Get help from the best in academic writing.

Discussion Boards

Same Day Essay Help / By
Discussion Boards. I don’t know how to handle this Communications question and need guidance.

PAD 3003
Instructions
First, answer the discussion prompt. Then, respond to at least 2 peers’ posts.
Posts are due at the end of each module with no grades for late posts. Please answer the prompt early during the module so you and your peers have enough time to respond.
Keep in mind that your discussion forum postings will be seen by other members of the course. Care should be taken when determining what to post.
Review the discussion grading rubric. See Canvas Guide: How do I view the rubric for my graded discussion? (Links to an external site.)
Prompt
Pretend to be either a Federalist or Anti-Federalist. Make an argument about one of the following current events from your Federalist or Anti-Federalist perspective.

Should fighting terrorism be focused on the state or federal level?
Should Government build more high-speed long-distance trains?

Should the military/law enforcement be allowed to use spy planes and drones inside the U.S.?

PAD 4723
Discussion 1: Science, Society and Social Research (Ch. 1)
After reviewing the module materials, explain how the issue of overgeneralization is played out in the “Hasty generalization commercial examples” video. Identify another example of overgeneralization in the media or public policy and analyze using the concepts discussed in Chapter One. Cite sources.
Please review the Discussion Rubric in the syllabus before posting.

Note: you are required to post before you can view other threads in this forum.

Rubric PAD 3003

PAD3003 Discussion Rubric

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNumber, Length, and Timeliness of Posts (30%)

4.5 to >4.0 pts Exemplary (100%-90%) Participated at least 3 times (1 original post and 2 responses to peers). Joined the discussion early within the week assigned. Posts were made in a timely fashion, giving others an opportunity to respond. Posts are substantial, convey ideas fully and concisely, and are at least 3-5 sentences long.
4.0 to >3.2 pts Competent (90%-70%) Participated at least 2 times. Posts were generally made in a timely fashion. Others had a reasonable opportunity to respond. One of the posts may be too short to convey a meaningful, relevant idea, or too long/overdrawn.
3.2 to >0 pts Novice (70%-0%) Participated 0-1 time. Post was not made in a timely fashion. Student waited until the discussion forum was about to close for that weekly period, thus not giving others the opportunity to comment on the submission. Post is either too short to convey a meaningful, relevant idea, or too long/overdrawn.

4.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInsight and Depth of Contributions (60%)

9.0 to >8.0 pts Exemplary (100%-90%) Posts reflect knowledge of course material and of peers’ posts. Posts are not purely opinion-based, but supported with course content, clear reasoning, and reliable external sources (if required). Posts generated in-depth dialogue and interaction: may have challenged others’ posts and did so in a respectful manner; extended discussions already taking place or posed new possibilities/opinions not previously voiced. Remained on topic.
8.0 to >6.3 pts Competent (90%-70%) All in all, posts at this level showed good effort. The student made an attempt to internalize and think about the material. Attempted to make connections to course material. Ultimately, though, the sum of the student’s posts lacked sufficient depth, detail, and/or explanation. Posts are not fully supported by course content, clear reasoning, and/or reliable external sources (if required). Generally stayed on topic.
6.3 to >0 pts Novice (70%-0%) Posts added little value to the understanding of course materials covered. Little to no insight offered. May have simply rehashed facts/information that is obvious. Only looked for ‘the correct answer’. Doesn’t seem to grasp the concepts nor make connections to course material. Posts are not supported by course content, clear reasoning, and/or reliable external sources (if required). May have made incorrect use of concepts. Strayed from topic.

9.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling, Grammar, and Presentation (10%)

1.5 to >1.4 pts Exemplary (100%-90%) Perfect (or close to) both spelling and grammar used. Professional and respectful language used throughout. Outside sources, if required, were cited correctly.
1.4 to >1.0 pts Competent (90%-70%) Spelling and grammar were reasonable, but not perfect. Attempted to cite outside sources, but possibly incorrectly. Was generally respectful to peers.
1.0 to >0 pts Novice (70%-0%) Little to no attempt made to write in proper English. Made mistakes in any of the following areas: spelling, grammar, punctuation. Did not cite outside sources. May have been disrespectful to peers.

1.5 pts

Total Points: 15.0

PAD 4723 Rubric

Discussions Fall 2019

Discussions Fall 2019

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePromptness of Initial Posting

5.0 pts Excellent Post before Thursday, which provides sufficient time for peers to respond.
3.0 pts Good Post after Thursday, which provides some time for peers to respond.
1.0 pts Acceptable Post on Saturday ,which only provides limited time for peers to respond.
0.0 pts Unacceptable The initial post is on the last day for the week which does not allow peers to respond.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOutcome Content of Initial Posting

5.0 pts Excellent Well developed assignment that fully addresses and develops all aspects of the question.
3.0 pts Good Well developed post that addresses all aspects of the question; lacks full development of concepts.
1.0 pts Acceptable Posts with superficial thought and preparation; doesn’t address all aspects of the task.
0.0 pts Unacceptable No initial post.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuantity of Follow-up Postings

5.0 pts Excellent Responds to 2 or more peer postings in a timely manner.
3.0 pts Good Responds to 1 or 2 peer postings.
1.0 pts Acceptable Responds to 1 peer posting.
0.0 pts Unacceptable Does not reply to any peer postings.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent of Follow-up Postings

5.0 pts Excellent Demonstrates analysis of others’ posts; extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts.
3.0 pts Good Elaborates on an existing posting with further comment or observation.
1.0 pts Acceptable Posts shallow contribution to discussion (e.g., agrees or disagrees); does not enrich discussion.
0.0 pts Unacceptable Posts no follow-up responses to others.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDelivery of Post

5.0 pts Excellent Consistently uses grammatically correct posts with rare misspellings.
3.0 pts Good Few grammatical or spelling errors are noted in posts.
1.0 pts Acceptable Errors in spelling and grammar evidenced in several posts.
0.0 pts Unacceptable Utilizes poor spelling and grammar.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 25.0

Discussion Boards

ACU Application of George Floyd Case Lessons to Saudi Arabia Questions.

or the next two weeks, nearly all of our attention will be on the Portfolio Project. You must analyze the George Floyd case through all 4 CILOs in the course.Part 1: The Event and the ResultsAnalyze the event including before and after by examining the viewpoints of all people involved including the suspect George Floyd, the police officers, witnesses and the community, the police leadership, and government officials.1) What role or roles were the police officers performing? Did they follow the correct protocols? Refer to Chapter 5 of the textbook for background information on this. (CILOs 1.1, 3.1)2) Describe the approach or model of police performance used. Refer to Chapter 12 of the textbook for background information on this. (CILO 2.1)3) Describe the tensions between the stakeholders (CILO 3.1) and suggest a plan to improve the relations among them (CILO 3.2)4) How you would apply international best practice to this case in the USA? (CILO4.1)Part 2: Lessons for Saudi ArabiaNext, discuss policing in Saudi Arabia.1) How are police roles different here and why? (CILO 1.1)2) Is the same model of police behavior used here? (CILO 2.1)3) Discuss how lessons learned from this case apply to police work in Saudi Arabia. (CILO 4.2)4) Could models of police behavior used in Saudi be used in the USA to improve police work?How to Start:1) Collect source documents and make notes from them. You might want to share links to the sources with your colleagues in this discussion forum.2) Organize your ideas and use APA format when citing sources. (CILOs 1.2 &2.2)3) Compose your report in an appropriate style for your intended audience. You should plan to write between 800 and 2000 words for this assignment.please use simple english dont use advanced english no citation needed.doc file
ACU Application of George Floyd Case Lessons to Saudi Arabia Questions

Table of Contents Introduction Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5 Source 6 Summary References Introduction Hosting mega sporting events has become a matter of prestige for the countries despite their economic consequences. The standard rhetoric for hosting the Olympic Games is that it promotes investment opportunities, open the country to the world, and increase tourism. However, the long-term outcomes of mega sporting events arouse doubt in the postulates. The present paper aims at exploring the short- and long-term consequences of the 2004 Olympic Games in Greece by reviewing scholarly and newspaper articles published by authors of varying qualifications. The review demonstrates that the impact of the Olympics is controversial. Source 1 The article by Associated Press (2010) aims at answering the question of the 2004 Olympic Games in Greece were the reason for the country’s financial crisis. The authors review government publications and interview experts in the field to address the question. The author of the article is not mentioned; instead, a corporate author is stated. Associated Press is a reputable news agency that employs a wide variety of specialists and various fields. Even though the qualifications and skills of the author cannot be assessed, the reputation of the news agency adds to the credibility of the source. It is unclear if the Olympics had a considerable contribution to the economic crisis in Greece, and no empirical analysis was conducted. The authors of the article do not have an explicit reference list that could help to identify the reliability of other incorporated sources. However, the names of people and organizations mentioned in the article demonstrate that the authors reviewed a wide variety of sources and interviewed people representing competing views. The assumption employed by the authors is that the Olympics had a negative impact on the country’s economy. However, the extent of damage is open for discussion. The author uses methods with questionable validity since the qualitative approach to measuring economic impact seems inappropriate. The credibility of findings, however, is medium since the interviewees are experts in the field, but the data to confirm their opinions is limited. As predicted by the authors, the Olympics had a negative influence on the economy of Greece. However, since expenditures associated with the Olympics are only a small portion of the country’s debt, the event cannot be considered the sole reason for the country’s financial problems. Source 2 The article by Boukas et al. (2013) examines the impact of the Olympic Games on the built and human heritage and cultural tourism in Athens. The authors are affiliates of the Center for Sustainable Management of Tourism, Sport, and Events of the European University in Cyprus. The authors seem to have appropriate qualifications since they have published several scientific articles that were highly appreciated by peers. The authors do not explicitly identify the gap in the literature that led to the formulation of the research question. However, the evaluation of the impact of the 2004 Olympic Games was focused on economic issues, and little attention has been given to cultural heritage tourism and the potential for leverage in the post-Games period. The authors review 100 sources of varying credibility and publication dates, which is helpful for providing holistic information about the matter. However, a large number of sources is expected since the primary method utilized by the authors is a literature review. The authors utilize qualitative methods for answering the research question, which may have implications for credibility. However, the issue is addressed by employing three techniques, including literature review, empirical analysis, and semi-structured interviews. Even though there is no assessment of the validity of the methods, they seem to be appropriate for answering the research question. The authors expressed no predictions concerning the outcomes of the study. The research results show that the Olympics helped to transform the city from an overcrowded capital with significant cultural elements into a modernized European city. If used correctly, heritage can be used to improve the financial situation in the country by attracting more tourists. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Source 3 The article by Georgiakis and Nauright (2012) discusses how the economic state of Greece is used to promote the policies of the European Union. The article also explores how the financial implications of the 2004 Olympic Games serve as a cautionary for smaller economies, which want to bid on hosting mega sporting events. The authors are associates of the University of Sydney and George Mason University. They can discuss the specified issue since they have appropriate skills and qualifications. The authors do not specifically identify a gap in literature the authors are trying to address. However, it seems that the authors aim at summarizing and conceptualizing the findings from other sources. The authors use 13 reputable sources that were up-to-date when the article was published. However, the number of reviewed sources seems inadequate, considering that the utilized method is the literature review. The authors presuppose that the 2004 Olympics were the primary reason for the financial crisis in Greece. The assumption prevents the authors from showing the competing views on the problem making the article one-sided. The validity of the utilized method is high since the literature review seems appropriate for answering the research question. However, the credibility of the findings may suffer from the inadequate number of sources that were not justified anywhere in the paper. As predicted, the authors conclude that the Olympics had a considerable negative impact on the Greek economy since it marked the beginning of the period of irresponsible spending. The example of Greece can be used to warn other countries about the negative consequences of mega sporting events. Source 4 The article by Kasimati and Dawson (2009) explores the impact of the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens on the Greek economy. The authors utilize macroeconometric modelling to identify short- and long-term financial outcomes of the event. The authors are credible since they have appropriate qualifications and skills for discussing the issue. Evangelia Kasimati and Peter Dawson are associated with the Department of Economics and International Development of the University of Bath in the UK. Kasimati is also a member of the Hellenic Institute for Training and Research in Athens. The authors claim that the majority of research studying the economic effect of the Olympic Games in Athens was undertaken before the event based on input-output (I–O) and computable general equilibrium (CGE) frameworks. Even though the authors used 39 credible sources, the majority of them were out of date when the article was published. However, as mentioned by the authors, most of the relevant sources were published before the Olympics. Therefore, the publication dates of the sources do not diminish the credibility of the article. The authors assume that the studies conducted before the Olympics are biased since they were “promotional.” The validity of the research is high since the authors use appropriate methods that have been elaborated and tested by authorities in the sphere. The credibility of the study is also high since the predictions were very accurate when juxtaposed with actual economic data. The results of the research show that the long-term economic impact of the Olympic Games in Athens is modest, which is coherent with initial predictions. Source 5 The article by Sanburn (2012) aims at exploring Greek people’s opinions about the results of the 2004 Olympic Games. The author asks several people in the streets, university professors, and banking specialists to discuss the issue. The author of the article is a talented and experienced reporter and assistant editor. Even though he possesses sufficient writing skills, he does not seem to have the appropriate qualifications and skills to assess people’s opinions. We will write a custom Essay on The Effect of the 2004 Olympic Games in Greece on the Country’s Economy specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The author failed to identify a gap in the literature; therefore, the article does not address a unique issue. He does not use any outside sources and states figures without references. The traditional formal methods of studying the opinions of a population include questionnaires and structured interviews. The author did not employ any of the methods; therefore, both the credibility and validity of the article are questionable. The author made no predictions. He concludes that Greek people are not interested in the new Olympics since the 2004 Olympic Games left a scar on the Greek economy. Governments around the globe spend too much money on preparations for the Olympics. However, the economy of the countries suffers most of the time. Source 6 The article by Smith (2012) offers an overview of the effects the Olympics had on Athens and Greece using observations, random interviews, and expertise. The article touches upon the economic impact on the country, the condition of the facilities, and the usefulness of the Olympics’ heritage. The author is a professional reporter who has numerous publications concerning various issues. However, the credibility of the author is doubtful since she does not have adequate qualifications to address the matter. There is a considerable difference in expert opinions about the impact of the 2004 Olympics on the Greek economy and society. The author’s use of references is insufficient, and the sources are not clearly identified. The author seems to presuppose that the long-term impact of the Olympics on Greece is negative since he demonstrates only one side of the argument. The author uses low validity methods since the economic impact is measured utilizing quantitative methods, rather than qualitative. The credibility of the methods is also low since the interviews are not structured, and interviewees are not credible. The author does not make any explicit predictions. She concludes that the expenditures on the organization of the Olympics were inadequate, which led to significant negative implications for the Greek economy. Summary All the reviewed sources demonstrate that the overall economic impact of the 2004 Olympics on the Greek economy differed considerably from the initial predictions. For instance, Kasimati and Dawson (2009) state that short-term implications for the economy were positive since a lot of money was attracted to the country, the long-term consequences of the event were modest but still positive. At the same time, the majority of reviewed articles claim that the effect of the games was between negative and terrifying. Sanburn (2012) and Smith (2012) believe that inadequate spending during the Olympics was the primary reason for the economic state of Greece. Even though research by Georgiakis and Nauright confirm the matter, it is unclear if the Olympics is to blame for the increasing debt of the Greek economy. According to Associated Press (2010), the money spent on the Olympics is equivalent to one-quarter of the 2009 budget deficit. Therefore, making $11 billion spent over seven years responsible for the crisis is irrational. Critical analysis of the quality of the research demonstrates that even though the economic outcomes of the Olympics for Greece are controversial, the event is not the main driving force of the financial crisis. The Greek economy has not had a balanced budget for more than 40 years (Associated Press 2010); therefore, the Olympics cannot be the reason for the crisis. The GDP increase during the preparation years was 2.5 times higher than the preparation cost, and unemployment fell down by 1.3% (Kasimati

Create an FAQ about Jack the Ripper or Lizzie Borden

Create an FAQ about Jack the Ripper or Lizzie Borden. I need support with this Psychology question so I can learn better.

Conduct research on Jack the Ripper or Lizzie Borden, and then answer the following questions:

When were the murders committed?
How many victims?
What similarities did the victims have?
What differences did the victims have?
What evidence was collected at the crime scene?
What other evidence was found?
Who were the suspects and how were they chosen to be suspects?
What was law enforcement’s theory?
What kind of serial killer was he or she?
What, if any, were their signatures?
What were their motivations for killing?

After reviewing the details of the case, write a brief summary that explains who you think the killer was, and why. Length: 1-page FAQ and 1-page summary
References: a minimum of two resources Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic.
Create an FAQ about Jack the Ripper or Lizzie Borden

validitiy and reliability

order essay cheap validitiy and reliability. I’m trying to study for my Writing course and I need some help to understand this question.

“Whether discussing formal or informal assessments, the assessment process must have integrity across an assessment’s development, use, and analysis” (Howard, V. F., & Aiken, E., 2015, p. 93). Before beginning the discussion, make sure you have read section 3.4 of our textbook that discusses the importance of reliability and validity in assessment. Next, watch the following videos on test validity and reliability:

Introduction to test validity (Links to an external site.). To view a transcript of the video, please click HERE.
Reliability (Links to an external site.). To view a transcript of the video, please click HERE.

Then, address the following:

Summarize your understanding of reliability and validity, including how they are related.

Explain the importance of reliability and validity in assessment.

Analyze the following situation:

A center or school is looking for an assessment instrument to measure reading ability. The selection has been narrowed to two possibilities:

Test A shows measures of strong validity, but there is no information about its reliability.
Test B includes measures of strong reliability, but there is no information about its validity.

Which test would you recommend? Be sure to include a comprehensive rationale with three reasons that support why you chose the test you did.

validitiy and reliability

Why You Prefer Living in an Apartment? Essay

Some people think that apartments are easier to live in and more affordable. Others argue that houses are more suitable for large families. Both of these options are accessible in cities. I prefer living in an apartment, as I believe that it is cheaper compared to renting a house. Since I live alone, I do not need as much space as the house would provide. It is more appropriate for me to live in an apartment, as it offers the perfect balance between space, price, and flexibility. A person may change it if required without serious efforts. Apartments are cheaper than houses. Fees paid for such living are also smaller. The choice of an apartment would help to save money. For small families, this is the best fit in terms of money and comfort. Young couples may also rent apartments together, as they may have limited money, and an apartment becomes a great solution. Modern apartments can provide comfortable accommodations to families of 2 to 4 people, depending on the size of the apartment and the number of rooms. The price of apartments may vary from area to area, depending on the proximity of shops, schools, and other public spaces. Flexibility is a significant advantage of apartments. It is easier to change the place of living area if needed. For example, if a person needs to change his or her job and their area of interest is in a different location, choosing a different apartment closer to work may be an option. It would save time and money that would otherwise be spent on travels. In addition, an apartment does not require too much furniture. There is no need to buy many things to fulfill rooms. Such living allows remaining active and oriented. The disadvantage of an apartment is that some additional elements cannot be used. Personal pool and garden are not provided for apartment renters. This may be a disadvantage to those who prefer privacy when they swim. Nevertheless, a person can always walk in the nearby park or visit a gym. In addition, there is no need to clean the personal pool. Housework requires less time, as it often takes a whole day to clean up the entire house, especially when one lives alone. Living in an apartment offers the opportunity to select any gym or pool. In conclusion, living in an apartment is better than in a house. It is more affordable and ergonomic. A person spends less time on housework. He or she may visit any parks, pools, and so on. Those renting an apartment receive flexibility. They may move from one apartment to another quickly if needed. Thus, apartments are more preferable because of their price, size, and location.

persuasive speech about why women study computer science

persuasive speech about why women study computer science.

Speech #3: Persuasive speech- topic must be supported by facts- Student will deliver a speech to persuade using a specific method (to be discussed).The speaker will present an issue and persuade the audience to take a particular stance.The speaker has the “burden of proof” and must provide evidence and logical reasoning during the speech.A minimum of four source citations must be cited in the speech and in the reference section.Presentation time is 6-8 minutes.Speech will be worth 45 points (including outline).Speech can be “real time” in zoom session or pre-recorded and posted. check document attached below.
persuasive speech about why women study computer science