Get help from the best in academic writing.

Capella University HTML Introduction Discussion

Capella University HTML Introduction Discussion.

As we continue to think about why we are learning HTML in this course, let’s dive into the vocabulary a bit. Specifically, I want to investigate and come to an agreement on the following:head elementhead sectionheader elementheading elementIf you are new to HTML, or have picked it up here and there as you’ve gone along, you may see the potential for some confusion here. Provide a brief explanation of each term and logically how they relate to one another, if applicable.We’re starting off this week with this most basic question as we dive into web-based applications. Why should you learn HTML? It is probably also important to think, as you ponder your response, are there any reasons you should not learn HTML?
Capella University HTML Introduction Discussion

Global Preparedness for Health Threats

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp Diseases and sickness have always existed among mankind. In the recent decades’ health epidemics have risen and conformed in correlation to human evolution. Solutions for such problems have been created as a deterrence, but the ever-changing biological make-up and persistence of communicable (and non-communicable) diseases have created troubles among the local and global communities. Proactive measures are required now more than ever in order to avoid international health emergencies. Many changes are needed and amongst them, many complications to improve global preparedness will be discussed. One of the important actors in maintaining favorable global health standards is The World Health Organization. WHO is a key player in these events. On April 7, 1948, the World Health Organization began.[1] This organization has branches throughout the world and aims to improve health for all individuals. Their duties are to avoid and prevent communicable and non-communicable disease outbreaks.[2] WHO is linked to the framework of the United Nations and works to improve and implement national health policies.[3] In most of the 20th century, local or national public health agencies in the western world have promised clean water sources for city governments, government vaccination programs, and quarantine of contagious communities. In rare instances, international health strategy has been debated in correlation with infectious disease pandemics of communicable diseases such as influenza, cholera, or large-scale efforts to eradicate. States rely extensively during the epidemic of diseases, on worldwide efforts to improve measures to deter the disease’s propagation throughout its borders by incorporating warnings and quarantine actions, as well as international traffic surveillance. Accordingly, the global health system has evolved throughout the years, and succeeded in monitoring communicable diseases and reducing child mortality rate.[4] In addition, life expectancy has increased drastically in low to middle-income nations. However, today, this process is in a deep state of transition. The need to focus on how we address global health challenges has increased. Several economic, human, technology, surveillance, and research health resources often already exist in communities that can actively support readiness efforts. Nevertheless, funding for disease programs, including Aids, hepatitis, paludism, and polio eradication, often don’t include or promote preparedness permanently.[5] Whether accidentally or intentionally released on medical or societal structures, reparation and response mechanisms are not adequate to tackle the vast effects of a potentially fatal global pandemic. Infrastructure and preparation for the production and produce of new vaccinations, antiviral drugs, and ways for efficiently exchanging therapeutic deterrents are inadequate in most nations. This instance of an outbreak involves careful planning in several sectors to improve social stability and threat coordination among nations.[6] Costs in disease prevention may utterly overpower the existing emergency response funding plans. This is a severe concern and a key reason for why increased funding is critical.[7] The support for the poor and disadvantaged countries by development assistance to their health and more significant prioritized aid to the United Nations Central Emergency Response Fund must be expanded for Donors, International Financing Institutions, Global Support and Humanitarian efforts to resolve the funds gaps in national health security action plans as a shared obligation and a greater public good.[8] Member States should commit to the increase in contributions from the WHO preparedness and response financing.[9] This is also including the development of a reconstruction scheme using funds from the updated Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility of the World Bank.[10] Without donations and funds for global health emergencies, economies of nations and lives of individuals all over the world will take a devastating turn for the worst. Collective aid is essential to the prevention or expansion of global health outbreaks. Legislative preparation is also one of the vital parts of global emergency preparedness. Universally, laws define the government of what determines crisis, catastrophe, or overall emergency issues in terms of public safety. Rules and regulations help to build the framework for identifying, stopping, recording, and coping with cases of emergency. However, it has always been a challenge when determining the legislative framework during times of such emergencies. Although procedural autonomy in crises can also lead to misunderstandings and sometimes chaos in times of an actual emergency, different parties may not correctly understand the changes in the legal environment or the ongoing changes in the emergency. Emergency acts committed by public-health practitioners, staff, or volunteers may be obscured concerning legalities.[11] Additionally, some respondents may act regardless of the actual repercussions, which would otherwise result in individual harm. Others, in contrast, may not participate in helping due to their fear of legal repercussions.[12] None of these outcomes are desirable. Furthermore, the threat of human rights infringement in disease emergency response is magnified because the urgency is not a matter of any other power but the executive. Furthermore, it is trivial to resolve the internal management problems generated by a rapidly growing global health system. Although every nation has a desire to respond to global health crises, they vary in essential demeanors, which will influence the effectiveness of the different strategies for enforcing the arrangements. Constraints on the growth of policies on further developments are the consequences of every nation having a complex political and legal structure. Countries have diverse backgrounds, including encounters of pandemics and the involvement of international and national governments.[13] However, strategic engagement among states can be perceived as a way of guaranteeing more stability and organizational capacity to impact universal issues. The need for continuous monitoring and assessment is emphasized in search of the best outcomes and the best prioritization in collaboration efforts. Conjointly, developing international global health laws will lead to stable partnerships and more effective implementation of international health norms.[14] This will include not only hierarchical ties between international organizations, nations, and non-governmental organizations but also hierarchical connections among such actors.[15] Coordination and planning for international precedents in health emergencies are vital if all actors are to understand their roles and work together, without doubling efforts or erecting bureaucratic barriers. Preparedness and overcoming threats recently are more advanced and adaptable. However, preparations needed to address unknown risks are still an obstacle, and unfortunately, measures used to address these risks are being deferred by inadequate public health capabilities, as well as by controversy concerning national sovereignty and global cooperation. Crises in public health have significantly shown that diseases continue to endanger human health in recent years. In order to protect the global health of individuals and address such threats, substantial local national and international public health establishments are needed so that they can detect and act prematurely to developing emergency health threats. Investing throughout the much-needed development required in order to improve these flaws, risk management for detrimental illnesses can be a continuing concern to international health regulators but also more importantly, to the world. Bibliography Barnett, Daniel J., Holly A. Taylor, James G. Hodge, Jr, and Jonathan M. Links. “Resource Allocation on the Frontlines of Public Health Preparedness and Response: Report of a Summit on Legal and Ethical Issues.” Public Health Reports 124, no. 2 (March/April 2009): 295-303. Bennett, Belinda, and Terry Carney. “PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN: GLOBAL, REGIONAL, AND LOCAL RESPONSES TO RISK.” Medical Law Review 25, no. 2 (March 31, 2017): 223-39. Craggs, Andy. “About WHO.” World Health Organization. Accessed October 16, 2019. Davies, Sara E. “What contribution can International Relations make to the evolving global health agenda?” International Affairs 86, no. 5 (September 2010): 1167-90. Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. “A world at risk: annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies.” Last modified 2019. Gostin, Lawrence O., and Rebecca Katz. “The International Health Regulations: The Governing Framework for Global Health Security.” The Milbank Quarterly 94, no. 2 (June 2016): 225-435. Accessed October 16, 2019. Portela, Gustavo, Amanda Fehn, and Mario Dal Poz. “Human resources for health: global crisis and international cooperation.” Ciênc. Collective Health 22, no. 7 (July 2017). Revision process of the International Health Regulations (IHR). World Health Organization. Accessed October 16, 2019. Urbi, Jaden. “The difference between G-7, G-8, and G-20 — and why they matter.” CNBC. Last modified June 8, 2018. World Health Organization. “Children: Reducing Mortality.” World Health Organization. Last modified September 9, 2019. ———. “Influenza (Avian and other zoonotic).” World Health Organization. Last modified November 13, 2018. ———. “Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV).” World Health Organization. ———. “WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization.” World Health Organization. World Trade Organization. “Glossary Term.” World Trade Organization. [1] Andy Craggs, “About WHO,” World Health Organization, accessed October 16, 2019, [2] Craggs, “About WHO,” World Health Organization. [3] Craggs, “About WHO,” World Health Organization. [4] World Health Organization, “Children: Reducing Mortality,” World Health Organization, last modified September 9, 2019, [5] Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, “A world at risk: annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies.,” last modified 2019, [6] Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, “A world.” [7]Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, “A world.” [8] Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, “A world.” [9] Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, “A world.” [10] Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, “A world.” [11] Daniel J. Barnett et al., “Resource Allocation on the Frontlines of Public Health Preparedness and Response: Report of a Summit on Legal and Ethical Issues,” Public Health Reports 124, no. 2 (March/April 2009): [12] Barnett et al., “Resource Allocation.” [13] Sara E. Davies, “What contribution can International Relations make to the evolving global health agenda?,” International Affairs 86, no. 5 (September 2010): [Page #], [14] Gustavo Portela, Amanda Fehn, and Mario Dal Poz, “Human resources for health: global crisis and international cooperation,” Ciênc. Collective Health 22, no. 7 (July 2017): [15] Portela, Fehn, and Dal Poz, “Human resources.” Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp

Colgate-Palmolive PEST and Porter’s 5 Analysis

assignment writing services Colgate-Palmolive PEST and Porter’s 5 Analysis. Jump to: PEST Analysis of Colgate | Porter’s 5 Forces Analysis of Colgate Introduction Companies seeking to gain a competitive advantage in today’s environment, where competition is very tough where technological improvement have pushed major companies forward are in need of a strategy development process. By using several capabilities like creativity and originality, companies can come up with a number of options and possibilities that can be used while building a strong strategic plan. Today, Companies should develop the sense of controlling and monitoring of processes, nothing should be left at random, because important losses can incurred. Many thinkers have argued that a strong strategy should consider three important factors (3C): Customers, Competencies and Competition. To begin with customers, companies should be able to distinguish between existing customers and potential customers; in addition, they have to understand customers’ needs for a better profitability. Competencies are perhaps the most important tool in this chain, it can raise the company’s stock index or lead it to bankruptcy, and it’s by recognizing multi-skilled people trained and capable in a large variety of skills or activities that companies can carry on ‘the adventure’. Finally, competition is no longer a concept to be defined or explained, it’s becoming a double-edged sword for companies in a world where the number of firms is growing exponentially. Analysis of the areas cited above is interconnected. Who you select as your target group will have consequences on capabilities you require, which will have an impact on what the competition policy which will pressure who you choose as your target group. Furthermore, a well structured strategic analysis will induce to brighter more significant goals, and a more safe future as companies are better aware of possible threats that may happen. They may be also known as (External Environmental analysis), it’s may be seen as the connection between going in the right track and making the appropriate decisions, a kind of trade-off established by the company. It’s through strategic analysis that organizations are capable of encouraging funders for future perspectives. Funders are more likely to go for donations or loans, in case of strategic analysis environment, to enlarge the gap between the organization and its competitors. In the other hand, not considering at least a little amount of strategic analysis means losing opportunities called also (opportunity cost). A ‘left behind’ status can be reached in case of ignoring strategic analysis. BNET Business Dictionary defines the strategic analysis as the way of conducting researches on the external environment or business environment where the organization performs and on the organization in the purpose of drawing a strategy. In the other hand, Professor Les Worrall thinks that strategic analysis is a fair understanding of organization surrounding, it takes into consideration the interrelation between the firm and its environment to improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness, by increasing the organization’s capacity to deploy and redeploy its resources intelligently.’ Many studies have been conducted in this field, they may have suggested different definitions of strategic analysis but three important characteristics are commonly linked with it: Identification and evaluation of important data to strategy elaboration. Recognition of both external and internal environment to be considered. Multiple analytical methods that can be used in the analysis. Examples of analytical methods used in strategic analysis include: Value chain analysis Four corner’s analysis Early warning scans War gaming PEST analysis and Porter’s five forces analysis Analytical tools are meant to ensure the sustainability and reliability of the analysis proposed. Analytical methods are worldwide used and understood, they have reached a mature state where every organization can use them to better work However, while dealing with the analytical methods, companies should keep in mind some considerations: The tool or method should be able to answer question that may be raised by the organization. The benefit coming from using any tool or method should be clearly defined and stated. To ensure a successful analysis, organization need to go forward a great understanding of the tool used. The tools proposed are empowered if there is collaboration as input with other people surrounding the company, in addition, time should be allocated to people concerned so they accommodate the analysis. Every member of the organization must be aware that the use of any analysis tool is time and effort consuming, decision-making board and stockholders ,in the implementation phase, should be ‘flexible’ and provide the necessary to complete the project. The objective of using an analytical tool is to go deeply in the analysis and to ensure a better approach more balanced and methodical. In addition, all analytical tools are using historical data, they rely on past data to better understand futures wants. Moreover, results coming from the analysis should be interpreted with caution or the analysis may lead to an influenced result, due to pressures, which look for a particular strategy. One of the important competencies of an analyst is to understand which tool or technique is most appropriate in the context. Colgate Palmolive Nature of Business Colgate-Palmolive is generating benefits from manufacturing and selling shampoo and toothpaste , 80% and 15% respectively. The remaining is shared between home care products (softeners).Colgate-Palmolive is the leader in the domestic market on the shampoo and the second on the toothpaste. The battle for market share with competitors is at: Shampoo with brands such as: HeadColgate-Palmolive PEST and Porter’s 5 Analysis

Factors Affecting Movement Of Luxury Goods Marketing Essay

The concept of luxury is not new and can find its roots in many great civilizations of the ancient world. Luxury has always been consociated with wealth, uniqueness, exclusivity and authority. Luxury products with their high technical superiority, craftsmanship, uniqueness, quality, high prices are always targeted towards the elitist of the society, who derives value from their exclusivity, brand heritage, service and premium pricing. Luxury goods are also believed to concurrently satisfy their emotional, psychological needs and accentuate their esteem, prestige and social status. These high net worth individuals are generally price insensitive and are usually very loyal to these brands. Value of the luxury goods is derived either from their functionality or for the modus-vivendi they project. Antoni et al. 2004, has suggested three features for a brand to have to be successful in the luxury market. These include:- Excellence Brand Aura Desirability In Economics, for luxury goods if the price increases, the demand also increases. They are supposed to have high income elasticity of demand i.e. as people’s income increases the demand for luxury goods also increases. The seeds of the modern luxury industry were laid in Europe during the Industrial Revolution. During this period, some European entrepreneurs created premium products which symbolized the supreme lifestyle of that period. The modern luxury industry evolved because of the need of these businesses to look for markets abroad, to increase their customer base due to limited potential in the domestic markets. (Antoni et al. 2004) The business model of the luxury sector involves providing supreme quality, high price and exclusive products to customers at the top end of the wealth spectrum. Their business model is based on meeting customers’ expectations and selective distribution. According to LVMH, the business model of luxury industry includes designing, production

PHAR 332 California State University Northridge Biostatistics Final Project Paper

PHAR 332 California State University Northridge Biostatistics Final Project Paper.

Please see the attached files for directions.You will be applying analyses and concepts learned this semester in order to complete the following report on a treatment’s efficacy. To help you get started and provide structure for the assignment, you have been provided with a partial write-up of the results of a clinical trial. Your goal is to complete the write-up provided below. Pay special attention to the highlighted portions, as these are the sections you are expected to fill in.For your final project you will be working with a fictitious dataset modeled after a real RCT chosen by a previous class. The clinical trial chosen examined the effect of sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on language development, motor skills, visual perceptual abilities, and social participation in young children with Fragile X Syndrome. Please note that your findings may differ from the original study findings. This is an entirely new dataset after all; anything is possible.Remember, this link will only allow a single submission, so triple check your work and be 100% certain that you’re ready to upload your assignment before submitting.Extra Credit will be offered for submitting early:I have attached a free spss version
PHAR 332 California State University Northridge Biostatistics Final Project Paper