Peer Review GuidanceOne of the hardest things about peer reviewing is getting over a natural reluctance to give negative feedback. However, constructive criticism not only helps the author improve, but it also helps you solidify your understanding of the course subject matter.These two things are the point of peer review assignments. With that in mind, it is import to give positive commentary where you peer has done well, and turn negative feedback into productive feedback.However, time is limited (both for your response and for the author’s opportunity to implement your feedback into the next assignment), so concentrate on the most important ways the flash reflection could be improvedHere are some key recommendations for accomplishing your tasks as a peer reviewer:OVERALLRead the entire Flash Reflection before starting to write the review.But take notes as you readRecord your thoughts as you read the Flash Reflection. These initial reactions are for your use and not for the author.Make a note when you find:Items you like / don’t like.Things that surprised or disappointed you.Concepts that were well or poorly presented.Anything that confused you.Anywhere you feel an example would have helped.Anything that contradicted your running expectations.Anything unclear, even if the author goes on to clarify it later.Read the reflection more than once.That way you pick up things you may have missed on the initial read throughNote a Flash Reflection’s strengths. Never assume an author will automatically know which parts work well… remember, they will not be objective about their own work. Praise what works well; point to specific items.Address the problematic partsComment on large issues firstDoes the submission appropriately respond to the assignment?Are important and interesting ideas presented?Is the main point clear and interesting?Is there a clear focus?Is the submission effectively organized?Is the sequence of points logical?Are ideas adequately developed?Is the submission convincing in its argument?Is evidence used properly?When you criticize an aspect of a submission, offer advice on how to fix it.If there are technical mistakes, can you correct them?If the premise is flawed, suggest a way to correct it Then move onto assessing presentation. If it is poor, identify why:Are the expressions of ideas clear and understandable?Is it hard work to understand the author’s intended meaning?Is the grammar poor?Are transitions stunted or awkward?Are concepts, definitions and discussions convoluted?Does the author assume too much of the reader’s knowledge?Are explanations inadequate?Are more examples necessary?Identify what’s missing, what needs to be explained more fully and what can be cut. Hold the snarky commentaryPeer reviews are not the place to show off your wit or make dismissive one-liners. Those are not constructive and do not belong anywhere in a peer review.NOTEThis assignment is subject to peer review. As such, to maintain anonymity:Do not put your name or any other personal identifier on the documents Because you are submitting through Canvas, your name is already appended to the submission in the system, so it isn’t necessary to put personal identifiers on your submission.The number of submissions is set to “unlimited” so there should be no problems submitting your two required Peer Reviews under separate documents.While Turnitin accepts multiple submissions on one assignment from the same person, for submission here, you may combine your two review documents into one. If you have done this, please indicate this in the comments section of your submission.IMMEDIATELY contact Canvas support with any difficulties you encounter in submitting this assignmentGOALS OF THE ASSIGNMENT:The purpose of this assignment is to provide substantive feedback to your peers.In this way you will 1) expand your knowledge and views of Victimology, 2) learn to appropriately provide constructive criticism, and 3) learn how to appropriately respond to constructive criticism.
QUESTIONS FOR PEER REVIEW ASSIGNMENTBe sure to identify which peer Rlection you are reviewing at the top of your responses and summary report, then answer the following questions. You must elaborate on why you answered yes or no for all of the yes/no questions.. Simply rephrasing the question in the form of a statement does not accomplish this and you will not receive full credit if that is all that you do to “elaborate.”Does the author communicate his/her ideas clearly? YES/NODoes s/he directly address all of the questions for the Flash Reflection? YES/NOIs everything presented relevant to the overall topic? YES/NOIs the overall organization clear and effective? YES/NOAre there disorganized parts? YES/NODoes the language seem appropriate for its intended audience? YES/NOAre thereTypos? YES/NOGrammatical errors? YES/NOPunctuation and/or spelling problems? YES/NODoes the author take a clear position on the issue? YES/NODoes the author present a convincing argument? YES/NO What other problems exist?Suggestions for improvement: OVERVIEW:For each peer review assignment, you must review the Flash Reflection for two peers.You will automatically be assigned your peer Flash Reflections to review shortly after each Flash Reflection assignment closes. Canvas automatically sends you a notification of your assigned peer Flash Reflections with links to those peer Reflections.I also manually verify that each student has received notification of the assigned Reflections from CanvasYou will find your assigned peer Reflections in your Canvas “to do” list. It is attached to the Flash Reflection assignment in question.You can also access your assigned peer Flash Reflections for a given Peer Review assignment from the related Flash Reflection submission page.In addition, you can follow the links provided in the Canvas sent notification mentioned above.If, after looking in these places, you still cannot find your assigned Flash Reflections for the relevant Peer Review assignment, please take the Canvas tour for students (https://canvas.fau.edu/enroll/43W6N6). This will teach you how to navigate Canvas and find your assignments.If, once you’ve completed the Canvas Tour for Students, you still cannot find your assigned Flash Reflections for the Peer Review in question, you will need to contact Canvas support for assistance as there may be a problem with your account. When you contact them, please have them write to me directly with any issues they uncover.Specifically, you are meant to be reviewing peer submissions from a given Flash Reflection for the Peer Review assignments. You are NOT reviewing the Peer Review. Thus, when contacting Canvas Support, you need to make sure that you give them the correct assignment name where your assigned submissions are located (e.g. the relevant Flash Reflection). Failure to do so will result in them being unable to help you (and will not be considered extraordinary extenuating circumstances).You must complete reviews for both assigned peers for each Peer Review to receive any credit for these assignments. Partial credit for completing only one will not be given.Due to the interactive nature of Peer Reviews and that your peers are waiting for your feedback, there are no make-up Peer Reviews. If you have missed a set, you will not be able to go back to it or earn points for it.For the Peer Reviews, you are providing your fellow students with valuable feedback on how to improve their work. Delays significantly reduce their ability to act upon your feedback. Therefore, no late submissions are accepted for Peer Reviews.When reviewing other students, please be respectful and respond in complete, correctly spelled and punctuated sentences.Texting short cuts and/or bullet points will not be accepted as valid reviews. Each Peer Review assignment set is worth 120 pointsThe Peer Review rubric will be used to relay feedback to you on this assignment.Please see the “Peer Review Guidance” in the course shell for further details on how to complete this assignmentTo complete this assignment, you must take two separate steps:Submit your written Peer Review in the specified Peer Review submission portal. This is where you submit your work for grading by me. Attachments and/or “comments” are not accepted as submissions for this portion. If you do not submit both of your Peer Reviews here, they will not be graded.Submit your written Peer Review to the peers whose work you have reviewed via the same link you gained access to their Flash Reflections. You must complete the assessment rubric and submit your written Peer Review via attachment in the “comments” section of the Flash Reflection in question.Please note that your access to your peers’ papers closes once you have completed the second step above.Therefore do not submit that part of the review until after you have completed the first step above. If you inadvertently do this and lose access to your assigned papers, you must contact Canvas support and explain that you need your peer review access to those papers restored. I do not have the access to unlock the papers for peer review once step two has been submitted.When you contact Canvas support, you have to make clear to them that you are NOT asking for any assignment to be re-opened. Rather, you are asking for your peer review access to the related Flash Reflection assignment to be restored.If you tell them you need an assignment re-opened, Canvas support will automatically send you back to me because you’ve given them the wrong information. You do not need any assignment re-opened, so do not say that to them. You need to tell them that you have to have your peer review access to the related Flash Reflection restored in order to regain access to it.When submitting your Peer Review feedback documents to peers, please be sure to:Submit separate files for each peer paper you reviewDo not include your name or any other personal identifier on your submissions so that peer anonymity can be maintainedBe professional constructive and helpful in your critiquesDo not use demeaning or abusive language of any kind in your feedback.Do not simply put “Yes” or “No” to the review questions without also explaining why you answered that way. Simply writing something like “Yes, the author was clear in his/her argumentation.” does not provide an explanation of why you thought so. As such, non-explanatory answers will not receive credit.Although peers will recommend a grade on your Flash Reflection, they do not influence it. Only I assign the final grade for these assignments.If, after the related Flash Reflection closes, for whatever reason, you cannot view your assigned Flash Reflections for Peer Review, you must contact Canvas support immediately as there may be an issue with your account. REVIEWERS:You will be evaluated on how well you identify the strengths/weaknesses in the Flash Reflection as well as on the quality and accuracy of your suggestions for improving it. Please see the rubric provided with this assignment in the Canvas course shell for further details.Your task is to help the author to improve his/her knowledge of the subject matter as well as their skills at communicating this knowledge to an audience. For each of the two reflections you are assigned, you need to answer the below questions for each Flash Reflection as well as write a summary of your thoughts on each author’s Flash Reflection.Be aware that simply answering to all questions as if there are no problems when there actually are identifiable shortcomings in the assigned Flash Reflections will result in a poor grade for this assignment. Remember, it is your task to help your peers improve their work. Ignoring problems hurts both them and you.Before starting your reviews, you must read the Peer Review Guidance available in the Canvas course shell. This, along with the guidance AND rubric listed for Flash Reflections should also guide your feedback.
CCJ 3666 LSU Criminal Justice System Failing Victims Flash Reflection Discussion
Week 6 Discussion 1: Comparative Reasoning
Week 6 Discussion 1: Comparative Reasoning. Paper details Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 12 Lesson 1, 2 Link (library article): The Doctors’ Choice is America’s Choice”: The Physician in US Cigarette Advertisements, 1930-1953 (Links to an external site.) Link (article): The Opioid Epidemic: It’s Time to Place Blame Where It Belongs (Links to an external site.) Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook and noted readings) Introduction The medical profession has a muddled and contradictory association with its approach toward the tobacco industry. While the profession now firmly opposes to smoking and vigorously publicizes the serious, even fatal, health hazards associated with smoking, this was not always so. Advertisements for tobacco products, including cigarettes “… became a ready source of income for numerous medical organizations and journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), as well as many branches and bulletins of local medical associations” (WolinskyWeek 6 Discussion 1: Comparative Reasoning
Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Self-Reliance Essay
java assignment help Ralph Waldo Emerson was an American Transcendentalist poet and essayist during the 19th century who wrote his best essay titled “Self-Reliance.” The purpose of Emerson’s essay was to encourage his readers to think freely. He argued that societal standards have a conflicting effect on an individual’s personal growth and individuality, and states that self-sufficiency allows the individual to determine their own opinions and ideas instead of allowing outside influences direct their thoughts and actions. Emerson was ahead of his time in the aspect of thinking more rationally than most during this time period, which is why he founded transcendentalism. His essay conveys an inspirational yet informative approach to individuality through many rhetorical strategies that help Emerson connect to his audience. At the beginning of his essay, Emerson states, “Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string.” Using the application of logos, Emerson appeals to the readers by suggesting that each individual has the same trust of acknowledgment, when in reality we must believe and acknowledge ourselves to begin with. He states that it is cowardly of a person to only rely on others’ judgement, and that a person with self-esteem exhibits more originality. He connects this with being child-like. I believe this is a misinterpreted part of the essay because although he is comparing being self-confident with being child-like, he is saying that children have a tendency to act with self-reliant behavior because they are too young to realize or care what other people think. Emerson empowers the reader to create themselves through trust without letting the fear of disapproval morph the way they think or act. In the event that each person trusts themselves enough to find self-acceptance and stability, they are competent enough of overcoming the internal doubts they hold themselves accountable for. Emerson remains in a motivational tone as he states, “The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried.” Emerson doesn’t want his readers to feel like they are incapable because he believes that everyone can accomplish something. As he connects to the reader in an emotional way, he makes them feel secure and confident in wanting to branch out. Emerson continues to use repetition to place the idea that everything happens for a reason. Which is something I truly believe in. Everything in our lives happens for a reason. He uses short events to create one big idea that everywhere we go, we are majorly influenced. Another thing Emerson mentions is “the sculpture in the memory” which is a metaphor for the underlying idea that all of our life experiences shape us into the person we are today. He implies that without looking into the past we can not “sculpt” the way we are in the present moment. Emerson continues to use the strategy of pathos to emotionally connect to his reader in order to remind them that they are in control and can shape their own future. Another aspect of Emerson’s essay is how he mentions consistency. He states that “a reverence for our past act or word, because the eyes of others have no other data for computing our orbit than our past acts, and we are loath to disappoint them.” Emerson implies that consistency is an enemy of independence in the sense that people are too scared to act or think differently in fear of contradicting their previous beliefs or actions. He states that being obsessed with consistency drains energy from the act of living essentially because people are too busy thinking about their next move too often to just do it. Emerson uses the metaphor “corpse of your memory” as he explains why contradicting what you did or said before shouldn’t matter because what you say today is in the present. Society’s disapproval and scorn has put an underlying fear in people which restrains them from independence and growth. Emerson uses pathos again to connect to his readers in order to let his idea sink in. He states, “Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict everything you said to-day. — ‘Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.’ — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.” Emerson states that successful and well-known persons are inconsistent and were perceived as “misunderstood” in order to create credibility. This persuades the reader to believe that if inconsistent people like that can create such a large impact, then why can’t they? Later on, Emerson uses a simple style to convey simple ideas. He says, “A man is relieved and gay when he has but his heart into his work and done his best.” This statement is useful in the fact that this is a clear and easy concept to grasp. If you simply do your best, then you will experience true happiness. Once again, Emerson uses pathos to affirm the audience that if they simply do their best and put their heart into everything they do, they will be happy. The next idea contradicts happiness and portrays a feeling of distress. Emerson says that you will never find peace if you do not put your all into what you do. This warns the reader of the negative emotions they could potentially experience without being completely motivated in all that they set their hearts on. Emerson presently proposes a transformative improvement of human advancement, tantamount to the improvement of an individual from youth to adulthood. The present age — the primary portion of the 1800s — is a time of analysis, particularly self-analysis. Albeit a few people see such analysis as a mediocre way of thinking, Emerson accepts that it is legitimate and significant. Starting a progression of inquiries, he solicits whether discontent with the quality from current idea and writing is such an awful thing; he answers that it isn’t. Disappointment, he says, denotes a transitional time of development and advancement into new learning: “If there is any period one would want to be conceived in,is it not the time of Revolution; when the old and the new stand one next to the other, and concede to being looked at; . . . This [present] time, similar to all occasions, is a generally excellent one, on the off chance that we however recognize how to manage it.” Emerson’s “Self-Reliance” essay is very inspirational and influential to whoever may read it.. He teaches the importance of individualism and how it affects our daily lives imensefully. Throughout the essay, Emerson uses pathos, repetition, motivating diction, and metaphors effectively in order to portray the underlying beauty in just being yourself.. Emerson wants the world to be unique and diverse, and effectively explains how to do just that throughout his powerful essay. This essay has truly put hope into many lives Works Cited Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Self-Reliance (1841).” Self Reliance, 1996, doi:10.4159/9780674286290-009.
Woman and Religion
Woman and Religion.
Fir this assignment provide meaningful feedback. I am not asking for your opinion with grammar, or spelling or the way it is written.I am asking you to respond to the information, topic and information presented below; Pleas respond with 220 words.I chose to write about Hinduism and Buddhism in the area of the roles and statuses of women. In Hinduism it is stated that women are to do nothing independently, even in their own home. A womens life in this religion focused on her obedient domestic duties that represent being a good wife. There are practices that mark the lesser and more subservient status of women. The first is a mans right to select a girl, the second is called purdah and involves the isolation of a woman in a room or house, which is associate with the notion that women are sexually polluted. the status of women is also reflected in the treatment of widows. A widow must appear different from other women and sometimes shave their heads. They also are denied inheritance rights. In Buddhism however, women have a more positive status, due to the fact that it is not between men and women but between monastics and laypersons. In early Theravada Buddhism, the prevalence of male monastics did engender fears of contact with women. But upon the spread of Buddhism into China more female monasteries were formed. The status of women are recognized more favorably and even based on equality with men.
Woman and Religion
MDC Education and Socialization to Professional Nursing Role Discussion
MDC Education and Socialization to Professional Nursing Role Discussion.
Education and Socialization to the Professional Nursing Role1. As a nursing student, do you share the values of commitment to public service, autonomy, commitment to lifelong learning and education, and the belief in the dignity and worth of each person? Do nurses with whom you have interacted demonstrate these values?Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per DQ, with a minimum of three sentences each paragraph.· All answers or discussions comments submitted must be in APA format according to Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.) 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4338-0561-5· Minimum of two references, not older than 2015.
MDC Education and Socialization to Professional Nursing Role Discussion
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service