Get help from the best in academic writing.

Central Texas College World Regional Geography Questions Discussion

Central Texas College World Regional Geography Questions Discussion.

Answer each question. 300 Words minimal each question. Islamic FundamentalismMosaic of Migration Toxic Water and Nuclear Hazards- THE RUSSIAN DOMAINthe future of Afghanistan1. What is the difference between Islam and Islamism? How has Islam been tied to politics in the past and how do we see this relationship between politics and religion still playing out today?2. How have migrants changed the demographics of Europe? What are some of the current concerns and impacts from ongoing immigration in Europe? What challenges might these migrants face and why have many of these new arrivals had a difficult time assimilating into European society?3. How has the Soviet era impacted the natural environment in this region? What consequences may still be seen across the landscape today and into the future from the legacy of the Soviet nuclear program?4. Afghanistan has been invaded multiple times but by various different world powers throughout history. Why is Afghanistan’s geopolitical situation so different from it’s neighboring countries and how might globalization play a role in determining the country’s future?
Central Texas College World Regional Geography Questions Discussion

MMSL 6105 Walden University Week 1 Personal Leadership Journal Discussion

MMSL 6105 Walden University Week 1 Personal Leadership Journal Discussion.

I’m working on a business writing question and need guidance to help me learn.

Week Assignment 2: Personal Leadership Journal – ReviewReview the feedback given for your Personal Leadership Journal entries from Weeks 1–6. Make any final additions or edits to those entries.To prepare for your Personal Leadership Journal: Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially: Personal Leadership Journal Assignment Instructions To complete the Personal Leadership Journal Review, ensure you have composed a cohesive document that addresses the following: Document includes all journal entries from Weeks 1–6. Weekly journal entries are supported by the week’s readings or other credible and relevant resources. You may also include quotes from the weekly Discussions that you think support your journal entry. Make sure All instructor feedback and comments have been addressed and revised within your completed submission. You are to compile your journals (Week 1-6) into a single document and submit them as a single document. Make sure each journal is clearly identified. Submit your REVISED Personal Leadership Journal. You HAVE to use the APA 7th edition. There are some differences between 6 &7.
MMSL 6105 Walden University Week 1 Personal Leadership Journal Discussion

HC 433 Herzing University MCO Opportunity Memorandum

online dissertation writing HC 433 Herzing University MCO Opportunity Memorandum.

Unit 2 Assignment – MCO Opportunity MemoSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadInstructionsAs a manager in a medical setting, it is an expectation to continuously seek out new opportunities to save money and manage patients more efficiently. In this scenario, assume the role of a manager in a medical clinic. A new opportunity to work with an MCO has been made available to the clinic and needs to be brought to the senior management team.Evaluation Title: MCO Opportunity MemoInstructions:Write a memo to the senior management staff explaining the new MCO opportunity.In the memo, include the following:Summarize the three reimbursement methodologies (capitation, discounted fees, and salaries) in 250 words or less.Choose one of the three reimbursement methodologies to recommend to the senior staff.Provide rationale for the selection.Discuss the pros and cons of the methodology.Estimated time to complete: 2 hoursRubricHC433 Unit 2 Assignment – MCO Opportunity MemoHC433 Unit 2 Assignment – MCO Opportunity MemoCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.18.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.16.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.14.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.12.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P20.0 ptsLevel 5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.18.0 ptsLevel 4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.16.0 ptsLevel 3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.14.0 ptsLevel 2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.12.0 ptsLevel 1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.0.0 ptsLevel 0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0PreviousNext
HC 433 Herzing University MCO Opportunity Memorandum

New England College Hershey Company Organizational Ethical Analysis Paper & PPT

New England College Hershey Company Organizational Ethical Analysis Paper & PPT.

Summary:Each student will write a research paper on an organization of his or her choice (5-7 pages minimum). The organizational analysis will utilize a minimum of five external, peer-reviewed academic sources and contain the following sections:· What is the organization and how would you describe it?· Who are the leaders of the organization?· Is the organization successful?· How do you determine whether an organization is ethical or not?· Based on your assessment and research, is the organization ethical?· What would you change about the organization to make it better, without sacrificing ethical standards?need 5 to 7 pages paper andneed 8 to 10 slides ppt
New England College Hershey Company Organizational Ethical Analysis Paper & PPT

The essay demonstrates your ability to write clearly and concisely on a selected topic and helps you distinguish yourself

The essay demonstrates your ability to write clearly and concisely on a selected topic and helps you distinguish yourself in your own voice. What do you want the readers of your application to know about you apart from courses, grades, and test scores? Choose the option that best helps you answer that question and write an essay of no more than 650 words, using the prompt to inspire and structure your response. Remember: 650 words is your limit, not your goal. Use the full range if you need it, but don’t feel obligated to do so. (The application won’t accept a response shorter than 250 words.) Some students have a background, identity, interest, or talent that is so meaningful they believe their application would be incomplete without it. If this sounds like you, then please share your story. The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you, and what did you learn from the experience? Reflect on a time when you questioned or challenged a belief or idea. What prompted your thinking? What was the outcome? Reflect on something that someone has done for you that has made you happy or thankful in a surprising way. How has this gratitude affected or motivated you? Discuss an accomplishment, event, or realization that sparked a period of personal growth and a new understanding of yourself or others. Describe a topic, idea, or concept you find so engaging that it makes you lose all track of time. Why does it captivate you? What or who do you turn to when you want to learn more? Share an essay on any topic of your choice. It can be one you’ve already written, one that responds to a different prompt, or one of your own design.

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: