Article Critique: Findings of a Quantitative Study
Purpose, Criteria, Methods, and Results
What was the purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)?
How was the sample obtained?
What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used?
Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data (demographic or clinical profile and dropout rate)?
What methods were used to collect data (e.g., sequence, timing, types of data, and measures)?
Was an intervention tested? If yes, how was the sample size determined? Were patients randomly assigned to treatment groups?
What are the main findings of the study?
Answer the following questions as Yes, No, or Not Clear.
Is the study published in a source that required peer review?
*Did the data obtained and the analysis conducted answer the research question?
Were the measuring instruments reliable and valid?
*Were important extraneous variables and bias controlled?
*If an intervention was tested, answer the following five questions:
Were participants randomly assigned to groups and were the two groups similar at the start (before the intervention)?
Were the interventions well-defined and consistently delivered?
Were the groups treated equally other than the difference in interventions?
If no difference was found, was the sample size large enough to detect a difference if one existed?
If a difference was found, are you confident it was due to the intervention?
Are the findings consistent with findings from other studies?
Are the findings credible?
Note any difference in means, r2s, or measures of clinical effects (ABI, NNT, RR, OR).
*Is the target population clearly described? (yes, no, or not clear)
*Is the frequency, association, or treatment effect impressive enough for you to be confident that the finding would make a clinical difference if used as the basis for care? (yes, no, or not clear)
Are the findings clinically significant? (yes, no, or not clear)
Do you feel this article would be useful for your project? Explain.
* = Important criteria
Provide a reference to your article in APA format:
For this discussion, make sure that your response(s) are substantial.
Article must be within 5 years from a credible source.
Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations.
Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses. Use the practice problem: Shortness of staff in nursing negatively impacting the safety and quality of care to patient. and two quantitative, peer‐reviewed research articles you identified to complete this assignment. In a 800 – 1000 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Essay Help “>Essay Help
Consider how Kant and Hegel present “modern” law
Complete the following article critique on a QUANTITIVE study. Attach or link your article to the discussion post. Article Consider how Kant and Hegel present “modern” law.
Consider how Kant and Hegel present “modern” law. What in your view are the significant similarities of, and differences between, these two accounts? Give attention to how each understands the relationship between law and morals. Use this discussion to comment upon Ernest Weinrib’s claim that corrective justice is implicit within modern private law. Test Weinrib’s analysis with examples.
Below are essential sources, but not limited to only use these sources.
Byrd B and Hruschka J Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary Cambridge UP 2010
Clarke J “A Kantian Theory of Political Judgment” Philosophy Today (1994) 135
Denis L (ed) Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide Cambridge UP 2010 Ellis E
(ed) Kant’s Political Theory Penn State UP 2012
Goldman L “In Defence of Blinders: On Kant Political Hope and the Need for Practical
Belief” 40 Political Theory (2012) 497
Hill T (ed) Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy Blackwell 2009
Hoeffe O Categorical Principles of Law Penn State UP 2002
Hoeffe O Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace Cambridge UP 2006
Kant I The Metaphysics of Morals (trans) Gregor M Cambridge UP 1991
O’Neill O Constructions of Reason Cambridge UP 1989
O’Neill O Towards Justice and Virtue Cambridge UP 1996
O’Neill O Bounds of Justice Cambridge UP 2000
Ripstein A Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy Harvard UP 2009
Rosen A Kant’s Theory of Justice Cornell UP 1993
Uleman J Kant’s Moral Philosophy Cambridge UP 2010
Brooks T (ed), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right Wiley-Blackwell 2012
Brudner A, The Unity of the Common Law: Studies in Hegelian Jurisprudence U of Calif Press1995
Brudner A, Constitutional Goods Oxford UP 2004
Buchwalter A Dialectics, Politics and the Contemporary Value of Hegel’s Practical
Philosophy Routledge 2012
Conklin W, Hegel’s Laws Stanford Law Books 2008
Essay Help “>Essay Help
Research the committees of the House and state senate Choose at least three (3) committees on which you’d serve, if elected. – Explain each committee’s functions. – Explain why your placement on these committees is justified. How does it serve your distr
Research the committees of the House and state senate Choose at least three (3) committees on which you’d serve, if elected. – Explain each committee’s functions. – Explain why your placement on these committees is justified. How does it serve your distr.
1. Research the committees of the House ( http://www.house.state.tx.us/committees/) and state senate (http://www.senate.state.tx.us/committees.php) 2. Choose at least three (3) committees on which you’d serve, if elected. – Explain each committee’s functions. – Explain why your placement on these committees is justified. How does it serve your district’s needs? How does it emphasize your experiences/interests? 3. Most Texans do not know who their legislators are. How do you seek to solve that problem?
Essay Help “>Essay Help
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service