Get help from the best in academic writing.

Complete the requirements below in one Word document.Step 1: Compose Project 1 for Instructor and Peer FeedbackComplete a feedback

Complete the requirements below in one Word document.Step 1: Compose Project 1 for Instructor and Peer FeedbackComplete a feedback draft of your rhetorical analysis for Project 1.Step 2: Evaluate Your Own Project 1 Feedback DraftAfter you complete your draft, write a list of concerns and questions you have about your rhetorical analysis feedback draft, tied specifically to the Project 1 description and accompanying learning outcomes.This assessment will help your readers direct their feedback and engage the concerns you identify. It can also help you set goals for how you will further develop this project.Step 3: Submit Draft for FeedbackAfter you complete a full draft, submit your work for instructor feedback. Then, navigate to the next page to learn about how to participate in peer review. RequirementsA one-paragraph self-assessmentA full draft of Project 1, including:Genre: Rhetorical analysis essay designed to be read and experienced onlineSubject: A social media account for a person with a public identity in your communityAudience: External readers who might encounter your analysis in an online ‘zine (such as Harlot (Links to an external site.)) devoted to rhetorical analysis of and commentary on popular culture and digital identitiesTitle: Something creative and fun, but also something relevant and on-topicLength: 750-1250 wordsMultimodality: Include at least four visuals, audio files, and/or screen captures that add value to your rhetorical analysisFormat: Either PDF or Microsoft Word-compatibleSubmit your assignment to Canvas by clicking Start Assignment and then uploading the correct file.
What Does Home Mean to You Essay.

Goal: You will have to develop a full-length expository essay that is no less than 5 paragraphs. This essay should contain an introduction, three body paragraphs and a conclusion as a response to the following: “What does home mean to you?”Role: You are an activist who supports the rights of the displace immigrants.Audience: Asylum Seekers Bureau in Berlin (BAMF) Committee. Situation:Recently, many asylum seekers’ appeals are rejected due to a variety of reasons. As a human rights’ activist, you are required to present a portfolio to the (BAMF) committee in which you will have to elaborate on the plight of those displace people who lost their homes in their own original countries due to the turmoil of warfare taking place there and that they cannot find any shelter anywhere elsebut in the guest country they are in right now. This guest country is becoming ‘home’ to them. Product: A well-developedexpository essay. Standards and Criteria for Success:The provided rubric.Other requirements:Word count: 700 words.Font size and margin: 12 TimesNewRoman. Double margin. Transitional words and phrases: 5-7 of them. Error Tolerance:3 errors in grammar, ideas and punctuation marks.
What Does Home Mean to You Essay

The true societal cost of medical assistance in dying (MAD) may be the degradation of the value of the lives of our most vulnerable. Medically assisted dying is very controversial and has been debated over all around the world for years. In an environment of ever-rising medical costs, the question that comes to mind is whether legislation permitting medical assisted death was put in place to offset the high cost of treatment in keeping someone alive. MAD is morally and ethically wrong while pain can successfully be treated, and a cure could potentially be found. Secondly, it’s wrong because assisted suicide engages society in killing one of its own members, rather than being a private matter. Finally, MAD is wrong because vulnerable people who are living with chronic pain or terminal illness may feel societal pressure to accept that their lives are not valuable. Fundamentally, I believe that assisted death is ethically and morally wrong on many levels and should not be allowed in our society. The topic of medically assisted dying is very relevant because on February 6, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada put an end to the prohibition of MAD in a unanimous decision. On June 17, 2016, Bill C-14 formally legalized assisted dying by amending the Criminal Code of Canada. The physician or nurse practitioner can either directly administer the injection to cause death or the eligible person can be prescribed the deadly medication that they can take themselves (Government of Canada). Some people believe it is a virtuous way to put terminally ill patients out of their pain and misery in a humane and dignified way. Others believe it’s ethically and morally wrong. There is a great deal of rhetoric around the right of the individual to choose a dignified death, which appears on its face to be a noble thing for an advanced society to permit. However, I believe medically assisted death is wrong because there is too much at stake in letting that choice be prescribed as a universal right, especially where not so altruistic factors can influence the reason underlying such decisions. MAD is wrong because pain can almost always be alleviated and in the meantime, a cure may be found. Many patients requesting MAD cite uncontrollable pain as a reason. However, incorporating optimal palliative services to the care of a person who is experiencing intolerable pain, facing an incurable illness would help to make a person’s suffering more tolerable. Pain relief is almost always possible with the advancement of analgesic options. With more palliative care available, perhaps fewer patients would be driven to seek assistance to end their life. A publication of the Linacare Quarterly states, “since pain can be alleviated, there is no basis to assert a need for physician assisted suicide (PAS) because of intractable pain. This may explain in part why many requests for PAS are no longer related to or initiated because of intolerable pain, but because of fear of such intolerable pain (Ely, Mitchell, Sulmasy, Travaline).” Surely a request for assisted death should not and must not be granted on the basis of the ‘fear’ of pain. We attribute permitting assisted death in cases where there is no cure, and therefore no hope for the chronically or terminally ill person to have a meaningful life. The law in Canada under Bill C-14, requires the person to make the decision while he or she has capacity to do so (Parliament of Canada), which in the case of certain types of illnesses such as Alzheimer’s, may mean making a decision too early and potentially prior to a medical intervention becoming available. Technological advances over the last 100 years, continues at a near vertical trajectory as compared to the prior history of mankind (Fogel). MAD should not be permitted because of anticipated pain or because there is no cure at the present time because pain can be managed, and while a person is made comfortable a cure could potentially be found. Secondly, MAD is immoral because it is no longer a private matter and engages society in killing one of its own members. It is made to appear that assisted suicide is a personal decision of the individual requesting the right to die with dignity, however that is a simplistic notion and involves various members of society. We place our trust in physicians to heal us and make us more comfortable, and then our laws (through Bill C-14) ask any two doctors or a nurse practitioner to make a legal determination that there is nothing more that can be done for a person who is seeking assistance with death (Parliament of Canada). The prescribing doctor or nurse practitioner has to then interact with the pharmacist, who is required to dispense the drug, irrespective of his or her own moral or ethical views. Family and friends may also be involved in witnessing or actually participating in the act. This has the potential to psychologically traumatize anyone involved. Although there may be rare cases that may justify assisted suicide, these should be decided on a case by case basis, rather than legislating medical professionals to make this decision. This highlights a conflict in the medical profession between their duty to save lives versus being given the responsibility to end lives. According to a structured in-depth telephone survey of U.S. oncologists who reported participating in physician-assisted suicide, “nearly a quarter of the physicians regretted their actions. Another 16 percent reported that the emotional burden of participating in assisted suicide adversely affected their medical practice (Pies).” Apart from the potential psychological impact on such health care professionals as well as on family and friends, the danger is that the doctors, who are usually perceived as the purveyors of hope, instead become agents of death, which can undermine their integrity. By legislating the right to medically assisted death, we are making the decision a public event, involving and negatively affecting many members of society, which is ethically wrong to ask of its members. Finally, we come to the most important reason why the practice of medically assisted death should be stopped. MAD is ethically wrong because vulnerable people who are living with extreme, chronic pain or terminally ill patients may feel increasing societal pressure to accept that their lives are not valuable and puts them at risk of being coerced into the decision to end their life. Human dignity is intrinsically tied to the value of a person, which is infinite, no matter how ill that person might be. Typically those impacted by painfully chronic and terminal illnesses are usually the elderly, disabled or mentally ill. The person who is already marginalized is under psychological pressure including depression, hopelessness and despair to make a decision that is not in their own self-interest (Anderson). The patient has to bear the burden of deciding whether their life is worth living, whereas society should be saying ‘all lives matter’. The terminally ill person may feel that they have become a burden to society and are therefore, of less value than a healthy, productive person. The Oregon Health Authority, in a State where assisted suicide has been legalized for some time, notes that 40 percent of those who were assisted with suicide cited being a burden on family or friends and caregivers as their motivation to end their lives (Oregon Public Health Division). Additionally, physicians who are asked to decide whether a person is a candidate for assisted death would likely be inclined to approve the suicide instead of expending medical resources (Finnis, 265). Eventually, as our society ages, the increasing cost of medical care for chronic illnesses will mean the more cost-effective option will be pushed on the person rather than going through a cycle of hospitalization. The resulting impact to society will be that our most susceptible population may be pressured into making a decision to end their life because they feel they have no value, during a period of despair. The ability for the dying person to have autonomy and be able to decide when and how they die in order to stop their suffering is one of the most important arguments put forward in support of assisted death. People in support of this argument maintain that when death is inevitable, the chronically or terminally ill person should be able to choose how and when they would end their life with dignity. They believe assisted suicide would give a person some sense of control in an otherwise out of control situation (Wiebe). This position argues that it is better to articulate your health care wishes, including when to die, rather than leave it to the whim of your caregivers. While this is a sympathetic argument, as who would not want to control their destiny if they had the opportunity, it is a far too simplistic approach. A blog written by Dying with Dignity Canada in favour of MAD stated “many of us think about dying in a vague way, hoping it will happen at home after a brief illness, without pain, surrounded by loving friends and family. In fact, most Canadians don’t die that way. Too many of us die in hospital, tethered to machines, tagged to receive CPR even if we don’t want it” (Dying with Dignity Canada). This statement is emotional and untrue. A person has the right to provide their health care wishes to a family or friend under a Power of Attorney over Personal Care that may provide instructions to their doctor and health care providers to ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ so that no mechanical interventions are provided to prolong life. What is being advocated here is a step beyond because it changes the health care dynamic from ‘don’t touch me to save me’ to ‘end my life, because I want you to’. Although I can empathize with one’s wishes for autonomy and control, this should not justify purposely ending someone’s life. The right to decide when and how to die is a complex issue, and one where the courts may be better equipped to deal with on a one off basis, rather than through legislation. Many believe that the dying person should have autonomy and be able to decide when and how they will die with dignity. I disagree because as a society, we need to evolve to a point where we protect all of our most vulnerable. Society owes both a duty to protect life as well as a duty not to destroy or injure a person. The legislation of MAD is fundamentally wrong. It is unacceptable because pain can be alleviated and a cure could potentially be on the horizon. Secondly, MAD is immoral because it engages society in killing one of its own members, rather than being a solely private act. Most importantly, it should not be allowed because the most vulnerable may feel societal pressure to accept that their lives are not valuable and puts them at risk of being pressured to end their lives. We can’t let the high medical costs dictate whether we let someone take their own life to spare the financial burden on their families or society as a whole. In order to be a culture where true dignity and equality prevail, we need to concentrate on caring for those vulnerable persons who suffer, rather than legislating the right to die, where too many non-altruistic factors can influence such a critical decision. Works Cited: Anderson, Ryan. “Always Care, Never Kill: How Physician-Assisted Suicide Endangers the Weak, Corrupts Medicine, Compromises the Family, and Violates Human Dignity and Equality.” The Heritage Foundation. March 24, 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/report/always-care-never-kill-how-physician-assisted-suicide-endangers-the-weak Dying With Dignity Canada. “End of Life Planning Canada’s Patient Rights Booklet breaks down the end-of-life rights and options that exist for Canadians.” Patient Rights Booklet. Accessed on December 2, 2018, Retrieved from: www.dyingwithdignity.ca/patient_rights_booklet  Ely, Wesley., Mitchell, Louise., Sulmasy, Daniel., Travaline, John. “Non- faith-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.” The Linacare Quarterly. August 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102187/ Finnis, John. Human Rights and Common Good: Collected Essays Vol 3, Oxford University Press, May 7, 2011. Fogel, Robert. “Catching up with the Economy.” The American Economic Review. March 1999. Retrieved from: https://www.die-gdi.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Messner_WS_2016/Fogel_Catching_up_with_the_economy.pdf Government of Canada. “Medical Assistance in Dying.” Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. October 26, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/medical-assistance-dying.html Oregon Public Health Division. “Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act – 2014.” Retrieved from: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PROVIDERPARTNERRESOURCES/EVALUATIONRESEARCH/DEATHWITHDIGNITYACT/Documents/year17.pdf  Parliament of Canada. “Bill C-14.” Statutes of Canada 2016. June 17, 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/C-14/royal-assent  Pies, Ronald. “How does assisting with suicide affect physicians?” The Conversation. January 7, 2018. Retrieved from: http://theconversation.com/how-does-assisting-with-suicide-affect-physicians-87570  Wiebe, Ellen. “Canada’s example of assisted dying refutes those who argue against it.” The Economist. August 27, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/08/27/canadas-example-of-assisted-dying-refutes-those-who-argue-against-it

Need marketing help with a Homework question about price elasticity of demand

Need marketing help with a Homework question about price elasticity of demand.

John, the new marketing manager of Doc’s Cola recently
decided to increase the bottle of soda by 5 cents. He needs to calculate the
correct formula for the calculation of price elasticity of demand. Which
calculation below is the correct formula for price elasticity?
E = percent change in price/percent change in demand
E = percent change in demand/percent change in price
E = percent change in demand/percent change in supply
E = percent change in supply/percent change in demand
Need marketing help with a Homework question about price elasticity of demand

Philosophy Critical Issues in Today’s Society Essay

best assignment help Philosophy is an important discipline that promotes creativity, critical and creative thinking, innovation, as well as independence of thought and action. Examples of critical issues in today’s society include religious and cultural intolerance, discrimination, racism, and gender inequality. It would be appropriate to include activities that try to solve these problems in the schedule of a philosophy day event. The aforementioned issues can be addressed through open debates and dialogues among different cultures, races, religions, and genders. Excellent activities for a philosophy day event include debates and dialogues among people from different cultures and races, lectures about the connection between philosophy and culture, philosophical debates and discussions on self-reliance and individualism, and lectures on the significance of philosophy in today’s society. Philosophical dialogues between people from different cultures, religions and races would aim to create a more harmonious society. For instance, a discussion on Kant’s philosophy of religion would help to eradicate religious intolerance. A lecture on philosophy of culture would increase understanding and appreciation of different cultures. An open discussion among young people about the need for independence of thought and action is also an appropriate activity. Drug use, conformity, and peer pressure are common challenges that young people face in today’s society. The discussion would help them to develop independence of thought and action in order to counter antisocial behaviors that emanate from peer pressure and conformity. A lecture on self-reliance would teach people, especially the young, about the importance of being self-reliant as a way of avoiding peer pressure.

Analysis of Mental Rotation Study

Analysis of Mental Rotation Study. Cheang Yin Yan Introduction Q1.What is mental rotation? ANS: This is the ability of people to have mental representation and manipulation of three-dimensional physical object, on two-dimensional plane. Shepard and Metzler (1971) demonstrate that people can mentally represent two physical objects on two-dimensional plane as three-dimensional and rotate analogously either one object to match the orientation of the other. Q2. What did Shepard and Metzler (1971) do in their study? What did they find about the mental rotation of three-dimensional objects? ANS: They rotated two-dimensional stimuli of same and different types either in (1) picture plane or in (2) depth in different rotation angles. They measured the reaction time for the participants to determine whether the two stimuli are of same shape. They found a linearly increasing function between rotation angles and reaction time and suggested mental rotation to be an analogous/serial process. Q3. What did Richardson (1994) do in Experiment 2 of his study? What did he find about gender differences in mental rotation ability? ANS: Richardson (1994) conducted Shepard and Metzler (1971)’s mental rotation task and measured the accuracy in order to study the possibility of changes over time for both sexes in mental rotation performance. He found diminished gender effect in mental rotation ability (i.e. men have greater accuracy than women) as compared to Philips and Rawles (1979). Q4. According to Shepard and Metzler (1971), what would be your hypothesis about the relationship between rotation angle and reaction time (hypothesis #1)? According to Richardson (1994), what would be your hypothesis about the effect of gender on the relationship between rotation angle and reaction time (hypothesis #2)? ANS: Hypothesis #1: Reaction time increases linearly with the rotation angle. Hypothesis #2: There is a gender effect on the relationship between rotation angle and reaction time. Men have shorter average reaction time and shorter reaction time across angular difference than women although both show linear function between rotation angle and reaction time. Method Participants Q5. How many participants were run in the current experiment? How were they recruited? What was the gender distribution? What were descriptive statistics on age? ANS: 72 participants were recruited directly from the PSYC 2007/007 Cognitive Psychology class. The participants were reimbursed with participation marks for class PSYC 2007/0007. Participants were 23 men and 49 women aged 18 to 43 years. The average age of participants was 22.6 years (SD = 5.11). Apparatus and materials For the details of the experiment: http://opl.apa.org/Experiments/About/AboutMentalRotation.aspx Q6. What were the visual stimuli used? What equipment and software were used to present the stimuli and collect the response? ANS: Two types of stimuli were used (i.e. one is the mirror image of the other). The stimuli on the left was always in same orientation while the stimuli in the right were presented randomly in eight different rotation angles orientations (0, 45, 90, 135, 180, 225, 270, 315 degrees) and of either type (same or different). The stimuli were only rotated in picture plane only. Procedure Q7. What was (were) manipulated (i.e., what was (were) the independent variable(s))? What was (were) measured (i.e., what was (were) the dependent variable(s))? ANS: The independent variables were the rotation angles in degrees, types of trials (same trial has same types of stimuli while different trials have different types of stimuli) and gender of participants. The dependent variables were reaction time in seconds and slope. Q8. What did the participant need to do in each trial? How many trials were there in each condition? How many trials were there in total? ANS: The participant observed and determined whether those two stimuli were the same. The participant was told to prioritize accuracy instead of speed in order to increase the reliability and validity of the results. There were three “different” and three “same” trials for each rotation angle. In total, there were 48 trials. Results Q9. How did you analyze the data? ANS: First, to study the relationship between rotation angles and reaction time, mean slope is analyzed to see if it is different from zero. Next, the average slope and time taken for correct response for both sexes were compared in order to investigate the gender effect on the relationship between rotation angles and reaction time. Q10. What were the results (both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics) regarding your hypothesis #1 (Q4)? ANS: One-sample t-test indicated that the mean slope was significantly larger than 0 (M= .0213, SD= .0318), t (71) = 5.67, p < .001, there was a significant linear relationship between rotation angles and reaction time. Q11. What were the results (both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics) regarding your hypothesis #2 (Q4)? Please include a figure showing the results regarding this hypothesis. ANS: An independent-sample t-test indicated the mean reaction time was significantly shorter for men (M=3.16, SD=.928) than for women (M=4.58, SD=3.00), t (70) = 2.21, p=.030 d=.639. An independent-sample t-test also indicated that women (M=.0265, SD=.0366) had significant greater mean slope than men (M=.0102, SD=.0123), t (70) =2.07, p=.042, d=.595. Discussion Q12. What is your interpretation of the results reported in Q10 and Q11? ANS: There was a significant positive linear relationship between rotation angles and reaction time for both men and women as the mean slope was positive and significantly different from 0. Also, there was a gender effect on this linear relationship, where men were found to have shorter mean reaction time and smaller average slope than women. Hence, the results indicated that men had stronger mental rotation ability than women. Q13. Given the results, how will you conclude regarding your hypothesis #1 and hypothesis #2? ANS: Both hypothesis #1 and #2 were accepted. Reaction time increases linearly with the rotation. There is a gender effect on the relationship between rotation angle and reaction time. Men have shorter average reaction time and shorter reaction time across angular difference than women although both show linear function between rotation angle and reaction time. Q14. How do you compare your findings with Shepard and Metzler (1971) and Richardson (1994)? ANS: The findings were consistent with Shepard and Metzler (1971)’s. However, since Richardson (1994) measured accuracy whereas this study measured the reaction time to study the gender effect, the findings cannot be compared with the expectation and did not match the hypothesis of Richardson (1994) that the gender difference is being diminished. Nonetheless, since accuracy is always correlated with reaction time, the findings supported Richardson (1994)’s findings that men have higher mental rotation ability than women. Q15. What is one possible direction for future research on this topic? ANS: Based on Cherney (2008)’s research regarding impacts of computer game experience on women’s mental rotation performance, one possible direction for future research on mental rotation topic will be the study of brain regions activated while playing computer games and performing mental rotation tasks to examine the role of such brain regions in mental representation. Analysis of Mental Rotation Study

American School of Business Elements that Make up The Marketing Mix Case Study

American School of Business Elements that Make up The Marketing Mix Case Study.

Case Study 1: Planning effective marketing strategies for a target audience

Describe the elements that make up the marketing mix. (10 marks)

Explain the term sponsorship. Name a sponsorship deal that you think was effective. Explain
your answer. (10 marks)

Analyse the importance of using both above-the-line and below-the-line promotion for an
effective marketing campaign. (15 marks)

Evaluate the effectiveness of adidas’ use of social media in its ‘Take the Stage’ campaign. (15
marks)

Case Study 2: Effective strategies for long-term growth

Explain the terms ‘vision’ and ‘aims’. Give examples related to NATS and a business of your
choice. (10 marks)

What is a SMART objective? Explain one benefit for NATS of setting SMART objectives. (10
marks)

Analyse how having clear, long-term strategies supports NATS’ vision for global expansion.
(15 marks)

To what extent can having a clear vision, strategies, aims and objectives guarantee a business’
success? Use the case study to support your ideas. (15 marks)Instructions and Criteria
The document should be 2,000 words maximum and address the following points listed below.Structure of the Assignment

Cover page: Must contain your full name, the name of the course.

Analysis: Address the case studies questions Bibliography: You should use the Harvard Referencing System Appendix
American School of Business Elements that Make up The Marketing Mix Case Study

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: