I have linked, the example features three pedestrians wandering absentmindedly into a crosswalk, creating a situation where the autonomous vehicle must choose to hit and kill the people in the crosswalk or swerve off the road and kill the driver in the crash.Surveys (such as the one mentioned in the article and more recent versions) demonstrate that people desire for the car to be programmed with Utilitarianism in mind: a majority of people strongly feel that the car should sacrifice its passenger for the greater good. This reflects Bentham and Mill’s understanding that Utilitarianism seeks to maximize the most happiness for the most people, and thus prioritizes the group over the individual. The dilemma, however, is that when the question is posed as to whether a person would themselves own a car that is programmed with utilitarian ethics (defaults to saving the lives of the most people) or with egoism as its default (programmed to save the driver/passenger at all costs), the selfish programming is preferred.One way to frame this ethical dilemma is to realize that what is problematic is not necessarily the distinction between Utilitarianism/Egoism, but the word that they share in common in this situation: programming. No matter how much machine learning or how many simulations have trained the AI algorithms that decide who lives and dies in this situation, maybe the real problem is that the comparative value of life and death has already been made long before the decisive emergency moment. In this sense, maybe the utilitarian approach is just as good an ethical approach as any other. Perhaps what bothers us is that the life-and-death decision in this hypothetical emergency was made in a laboratory in advance and far-removed from that fateful drive—unlike the reflex-like reaction of a human driver, which, while scarcely qualifying as a decision, could nevertheless be interpreted as split-second Utilitarianism.
PHI 208 Ashford University CH3 Utilitarian Ethics Symposium Discussion Prompt

Watch this doc on Dollars and Dentists.

I’m working on a health & medical writing question and need support to help me understand better.

The program was a documentary developed by the Center for Public Integrity and hosted by the Public Broadcasting System (PBS). The program presents an overview of the poor condition of oral health in this country and some of the issues associated with a broken health care system. Specifically, the program discusses the high cost of dental care, the lack of insurance to cover oral health issues, and how these costs leave many people unable to afford dental care services. It also calls into question the way corporate America has responded to fill this need. Several business models have emerged with big corporate backing. While viewing the video you should be able to recognize a number of ethical and moral issues that arise related to access to health care, quality of care, and financial exploitation of disparate populations.After you’ve watched the video, download and complete the Dollars and Dentists assignment (see attachment above). I will provide the doc you need for this assignment. You will answer all of the questions that is on that soc, but you will create a new word document. CORRECT APA HEADINGS AND REFERENCE PAGE!Here goes the link to watch the video…
Watch this doc on Dollars and Dentists

University of California Merced Life History Psychology Discussion

University of California Merced Life History Psychology Discussion.

his week you will describe:Nadir Experience (Low Point)A “nadir” is a low point. A nadir experience, therefore, is the opposite of a peak experience. Please think about your entire life. Try to remember a specific experience in which you felt extremely negative emotions, such as despair, disillusionment, terror, profound guilt, shame, etc. You should consider this experience to represent one of the “low points” in your life story. Even though this memory is unpleasant, we would still appreciate an attempt on your part to be honest and straightforward and to provide us with as much detail as possible. Please remember to be specific. We would like to know what happened, when it happened, who was involved, what you were thinking and feeling, why the event is significant, and what the event says about you and your personality.Include all of the following in your written description of the event:When did the event occur? (How old were you?)What exactly happened in the event?Who was involved in the event?What were you thinking, feeling, and wanting in the event?Why do you think that this is an important event in your life story?What does this event say about who you are, who you were, who you might be, and how you have developed over time?Basically you will see what kinds of characters, scenes, and themes come up in your life story.his week you will also:Look for 3 educational resources on the internet that will help you make sense of your nadir experience. Do some research online and find 3 resources that will help you understand your nadir experience. These 3 resources can be: a website, a news story, a video, a free Coursera course, a podcast episode, etc. The 3 resources you find should add to what you learned from this week’s chapter.Explain how these resources helped you:understand why you do the things you dounderstand what you need most from your education and careerlearn to accept and celebrate yourself as you areknow exactly what you need from your relationships to feel accepted, understood, and fulfilleddiscover what you desire, more than anything else, from your lifegain the ability to ask for what you want and needget the ability to control your behavior the way you want and under any circumstancelearn what you want your life to add up to in the endYou are not trying to figure out if anything is wrong with you, and you are not trying to judge the “goodness” of your life. Instead, you want to decide whether educational resources from the internet related to psychology can help you make sense of the characters, scenes, and themes of your life story.
University of California Merced Life History Psychology Discussion

Reflection Paper

term paper help Reflection Paper. I’m working on a English question and need guidance to help me study.

I want from you to write a reflection paper based on reading this chapter ” (Between a Rock and a Hard Life)” from “Five Equations that Changed the World book that has been attached by answering the question on the question file has been attached.
and please tell me which pages did you get these information
And follow the ” Excellent ” rubric in the rubric file has been attached.
Please note you should write detailed answer, and follow the reubric
Reflection Paper

The Outsiders Death Caused By Society English Literature Essay

The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton is a novel about gang rivalry and the consequences of stereotypes and social classes. The Outsiders is composed of two gangs that are socially different but racially homogenous. The Socs are the wealthy kids from the West side of Tulsa who drive new cars, wear madras shirts, and cut their hair short. On the East side of town the Greasers are the working class boys who walk or drive jalopies, wear t-shirts and jeans, and slick their long hair back with grease. But these trimmings are just the external manifestations of their identities. Class differences and the stereotypes society have placed on the two gangs are what really fuels their animosity for one another. My argument pertains to the way these societal conceptions affected both members of the gang and ultimately cause the death of Bob, Johnny, and Dally. Class can be defined as the division based on quality, rank or grade and the relationship to the means of production. The Socs, relying and their parent’s wealth, have a much more fortunate relationship to the means of production than do the Greasers. The Greasers have fewer resources to use when faced with a crisis requiring some sort of power in society. When Ponyboy’s parents are killed in a car accident, Darry must give up all his dreams of an immediate future to ensure the safety of his brothers. He is not legally required to care for his younger siblings and they could have been left for the state to deal with. But the state would have placed them in a group home where they would suffer significantly from a lack of adult guidance. Ponyboy and Soda cannot get into trouble with the law or the state is reasonably capable of deciding that Darry is not a suitable parent and eradicate his brothers from his custody. I imagine if Darry and his brothers were affiliated with the Socs, there would be some sort of monetary support or insurance that would solve this problem and allow the boys, especially Darry, to still have hopes of a successful future. The Greasers’ and the Socs’ hatred for one another is due to popular ideas about class, predominantly in the United States. To be poor or rich are more than just misfortunes of birth, they are moral categories. In the United States, children are frequently educated to believe that moving up in class is not just possible, but is almost inevitable for anyone that works hard. So it’s easy to see why the Socs may feel threatened by the Greasers as well as deserving their hatred. The Soc’s parents are those who make legal decisions and compose of most of the education system while the Greasers are juvenile delinquents with no aspiration in life beyond fighting and drinking. Very little thought is given to how the Greasers’ lack of prosperity combined with class discriminations against them complete their association in this category. We can also see that the consequences for law-breaking are far less harsh for the Socs than they are for the Greasers. The justice system is inclined to see Greasers as essentially bad and deserving of cruel punishment. As for the Socs, the consequences for their delinquency are much lighter. The justice system is more liable to see them as good boys who just made unusually bad decisions so their penalties tend to be less severe. In the Greaser’s gang, Johnny’s father is an alcoholic and his mother is heartless. Two-bit’s mother works in a bar to support her children after being abandoned by their father. Darry is becoming old before his time trying to bear the responsibility of his two younger brothers, and Sodapop drops out of school to assist him. All along, “the Socs had so much spare time and money that they jumped us and each other for kicks, had beer blasts and river-bottom parties because they didn’t know what else to do” (Hinton 43). Class freedom is further established by the Socs’ favored technique of fighting. It’s usual for several of them to jump one Greaser. This not only reveals their overall spinelessness, but that all of the Greasers will eventually be jumped by the Socs. The Socs have a more advantaged relationship to the means of production and so the two classes can hardly ever see eye to eye. Maybe the reason the Greasers are so eager to fight the Socs is because this ground of physical violence is the only true meritocracy. Ponyboy’s untraditional family does not express a negative stereotype of working class life. Darry can be seen as characterless in that he “doesn’t understand anything that is not plain hard fact. But he uses his head” (Hinton 7). Sodapop has a joy for life and he never drinks alcohol since he “can get drunk in a drag race or dancing without ever going near alcohol” (Hinton 8). Ponyboy’s parents are also not stereotypical working class either. They were actually loving and involved in their children’s lives. His father was “never rough with anyone without meaning to be” (Hinton 6), unlike Darry, who has now taken over the paternal role and constantly lives under the pressure of raising a family as a single father. Darry’s fate demonstrates to what extent class mobility is a myth. Ponyboy explains that “Darry didn’t deserve to work like an old man when he was only twenty. He had been a real popular guy in school; he was captain of the football team and he had been voted Boy of the Year. But we just didn’t have the money for him to go to college, even with the athletic scholarship he won. And now he didn’t have the time between jobs to even think about college.” (Hinton 16) There seems to be little hope for Ponyboy since the same forces that have formed Darry’s life are also planning to make it exceedingly difficult for him to leave the working class. Ponyboy and Johnny have the most unclear gender characteristics of the Greasers and if it wasn’t for their love of fighting they would almost be marked as feminine. Both boys have an attraction to sunsets and seem to be unashamed to cry in the other’s presence. But throughout the story both characters are exploring their identities and forming them from the qualities and guidance given by those around them. At the end of the novel, the two characters who reside on opposite ends of gender traits both die. Dally had always emotionally felt so little and flirted with death so much that it became almost suicidal. And Johnny felt so much and put others before him to a degree that it would be difficult for him to survive to adulthood either. Both Ponyboy’s and Johnny’s preferred type of literature displays how they have internalized the ideas of middle and upper class. Johnny is enthralled with the novel Gone with the Wind, a book that is usually more suitable for women than men. This is because Johnny “was especially stuck on the Southern gentlemen–impressed with their manners and charm” (Hinton 75). Ponyboy explains that he had to read Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations and the character of Pip reminded him of his gang, “the way he felt marked lousy because he wasn’t a gentleman or anything, and the way that girl kept looking down on him” (Hinton 15). Johnny’s attraction to the manners of a Southern gentleman is somewhat important. When the middle class arose at the end of the 18th century, the members began to legitimize themselves as something more than just rich. They began distinguishing themselves by the manners they expressed. “Before the rise of the middle class, a gentleman was someone with an inherited title, something not available to everyone. After the rise of the middle class, however, a gentleman came to be defined as someone who behaved in a certain way, something that conceivably anyone could do.” It’s made clear that Ponyboy does not symbolize the stereotypes of working class masculinity. He is not like the other gang member, but more literate and thoughtful. He enjoys reading books and studying movies so he can pay more attention to the values of the stories. When Ponyboy describes the other Greasers, it becomes very clear that the members also don’t completely represent the stereotype of working class masculinity. Together the Greasers are “almost like hoods; they steal things and drive old souped-up cars and hold up gas stations and have a gang fight once in a while” (Hinton 3). This description does not justify the individual portrayal of the members in the gang. Two-Bit, the clown of the gang “liked fights, blondes, and for some unfathomable reason, school” (Hinton 10) Tragically, Dally and Johnny best represent stereotypes of working class family life. Dally is the hardest member of the group “he spent three years on the wild side of New York and had been arrested at the age of ten” (Hinton 10) A result of living in New York made Dally tougher, colder and meaner than the rest of them. Johnny is the youngest member of the gang and comes from a family that embodies the best example of their class. “His father was always beating him up, and his mother ignored him, except when she was hacked off at something, and then you could hear her yelling at him clear down at our house” (Hinton 22). Ponyboy meets Cherry, a Soc girl, at the movies one night with Johnny. After an argument with Dally, the girls ask Ponyboy and Johnny to sit by them. It is under these conditions that Ponyboy sees the connection between himself and people of another class. When Ponyboy tells Cherry the story of Johnny almost being beat to death by the Socs she replies, “all Socs aren’t like that” (Hinton 42) and “things are rough all over,” (Hinton 43) for both the Socs and the Greasers. Cherry sees the diverse values, not money that separates the two groups. She depicts the Greasers as more emotional, while the Socs tend to be “sophisticated-cool to the point of not feeling anything” (Hinton 38). But Cherry fails to understand how these personalities she allocates to the two groups are also a result of class. She recognizes that the Socs suffer from having more than they want, and as a result persist to hunt for some insubstantial thing to satisfy them (Hinton 38). Not having to worry about whether they’ll be able to eat or have shelter for or even feel safe walking home at night gives them the liberty to have this desire for the indescribable. Bob, Cherry’s boyfriend, has the same traits as Dally, “he was a reckless, hot-tempered boy, cocky and scared stiff at the same time” (Hinton 162). His rings are symbolically similar to the Socs’ cars. Throughout literature it has become common for jewelry to be symbols of wealth. The rings that Bob wears ultimately represent the power that accompanies wealth. By using the rings as weapons during fights, Bob is taking advantage of his economic supremacy over the Greasers and using his prosperity to hurt his opponents. The guys who have the conventional, steady upper class family such as Bob are not automatically better parented in these situations. Randy talks to Ponyboy about his deceased friend and that his parents “spoiled him rotten . . . gave into him all the time. Bob kept trying to make someone say ‘No’ and they never did” (Hinton 116). Ponyboy’s untraditional family seems to be more caring and stable than Bob’s. Living within the upper class encourages the Socs to be less outwardly emotional than the Greasers. Controlling one’s emotions signifies the capability to manage one’s self in other arenas in life, and the working class is often described as a group missing self control. Dally is a great example of this loss of self control. The Socs have more organization in their lives than the Greasers do. Both gangs might have much in common, but when the Greasers become adults, they have a lot less capacity to establish the path of their lives than do their better off counter parts. The Outsiders depicts the story of two groups of teenagers whose bitter rivalry stems from socioeconomic differences. Hinton suggests these differences in social class do not necessarily make natural enemies of the two groups. I believe Hinton is correct but in the end the differences they share prove to be too strong and the groups are ultimately destroying themselves due to the stereotypes placed upon them. The Greasers and Socs do share some things in common and over the course of the novel, Ponyboy begins to see the pattern of shared experience. He realizes that the hardships the Greasers and Socs face may take different practical forms, but that the members of both groups must inevitably come to terms with fear, love, and sorrow.

Harvard University American Indian Cultural Profile Hofstede Presentation

Harvard University American Indian Cultural Profile Hofstede Presentation.

I’m working on a Management exercise and need support.Please see the instructions. Please read the article below and the script.…the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.Read the article “How Indra Nooyi Turned Design Thinking Into Strategy.”Watch the video “Nooyi: You Can ‘Have It All’ With Support, Sacrifices.” Develop an American-Indian cultural profile via a 10- to 12-slide presentation (utilizing the presentation tool of your choice). Include narrative giving generalized country profiles based on a synthesis of research, primarily from Hofstede as well as numerous other sources. This profile illustrates how to synthesize information and gain a sense of the character of a society from which implications may be drawn about how to manage more effectively in that society.The 10- to 12-slide presentation should also include the answers to the following questions:What is the PDI (power distance index) for India compared to America? The difference between the two PDIs indicates what information for global managers?What were the factors that shaped Indra Nooyi as a leader?If PepsiCo were headquartered in India, how might Nooyi lead her employees in India based on the PDI of this country in comparison to America?What leadership style is being used by Nooyi at PepsiCo? Highlight the mix of various leadership styles found in Nooyi, such as that of servant leadership, ethical leadership, socialized charismatic leadership, and authentic leadership.Your presentation should include a minimum of three properly cited references. For questions on APA style, go to OCLS APA Writing Style Guides.Your presentation is due by the end of the workshop. .doc file
Harvard University American Indian Cultural Profile Hofstede Presentation