Factors that Influence Quality Safe Patient Centered Care PPT
Factors that Influence Quality Safe Patient Centered Care PPT.
Assignment ContentEvaluate factors that influence quality, safe, patient-centered care. Consider:TechnologyCommunicationCollaborationShared decision makingLaws, regulations, and policiesAnalyze changes in technology and their effect on quality patient care.Explain the roles of communication, collaboration, and shared decision making.Consider communication and collaboration between health care team members, between the patient and staff, and involving insurance companies.Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources within the last 5 years, in an APA-formatted reference slide.Format your assignment as a Please use slides for bulleted information and elaborate on the bullets in the speaker notes. Each slide should include at least 50 words within the speaker notes.
Factors that Influence Quality Safe Patient Centered Care PPT
Modernist Home Design after WW1
cheap assignment writing service Modernist Home Design after WW1. A machine for living: Modernist Home designs between the wars During the interwar period, Australian homes were greatly developing. This was demonstrated through the development of homes by architects such as Geoffrey Mewton, Arthur Baldwinson, Roy Grounds and many more. Architect Geoffrey Mewton was a well-known architect in Australian society and was one of the leading architects to progress the modern movement at the time. Mewton designed many infamous Australian designs like the single storey clinker brick house in Sandringham. Much similar to the Mewton, Arthur Baldwinson built two of Sydney’s first authentically modernist homes before 1939, which became significant in the development of modernist homes. Baldwinson was considered to be a central figure during the development of modernists homes in Australia not only for his practice but his role as an activist in different organisational groups. Roy Grounds was another well-known architect who was symbolic for his exploration of geometric shapes, the Henty House located in Frankston was circular, the Lyser House in Kew was an elevated triangle and the Roy Grounds House itself was square-shaped. It was after WW1, that allowed Australian society to make progress and gain more hope and confidence in the country. Australia was faced with a large economic crisis after WW1, it was between 1914 and 1920 were Australia’s domestic product declined drastically. This then led to the development of homes in Australia. Due to the large economic crisis happening at the time, houses were built as single storeys – this design was common during the period. Majority of the houses during the interwar period were built upon large blocks and were built away from the streets. Homes would usually be built from materials such as timber or brick, meaning low-income families had more access to home like this, especially during such a profitable period. The style of these houses strongly reflected upon the movement towards modernism in Australia as well as the economic state during the interwar period. Figure 1. Modernism during the interwar period as a movement can essentially be split into two concepts. One is the Art Deco style, whilst the other was a philosophical approach to design. Art Deco style was a movement in the decorative arts and architecture that came to be in the 1920s, it later becomes a more well-known style during the 1930s. Arthur Baldwinson, an architect who was well known for building two of Sydney’s first authentic modern homes before 1939, was featured in The 1939 Better Homes Exhibition. The exhibition explores the concept of homes using different materials and how they work in Australian society, it included plans and scaled models. Baldwinson designed a suburban house which demonstrated that modern style homes have been designed for materials such as timber, which is more affordable than materials like concrete or steel. This leads back to the idea of housing during the interwar period being designed and built for families with lower income. Presented behind the scaled model is a caption “well-designed houses are cheaper”, this again relates to the concept of timber wood and bricks being a more affordable material for building homes with. Figure 2. The Grounds House was an architectural significance during the mid 20th century, designed by Roy Grounds himself. Though being designed in 1952, the home itself was of much similar style to those homes during the interwar period. Shaped into a perfect square whilst including a nice rounded courtyard in the heart of the building, demonstrates the concept of geometrical design during this period. The Grounds House relates to houses built during the interwar period as it mimics the traditional style of a single storey home, built from affordable materials. The Grounds House was considered to be part of experimentation towards developing architecture in Australia. The use of geometrical shapes started to come into play, and architects were beginning to develop this idea more into their designs. Roy Grounds not only designed the Grounds House, but he also designed houses such as the Henty House which is located in Frankston and the Lyser House in Kew. Both these houses explored the ideation of geometrical shapes and were also symbolic of the movement of modernism in Australia. Figure 3. The development of homes in Australia was constantly changing, architects would explore with different materials and styles as time went on. A great example of the exploration of different materials can be The Glass House, designed by architect Hamlet Agabiti. The Glass House demonstrates the use of two significantly modern materials, glass bricks and bent glass. This house was the first Glass House to be designed in Australia and was playing an important part in the development of housing during the interwar period. The Glass House had been designed to be strictly functionally whilst maintaining limited decoration, this idea of homes being more functional than aesthetic was also something that played a major part in the development of modernist homes in Australia. Designers would create excitement and vibrancy in society by bringing in new materials for their designs. For example, the green tiles and Muntz brick walls featured in a low pitched roof house, the use of the vibrant and saturated colours reflected represented harmony and was of significance during the interwar period. Figure 4. Australian architects towards the end of the interwar period wanted to pursue the idea of efficiency and beauty of the design. Geoffrey Mewtons and Roy Grounds worked together and designed two modern houses in suburban Melbourne areas. The building located in Upper Beaconsfield was a great example of a low-line environmental house, whilst the seaside cottage was built from steel and asbestos cement, both very different from each other. It was by the mid-1930s that concrete starting to become a more popular material in designing homes and were going up against materials such as brick. The seaside cottage, also referred to as The Ship, was designed in early 1933, is made up of modern materials, it then grew to be a significant economical creation in its time. The design of the taut skin on The Ship is an excellent example of Australian designers being influenced by an international style. Figure 5. Concrete homes were beginning to become an experimental material during the mid-1930s, many houses were starting to incorporate this material instead of using timber and bricks. Leslie M. Perrott (1894-1975) was a well-known designer, specialising in concrete housing since the end of WW1. Perrott was strongly influenced by designs from America and Europe, in which he incorporated similar techniques into houses he had designed in Australia. Perrott designed a concrete residence location in East Camberwell, which became a significant building due to its thick reinforced concrete. The modern materials in Australia between 1919-1939 were considered to be glass, steel and reinforced concrete. The use of these materials, whether it be used on its own or even combined allows Australian designers and architectures to modernise homes even further. The concept of modernization had greatly developed over time, and in today’s society, it is clear to see how far we have come through the development of our homes. Materials like veneered wood, mineral alloys, artificial stone, asbestos and many more, are examples of how the materials that architects and designers have used have developed drastically overtime. Figure 6. Living in the 21st century allows us to look back on the immense development of modernist homes and see how far we have come as a society. Society has played a major role in helping the growth and development of all these designs and it has been demonstrated through many architects and designers. The interwar period allowed Australian society to further explore different materials and techniques whilst still modernising its designs and architecture. At the beginning of the economic crisis, Australia began with using affordable and fundamental materials to go onto exploring with more complex and powerful materials. Single storey houses, much like the Grounds House have helped the development and lead to significant homes that are not only more functional but much more aesthetic, such as the Glass House or even The Ship. Bibliography Birrell, J. (1964) Walter Burley Griffin, St. Lucia: Queensland University Press. 720.924 GRI-B Ch.9 Birrell J. ‘Birth of the Modern Australian Home’ pp.125-156 I chapter https://commons.swinburne.edu.au/file/f7569505-98b7-43d1-8fe0-70eac06e3dc9/1/WalterBurleyGriffin_pp125-156.pdf Cuffley, P. (2007) Australian Houses of the 20s and 30s. Rev.ed. Rowville, Vic: Five Mile Press. 728.370994 CUF-A Ch. 3 ‘Magazines and Fashion’ pp.38-47 10p https://commons.swinburne.edu.au/file/9f30408a-793b-4d94-99bb-bfdbf35f4df9/1/9781741783902_pp38-47.pdf Ch.8 ‘Modernism and Materials’ pp.132-147 16p https://commons.swinburne.edu.au/file/0620d1b8-b193-4dbb-a283-70f2e6ef5ade/1/9781741783902_pp132-147.pdf Turnbull, J.Modernist Home Design after WW1
Significance Of Language In Animal Farm Philosophy Essay
The end of World War II, the detonation of the atomic bomb, and the start of the Cold War, all took place during 1945. However, what also took place that year was the publishing of George Orwell’s, Animal Farm. Through the use of animals, the novel mocks certain human traits and characteristics. It depicts man’s greed and selfishness as part of human nature and how innocent bystanders are swept under and destroyed by these selfish, heartless people. Orwell’s transformation of the pigs into humans shocks the reader who eventually realizes the tremendous similarities that humans have with the pigs in the novel. A recurring theme in this novel is how language can be manipulated as an instrument of control. From the inspiring song, “Beasts of England” to the commandments and the changing of them by Napoleon, the main source of power throughout the novel is language and the use of rhetoric. Without the correct use of language and the power of words in Animal Farm, the rebellion never would have taken place and certainly the end result of Napoleon’s complete takeover would never have happened. Through Napoleon’s manipulative characteristics, the gullibility of the animals of the farm and the impressive rhetorical and propaganda skills of Squealer, reality is shaped by words. In the beginning of the novel, Napoleon shows no concern in what the animals do and leaves most of the leadership work and inspirational speeches to Snowball. Napoleon is described as, “â€¦not much of a talker, but with a reputation for getting his own way,” (Orwell, 25). This foreshadows Napoleon’s future behaviour because later on in the novel, he takes on more of a Stalin-like role in the farm. Unable to effectively speak in public, he uses Squealer to talk to the animals of the farm and get them under control. However, being unable to speak effectively in public doesn’t hold him back from taking control. To maintain power, he uses many different types of propaganda techniques, one of which being, using Snowball as scapegoat. Napoleon blames the farm’s failures on Snowball who is no where to be found so he cannot deny or confirm any truth of what is said. For instance, when Boxer questions the loyalty of Snowball, Napoleon tells Squealer to announce that “Snowball was Jones’s agent from the very beginning”. (Orwell, chpt.6) Boxer, being the loyal and gullible animal he is, admits that “if Comrade Napoleon says it, it must be right.” (Orwell, chpt.6) Not only does Napoleon use Snowball as scapegoat, so that he can secure his position, he alters the seven commandments to legitimize what he does (drink alcohol, sleep in beds, deal with humans). At this point in the history of the farm, the pigs do not quite have enough power to do what they like and Squealer is forced to change the Commandments to fit new circumstances. Meaning, the pigs haven’t yet fully gained the trust of the animals of the farm and therefore need to alter the commandments secretively. The first alteration to the Commandments comes after the pigs move back into the farmhouse. As the pigs slowly adapted to the ways of humans, they started sleeping on beds. The ban on sleeping in beds was changed in Napoleon’s favour by the addition of the words ‘with sheets’. When Clover questions the sleeping in beds of the pigs, she finds that the fourth commandment says, “‘No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.” (Orwell, chpt.5) Clover doesn’t quite remember the ‘with sheets’ being there and eventually concludes that “it must have been there,” (Orwell, chpt.5) Due to Clover’s faulty memory she wasn’t able to recognize this alteration. From drinking alcohol to murder, and everything in between, Napoleon abused the seven commandments of Animalism and was never rebelled against, not once. This was due to all the animals of the farm being very gullible, to such an extent, that they didn’t realize what was really going on. The gullibility of the animals played an important role in taking Napoleon to the top. He relies on the gullibility of the strongest animals, like Boxer the horse, and the apathy of the wisest, like Benjamin the donkey. When anyone questions Napoleon’s version of history, he has a herd of sheep chant loudly over their protests. In Chapter nine, we read of the tragic death of Boxer, the veteran of the “Battle of the Cowshed” and the “Battle of the Windmill.” Boxer’s motto had always been “I will work harder,” (Orwell, chpt.3) and it is precisely this over exertion in rebuilding the windmill which finally causes his death. One day he collapses and is taken away to the slaughterhouse where his body parts are commercially exploited. When the animals question this tragic death, they are yet again fooled by Squealer. “The animals were relieved to hear [that, he had received] admirable care [and] expensive medicine for which Napoleon had paid without a thought as to the cost, ,” (Orwell, chpt.8).They are told that Boxer was given the best of the best treatment, however, couldn’t survive. The animals, being gullible, calmly agree with him and are told to work even harder since Boxer is not there to help anymore. In chapter 5, when the pigs were found sleeping in beds, Clover thought that there was surely a definite rule against sleeping in beds. “Muriel,” she said, “read me the Fourth Commandment. Does it not say something about never sleeping in a bed?” (Orwell, chpt.5) However, Squealer came along to explain that “a bed is merely a place to sleep in. A pile of straw in a stall is a bed, properly regarded. The rule was against sheets, which are a human invention. We have removed the sheets from the farâ€¦” (Orwell, chpt.5) Clover eventually agreed as she could not remember and because Squealer was thought as a friend, she accepted what he said and didn’t argue any further. “All that year the animals worked like slaves.” (Orwell, 63) The animals thought that by obeying the pigs, they were preventing the farm from disbanding. Orwell is quite literally suggesting that even if a smart person or leader says something, it cannot be assumed to be true, as demonstrated by politicians. Propaganda only succeeds if people are gullible. Squealer, described as quite the tricky pig, takes advantage of the other animals’ ignorance and exploits it to an unimaginable level. Squealer has all the characteristics of a successful orator; he is charismatic, intelligent, emotional, persuasive, and even hypnotic. Above all, through the use of correct words and rhetoric, he is able to manipulate language in order to gain the confidence of the animals of the farm. Squealer, being the most powerful weapon which Napoleon possesses, uses his extraordinary skills to bring Napoleon to such a height of success. Squealer constantly puts particular spins on events and conditions and he uses slogans and such to help control the other animals. For instance, when the animals question the pigs getting all the apples and milk, he replies, You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of us actually dislike milk and apples. I dislike them myself. Our sole object in taking these things is to preserve our health. Milk and apples (this has been proved by Science, comrades) contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig. We pigs are brainworkers. The whole management and organization of this farm depend on us. Day and night we are watching over your welfare. It is for your sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples (Orwell, chpt.3). Squealer often uses comrades to give the animals a title, a position, which really makes them feel important, useful and in place. However, when it comes to them questioning the actions of the pigs, Squealer often threatens the animals that Mr. Jones will come back, “Surely, comrades, surely there is no one among you who wants to see Jones come back?” (Orwell, chpt.3) It continues to say how the animals certainly do not want Mr. Jones back. “The importance of keeping the pigs in good health was all too obvious” (Orwell, chpt.3) This comes to show how Squealer has the animals so deeply convinced, that they don’t know what is actually happening. Also, Squealer often uses certain slogans that drum ideas into their head, rather than having them think about anything. Slogans such as, “Tactics, comrades, tactics” (Orwell, chpt.5) are used to get the interest of the animals and have them thinking about what they are doing wrong. This displays Squealer’s ability to use certain words and slogans to not only convince the animals, but have them happily agree with him. Although Squealer is a porker pig, he plays almost the main character in the novel. Without Squealer’s ability to persuade, Napoleon was to get nowhere. By giving Squealer such a role, Orwell is suggesting that one doesn’t have to look intelligent to be intelligent, but, in fact, must know how to use their intelligence correctly, for good or for bad. The main source of power was from the correct use of rhetoric and language. Through Napoleon’s manipulative characteristics, the gullibility of the animals of the farm and the impressive rhetorical and propaganda skills of Squealer, reality was shaped by words. Animal farm discreetly gives out warning signs on life and what to expect of people. Using animals on a farm, Orwell tells about an unstable fight for power. Hidden warnings found in the book depend on the reader. Orwell mainly pushes the points of education as a necessity of life, there is no peace when striving for power, and words have a very large impact on the minds of others. Many things in life can be used as a warning but it is unfortunate that the warnings aren’t usually noticed until it is too late. None of the animals knew how much education meant, or how much the greed for power had taken over, or even that they were being lied to through the words of those very convincing pigs. By demonstrating how easily swayed the animals of the farm are by a powerful speech or strong words, Orwell is demonstrating the human vulnerability to carefully chosen words and our unfortunate ability to fall victim to the power of words without understanding the deeper meanings behind them. Work Cited Orwell, George. Animal Farm. New York: Harcourt, Brace
BUS 443 AU Quality Management for Organizational Excellence Essay
BUS 443 AU Quality Management for Organizational Excellence Essay.
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the webpage Total Quality Management and Six Sigma (Links to an external site.), and watch the accompanying video on the webpage.For this assignment, you will address the following bullet points based on the webpage above.In your paper,Define total quality management (TQM).Break down the acronym TQM, and explain each of its three components and how the TQM process works.Explain each of the eight basic principles in the TQM Process.Outline the benefits of TQM.Select one standard TQM tool, in addition to the control chart, from the webpage, and explain the purpose and benefits of both the chart and the tool.Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text. The course text is belowEvans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (2020). Managing for quality and performance excellence (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
BUS 443 AU Quality Management for Organizational Excellence Essay
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service