Get help from the best in academic writing.

CJ 416 Grantham University Charles Albright The Eye Ball Killer Case Study

CJ 416 Grantham University Charles Albright The Eye Ball Killer Case Study.

Final Paper In-depth Case StudyIn chapter 1 of Karmen’s “Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology” we are introduced to what victimologists do. There are four basic steps (p. 25-29) that he discusses that criminologists go through when looking at a situation:Using these steps, and the information that you have read in the texts to complete a thorough case study on one of the criminal cases learned about in class (Do not use any of the case study subjects from the previous assignments in this course).In your case study, use the theories and ideas in victimology to identify, define, and describe the problem. Measure the real dimensions of the problem (e.g., explain the perpetrator’s actions), and specify how the victims were handled, as well as the criminal justice process (how evidence was gathered to test the hypotheses). Include the outcome of the prosecution, the victims, and their families.Your paper must be formatted in the following manner:The paper must be 750 words in length (roughly three pages). Only the body of the paper counts towards the length. No information that belongs on a title page or reference page will count towards the length requirement.Please follow APA guidelines; provide a title and reference page, use Times New Roman 12 point font, and double-space your lines. You need to have five references, two of which can be your textbooks from this class; the references for these can be found in the course syllabus.
CJ 416 Grantham University Charles Albright The Eye Ball Killer Case Study

Indiana University Bloomington Scope of World Civilization II Narrative Essay.

I’m working on a history project and need a sample draft to help me learn.

A. (12 points) Begin to answer the learning objective by briefly defining/describing/characterizing the overall scope of the study of World Civilization for the time period: 1600-1991 in either Europe or Asia. 

(12 points) Based on your description/characterization in section A – use more detail by discussing the major themes for each of the following time periods: 

From 1600-1750 
From 1750-1918
From 1918-1991

(12 points) Of the three time periods in section B, which of these do you think is the most important to study for a person to gain an understanding of what defines world history? Defend your argued time period choice by using even greater detail explaining the major themes of the time period. As part of your evidence, include your primary source of a letter, diary, or speech in this section.    
(12 points) Search for two images/ pictures/ paintings/drawings/sketches etc. that are emblematic of your chosen time period. They should be symbolic examples of the major theme(s) of the chosen time period. Describe the images and explain why each image is a symbolic example of that time period.  Insert your images into your word document along with the explanation of why each is emblematic of the time period. Each image and explanation should be approximately one-quarter of a page.  
(12 points) Is your chosen time period reflected in current world events? If so, how is your chosen time period reflected in current world events?  If not, what may explain the declining influence or disappearance of the themes of that time period?  

Indiana University Bloomington Scope of World Civilization II Narrative Essay

MKT 113 SNHU Product Overview Pet Supply Store the Good Life Pet Food Case Study

MKT 113 SNHU Product Overview Pet Supply Store the Good Life Pet Food Case Study.

written product overview will include a detailed product overview and
marketing strategy. It should be a complete, polished artifact
containing all of the critical elements of Part I of the final project,
including content created in Milestones One and Two. It should reflect
the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. The Final Project Part I Exemplar- Tip Top Bakery Market Overview Word Document uses
a bakery promoting a new product to provide you with an example of a
complete written product overview, such as the one you will be writing
for your pet supply company. Use the Final Project Part I Final Submission Template Word Document for your written product overview. To complete this assignment, review the Final Project Part I Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.
MKT 113 SNHU Product Overview Pet Supply Store the Good Life Pet Food Case Study

GFT 503 UPhoenix Assessment For Gifted and Talented Learners Discussion

essay writing help GFT 503 UPhoenix Assessment For Gifted and Talented Learners Discussion.

Assignment ContentImagine that you have been asked by your principal to create a job aid for the other teachers and paraprofessionals in your school on the various types of assessment that can be used for gifted and talented learners.Essays, powerpoing with narative writing Address the following in your job aid:Research different types of assessment for the identification of gifted and talented learners, as well as assessments for ongoing progress monitoring.Describe different types of traditional and nontraditional assessments for gifted and talented learners.Compare the different types of assessment.Determine what assessment tools are most effective in helping identify students who are gifted and talented. Provide examples because the tools may vary from situation to situation.Explain assessment strategies to provide ongoing assessment and data on student progress.Cite any sources according to APA guidelines.
GFT 503 UPhoenix Assessment For Gifted and Talented Learners Discussion

San Diego Supply Chain Disruption in the Pharmaceutical Industry Discussion

San Diego Supply Chain Disruption in the Pharmaceutical Industry Discussion.

I’m working on a supply chain discussion question and need guidance to help me understand better.

Hi, I need help for my business assignment. Thank you Assignment: Identify an instance of a supply chain disruption, and provide a reading that discusses it. Summarize the disruption, it’s cause(s), it’s impacts (human, financial, etc.) and anything else interesting or relevant to the course. Explain how how the disruption was dealt with (or in being dealt with). Feel free to bring in capacity concepts/metrics, and to provide specific before/after data. I encourage you to pick something COVID-related (but you don’t have to). Please let’s not everyone pick toilet paper!
San Diego Supply Chain Disruption in the Pharmaceutical Industry Discussion

Was The Alliance System The Cause Of WWI History Essay

Since most of the governments opened up their archives in 1919 and unclosed an incredible amount of material on pre-war historical material, people have been trying to find the cause of the Great War. Many historians, experts and laymen have come up with a huge scope of possible solutions and explanations. However, the question of guilt is a very controversial and sensitive one, and at some point every answer seems unsatisfactory. The Alliance System certainly played a very important role, but does not solely explain the outbreak of war. It was rather the base for other causes and crises that finally lead to war. However, without Wilhelm II issuing “Weltpolitik”, such an alliance system and its consequences would not have existed. I can therefore say that Kaiser Wilhelm II’s Weltpolitik was the main cause of war, which inter alia brought about the fatal build up of an Alliance System and its consequences that led to war. Leaders have been forging alliances as time immemorial. These agreements of friendship between two or more countries or parties were designed to advance common goals and secure common interests. However, the pre-war alliances did neither bring advancement nor security, but a war that would last 5 years and that would kill and wound almost 30 million people, that is half of the men mobilized. Otto von Bismarck had realized the danger of alliances and swept any possibility for any country to form a dangerous diplomatic alignment out of the way. By tying Germany to Russia and Austria Hungary, Bismarck enabled Germany to restrain the leaders of the other two countries, and isolated France. He thus rendered a possible French revenge on Germany impossible; and gave Great Britain, who had big colonial interest but little to become involved with continental alliances anyway, no further reason to do so. However, when Wilhelm II became Kaiser in 1888, he rashly dismissed Bismarck to conduct his own domestic and foreign policies. The Bismarckian diplomatic system and the so carefully maintained balance in Europe collapsed in the following decade. By refusing to renew the Reinsurance treaty with Russia in 1890, Wilhelm II paved the way for the formation of new alliances: Russia drew away from Germany and Germany became more closely associated with Austria-Hungary. France was thus able to settle any differences it had had with Russia and Britain. As a result of Wilhelm’s new political approaches, France and Russia became allies in 1892. The Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy was renewed in June 1902. Only a couple of month later, in November, the Franco-Italian Entente was signed. Germany’s Foreign Minister Bernhard von Bülow’s claim for “Germany’s place in the sun” on December 6, 1897 is known as the official announcement of Weltpolitik, which mainly concentrates on expansion of the colonial empire and the construction of a navy that could rival or, even better, exceed the British one. Wilhelm’s decision to pursue Weltpolitik made it impossible for Britain to stay neutral. As a result, Britain and France resolved their colonial tensions and signed the Entente Cordiale in April 1904. Three years later, in 1907 the Anglo-Russian Entente was signed, which along with the Entente Cordiale formed the Triple Entente. And so, the two major war alliances where formed. It could be argued that the now built Alliance System did not make a war inevitable, since all agreements were rather uncertain: The alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary was by far the firmest one. It was however uncertain whether or not Germany would back up Austria-Hungary in any of the Balkan affairs. The attitude of the Triple Alliance was extremely ambiguous, and any arrangements within the Triple Entente were very loose, the Entente Cordiale did not even contain a military commitment. However, there are many points that suggest that the Alliance System did indeed pave the way that led to World War I, inevitably. Firstly, the Alliance System was built on war-footing. This intensified the already existing tensions between the powers, and created an arms race that made a war much more likely. Weltpolitik had been determined to set up a navy that was at least as strong as the British one. Within only four years after the formation of the Triple Entente in 1907, Germany mobilized nine dreadnoughts, after it had ordered 41 of those battleships in 1900. Consequently Britain built twice as many. This started another chain reaction and gave European powers the feeling of having to get ready for war. Everyone felt the need to have the strongest army, the best navy, the most skilful troops. Apart from the arms race this also led to many misjudgements: Germany’s flawed “Schlieffen Plan”, to invade France via Belgium, was based on the assumption that a war with France would mean a war with Russia. In addition, the forging of the alliances carried much secretiveness with it and thus caused much suspicion and distrust among the European powers, which made diplomats very judgmental and generally suspicious and contributed too many of the crises preceding the war getting out of hand. The members of the Triple Entente, for example, made various agreements inter alia with Japan, Portugal, Spain and America; and France even concluded a secret agreement with Italy, which made her alliance commitments, namely to help Germany in case of a French attack, worthless. Another problem was that Germany felt very threatened because of its geographic position. In case of war the powers of the Triple Alliance Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy, located in the center of Europe and therefore also called the Central Powers, would have to face a battle on two fronts. The German Press even talked about “encirclement” and being surrounded by enemies on all sides. William II reacted with issuing an even more vigorous foreign policy in order to destroy cohesion among the Triple Entente powers, which caused a series of international crises from 1905 to 1914 contributing to the outbreak of war. Lastly, and probably most importantly, the Alliance System brought the crucial problem with it that as soon as there was a conflict between two countries belonging to different alliances, the other powers would be drawn into war. Exactly this happened after the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo in 1914. When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia having a protectorate on Serbia had to come to its aid and declared war on Austria-Hungary. Germany coming to Austria-Hungary’s aid was only the start of a large chain reaction that brought the rest of the European powers into war as well, causing the First World War. In conclusion I can say that the extend to which the Alliance System can be said to be the main cause of war is huge but limited: The Alliance System brought about an arms race and mobilization, it made many powers estimate their power and strength wrongly, and created further mistrust among the alliances. It also made Germany feel particularly threatened about it geographical position and enhanced its decision to go to war. Most importantly though, it brought about chain reaction that brought the European powers one after another into war and thus created the disastrous years of the Great War. However, without Kaiser Wilhelm II’s Weltpolitik no such alliance system would have existed. Germany can also be held responsible for the fact that World War I broke out in 1914 and not earlier. The alliances were originally strictly defensive but after the assassination of Franz Ferdinand Germany changed her attitude and guaranteed Austria full support in anything that it might undertake against Serbia. Germany was clearly provoking war in doing so. The theory of Germany seeking aggressively for expansion and war is also supported by the historian Fritz Fischer. In the end, I am of the opinion that Wilhelm II contributed the most to causing World War I.