Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read Chapters 8 and 9 of the textbook.You have been hired as a marketing consultant in your company, or a company or public service organization of your choosing. The organization is asking you to identify a sample population to determine the demand for a product or service they are planning to offer. You will need to provide an unbiased sample survey that best represents the population.In your post,State the organization’s industry or purpose.Identify the product or services selected for conducting the survey.State the problem that the product or service will solve.Explain what the organization wants to learn about the product or services from the survey.Explain how and where you determined your sample population and why your sample choice will get you the data you need.Determine a sample size that will adequately represent the population for your example and how you determined this is an adequate sample size in your survey.Guided Response: Your initial response should be a minimum of 300 words in length. Review and respond to two of your peers’ sample selections. Propose an alternative sample choice with justification, special circumstances, or issues that may need attention in your peer’s sample. Note that this discussion is reinforcing the fact that you can get many different samples from the same population.
BUS 625 Ashford University Marketing Consultation Discussion
Liberalist and Socialist Responses to Khomeini Term Paper
Table of Contents Introduction Liberalism Response to Khomeini Socialism Response to Khomeini Conclusion Works Cited Introduction Khomeini was an outstanding political leader who strived to reorganize the government and imposes his religious vision of ruling the economy. In particular, his work entitled as The Necessity for the Islamic Government, he outlines his position towards the government and his vigorous apposition against Western tendencies in administering the state. The main point of his work is based on the idea that government should be guided by divine laws and there should be executive and administering organs that would implement laws and ordinances of Islam. In addition, Khomeini is reluctant to accept corrupt and ruthless regimes that contradict Islam teachings. He was more concerned with the necessity to preserve national and religious identity being the basic need of Islamic people. In contrast to his judgments, liberalist and socialist views on the government and its functions are quite different. To be more exact, their outlooks contradict Khomeini’s views on the government and power in terms of religion, political system, and social rights of people. Liberalism Response to Khomeini By juxtaposing liberalist and Khomeini’s outlook on the government, there are numerous aspects and ideas that considerably differ from each other. This particularly concerns such issues as individual freedom and equality of human rights. Another serious discrepancy is revealed through different views on the relation of religion and government. Hence, Khomeini envisions religion as the basis for constructing laws and regulations within governmental bodies believing that this will contribute to the “production of morally upright and virtual human beings” (Khomeini 42). In contrast, liberalism insists on the necessity to separate the church and the state believing that religion should not be involved in governing and administering people. Considering religious views, particularly the views on separation of the church and the state, it is necessary to resort to Thomas Jefferson provides his position which challenges Khomeini’s view. Hence, Jefferson believes that a religion is “a concern purely between our God and our consciences, for which we were accountable to him, and not to priests” (Jefferson as cited in Jefferson and Beileson 34). Interpreting this statement, liberalism envision religion is not a social phenomenon, there is no connection between religion and government because they are based on different outlooks. Besides, liberalism could also oppose to Khomeini’s idea about close connection of government to morality stating that these notions cannot be considered within one context. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More As it has been mentioned previously, the liberal ideas centers on the need of individual freedom. It was supported by many philosophers who did not believe in power of monarchy. Liberalism is known to entail different beliefs and ideas in what they call a better life. The liberalists seem to back Khomeini’s idea of having a good life in future without what they call a tyrannical authority. The renowned liberalism philosophers include John Locke, Thomas Paine and John Stuart Mill all of whom their work seems to advocate for a liberal and free kind of society. John Lock in his works Two Treatises on Government states that there are two liberal components which are the intellectual liberty, which include the freedom of conscience and the economic liberty (Locke 4). This issue is expounded by the philosopher as freedom to possess property and deal with it in any manner. He goes further to explain what intellectual liberty entailed in his Letter Concerning Toleration. John Locke shares the same religious ideas such as Khomeini where he argues in his works that man was created by God who gave his commands that man enjoys whatever is on the earth. In response to Khomeini’s views on religion, the philosopher has a different perception of this concept with regard to the government. In particular, he believes that although a person should be concerned with the divinity laws, there still should be the idea of individualism. In addition, he was less extreme in his views on religion as an integral part of the administrative and executive organs. It should be the basis of the political system (Locke 13). These ideas are similar to those of Khomeini who argues the necessity to form a government that will serve as a protector to the society when it comes to enforcing the rights of individuals. Further in his work, Khomeini bases his arguments on the Quran, the same concept used by Locke when he backs his argument on the concept of creation. However, Locke seems to disagree with Khomeini on the concept of entrusting the government wholly to govern man. He argues that man should be left to acquire his natural state of living and should not live under certain rules. He argues that the government should act as a trustee only. We will write a custom Term Paper on Liberalist and Socialist Responses to Khomeini specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Thomas Paine on the other hand wrote several articles backing the need of freedom of man. In his articles, he criticized the monarchies and the social institutions. He went further to expose the government’s wrongs such as fraud in a bid to promote individual freedom and degradation. He reasons with Khomeini on the need of a government that promotes individual rights rather than living under a certain tyrannical body with no proper rules of law put in place. He however was not affiliated with any religion and argued that he believed that his mind was his religion. His pamphlet, common sense is said to contribute to the idea of a republic government. It advocated for a better form of government other than the tyrannical one that Americans had been accustomed to at the time (Paine and Philp 7). John Stuart Mill on the other hand advocated for Utilitarianism and one of the chief campaigners for liberty. He also had the same idea like the other two philosophers about attaining some form of happiness to the people. He argued that the monarchs had excess powers to the peril of the common citizen and he became an advocate of fighting for those powers to be shed so that people should attain their freedom (Mill 15). He further contended that though power had been given to people through what he calls democratic governments, the threat is that liberty has been denied to people because of the laws imposed or social pressure. Socialism Response to Khomeini Confronting socialist views to Khomeini’s position about governmental system, it should be noted that socialistic school of thought greatly opposes to Islamic teaching that rejects the individuality and human consciousness. This is especially connected with the concept of equality, individual freedom, and necessity for changes. Like liberalist, they are also in a strong apposition to religion rejecting to accept divinity laws as the basis for governmental system. According to Marks, “[r]eligion is the general theory of that world, its encyclopedic compendium, its logic in a popular form, its spiritualistic point d’honeur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn completion, its universal ground for consolation and justification” ( Marx 20). On the one hand, the socialism idealist accepts religion as the essence of a human being (Marx 20). On the other hand, Marx perceives religion as a parallel world that does not have anything in common with politics and government. The social theorists base their arguments on the modern capitalism. They refer socialism as a society that is made up of political movement or philosophy (Lenin 240). In contrast to Islamic teachings that impose some sort of duties and obligations in front of God, socialism is more concerned with equality of human rights and the formation of consciousness independent of religion. However, the similarity of views is based on the assumption that all people should be equal in wealth and opportunities. But this slight congruence is deceptive because there is much more serious divergence in views with regard to political system. Judging from Khomeini’s views, the philosopher considers government as an absolute monarchy where the governor is considered to be the envoy of God. Not sure if you can write a paper on Liberalist and Socialist Responses to Khomeini by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In response to this judgment, socialist insist that political power belong to people who have the right to participate in administering the state. Such a position is extremely opposed to Islamic governmental system that finds it extremely important to have one ruler for avoiding chaos and disorder. The proletariats on the other hand were the working class who sold their labor power. They argue that proletariat would take over the economy which would lead to diminishing social classes (Marx et al. 12). The Marxism theory is based on social change and the main aspects included the materialist and dialectical historical concept which explains the struggle in social classes. The other aspect is capitalism criticism where Marx argues that the bourgeoisie oppressed the proletariat in a capitalist society and lastly is the aspect of proletarian revolution where the working class will take over the power in a social revolution (Bernstein 3). The socialism philosophers believed that man should fight to be free of any tyranny or any kind of anarchism (Zedong 12). Other socialism philosophers like Trotsky tend to differ with Marx opinion of the Proletariat taking over the economy (Trotsky 13). Conclusion It can be seen that while both the philosophers of liberalism and socialism present quite different arguments on freedoms of individuals, governmental system and religion, but still they are rigidly apposed to Khomeini’s image of the Islamic government. Hence, the supporters of liberalism are more concerned with individual freedom where human rights and interests should be protected by the government. They defend democratic values and believe that the state should be separated from the church. The socialism theorists base their arguments of certain classes of the individuals oppressing their counterparts and not a governing body. The Marxist theory reveals that the weaker class will take over the stronger class through a social revolution, which contradicts Khomeini idea about the necessity to introduce executive and administrative bodies. On the other hand, the liberalism theorists support Khomeini arguments that indeed a government is very necessary but that very same government should not withhold the freedom of the people. Works Cited Bernstein, Eduard, Evolutionary socialism: a criticism and affirmation, Stuttgart: Huebsch, 1911. Jefferson, Thomas and Belienson Nick. Thomas Jefferson: His Words and Visions. NJ: Peter Pauper press, 1998. Khomeini, Imam. Islam and Revolution: writings and declarations of Imam Khomeini. Trans. Hamid Algar. US: Mizan Press, 1998 Lenin, Vladimir. Revisionism, Imperialism, and Revolution. Ideals and Ideologies, Terence Ball and Richard Dagger. New York: Pearson Longman, 1967 Locke, John. Two Treatises on Government. US: Urie R, 1957. Marx Karl, Engels Friedrich, and Gaspe, Philip. The Communist Manifesto: A road Map to History’s Most Important Political Document, Canada: Haymarket Books, 2005. Marx, Karl. Marxism, Socialism, and Religion. US: Resistance Books, 2001. Mill, John. On Liberty and Utilitarianism. France: Bantam; 1993. Paine, Thomas
University of Central Florida Jesus Christ OT System Questions
assignment writing services University of Central Florida Jesus Christ OT System Questions.
I’m working on a philosophy question and need support to help me understand better.
In this two-part final project, you will construct an in-depth examination of Jesus’s NT fulfillment of the entire OT system. The book of Hebrews is one giant OT sermon in the NT. The section in view for this assignment focuses on how Jesus fulfills the OT.Part 1: Take the NT text, Hebrews 6:13-10:18, and make an annotated list of all the ways Jesus fulfills the systems of the OT. Starting from the beginning of this passage, complete the following:Make a list of every OT reference: people, places, ideas, actions, themes, etc.Then look up these OT items (using CCU’s online resources, a study Bible, online Bible software, a Bible index, etc.) and state where they are found in the OT (verses) and in what genre of OT literature.Provide a brief explanation of what each item is or does in the OT.Then using the text in Hebrews, articulate how Jesus fulfills or surpasses that OT idea.Part 2: Create a succinct and clear summary of your findings. How would you communicate your conclusions to a middle-school student? In the equivalent of two pages, double spaced, communicate the following:What is the central thesis of Hebrews 6:13-10:18?How does this perspective connect the NT to the OT?Submit your two-part assignment as a single file to the appropriate submission area.Assignment Requirements:Paper should be 6-8 pages, double spaced (not including the title and reference pages).Written in Word using APA format (see the APA Requirements module for further assistance).In-text citations included to support your main points.Click on the Session 5 Final Assignment link and submit your assignment by the posted due date. Review the rubric available in Due Dates and Grades for specific grading criteria.
University of Central Florida Jesus Christ OT System Questions
Invent-A-God. I’m working on a Communications question and need guidance to help me study.
For this short creative writing experiment, you will create an immortal being in order to explain a specific natural phenomenon. The natural phenomenon may be an event (for example: earthquake, flood, fire) or a celestial body (for example: a constellation of stars, the sun or moon, a comet) or a terrestrial body (for example: a mountain, ocean, type of tree, flock of birds). Give this god a name and a birth story, and describe the god’s looks and stature. Create a story about the god that explains the natural phenomenon. Finally, give the god a primal power and a primal weakness: what can this god do that no one else can do? And what is the one way this god might be slain? Note: ALL of this must be your own writing!Length: roughly 750 words.
Importance of service recovery in successful relationships
Service recovery plays an important role in nowadays relationship marketing. Today, many organisations are facing challenges in the area of customer service and service delivery. It has been found that as the cost of attracting a new customer is more expensive than retaining an existing customer, therefore, organisations are striving to build long-term relationship with existing customers (Fornell and Wernerfelt, 1987; Kotler et al., 2003; Spreng et al., 1995). This approach helps the organisations to keep their existing customers higher the loyalty level towards their businesses and also benefit the customers in enjoying a high level of customer service which is provided by the organisations. Why do organisations need to implement service recovery programmes? Service failure happens all the time when organisations provide services to the customers. Although a zero defect product and well-trained service delivery can result in a negative service conflict because of the heterogeneity of customer’s outcome and process expectations. These unavoidable mistakes affect the goal of securing customer base (Chihyung Ok et al., 2007). For customers, service failure means they do not get what they expect to get, whether in term of products or services. For businesses, they are required to rectify customers’ imbalance in equity evaluation (Chihyung Ok et al., 2007). Owing to unavoidable service failures are happened, organisations cannot ignore the importance of cost when the customer is lost (Kristie K. Seawright et al., 2008). Increasingly profits and lower marketing costs for long-term customers A research estimated that organisations lost about 50 per cent of their customers every five years (Mach et al., 2000). Most customers feel that complaining to staff when the problem occurs is a waste of time and dissatisfied customers will tell a number of people about the unhappiness they have received from the service provider (Gavin Eccles
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service