Unit VIII PowerPoint PresentationDue: Tuesday, 10/27/2020 11:59 PM (CST)InstructionsFor your final assignment in this course, you will create a PowerPoint presentation describing ways to prepare for a job interview. Please address the following topics:Describe ways to prepare for an interview.List three different types of interview questions and tips for answering them.Describe ways to close the interview.Explain how to follow up after the interview.Conclude your presentation with any additional recommendations you can give someone who is just starting their job search.Your complete PowerPoint presentation must be at least eight slides in length. Notes are not required for this assignment. You must use at least two outside sources, one of which must be from the CSU Online Library. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment. APA formatting, however, is not necessary.
Columbia Southern University How to Prepare for A Job Interview Presentation
Home School Final Paper Criminal Psychology Case Discussion
Home School Final Paper Criminal Psychology Case Discussion.
Each case scenario represents a different type of offender (e.g., mentally disordered offender, sex offender, violent offender, family violence offender, female offender, white-collar criminal, cybercriminal, or terrorist).For each case, you will:Apply a specific theoretical approach to the criminal behaviors displayed in each case.Determine if the crime or crimes presented would be categorized as expressive or instrumental. Explain your rationale.Evaluate whether developmental risk factors and correlates of criminal behavior influence criminal behavior. Evaluate whether the offender in each case scenario is a criminal.Note: Although assessment is an integral step in the tasks you complete in this Final Project, for the purposes of this course and Final Project, you will not assess the offenders in the case scenarios you select.Your Final Project may be presented via one of the following options:A 10- to 12-page (not including references, title page, or abstract), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper.Case Studies:Case 2. Family Homicide A devout Christian, married woman living in Florida had 6 children. She suffered from depression for many years. Each pregnancy and the addition of another child added to her stress and depression. Over time her conditioned worsened and her family insisted that she seek therapy. She was prescribed anti-psychotic medications and regular visits with a therapist. Over time her doses of medications doubled but her depression pulled her down into states of psychosis. There were moments of clarity. She admitted to her therapist that she was having thoughts of harming her children. That admission resulted in someone being with her at all times to supervise. Her husband was not convinced that there was anything really wrong with her other than that she could use a “good swift kick in the pants” to get her back on track. Besides, they both wanted children. They even decided that she would go off her anti-psychotic medication so she could get pregnant again. Besides, he argued, it was God’s will for them that they have lots of children. In truth the woman had actually reported to her therapist that it was her husband who wanted more children and that he convinced her it was the right thing to do and that all would be well according to God’s plan. The husband soon decided that his wife really did not need constant supervision and, without notifying the therapist, he went off to work leaving her alone with the 6 children. He believed she needed some independence. The wife waited until she knew he was gone and placed the family dog in a secure space so he would not interfere with what she was about to do. She knew that she could never raise her children properly and believed what she was about to do was in their best interests even though she would be damned to hell for eternity. She filled the bathtub and one by one brought in the children and drowned them. The eldest boy who was 11 was difficult because he resisted and tried to escape, but she was stronger and faster. When she was done killing them all she called her husband at work and calmly announced that she had done something very bad to the children. Prosecutors believed that she had intentionally killed the children. Yet in her defense, her sanity became a key issue.Was she responsible or criminally responsible for the killings? Case 3. A Child Murderer Luke, age 12, appeared on the surface to be a normal child who seemed reasonably happy and respectful of others. But there were differences in his appearance that made him a target for his schoolmates. His ears were a bit deformed; he had a noticeable speech impediment, wore thick glasses, and had a hearing impairment. Luke also was struggling in school due to his ADHD, and as a result he was 2 years behind his classmates. Luke struggled to fit in with kids younger than him. He greatly resented the taunting and had no real friends. He was very sad and angry at the recent loss of his grandfather, with whom he had been living since his parent’s divorce. His new stepfather had a violent temper and was very controlling. The tension was so severe that his 17-year-old sister announced one day that the stepfather had molested her and promptly moved out. Luke had also learned accidentally from another student at school that Luke’s real father lived just 30 miles away and that he had met him before. Luke had never seen his biological father. All of these factors deeply affected Luke’s self-esteem and his growing anger toward others. One day while walking alone in a local park Luke noticed a young, cute little boy by himself. Luke called to the boy and offered to show him some kittens he had just found in the woods nearby. Once inside the wooded area Luke attacked and strangled the boy. He then smashed in the boy’s skull with a large rock and sodomized him with a stick. After making up several misleading stories, Eric eventually confessed that he alone had killed the boy but could not explain his actions, nor did he appear particularly concerned about the killing. What was it that made Luke kill? Was Luke biologically predisposed to violence? Was it lack of parental nurturing? Could there have been other environmental factors influencing Luke? Luke was sentenced to several years in prison.Case 6. Cary Stayner, the Yosemite Park Signature Killer Cary Stayner could have easily been a model gracing the pages of GQ magazine. Tall, dark, and striking, he was rated high on the “attractiveness” scale by many women. Due to his artistic gifts, Cary was voted “most creative” by his graduating class and was expected to become a famous cartoonist. I had the opportunity to examine several drawings done by Mr. Stayner around 1995. These drawings depicted scenes of death and destruction, with heads of victims on the ground. The backdrop was Yosemite National Park. Those who knew him describe him as amiable, easy going, and quiet. He was described as a naturalist, with a penchant for nudity, frequenting secluded lake areas to sunbathe unencumbered. His acquaintances were shocked at his confessions of multiple murders and even more so by the macabre means by which he killed. First born of five children, Cary was eldest brother to Steven Stayner, who in 1972 was kidnapped and held prisoner by a child molester for almost 8 years. Steven escaped, bringing with him a 5-year-old child who had also been abducted. Making national headlines, Steven became the hero, his notoriety pushing his sibling into obscurity. Disgusted by the book written about his brother and the made-for-TV movie, Cary’s resentment grew. At Merced High School, Cary was considered a good student and was thought of positively. But his home life was deteriorating with the separation of his parents. He moved in with his uncle, Jesse Stayner, until 1990, when tragedy struck and an intruder shot Jesse to death. Cary was never considered a suspect and was believed to have been at work. His employers considered him a diligent worker and a proven employee, always showing up on time and never the object of customer complaints. Between 1996 and 1997, Cary moved to El Portal in Yosemite National Park, where he worked as a handyman at several hotels. Those who knew him described him as likeable, but he was also a loner who never dated and was not inclined to close friendships. Though he occasionally smoked marijuana, he was not disposed to drinking, even when generous tourists at the hotel offered to indulge everyone with a “round.” But such benign behavior only masked the brooding predator within. Rarely does evil not masquerade. For many years, Cary Stayner had fantasized about killing women. In the winter of 1999, Eureka, California, resident Carol Sund, 42, her daughter Julie Sund, 16, and an Argentine friend, Silvina Pelosso, 16, were visitors to Yosemite National Park in California. On February 14, they checked in at Cedar Lodge, where Stayner worked and lived. They were last seen alive February 15. One month later, Carol and Silvina’s charred bodies were found in the trunk of their burned-out rental car. On March 25, Julie’s decomposed body was found several miles away. Her throat was cut so severely she was almost decapitated. Stayner was not considered a suspect. Almost 5 months later, Yosemite naturalist Joie Armstrong’s body was found in a creek near her home after she was reported missing by her friends. She was decapitated. A similar vehicle to Stayner’s had been seen in the vicinity of Armstrong’s home. Three hours after the body was found, Stayner told authorities he had nothing to do with her death. When he didn’t show up for work the next day, authorities began searching for him and found him at a nudist colony in Wilton. He has confessed to all four slayings. The FBI had originally arrested other suspects and kept reassuring the public they had the right people in custody, only to suddenly retract those statements when Stayner gave them specific incriminating information that was privy only to law enforcement officials. Stayner has since pled guilty to the Joie Armstrong murder. He was convicted for the other murders and given the death penalty. One of the most important clues linking these murders was the manner in which the victims died. Decapitation or nearly severing a person’s head is not just about murder but is also about sexual fantasy and gratification. The offender becomes sexually gratified by the fantasy of cutting into a victim’s throat. The sense of sexual power overwhelms the offender. Stayner had been fantasizing and drawing his fantasies of decapitation for several years. The method of killing became his sexual signature that could link him to other similar murders. While awaiting trial at the Fresno County Jail, Stayner enjoyed drawing pictures on the walls of his cell of decapitated heads of females. He also tried and failed to sell autographed photos of himself to the public. In one of his public statements he said, “I would like to say how deeply sorry I am for all the pain and sorrow I’ve brought upon so many people. Not only the Sunds, Pellossos [sic], Carringtons and the Armstrongs, but my fellow employees at Cedar Lodge, the community of El Portal, the people of Argentina, and all those across the nation who felt the sorrow of my victims’ families. I am truly sorry.” He then requested that a movie be made about his murders and sought an interview with NBC’s Jane Pauley. (Hickey, E.W. 2015.7th Edition. Pg. 214-215. Just this case)
Home School Final Paper Criminal Psychology Case Discussion
Note: Mandel has 3, not 5 Golden Rules. If you read his website you will find almost a dozen! Essay
research paper help Note: Mandel has 3, not 5 Golden Rules. If you read his website you will find almost a dozen! But pick those 3 primaries for this assignment. Case Study – User Interfaces Early user interfaces were designed with little or no consideration for the end user. This was largely due to technical and hardware limitations. The poor interface design required a specific skill set for users and limited the mass appeal of computers. Modern interfaces are much more user friendly. Theo Mandel has written about the golden rules of interface design. Read “The Golden Rules of User Interface Design [PDF].” Write a four- to five-page paper in which you: Describe three interfaces you interact with on a daily basis. Analyze each interface you identified in Question one and assess how it adheres to Mandel’s five golden rules. Suggest two changes for each interface to achieve a more user-friendly design and justify your suggestion. Provide three screenshots for each interface. Note: These screenshots should be labeled and appear in the appendix of the case study. These pages are not included in the page requirement for the assignment. Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Why Fashion Brands need to include Plus sized models.
Why Fashion Brands need to include Plus sized models.. Paper details A manifesto addressing fashion brands like Louis Vuitton and Gucci and demanding big fashion brands to include plus sized models in their runway shows. compose a manifesto, “expressing the aims, goals, desires, and obsessions of an artistic and creative moment” (Taciuch). Organize your manifesto into three distinct sections: Introductory section declaring the context of the manifesto. Such a declaration must arise from a specific place and time. The description of the place and time should itself serve as a model of the kind of art you are calling for. This section should also identify, in strong terms, that which you are against, and [explain] exactly why. List of criteria for your art: demands rules and guiding principles condemnations Concluding statement explaining, for example, how the world will be better after your ideas have been implemented. Or perhaps simply urging others to join with you.Why Fashion Brands need to include Plus sized models.
The Freedom of Information Act Research Paper
Table of Contents The Freedom of Information Act Process Freedom of Information Act Exemptions Using the Freedom of Information Act Amendments to the Freedom of Information Act Works Cited The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is popularly understood to be the representation of “the people’s right to know” (Ginsberg 1) the various activities of the government. The Act was passed in 1966 after a series of investigations and legislation that took nearly 11 years. Under the Act, individuals have a right to access and use records without being questioned. No one is thus expected to explain why they need to access information. Generally, FOIA requires all federal agencies to permit the public to access any information under their custody in order to make it possible for civilians to gain an understanding of the decisions and activities of the government. The Act also creates a channel through which disputes regarding access to information records can easily be resolved. In the United States, the Act is presently a very important tool of inquiry as well as information gathering. Different people or groups are thus able to access information for various purposes. They include the press, the business community, activists, scholars, consumers, and attorneys (Ginsberg 1). Apparently, this privilege has also been extended to interested foreign parties. Ordinarily, responses to requests may be presented in paper or digital form. The assembly of responses usually consumes so much time and is thus handled by a special group of information management experts. In some cases, experts may explore the possibility of narrowing the scope of the requested information. In the event that some information cannot be given out to the requesters, it is the responsibility of information management professionals to a satisfactory explanation. With the passing of the OPEN Government Act in 2007, modifications were made to FOIA to encourage public participation in the improvement of the Act. The Freedom of Information Act Process To a large extent, the process of handling Freedom of Information Act requests tends to vary from one federal agency to another (Koontz 8). This notwithstanding, there are underlying similarities in the way things are done. As a starting point, information requesters are expected to submit their requests in writing to federal agencies. Requests may also be received via telephone or electronic means. Generally, requests for information may be initiated either by organizations or ordinary members of the public. After being received, information requests are expected to go through a number of distinct phases. Typically, the processing cycle is initiated by the requester of information. Next, the agencies locate and retrieve the requested information from their database records. After retrieval, the requested information is then prepared in readiness for release to the requester. However, before the information is released to the requester, the released records must be approved by relevant authorities. The records requested are then delivered to the individual or organization requesting. A number of things happen during the different phases. At the initial processing phase, for example, “a request is logged into the agency’s FOIA system, and a case file is started” (Koontz 8). Ostensibly, this activity is very critical for starting the FOIA process. The federal agency then takes time to review the request and establish both scope and cost requirements. The agency then relays an initial response to the person or organization making the request. After getting a nod from the requester, the federal agency staff proceeds with the search to locate and retrieve the requested records from their database. For effectiveness, the search may be expected to span multiple locations or offices. Freedom of Information Act Exemptions Legal exemptions from FOIA are “often referred to as non-disclosure statutes” (Stevens 5). The exemptions came about as a result of efforts made by corporations and federal agencies. However, the private sector is concerned that FOIA’s exemptions do not meet the expectations of different organizations and individuals. Academicians and some members of the public are opposed to FOIA’s exemptions based on their allegation that such exemptions will weaken the intention of the government to be transparent and accountable to the public. Apparently, exemptions have “the potential to severely hinder the public’s ability to access critical information related to oversight activities” of the government agencies (Stevens 6). Individuals who are in support of transparency and accountability contend that new exemptions from the Freedom of Information Act present a serious threat to the ability of the public to gain access to critical information about government operations and the industry. Proponents of open records further claim that exemptions generally cause the intent of the government to appear suspicious. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Arguably, the Freedom of Information Act exempts various classifications of records, as explained here. One of the exemptions has to do with information that touches on security and national defense. Apparently, this classification is designed to ensure that sensitive information does not end up in the wrong hands and puts the security of the nation at risk. The exemption also ensures that all foreign policy secrets are guarded jealously. The second category is that of information that directly relates to the internal operations of a federal information management agency. A third classification includes information that is exempted from any form of disclosure by legislation. Other categories include trade secrets and financial information about privileged individuals, records collected for the purpose of law enforcement, and vital information about the operations of financial institutions. Using the Freedom of Information Act Drawing from a study by CGR (6), the Freedom of Information Act is applicable to the documents that are held by various agencies of the executive arm of the Federal Government which consist of the military, cabinet, government corporations, regulatory agencies run by private individuals or organizations, and corporations that are controlled by the government. Ostensibly, officials elected by the public are not subject to FOIA regulations. In addition, the judiciary and some designated private companies are also free from FOIA’s rules and regulations. All agencies are expected, under the Freedom of Information Act, to publish information that describes the agency organization and its addresses. They are also required to publish information regarding their operations as well as rules and procedures that govern those operations. All the records of a particular federal agency may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act, and “the form in which a record is maintained by an agency does not affect its availability” (CGR 7). A requester is thus permitted to ask for records in printed, electronic, tape, or any other form as desired. However, it is important to note that not all records requested under FOIA must be made available to the requester. The disclosure of the requested records may be subject to exemptions and hence not accessible to the requester. In order to obtain the requested records, it is imperative to ensure that the request provides a clear description of the records requested. Every request must be submitted with specific details so as to simplify the search process. Amendments to the Freedom of Information Act At the time of enactment, it was hoped that FOIA would bring about a revolutionary change in the United States. Arguably, FOIA offered very clear directives on how to access specific information and ensure that it is not disclosed to unauthorized parties. Evidently, every single administration in the United States made use of the Freedom of Information Act differently. During his reign, for example, President Barrack Obama has endeavored to encourage federal agencies to embrace the idea of disclosure and open access. Over the years, a number of bills been introduced in Congress to amend the Freedom of Information Act. The Reducing Information Control Designations Act, for example, was introduced in order to compel federal agencies to organize their systems in a way that permits easy access. Another amendment was introduced on May 15, 2009, requiring all government rehabilitation centers to be subjected to FOIA regulations. The OPEN FOIA Act introduced in 2009 required all federal agencies to state the reason for any exemption claimed. Apparently, this was the first key reform to the Freedom of Information Act after a very time. It is presumed that “the OPEN Government Act will help to reverse the troubling trends of excessive delays and lax FOIA compliance in government operations” (GPO 36061). The OPEN Government Act was also meant to restore the government image and gain public confidence. It is also presumed that the OPEN Government Act will help to ensure the FOIA process is transparent enough. We will write a custom Research Paper on The Freedom of Information Act specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Works Cited Committee on Government Reform (CGR). A Citizen’s Guide on Using the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act of 1974 to Request Government Records: First Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2004. Print. Ginsberg, Wendy. Freedom of Information Act: Issues for the 111th Congress. Collingdale, PA: DIANE Publishing, 2010. Print. Government Printing Office (GPO). Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 110th Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2011. Print. Koontz, Linda. Freedom of Information Act: Agencies are making Progress in Reducing Backlog, but Additional Guidance Is Needed. Collingdale, PA: DIANE Publishing, 2008. Print. Stevens, Gina. Freedom of Information Act and Nondisclosure Provisions in Other Federal Laws. Collingdale, PA: DIANE Publishing, 2010. Print.
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service