Get help from the best in academic writing.

Chemistry homework help

Chemistry homework help. This is a paper that requires the student to review Tesla Disrupting the Auto Industry key and underlying issues. The paper also provides additional guidelines to use in the writing and submission of the assignment paper.,Review Tesla Disrupting the Auto Industry key and underlying issues,Critical Thinking: Scope of the Modern Company (105 points),In this module, we looked at technology-based industries and the management of innovation. For this week’s assignment, review Tesla: Disrupting the Auto Industry, Case 12 (in your textbook). Remember: A case study is a puzzle to be solved, so before reading and answering the specific case study questions, develop your proposed solution by following these five steps:,Firstly, read the case study to identify the key issues and underlying issues. These issues are the principles and concepts of the course area which apply to the situation described in the case study., Secondly, record the facts from the case study which are relevant to the principles and concepts of the course area issues. The case may have extraneous information not relevant to the current course area. Your ability to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information is an important aspect of case analysis, as it will inform the focus of your answers.,Thirdly, describe in some detail the actions that would address or correct the situation., Fourthly, consider how you would support your solution with examples from experience or current real-life examples or cases from textbooks., Lastly, complete this initial analysis and then read the discussion questions. Typically, you will already have the answers to the questions but with a broader consideration. At this point, you can add the details and/or analytical tools required to solve the case.,Case Study Questions:,How are the conventional (internal-combustion-powered) automobile industry and the electric-powered automobile industry similar and how are they different?, Was it a mistake for Tesla to open its patents? Why or why not?, What is Tesla’s strategy? What role does innovation play in this strategy?, How sustainable is Tesla’s competitive advantage? What changes in Tesla’s strategy or its management systems, if any, would you recommend?,Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:,Be 4 to 5 pages in length, which does not include the required title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements., Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines., Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more., It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the ,Turnitin, Originality Check before submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check,—Student Guide for step-by-step instructions., Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.,Attachments,Click Here To Download,Chemistry homework help
Keyword Research.

I need an APA paper for the following instructions. Week 3 Assignment – Keyword ResearchThis week, you’ll be analyzing why keyword research is so important and which keywords will be most helpful for you.Please be sure that you’ve read this week’s assigned readings before completing this assignment (especially WordPress SEO: The Only Guide You Need) and that you’ve watched this week’s assigned video tutorials before completing this assignment (especially How to Increase Web Traffic with SEO Keywords).To complete this assignment, you will write an APA paper that must answer all of the following questions:1) Why is keyword research important?2) How do keyword research and SEO efforts relate to ROI?3) What are the 7 steps for finding the right keyword phrases (per this week’s tutorials)? 4) What are the geographic and demographic characteristics of your target audience for your P.R. brand?a. Geographic characteristics cannot be bigger than one stateb. Demographic characteristics must include all of the following: age range, gender, ethnicity, income bracket, educational level, and any other relevant categories for your brand.5) How does knowing these geographic and demographic characteristics of your target audience help you plan your SEO strategy?6) Go to the Google Keywords Planning Tool. Click on “Go To Keyword Planner.” Click on “Find New Keywords.” Enter a few words/phrases that describe the kind of P.R. (public relations) work you do. Provide one (1) screenshot of your results.7) Based on your keyword research, how would you create a blogging strategy to increase visits to your website?a. Be sure your answer includes the keywords you’d use in your blog posts. (My website/blog: Be sure your answer includes where on your blog you’d use those keywords.8) Based on your keyword research, how would you create a social media campaign to increase your brand awareness?Be sure your answer includes information about the keywords you’d use in your social media profiles.Be sure your answer includes information about the keywords you’d use as hashtags.Your paper must be written in APA format, with a cover page, and with your citations listed in APA format.Proofread your paper extraordinarily carefully in order to avoid grammatical, spelling, and typographical errors.There will be a 1-point deduction for each type of grammatical/typographical error that appears in your posts.
Keyword Research

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp In this case study I will be outlining the nursing care I would provide for 69 year old Simone who has been diagnosed with early onset dementia and wishes to remain living at home with her 40 year old paraplegic daughter whom she cares for. As I have only a few brief details about Simone’s current condition, I will be hypothesising and considering various outcomes based on possibilities in her life. I will discuss the diagnosis of different types of dementia and their/its possible effect on Simone then a possible care package based on evidence from literature. Dementia is the name given to a condition which is a gradual, progressive decline in a person’s memory and other cognitive abilities which eventually affects their function and ability to care for themselves (Alzheimer’s Scotland 2010.) Despite huge advances over the last century, the diagnoses of dementia and its sub-types remains a challenge (Gold 2002.) The most common form of dementia is Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) which affects 55% of people with dementia in Scotland. This disease slowly destroys the brain cells and connections affecting a person’s cognition and function (Alzheimer’s Scotland 2010.) The functional assessment staging (FAST) tool provides a detailed framework for the expected evolution of AD. It works by outlining the stages of AD that the person should go through and by assessing them regularly against these stages, the assessor can decide if they have AD or not. For example, Simone seems to be at stage “4: Mild Dementia: IALDs become affected, such as bill paying, cooking, cleaning ansd travelling.” If she has AD the next stage would be “5: Moderate Dementia: Needs help selecting proper attire” but if she was assessed instead to be at “6a: Moderately Sever Dementia: Needs help putting on clothes” then she would have missed a stage in the progression of AD. She would either not have AD or have another type of dementia as well (Medical Care Corporation 2010.) Thus any deviations from this tool can give the assessor a clue to another process (Gold 2002.) If this was the case then there is a strong possibility that vascular dementia (VD) would be diagnosed. This type of dementia accounts for around 20% of sufferers in Scotland and a further 20% have VD and AD known as mixed dementia (MD.) The most common sub-type of VD is multi-infarct dementia (MID) when the brain has been damaged by small strokes but it can also be causes can be attributed such as irregular heart rhythms and high blood pressure. The effect on the person is very similar to AD but the progression is different. While the decline in AD is gradual as per the stages in the FAST tool, the condition of the person with VD will be generally be step-wise and sudden caused by a series of strokes. This could cause the condition of the person to deteriorate quickly missing out one or more of the FAST stages (Alzheimer’s Scotland 2010b.) There is evidence that the FAST tool is superior to the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in measuring the evolution of AD (Gold 2002.) The MMSE is the standard tool used to screen for cognitive impairment and is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE 2007) for deciding whether drug treatment should be used for the person with dementia. It rates the person’s cognition from 0 to 30 based on functions such as memory, arithmetic and orientation. NICE (2007) advises that dementia medication, such as donepezil, galantamine or rivastigmine, should only be used in moderate to moderately severe cases of AD, i.e. a score of between 10 and 20 and that memantine can be prescribed for moderately severe to severe AD. 64 carers of people with dementia responded in a questionnaire saying that they believed that early prescription of medication was necessary to see any benefit in the person with dementia. Also that these benefits should be discernible for at least six months or it was not worth taking the medication (NICE 2007.) And so Simone would most likely be prescribed a medication. However, dementia is not the only cause of the signs that Simone presents with. Diagnosing dementia is extremely difficult and is partly carried out by eliminating other more treatable causes such as confusion and depression (Nazarko 2009.) Although Nazarko uses the word “eliminate” and Simone has been diagnosed with dementia, it is possible that she is also suffering from depression. The prevalence of depression is increased to 10-20% in people with dementia (Ouldred

ELM 500 Colorado Technical The Model Code of Ethics for Educators Discussion

ELM 500 Colorado Technical The Model Code of Ethics for Educators Discussion.

Resources: Model Code of Ethics for Educators, Technology Resources LibraryChoose at least one concept in each principle of the Model Code of Ethics for Educators and summarize how this concept relates to or impacts specific areas of classroom management.Choose an online tool or application such as Glogster or Popplet to make an infographic to present this information. Write a 175- to 350-word reflection answering the following:What ethical areas might be a challenge for you, and why?How might your struggles negatively impact your students? What will you do to minimize this impact?Identify activities and resources you’ll use to lessen your struggles in these areas.Submit your assignment.
ELM 500 Colorado Technical The Model Code of Ethics for Educators Discussion

How Competition affects Social Preferences

python assignment help Does competition affect social preferences in the context of a bargaining game? Abstract In the first part of this paper, we have a generally review about several typical experiments and their results. Then based on the empirical study, especially the achievement of Güth et al. (1982) and Fischbacher et al. (2009), we have a full discussion on how competition affects social preferences in the context of a bargaining game. Introduction Economists have long been interested in the bargaining games. There is a considerable amount of literature published in this field by now. Firstly Neumann and Morgenstern (1944) studied bargaining games in the book The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. The bargaining game is a kind of typical dynamic game and plays an essential role in game theory. In 1982, Rubinstein suggested bargaining games of alternating offers model which was based on the work of Stalh in 1972 and Krelle in 1976. Generally, it is regarded as the most classic literature about non-cooperative games theory. Additionally, John Forbes Nash published two essays in 1950 and 1951 respectively, which were the turning point of non-cooperative games. His contribution about Nash equilibrium applied to solve game theory problems became the foundation for he won the 1994 Nobel Prize in economics, and the research is quite practicable and is applied in various fields. Then in 1986, Rubinstein et al (1986) made further research on bargaining games by analyzing the relationship between the static axiomatic and the dynamic strategic, which made a contribution to modify Nash bargaining solution. At the end of 20th century, many economists began to concentrate on the impact of competition to bargaining game, and among them, what Roth et al. (1991) have done maybe the most typical one by making a series of experiments among four countries to find the bargaining and market behavior. After Roth, Fischbacher et al. (2009) conducted several specified experiments on the power of competition to proposers and responders with fairness, and they found that the outcome of responder’s average share of the pie would have a significant change by merely increasing small in competition levels. In view of all that has been mentioned so far, one may suppose that we first have a look at a famous bargaining game experiment. The typical ultimatum game One of many typical bargaining games is the ultimatum game. In the standard experiment without competition, there are 2 parties X and Y. X, the proposer can decide how to distribute a fixed amount of money between them. Y, the responder could only accept or reject the proposal. If Y accepts, the distribution conducted and they will exactly get the amount proposed by X. Or, if Y chooses to reject the proposal, both of them would get a payoff of zero. Clearly under the rational person and purely self-interest hypothesis we can predict that the responder Y should accept any positive offer proposed by X. However, this prediction was rejected by the first experimental study of the ultimatum game (Güth, Schmittberger, and Schwarze, 1982) and numerous subsequent studies in the following years. One robust observation result we can summarize through these studies is that responders frequently reject low offers and most proposers offer between 30% and 50% of the surplus to their responders. Why could this happen? There are two possible reasons for this behavior. One is that the proposer cares about fairness, which is to say that he prefers a fair allocation with a lower payoff to himself to an unfair allocation where he can get more. The other explanation is that he may choose to offer a fair allocation because he is afraid that an unfair proposal will be rejected by the responder. Which one is right or both of them matter? This question was answered by Forsythe, Horowitz, Savin and Selfton (1994) using a comparison of different behaviors in the Ultimatum game and the Dictator game. Like in the ultimatum game, there are 2 parties X and Y. Player X can make a proposal on how to divide some money between himself and player Y. What is different to the ultimatum game is that in the dictator game the responder Y does not have the power to reject. The proposal is dictated by the proposer. If the proposer prefer a fairness allocation, the result in the dictator game should be similar to that in ultimatum game. However, they find that proposers are considerably more parsimonious in the dictator game. A significant fraction of dictators give nothing. This shows that many proposers are generous and fair only for strategic reasons in the ultimatum game. The fear of being rejected by the responders is the right explanation. Introduction of Competition How will competition influence the results in the above experiments? Since there are two different roles in the typical ultimatum game, we should consider two kinds of situation when we add the competition factor into bargaining game: proposer competition and responder competition. Games with proposer competition Roth et al. (1991) conducted an experiment about the ultimatum game with proposer competition in four countries (Israel, Japan, the United States and Yugoslavia). There are n-1 proposers who simultaneously propose a share to the only responder who can decide whether to accept the highest price or not. If the responder accepts it, his monetary payoff is and the successful proposer earns 1- . If the responder rejects , all players receive a payoff of zero. The results they get from the experiment are displayed in the Figure1 and Figure2. Though there are some little differences between the data in different countries, the price proposals, or say, the amounts of money accepted by the responders are much nearer the middle of the range. Figure 1 Distribution of bargaining offers in the US Figure 2 Distribution of bargaining offers in Yugoslavia, Japan and Isreal Games with responder competition Fischbacher et al., 2009 investigated the effects of competition on the outcomes of a bargaining game. They examined both the cases of proposer competition and responder competition. Firstly they introduce proposer competition to the ultimatum game (UG) by adding one extra proposer (PC2), which causes a large increase in mean accepted offers. At the same time they find even under competition proposers still reap substantial share of the surplus. Obviously this result is approximately consistent with Roth’s. Similarly they introduce responder competition to the ultimatum game (UG) by adding one extra responder (RC2), which causes a large reduction in mean accepted offers. Then adding three additional responders (by moving from RC2 to RC5) causes a further reduction in the mean accepted offer. Figure 3 Average accepted offer in bargaining and market experiments Showing clearly by the Figure, introducing competition to the UG has significantly large effects on the amount of accepted offer and the behavior of players in the experiments. The responder’s earnings in PC2 are almost twice as large as in the UG, while the trading responder in RC2 receives only 50% of the responder’s payoff in the UG. Why does the maximum offer size change a lot when the competition levels change? We can take the social preferences into consideration. Preferences are choices people make under different situations. Social preferences are how people rank different allocations to themselves and others. There are many behaviors which we can use social preferences to explain, such as reciprocity, fairness, altruism, inequity aversion, etc. References Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., and Zamir, S., 1991, “Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study”, American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1068-1095 Güth, W. (1995). “On ultimatum bargaining experiments – A personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior

Review Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and apply the hierarchy to children living in war-torn areas or as refugees.

Review Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and apply the hierarchy to children living in war-torn areas or as refugees.. I’m trying to learn for my Psychology class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Review Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and apply the hierarchy to children living in war-torn areas or as refugees. Choose a specific country or refugee population and find three to five news or academic articles that discuss the situations facing those children.
What would Maslow and his hierarchy say about their needs and where they would be on the hierarchy?
Your paper should be two pages, double-spaced and include in-text citations and a reference page.
Review Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and apply the hierarchy to children living in war-torn areas or as refugees.

College of San Mateo Education History & Educational Autobiography Essay

College of San Mateo Education History & Educational Autobiography Essay.

Educational AutobiographyEssay #1Tell me the story of your educational history—the journey you’ve been on, the good, the bad, how you have felt about yourself as a learner in your past schooling, and whether you felt you had (and/or have) a “fixed-mindset” or “growth-mindset.” Paint me a picture. Make it detailed so that I can start to get to know you and learn about your experiences.Some things I’d like you to include:Provide a brief introduction of yourself and whether you feel you had/have a “fixed mindset” or “growth mindset” (from Carol S. Dweck’s “Brainology: Transforming Students’ Motivation to Learn”).Describe one particularly positive experience you had in your past education and how it impacted you. (This might be in an English class or in a different subject.)Describe one particularly negative experience you had in your previous education and how it impacted you.Explain which “false belief” and “new truth” (from Dr. Michael V. Miranda’s “The Seven False Beliefs”) relate most closely to your educational experience(s).Discuss your personal strengths that you bring to the class and how these strengths can help you and your peers find success.Please close by bringing me up to the present—what do you want to get out of this particular English class Is there anything you’d like me to know so that I can support your learning? Is there anything that concerns you? The essay should be 3-4 pp., double spaced in Standard Format, as described in the syllabus.
College of San Mateo Education History & Educational Autobiography Essay