Get help from the best in academic writing.

# colt writing essay -01

colt writing essay -01.

The reading is post in the attached file, please check.No outside resources needed. Total word count: 300, need 2 paragraph essay. Writing instruction:When the readings for class are theoretical, your responses should attempt to recapitulate the main argument. If you’re not sure what the argument is, or if it seems that there are multiple arguments and you’re not sure which is most central or how they relate to each other, your response could describe this confusion. Also, try to imagine what problem or concern the author is trying to address. What’s motivating the essay? What does the author accomplish and how? You should give some thought to the way the argument is put together. How is it structured? What rhetorical or stylistic gestures does the author use to persuade the reader? Is there anything that author overlooks?
colt writing essay -01

This chapter will provide a brief explanation of the theoretical framework on Van Hiele theory of geometric thinking. Consequently review and discuss on literature involving van Hiele theory and dynamic geometry software, follow by review of literature on teaching and learning of geometry by dynamic geometry software Cabri 3D as an instructional tool. Then chapter conclude by reviewing literature on designing learning activities. The Van Hiele Theory of Geometric Thinking The van Hiele model of geometric thinking is one theory that offers a model for explaining and describing geometric thinking. This theory resulted from the Dutch mathematics educator doctoral work of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre van Hiele at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands which completed in 1957. Pierre van Hiele formulated the five levels of thinking in geometry and discussed the role of insight in the learning of geometry in this doctoral thesis. Van Hiele reformulated the original five levels into three during the 1980’s. Dina van Hiele-Geldorf’s doctoral thesis, which was completed in 1957, focused on the role of instruction in the raising of a pupil’s thought levels. Her study centered on thinking of geometry and the role of instruction in assessing pupils to move though the levels. The following summary of Van Hiele theory history is taken from Hanscomb,Kerry, (2005, p.77): A convenient location for many primary sources on the Van Hiele model is Fuys et al. (1984).Other primary sources are van Hiele and Van Hiele-Geldof (1958) and Van Hiele (1986). Secondary sources for Van Hiele research are Mayberry (1983), who found that students may operate at different levels for different concepts; Mayson (1997),who claims that gifted students may skip van Hiele levels; and Clements and Battista (1992),who cite finding indicating that the van Hiele levels involve cognitive developmental factors as well as didactical factors. The van Hiele theory has been applied to clarify students’ difficulties with the higher order cognitive processes, which is necessary to success in high school geometry. In this theory if students do not taught at the proper Hiele level that they are at or ready for it, will face difficulties and they cannot understand geometry. The therapy that offered for students by this theory is that they should go through the sequence of levels in a specific way. (Usiskin, 1982b). It is possible to generalize the Van Hiele model to the other topics such as physics, science and arts. Because the main idea of this theory is the consequence of levels and believing that each level is built on properties of the previous level as many researches has done based on this theory on science education. Characteristics of Van Hiele level of geometric thought Van Hiele theory argues there are some misconstructions in teaching of school mathematics and geometry, which was existed for long time based on the formal axiomatic geometry and was created by Euclid more than two thousand years ago. Euclid logical construction is based on his axioms, definitions, theorems, and proofs. Therefore, the school geometry that is in a similar axiomatic fashion assumes that students think in a formal deductive level. However, it is not usually the case and the students have the lack of prerequisite understanding about geometry. Van Hiele discusses this lack creates a gap between their level of geometric thinking that they are, and the level of geometric thinking that they required for and they expected to learn. He supports Piaget’s points of view “Giving no education is better than giving it at the wrong time”. Teachers should provide teaching that is appropriate to the level of children’s thinking. Van Hiele theory suggests: It depends on the students’ level of geometric thinking the teacher can decide in which level the teaching should be begun.(Van Hiele, 1999) According to the van Hiele theory, a student moves sequentially from the initial level (Visualization) to the highest level (Rigor). Students cannot achieve one level of thinking successfully without having passed through the previous levels. Furthermore, Burger

## HRM326 University of Phoenix Development Plan Assessment Paper

HRM326 University of Phoenix Development Plan Assessment Paper.

***Format in APA 6th Ed. Each bullet point needs a heading. Three ORIGINAL references. Grading Guide included. Include URL for any online reference. Please follow the attached grading guide very carefully.***Create a 700- to 1,050-word development plan that includes the following:Assess the legalities of training.Determine whether the plan could offend any of the protected classes.Evaluate whether you will use the plan as the sole weighting for promoting and determining the eligibility of employees for the opportunity to move forward at work.Conduct a cultural assessment of your terminology.Consider the various aspects of EEOC.Cite any sources according to APA formatting guidelines.
HRM326 University of Phoenix Development Plan Assessment Paper

## ECS 560 Grand Canyon University Leadership in The Classroom Paper

custom writing service ECS 560 Grand Canyon University Leadership in The Classroom Paper.

I’m working on a writing question and need an explanation to help me study.

As
an educator, you are the leader in the classroom. You are leading
children, parents, paraprofessionals, other service providers, and
following questions, using supports fromthe readings and outside
sources. Each answer should be between 150-250 words.Collaboration
is an essential component to early childhood education. Why is
collaboration necessary to meet the needs of young learners and their
families? Cite evidence and specific codes of ethics, teacher
dispositions, and/or standards that apply.Paraprofessionals
are often assigned to classrooms by administrators. You will likely be
the direct supervisor of a paraprofessional who was hired and assigned
by someone other than you. What will you do in the event that your
personality or general philosophies about education seem to clash with
those of your paraprofessional? How will you maintain a positive
relationship and a professional rapport? What strategies could you use
to teach, lead, and model appropriate interactions and responses to
student needs so that you and your paraprofessional are on the same
page?How
can you utilize your paraprofessionals to maximize student engagement
in your classroom as well as help maintain a structured learning
environment?You
have a paraprofessional who is older than you and more experienced. She
has been at the school for the past 15 years and this is your first
year there. As you set up the classroom and begin lesson planning, she
challenges you at every turn, stating that, “this is not how it is done
here.” When your students arrive, she begins undermining you and
behaviors. On two occasions, she refuses to comply with your classroom
management plan and instead sends students to the office for minor
behavioral infractions. What will your plan of action be to gain control
paraprofessional’s actions?You
have a paraprofessional who comes to school late every day, takes
frequent bathroom breaks that last 20-30 minutes or more, and leaves
early at least three days a week. What strategies will you use to gain
rapport, set limits, and reduce these absences? Are there any procedures
you can think of that might reduce these “disappearances”? At what
intervene? What steps should you take before that point? How might
building a rapport help reduce these issues?While
APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid
academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references
should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
ECS 560 Grand Canyon University Leadership in The Classroom Paper

## Performance Based Labs

Performance Based Labs. I’m studying for my Programming class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Complete the Week 5 Labs in uCertify to reinforce your understanding of this week’s objectives.
You will submit screenshots for this assignment.
Obtain a screenshot as you complete each lab.
Paste and save each screenshot into one Microsoft Word document.
Label each image with the Lab Module name, Exercise, and Task, for example:
Configuring User Access Control Settings | Ex 1
Include the week of the assignment and your first and last name in the filename, for example:
Week_5_Lab_Screenshots_FirstName_LastName.docx
Performance Based Labs

### Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service

Rating: