A good friend is like a full-time emotional and moral support system, but a clinging friend is like a full-time Job.
In this definition essay, the concept of a clinging friend would be defined in detail. To define a clinging friend, we first need to define the word “clinging’. In dictionary terms, clinging refers to a being overly dependent on somebody for emotional support. Thus, a person who clings is the one who depend upon someone else for emotional and moral support, a bit too much.The term is also seed by people for whom an overly dependent friend or relative is unwelcome. The Clinging Friend: Overly Dependent The first part of the definition of clinging friend states that he/she is an individual who is overly dependent upon someone else. Such “clinging friends” not only monopolize another person’s time, they also limit the other person’s ability to be and show his/her best, because how and with who they spend their time becomes limited.
This overconfidence of the clinging friend creates a physically and notionally taxing situation where his/her happiness takes precedence over the happiness of the other Individual. The Clinging Friend: Need for Emotional Support It cannot be said that a clinging friend Is necessarily a bad Influence; however, It Is an unwelcome burden for most people. A clinging friend Is one who promises to keep one company all the time, which In turn means that he/she constantly need that emotional support.So, being friends with a “clinging friend” Is not only emotionally draining, It Is similar to a full-time, hands-on Job. The friendship with a clinging friend Is neither honest nor pleasant, and It also not a healthy relationship. Conclusion In conclusion, It can be said that a clinging behavior result from various reasons Like possessiveness, but the primary reason behind such attitude Is over dependency and need for emotional support. Friendship Is a relation which needs equal give and take of support from both sides.
If one person keeps on demanding emotional support without returning any, the friendship becomes a burden and a negative Influence Clinging Friends By model 984 word “clinging”. In dictionary terms, clinging refers to a being overly dependent on happiness of the other individual. It cannot be said that a clinging friend is necessarily a bad influence; however, it is an unwelcome burden for most people. A clinging friend is one who promises to keep one company all the time, which in turn means that he/she constantly need that emotional support.So, being friends with a “clinging friend” is not only emotionally raining, it is similar to a full-time, hands-on Job. The friendship with a clinging friend is neither honest nor pleasant, and it also not a healthy relationship. In conclusion, it can be said that a clinging behavior result from various reasons like possessiveness, but the primary reason behind such attitude is over dependency and need for emotional support.
Discuss whether contemporary businesses should completely do away with outdated classical approaches in favour of more people-centric structures outlined by human relations and/or post-bureaucratic perspectives.
Discuss whether contemporary businesses should completely do away with outdated classical approaches in favour of more people-centric structures outlined by human relations and/or post-bureaucratic perspectives..
A 1500 word individual report which addresses the brief: Discuss whether contemporary businesses should completely do away with outdated classical approaches in favour of more people-centric structures outlined by human relations and/or post-bureaucratic perspectives. The report should be divided into appropriate sections where you discuss and apply academic literature. It will also highlight examples from empirical research and real-world examples to support the debate presented. A range of academic references should be drawn on to evidence your report. Your work should conform to the conventions of academic writing and be fully referenced in UWE Harvard style. Suggested structure: Introduction (approx. 10-15%) Outline the scope of your report and the area you’ve chosen to focus on. Signpost the broad debates that you have identified in your research. Treat this like an abstract – tell the reader exactly what you will include and conclude, so that they know what to expect. Do you agree or disagree with the statement in the question? Main body (approx. 65-70%) Divided into appropriate sections –arguing both for and against the question to form a balanced argument. Should avoid simply describing each approach, and seek to discuss them using the literature and by comparing and contrasting their principle differences. Additional nuance to the discussion should be provided by considering if any of the listed perspectives in the question provide the ‘one best way’ of organising, or if there may be an alternative answer. Support this discussion with evidence from the research and examples from real world organisations where possible, but remember that the focus of the piece is on academic sources. Discussion and Conclusion (approx. 20-25%) Give a thoughtful and considered evaluation of the most important points that have been presented. Link back to the title and what you outline in your introduction, and make sure that you have a solid answer to the question – agree / disagree / to some extent? Whatever it is, make sure that you justify your response and relate back to the second part of the question. Do not simply recap what you’ve said in your report. It is fine to bring in some new information / references / sources at this point – perhaps related to an alternative approach. Reference List Only include sources that you’ve referenced within your assignment. This assessment assesses the following modular learning outcomes: Contextualise the purpose and process of Management in contemporary contexts (A & B) Have a thorough understanding of contemporary business and organisations, and an overview of the main disciplines & functions of business (B). Be able to describe and understand the nature of contemporary organisations and business activities, i.e. their management structures and challenges; and the changing environment in which these organisations operate (A & B) The first stage of this is deciding what your stance is. This may be that you simply ‘agree’ or ‘disagree’ with the idea of classical approaches being less suitable in modern society, or that you agree partially. You should state this in your introduction. The second stage is to appropriately justify your stance. This will happen through the main body and the discussion. Here, imagine that you are writing for a real-life person who does not necessarily share your opinion. How would you convince them in an academic way? The extent to which you justify your argument will have a large impact on your overall mark. It is expected that you would have a balanced argument in the main body. That is, if you agree with the main point of the question, you still need to offer the other side of the story to make for a convincing argument, rather than it being one-sided. If you disagree with the statement – you also need to explore the counter-argument. Providing evidence both for and against the statement is therefore a very important part of this piece. In the final part of the essay, you should come to an overall conclusion and clearly state what your answer to the question is. Do you agree that classical approaches should be done away with? Or do you think that bureaucratic approaches are here to stay? Or is there a mid-ground position on this, or an alternative way forward? What does ‘discuss’ mean? Do I have to agree with the statement in the question? This wording is deliberate – it is there to show you that you need to give both sides of the argument rather than only agreeing OR disagreeing with the statement. To discuss is to think from multiple perspectives, and we would like to see this on show here. This might catch you off-guard to start with, as the question is written in such a way that makes it appear like you only have to agree with it. In fact this is only one of the possible options that you have. To reiterate: In a ‘discuss’ question for this module, you do not have to agree with the statement in the brief (although you might), and what it most important is that you offer a balanced argument, with an interesting discussion.
Essay Help “>Essay Help