Get help from the best in academic writing.

Concordia University St Paul Computer Science Security Paper

Concordia University St Paul Computer Science Security Paper.

A completely secure environment is an unusable environment for the users. How can security work in an atmosphere that mandates usability over safeguards? Why is it important to use publicly known algorithms instead of proprietary algorithms that are unknown? Review some common websites to find areas that should use HTTPS instead of HTTP. Document why they should be encrypted and not transmitted in plain text. Define your values as they relate to cryptography. Is the use of cryptography always ethical?When would the use of cryptography not be ethical?Research and answer these questions in your own words (in other words don’t copy and don’t spin it).
Concordia University St Paul Computer Science Security Paper

St Cloud State University Innovation in The Mexican Healthcare Industry Case Study.

Hi, please read it carefully and i will upload the case in attachment.CASE WRITE-UPSThe case study is a fundamental learning method as the business discipline is by nature an applied science. First, you skim a case for the basic facts: What company? Who are the principal actors? What are the key events? Then, go back and reread the case carefully with a focus on defining the challenge(s)/problem(s) to be addressed.In general, there are no “right” or “wrong” answers for a specific case – different approaches and insights are possible, depending on your perspective and approach. However, application of knowledge and analytical models we cover in this course is an essential part of the case analysis. Regardless of your approach, I will expect you to draw logical conclusions and (if appropriate) make recommendations that: (a) address the identified issues; (b) follow logically from your analysis and conclusions; and (c) make sense (are feasible) in the context of the case situation.In short, case analysis assignments are designed to evaluate and develop your skills in:Identifying key issues (decisions or actions required in a given situation; description of the challenge(s) to be addressed)Analyzing business situations (choosing appropriate analytical tools/frameworks from those introduced in the course; understanding the organizational and environmental contexts, identifying and analyzing opportunities and threats, and competitive advantages and disadvantages; and evaluating options)Recommending specific strategies and actions (to address the identified strategic issues).The length of each case analysis report should be approximately 3 to 4 pages, double spaced, including figures, tables, and references. In your case write-up, choose and answer at least 2 Case Discussion Questions provided with the case in the textbook. Make sure that the report is divided into sections in a logical manner.*Note* please do not copy from any website and make it in your words
St Cloud State University Innovation in The Mexican Healthcare Industry Case Study

Growth In The Sector Of Social Networking Media Essay

Social networking can be described as the art of keeping in touch with friends and relatives through social Media. Social networking came to be with the introduction of Facebook amongst other social sites. For years now, there has been tremendous growth in the sector of social networking. Like we all know, any changes in the course of our lives will affect us in different ways. The effects of social networking are important to me personally as it will help me understand it in a broad perspective. I will be able to fully research on the possible future effects that come with the development of social networking. I will also be able to expound more on what the other research have explored on the effects of social networking. As much as I will contribute to the study of the effects of social networking, I will also gain from it by learning on what others had to say. The study will also help others in knowing what they are getting into when they register onto social network sites. What are the positives they stand to gain and what are the negatives to be on the look out for? How well can they be able to control their use of social networking in order to benefit fully from them? Should they embrace the wave of social networking fully or take precaution measures? These are some of the questions that the study will help answer to the readers of this report. The study will mostly target individuals who use social networking sites on daily basis. The individuals will be grouped in accordance to age and current occupation. It will also take into consideration individuals who are still in school. The study will be conducted within a period of one month so as to fully establish the effects of social networking. The time duration is ideal because it is neither too short nor too long. It is suitable for effective results that are up-to-date. Through the study, I hope to establish if there are more positive than negative effects of social networking. How we can all benefit from social networking simply because it is what everyone including companies are doing. I hope to find if we can entirely do away with social networking and how it will affect us should we take that path. The main sections of this paper are the literature review, the findings of the study, the conclusion and the recommendations for the study. 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW In this chapter, the effects of social networking are analyzed in depth. It will focus mainly on three variables that are mostly affected by social networking i.e. professionalism, social life and education. This paper only focuses on the three as these are the key area of the study. Social networking services can be described as online services that are only established to bring people closer together in terms of creating relations and sharing a common interest (Woessner, 2011). Social networking began to grow with the advance revelation of computers and easy access to the internet (Jue, Marr

Nutrition and The Bioavailability Exercise

custom essay Nutrition and The Bioavailability Exercise.

I’m working on a science exercise and need an explanation to help me understand better.

We would like to emphasize individualized nutrition and the bioavailability of foods this term. See attached videos. 1-Consume a “control” breakfast. This might be fasted, a normal breakfast that you intend to change or supplement, hydration only, energy drink or other ergonomic aid such as coffee only.2-Bring the packaging or specs for any ergonomic aid or “special” water that you ingested, if you chose to consume something.3-Choose 2 different exercises that you normally do. These can be endurance or resistance oriented, just pick something that you will do at the same time each week. Keep track of sets, reps, weight, distance, time whatever you want to look at.4-Log your results for the day and report them on this assignment. 5-Why did you choose this condition?
Nutrition and The Bioavailability Exercise

Rhode Island College Crystalloid IV Fluid Nursing Quiz Questions

Rhode Island College Crystalloid IV Fluid Nursing Quiz Questions.

Review crystalloids (3 types) and colloids of IV fluid solutions and describe what they are in your own words. Include examples of IV fluids for each type. Identify causes of acid-base imbalances such as medications, conditions, or procedures. Provide an example for each, Metabolic Acidosis, Metabolic Alkalosis, Respiratory Acidosis, and Respiratory Alkalosis. Identify the difference between DKA and HHS. Signs and symptoms, causes, and treatment plans.Identify the difference between Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Signs and symptoms, causes, and treatment plans.Identify the causes of cirrhosis of the liver, signs and symptoms, and treatment plans.Make sure you answer each question with a well thought out response that provides examples and substance. One sentence is not enough, and your answer should consist of a minimum of 50 words
Rhode Island College Crystalloid IV Fluid Nursing Quiz Questions

NR 505 Chamberlain University Prevention of Infections Discussion

NR 505 Chamberlain University Prevention of Infections Discussion.

Over the course of the next eight weeks, we will be examining concepts related to nursing research and the translation of evidence to practice. To help you better understand the process, you will be identifying a practice issue for nurse practitioners. You will develop a PICOT question associated with the issue, find evidence to support a change in practice, and present your recommendations for change to your peers. This week, we will work on helping you refine your area of interest so that you will be able to develop a concise question for next week’s assignment. You are encouraged to use the area of interest you chose for the project in NR500NP and/or NR501NP; however, you may choose a different area if you wish.Select an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which you would like to see a practice change occur. Conduct a review of literature to see what is currently known about the topic. In 1-2 paragraphs, describe the scope and relevance of the issue and your recommended change. Provide reference support from at least two outside scholarly sources to support your ideas. References no older than 5 years.NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Course Knowledge _5946 Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week. view longer descriptionAnswers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 15.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding. blank Edit ratingDelete rating 14.0 to >12.0 pts Very Good Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding _6391 Edit ratingDelete rating 12.0 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding. _9772 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question with little depth and lack of application of experiences, knowledge, or understanding. _254 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not address the initial question(s). blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 15.0 pts — Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty _9902 The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue. view longer descriptionThe student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 10.0 to >9.0 pts Excellent Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. _2051 Edit ratingDelete rating 9.0 to >8.0 pts Very Good Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. _1790 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Responds to a student peer and/or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion. _2272 Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Responds to a student peer or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion. _5659 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No response post to another student or course faculty. _5169 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10.0 pts Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Evidence _3605 Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years. view longer descriptionAssigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:<br/> 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 15.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lessons AND • at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.* _8035 Edit ratingDelete rating 14.0 to >12.0 pts Very Good Integrates evidence from: • no assigned readings OR online lesson is included • at least one outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.* _1235 Edit ratingDelete rating 12.0 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.* _6547 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are not credited.* _3229 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not integrate any evidence. _231 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 15.0 pts — Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Communication _4427 view longer description Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >4.0 pts Excellent Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (0–1 error in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _8976 Edit ratingDelete rating 4.0 to >3.0 pts Very Good Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (2–3 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _7976 Edit ratingDelete rating 3.0 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (3–4 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _1214 Edit ratingDelete rating 2.0 to >0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (5-6 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _6128 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the post (7 or more errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). _5325 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5.0 pts — Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation _2725 view longer description Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >4.0 pts Excellent References have complete information as required by APA (0-1 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _4930 Edit ratingDelete rating 4.0 to >3.0 pts Very Good References have most information as required by APA (2 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _579 Edit ratingDelete rating 3.0 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory References have some information as required by APA (3 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _5548 Edit ratingDelete rating 2.0 to >0.0 pts Unsatisfactory References have some information as required by APA (4 errors). In-text citations included for all references AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _8749 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory References missing 5 or more elements AND/OR In-text citations missing OR final references not included for in-text citations. _8728 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5.0 pts —
NR 505 Chamberlain University Prevention of Infections Discussion

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: