I have written the paper, I just need the editing and correction. And this is the rubric. My professor already mention what to correct on the paper.
CRIM 495
Grading Rubric for Papers
Excellent
Good
Ok
Marginal
Unacceptable
GENERAL [ENTIRE PAPER]
Structure and organizationStructure is clear, organization makes sense and topics flow smoothly. Use of transition words
The author organizes the content in a logical way, uses topic sentences to clearly illustrate their point, and uses transition words/phrases to connect one idea/paragraph to another.
The author organizes the content in a logical way and uses some topic sentences and transition words/phrases.
The author presents each section separately with few connections between different sections.
The author presents the sections in a confusing or illogical manner with little to no use of topic sentences and/or transition words/phrases.
The author presents the sections in a confusing or illogical manner with little to no use of topic sentences and/or transition words/phrases and no connection to conclusion.
Proper use and format of headingsUse and format headings and subheadings correctly
Author uses and formats headings and subheadings correctly.
Author uses headings for all sections with some formatting errors.
Author uses headings for major sections only with some formatting errors
Author uses headings for major sections only and with incorrect formatting.
Author does not use headings or use of headings is inconsistent and incorrect.
FormatDouble-spacing, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, page numbering, typed,single-sided printing, etc.
No errors in formatting.
Almost no errors in formatting.
Regular errors in formatting (e.g. continually misses indent)
Many errors in formatting.
Numerous and distracting errors in formatting (e.g. complete disregard for APA formatting guidelines)
Proper Tone and VoiceFormal, academic writingActive voice
All of the writing is formal and in active voice
Most of the writing is formal and in active voice
Some of the writing is informal and in passive voice
Most of the writing is informal and in passive voice
All of the writing is informal and in passive voice
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE (0.5 – 1.5 pages)
(5 of 5 possible points)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(0-1)
Broad thesis/topic statements–Provides clear sense of content/topic–Importance of topic–Engages reader (hook)
The topic/thesis statements are clear, concise, engaging, and thought provoking. Importance of topic is clearly addressed.
The topic/ thesis statements are clear but not the hook to engage the reader. Importance of topic is addressed.
The topic/ thesis statements are less than clear and not engaging. Importance of topic is not addressed.
The topic/thesis statement is incomplete and/or unfocused. Importance is not addressed.
Missing/No Evidence
Organizational Roadmap–name of case–three factors–clear
Author clearly and concisely previews the structure of the proposal (i.e., roadmap). The case and the three factors are clear.
Author previews the structure of the proposal but is not concise. The case and the three factors are given.
Author does not adequately preview the structure of the paper. The case and the three factors are not given.
The structure of the paper is stated in general terms The case and the three factors are not given.
Missing/No Evidence
Purpose statementFor example–what you want reader to learn–what you hope to accomplish
The purpose is clearly and concisely stated in an engaging manner.
The purpose is clearly and concisely stated.
The purpose has to be inferred.
The purpose is incomplete and/or unclear.
Missing/No Evidence
CASE DESCRIPTION (2 to 3.5 double-spaced pages)
(10 out of 10 possible points)
(8-9)
(5-7)
(2-4)
(0-1)
Brief overview paragraph with organizational roadmap–Clear what the section is about–Name of case–2 to 3 sentences–See Michelle Murphy example (BB, 495-001)
Overview present and clear. Organizational roadmap present and clear.
Overview present but unclear. Organizational roadmap present and clear.
Overview present but unclear. Organizational roadmap present but unclear.
Either Overview or Organizational Roadmap is missing.
Both Overview and Organizational Roadmap missing.
Clear and Concise description of selected case–Use your own words and do not rely on quotes–Can be chronological description but does not have to be. However, should include details about wrongful conviction and exoneration to the extent possible.–Does have to be organized and flowing (not jump around from one topic to another and back again)–Do not include extraneous (unnecessary) detail. Keep to the suggested page limits–Engaging
The case description is concise, organized, and written in your own words. It is engaging and does not include unnecessary information. It is an appropriate length.
The case description is concise, organized, and written in your own words. But it is not engaging and includes some unnecessary information. It is an appropriate length.
The case description is not concise, not organized, but is written in your own words. It is not engaging and includes some unnecessary information. It is an appropriate length.
The case description is unorganized, and/or does not use your own words. It is not engaging and includes unnecessary information. It is too long (more than 3.5 pages) or too short (1 page or less).
The case description is missing or the majority is quoted or plagiarized. It is too long (more than 3.5 pages) or too short (1 page or less).
Three case selection factors –Clear and present–Detailed/Informative
The 3 factors are clear and detailed/informative.
The 3 factors are clear but not detailed/ informative.
The 3 factors have to be inferred and are not detailed/ informative.
The 3 factors are not obvious or are incomplete.
The 3 factors are Missing.
Brief Summary and Transition Paragraph–Brief summary or wrap up of section–Transitions into next section of the paper (i.e., analysis of 3 factors)–Engaging–See Bernard Baran example (BB, 495-001)
Summary/ transition paragraph is clear and engaging. Written in a way that sets up the next section of paper
Summary/ transition paragraph is present but not engaging. Does not provide a summary. Written in a way that sets up the next section of paper.
Summary/ transition paragraph is present but not engaging and introduces new information. Not written in a way that transitions to next section.
Summary/ transition paragraph is partially present but is unclear, not engaging, and does not transition into next section.
Summary/ transition paragraph is missing.
ANALYSIS OF ERRORS (4 to 5 double-spaced pages)Note, this section is NOT about your case; it is about the 3 factors/errors
(10 out of 10 possible points)
(8-9)
(5-7)
(2-4)
(0-1)
Brief overview paragraphs with organizational roadmap–Clear what the section is about–2 to 3 sentences
Overview present and clear. Organizational roadmap present and clear.
Overview present but unclear. Organizational roadmap present and clear.
Overview present but unclear. Organizational roadmap present but unclear.
Either Overview or Organizational Roadmap is missing.
Both Overview and Organizational Roadmap missing.
Use of scholarly sourcesUse of reliable sources of information for EACH of the three factors (including academic journal articles, court cases, etc.). You should findONE to TWO reliable sources on your own (not provided in this class) for EACH factor
Author uses all or mostly reliable sources. Found and cited at least 3 reliable sources (1 for each factor)
Author uses all or mostly reliable sources. Foundand cited 2 reliable sources (for 2 factors)
Author uses a mix of reliable and unreliable sources. Foundand cited 2 reliable sources (for 2 factors)
Author uses all or mostly unreliable sources. Foundand cited only 1 reliable source
Author uses all or mostly unreliable sources. Does not find any sources on his/her own
Organized, Clear, and ConciseOverall section is organized (follows a logical course, use of headings), writing is clear and concise. Main points are apparent and supported with evidence. –Use your own words and use quotes sparingly or not at all.
Section is organized and easy to follow. Writing is clear and main points supported with evidence.
Section is mostly organized. Writing is mostly clear but some instances of awkward writing. Main points supported with evidence.
Section is not always organized. Writing has many instances of awkward writing. Most main points supported with evidence.
Section is not organized. Writing has many instances of awkward writing. Main points not supported with evidence. Section written in own words.
Section is not organized. Writing is not clear. Main points not supported with evidence. Section not written in author’s own words.
Citation of sourcesSources are cited consistently and properly both in your writing and in reference list at end
Author uses citations consistently and in correct APA format both in text and the reference list.
There are a few formatting errors in the document’s citations.
There are many formatting errors in the document’s citations.
None or few cited works are in correct APA format.
Author does not include citations.
Brief Summary and Transition Paragraph–Brief summary or wrap up of section–Transitions into next section of the paper (i.e., Research Questions)–Engaging
Summary/ transition paragraph is clear and engaging. Written in a way that sets up the next section of paper
Summary/ transition paragraph is present but not engaging. Does not provide a summary. Written in a way that sets up the next section of paper.
Summary/ transition paragraph is present but not engaging and introduces new information. Not written in a way that transitions to next section.
Summary/ transition paragraph is partially present but is unclear, not engaging, and does not transition into next section.
Summary/ transition paragraph is missing.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS (3 to 4 double-spaced pages)These questions should derive from your case and/or analysis of errors
(10 out of 10 possible points)
(8-9)
(5-7)
(2-4)
(0-1)
Clarity–TWO research questions clearly stated (no ‘should’ questions or statements)–The independent variable (what you want to study) is clearly defined and operationalized–The dependent measure (outcome) is clearly measurable
Both research questions are clear. The independent and dependent variables are also well defined.
Both research questions are mostly clear. The independent and dependent variables are generally well defined.
Both research questions are mostly clear. Either independent or dependent variable is well defined, but not both.
Only one research question is clear. The independent and dependent variables are not well defined.
Neither research question is clear. The independent and dependent variables are not well defined or are absent.
Justification–The justification for the two questions is clear (WHY is it important that these two research questions be addressed?). –The justification is supported with evidence [cites] (not just your opinion that this is an important question)
Justification for both questions is clearly present and well developed. Supporting evidence from scholarly sources is provided.
Justification for both questions is present but not well developed. Supporting evidence from scholarly sources is attempted.
Justification for only one question is present but not well developed. Supporting evidence from scholarly sources is attempted.
Justification for one or both questions is present but not well developed. Supporting evidence from scholarly sources is lacking.
Justification for both questions is not present.
Methods for Research Questions–Clearly state how each research question could be answered.–Be specific about what methods would be appropriate to use (e.g., survey, interview, experiments, analyzing already-collected data [which data?])
Methods to address both research questions are clear and specific. Methods specified are appropriate to answer the questions.
Methods to address both research questions are clear and specific. Methods specified are not appropriate to answer the questions.
Methods to address only one research question are clear and specific. Methods specified are not appropriate to answer the questions.
Methods to address both research questions are not clear and not specific. Methods specified are not appropriate to answer the questions.
Methods to address both research questions are not specified.
Other–Research questions address two SEPARATE factors (e.g., both questions are not on false confessions)–The section is logical and coherent. Relationship of the questions to the case/factors is apparent.
Questions are about two separate issues. Section is logical and coherent. Tie in with case is clear.
Questions are about two separate issues. Section is mostly logical and coherent. Tie in with case is mostly clear.
Questions are about two separate issues. Section is sometimes logical and coherent. Tie in with case is not clear.
Questions are not about two separate issues. Section is mostly logical, coherent. Tie in with case is mostly clear.
Questions are not about two separate issues. Section is illogical and/or incoherent. Tie in with case is not clear.
Conclusion Paragraph–A concise paragraph that summarizes the paper as a whole (not just the research question section)
Conclusion paragraph is present, and summarizes the paper as a whole in an organized and engaging way.
Conclusion paragraph is present, and summarizes the paper as a whole but is either not organized or not engaging.
Conclusion paragraph is present, and summarizes the paper as a whole but is not organized and is not engaging.
Conclusion paragraph is present, but does not summarize the (whole) paper. It is not organized and is not engaging.
Conclusion paragraph is not present.
Can someone edited my paper according to the rubric. I have written the paper i
Peirce College Coca Cola and McDonalds Code of Conduct Case Study
Peirce College Coca Cola and McDonalds Code of Conduct Case Study.
Once complete, I will send you an invite for replies to 3 students. I must post this first in order to see other students posts. Here is the discussion: Discussion: Code of ConductLocate the code of conduct for three different companies using the Internet. You may use your employer, if they have a code conduct, as one of them.Post a clear and logical response in 250 words to the following, providing specific examples to support your answers:Briefly describe the companies and each code of conduct.What are the similarities? Explain.What are the differences? Explain.
Peirce College Coca Cola and McDonalds Code of Conduct Case Study
Florida Gulf Coast University Hidden Brain NPR Podcast Paper
online assignment help Florida Gulf Coast University Hidden Brain NPR Podcast Paper.
Required length: At least 20 sentences cite any references in APA formatThe NPR podcast Hidden Brain (in the link below) explores various psychology topics. You can listen to this podcast in the link below or in Apple podcast, Spotify, etc. Note that the link below also includes full written transcripts of each episode:https://www.npr.org/series/423302056/hidden-brain (Links to an external site.)Your assignment here is to browse some of the episodes in this podcast and pick ONE episode that relates to some field/theme of psychology and is interesting to you (note that when you scroll to the bottom of the episode list and click “Load more stories”, there are many more episodes to choose from). Listen to your chosen episode in full and write a post in the discussion below in which you include the following (in at least 20 sentences total): (Links to an external site.)1. Identify the episode you picked and summarize the specific psychology information from the episode that you find interesting. Optionally, you can also explain why you picked this episode/why you find this particular episode interesting (but if you have personal reasons, you don’t have to share them unless you want to).2. Find at least one academic source about the psychology-related aspects of the information in the podcast. If applicable, this could be our textbook (and might be a chapter we have not covered in the class). Or it could be an scientific peer-reviewed article, a reliable academic website or video, or another book. Discuss how the academic source addresses/confirms/challenges the information in the podcast. Cite the academic source(s) in APA format (in-text citations and a reference list). You don’t need to use APA format citations when you refer to the podcast itself as long as you clearly identify the name of the relevant episode. 3. Share your opinions and possible critique about the episode (e.g. was the information presented in an engaging way, or was it boring, annoying, etc; was something missing? Or too much information?). If you relate to something in the episode and want to share about your own life experiences or observations, feel free to include it in your post (but sharing personal experiences is not required). The required minimum length of your podcast post is at least 20 full sentences (not including the reference list). There is no limitation on the maximum number of sentences. IMPORTANT: In addition to submitting your post in the discussion below, submit your podcast post in the PLAGIARISM CHECK (underneath the assignment itself) to get a Vericite score. See the instructions there. I will not grade this assignment without the Vericite plagiarism score. GRADING: 10 POINTS: accurately identifying and summarizing relevant psychology information from a podcast episode (clearly showing that the student listened to the episode)Needs improvement – 1-3 ptsSatisfactory – 4-7 pts Excellent – 8-10 pts5 POINTS: picking a relevant academic source(s) and accurately citing with APA format in-text citations and a reference list for the academic source(s) 5 POINTS: evaluating the podcast episode
Florida Gulf Coast University Hidden Brain NPR Podcast Paper
Chart analysis
Chart analysis.
Attached is an excel file that has charts of admission and registration period for the fall semester 2019/2020 of a university.What I need is 4 double spaced paper about these graphs and an interpretation and analysis of the charts. for example you will see different charts about Dammam city/center, you can combine these graphs in a summary. we also need a comparison between the general admission and the admission of ALL the centers. the comparison should include differentiation between nationalities, programs, sponsored or paid, new and old students…etc the paper could also include comparison between different dates and different centers about number of applicants the report should be written, but please feel free to include tablesplease message me if you have any questions or need more explanation
Chart analysis
Reflective Journal #2: Volunteer Recruitment
Reflective Journal #2: Volunteer Recruitment.
DirectionsRead all the assigned readings on this learning module’s agenda. Then respond to the writing prompts and questions below.Answer each question/prompt thoroughly and completely. Remember this exercise is meant for you to be able to reflect upon what you have read and learned. There are not right or wrong answers here, but responses should show comprehension and interpretation of the material.Please do not upload a document to submit this assignment. Rather, you may type it in Microsoft Word and then copy & paste into the journal assignment for submission and grading.When recruiting different types of volunteers (long-term, one-day-only, skill-based, virtual, board member, etc), what different strategies do you think are most effective for various groups? How do you target your recruitment based on volunteer motivations? Integrate resources from the learning module and cite your references in text and in a reference list!ISU has a Community Service Leave policy. What benefits and challenges do you see to having the policy? Find at least two additional organizations that offer this type of benefit and compare them. How do they differ? How are they similar? What might an organization gain by allowing their employees to take paid leave to volunteer? Do you think Community Service Leave is a major incentive for perspective employees when job searching? Why or why not? Integrate resources from the learning module and cite your references in text and in a reference list!What are common motivators for people to volunteer? Are they intrinsic or extrinsic? What are your thoughts on providing incentives for volunteers (t-shirts, gift cards, meals, etc.)Construct a comprehensive list of volunteer recruitment strategies discussed in the required readings and videos.Evaluate the FEMA online course. Was it an effective tool for teaching emergency managers effectively about volunteer recruitment?Please share something not addressed in the previous questions that you learned throughout this learning module and how you can apply it to your nonprofit career. [Please note: all thoughtful answers will receive full credit for this question.]
Reflective Journal #2: Volunteer Recruitment