Get help from the best in academic writing.

Bus 335 Assignment 2 Business Expansion and Substainability

Bus 335 Assignment 2 Business Expansion and Substainability.

Due Week 10 and worth 280 pointsIn order to complete this assignment, refer to the scenario that you chose in Assignment 1. Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of these assignments.Using the scenario from Assignment 1, write a six to seven (6-7) page paper in which you:
Identify three (3) job requirements (e.g., needed certifications, previous work experience, external influences, etc.) that could apply to your chosen scenario. Determine two (2) ways these requirements could impact staffing at your organization. Next, suggest one (1) strategy that you could utilize to ensure that all applicants meet the identified job requirements for your organization. Justify your response.
Outline a long-term recruitment plan that contains at least four (4) components, is aligned with your company’s recruitment strategy, but also addresses possible job skill or credential shortages. Note: Consider concepts such as succession planning and hiring retirees.
Describe three (3) branding strategies that you would employ to attract qualified applicants to your organization. Next, suggest three (3) communication methods that you would utilize to reach out to applicants. Predict the outcome of integrating your branding strategies and communication methods at your organization. Provide a rationale for your response.
Determine two (2) selection processes for recruiting new employees that could apply to your chosen scenario and then identify five (5) selection criteria that you could use when hiring new employees. Next, analyze the effect of the five (5) identified selection criteria on long-term employee retention and preservation of organizational knowledge. Justify your response.
Suggest two (2) assessment methods that you could employ to select new employees for your organization and then analyze the validity and reliability of each method in regards to the job your organization is offering. Next, identify four (4) job predictors that you believe can assess candidates’ knowledge, skills, abilities, and other skills and experiences (KSAO’s). Provide support for your rationale.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
Bus 335 Assignment 2 Business Expansion and Substainability

UPG Besieged by Climate Deniers a Scientist Decides to Fight Back Article.

Mann, M. (2012, April 12). Besieged by climate deniers, a scientist decides to fight back. Yale Environment 360. Retrieved from http://e360.yale.edu/features/climate_scientist_mi…As you read and take notes on this article, identify the subject of the article, the occasion that prompted its composition, the intended audience, and the purpose the writer hoped to accomplish in writing it.Write a brief (2-page) paper in which you summarize the article’s main ideas clearly. Be sure to:
Identify the article by title, date, and author in the first paragraph of your summary.
Avoid quoting the article directly; employ the technique of summary to report the main ideas of the article in your own words.
Avoid taking a position on the subject or argument presented; maintain objectivity in reporting the information you have read.
Required Criteria:In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the Assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria:
Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained.
Assignment should follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).
Writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful.
Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics.
Appropriate APA citation style should be followed.
You should also make sure to:

Include a title page with full name, class name, section number, and date.
Include an introductory and concluding paragraph and demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard English.
Use examples to support your discussion.
List all sources on a separate reference page at the end of your paper and cite them within the body of your paper using APA format.
UPG Besieged by Climate Deniers a Scientist Decides to Fight Back Article

Saint Leo University Early European Philosophy Discussion

Saint Leo University Early European Philosophy Discussion.

Two Part AssignmentPart 1: Original Discussion at least 500 words double APA guidelinesFrom the Smith textbook, select one of the Reflection questions at the end of Chapters 1-3 to address in your initial thread. Begin your initial thread by identifying the chapter and question number and by inserting the exact wording of the question at the top of your post. In your response, consider how you may extend your answer with a critical analysis, personal reflection, and/or perspectives from different sources. To review APA video references and citations, explore APA Style: Youtube Video References. (Links to an external site.)Please review the Discussion Assignment Instructions and Discussion Grading Rubric prior to posting. You may also click the three dots in the upper corner to Show Rubric.Part 2: Respond to two peer discussion (ATTACHED BELOW)Book information attached below.
Saint Leo University Early European Philosophy Discussion

ECO 2023 University of South Florida The Free Market Discussion

essay writing help ECO 2023 University of South Florida The Free Market Discussion.

Rough DraftThis Rough Draft of GEA1 – Case Study as two primary parts, described
below. You should write the paper as a cohesive whole; do not include
section headers. Use the link above for submission details.DESCRIPTION Part I – (this draws on opportunity cost (Ch 1) and markets (Ch 3)) Describe the market for kidney organs, as it would be in a free
market without government intervention, using what you have learned
about scarcity, marginal analysis in decision-making, and markets. You
must include a discussion of resources, supply and demand, as well as
marginal benefits and marginal costs. Think of this as an explanation of
the pros and cons of the market using economic terminology.Describe the benefits and costs but leave the discussion of organ rationing and other solutions to the problems in this market for the next part. Describe
this market using supply and demand; reference your graph in your
description. Include “graph 1” of this market at the end of the paper
(not included in page count). This should be a discussion without
mentioning Price Controls, only discuss how the kidney organ
market would be without government intervention. Feel free to use any
stats or data that you find through your own research – make sure you
use econ terminology.Part II – (this draws on government (Ch 4) to improve the discussion made in Part I) Consider the reasons why the market for kidney organs is not a free
market in the US, specifically discuss equity concerns. Expand on your
discussion of the market from Part I, using what you have learned about
government interventions/price controls. Discuss the current government
intervention in the Kidney Market in the U.S. Describe this market –
comparing the free market and to the government intervention in one
graph – using supply and demand; reference and discuss your graph in
your paper. Explain the current government intervention and exactly how
it corrects the problems of the free market. Include any other
beneficial aspects of the intervention that you find through your own
research – make sure you use econ terminology throughout.Also discuss other Donation Systems Around the World, no need to add a graph here.
Explore the policies that are currently implemented across the globe
(i.e. some discussed in the articles include – routine removal, presumed
consent, organ donor points, “no give, no take”, etc.). Evaluate the
limitations of these policies. Also consider how these policies fare in
terms of the efficiency vs. equity debate. (You do not need to critique
them all, just select from 2 or 3 different countries that you find
interesting/appealing.)FORMATTING The body of the text (NO header/footers/by lines, separate –
title/graph/bibliography page) for the rough draft must be at least 4 full pages
(it is best if you write onto the 5th page to be sure you meet the
minimum, keep in mind more pages will be added later for the final
draft), double-spaced, 1″ margins, and size 12 Arial FONT. File type must be doc OR docx. Make sure to include a title page and an updated bibliography page
(both should be on their own pages and not share a page with the body of
the text). Graphs/Charts/Figures/Bibliography should be at the very end of the text and are not included in page count.
Only use in-line citations with the author and the year in parentheses
at the end of the sentence; do not include citations in the footers. The
full citation should be given on the bibliography page only.Submit your assignment using Turnitin under assignments Rough Draft
ECO 2023 University of South Florida The Free Market Discussion

RC Gun Control in the United States Controversial Issues Outline & Thesis Statement

RC Gun Control in the United States Controversial Issues Outline & Thesis Statement.

As you gather and read through your project sources, you should begin building your outline. This week, you are required to submit a substantive outline with your thesis statement and your potential arguments/discussions. This outline should not be a rough draft. It should be at least 2 pages, written in substantive, sentence-format, showing a clear road map of the research you found and how it supports the recommendation you are proposing to resolve the major problem(s) that you identified. It must include at least half of the content for final draft and substantive research materials with at least 5 credible and scholarly sources. Include APA citations for any resources used as references.ResourcesFor assistance with writing a thesis statement, check the following resources:What is a thesis statement?Research Papers Step 3: Writing a thesis/introductionFor assistance with writing a good full-sentence outline, go to http://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/32339. Scroll down to the “Full-sentence outline” section.
RC Gun Control in the United States Controversial Issues Outline & Thesis Statement

Plato’s Republic and Hobbes’s Leviathan Philosophical Comparison Essay (Critical Writing)

Table of Contents Introduction The Republic Theory Versus The Leviathan Theory The Ability Of Human To Reason Theory Of Community And Its Take To Human Reason Conclusion Reference List Introduction The Leviathan and Republic theories proposed by Thomas Hobbes and Plato respectively are the two most solid arguments that attempt to explain an ideal state. From their arguments, it is clear that they each share a common sentiment regarding the need of a State. However, they seem to differ on the manner of administration to run the state. While Hobbes adopt a negative image of humans and view them as being materialistic on one hand, Plato adopts a positive image of humans and view them as inherently good on the other (Velasquez, 2008). However, they form a common ground by arguing that a society need to have some form of a government that creates a hierarchy of some sort. They both concur on the issue that without some sort of government, the society would be chaotic and would eventually crumble down. This paper will critically analyze the arguments posed by both Hobbes and Plato and to further establish the capability of human reason to determine the universal, objective, moral and political truths based on the two theories. The Republic Theory Versus The Leviathan Theory In order to form a solid basis on how the two theories visualize the ability of man to reason, it is important to have a valid understanding of the theories themselves. According to Plato’s Republic theory, he envisions a State run by individuals, each possessed with particular mannerisms that would otherwise render them more superior to others. He presents a positive attitude towards human nature in what he calls an ‘ideal state’. According to his theory, he views man as being naturally good and only requires a supreme power to guide him. According to Plato, if man and his government are well affiliated and balanced, then a just society comes into existence. In order to create a perfect state, the government created should further integrate virtues of knowledge, bravery, self-control and justice. Hobbes on the other hand shows his distrust in men and governance. He views man as greedy and up to no good. According to his school of thought, Hobbes adopts a materialistic philosophy and argues that human nature is characterized by desires and repugnance that ultimately lead to regular power struggle. He further contends that the virtue of morality is instinctively subjective and that human nature is naturally vicious and aggressive resulting to a fearful society. He envisions his imaginary State as one tainted with regular wars, death, violence and fear due to lack of adequate resources. He criticizes Plato’s idea of having a State with platonic love and contends that it is non-existence. He also believes that justice cannot prevail in such a society. The Ability Of Human To Reason Human reason is very important as it is related with the act of thinking and making sense of certain issues (Kellogg, 2002). Most theorists have attempted to learn and explain human reasoning. According to Hobbes, he describes reason as being calculative. Plato on the other hand views reason as a natural sovereign which should take over other things such as emotions and spiritedness. He further contends that humans achieve a form of happiness that is enjoyed in accordance with reason. Both Plato and Hobbes in their theories lay out solid arguments on the ability of human beings to reason and make impartial decisions regarding political issues that affect them. According to his Republic theory, Plato contends that humans have the ability to reason without being externally influenced. In his ideal government, which he envisions as one that capitalizes on natural order, humans can be able to exercise their freedom to make choices. He however states that the humans are guided by the wisdom of their rulers. One of the leading philosophers, Immanuel Kant, seemed to share similar sentiments as Plato regarding human reason. He introduced the act of practical reasoning where man is governed by his own self-governed norms. In his argument, Plato argues that in his government, which is run freely and fairly, each person has the freedom of following their goals in their own will so long as they conform to the standards given by reason. He also holds a strong belief that human nature is characterized by reason, desire and aggression. He however argues that reason dominates desire and aggression. Man is therefore able to reason so as to ascertain the truth about how they are supposed to live. The truth, according to his theory, engrosses knowledge of thoughts in existence in other magnitude of reality that can only be apprehended by reason. Based on the above argument, Plato states that man can exercise self-control when it comes to their desires and aggressive nature by using their reason. This is because man is not governed by self-interested appetites as claimed by other philosophers such as Freud and Hobbes. Plato contest that the aptitude of reason to have power over desires and aggression is dependent on one’s past preferences. This means that if man constantly gives in to his desires and aggressive nature, then he ultimately lose his capacity to control them. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Hobbes seems to have a different take on the views proposed by Plato regarding human reason. He depicts reasoning as the practice of calculating the outcomes of names that refer to entities. He further argues that the act of reasoning can be miscalculated and he gives an example of error as a type of inaccurate reasoning. He equates reasoning to science and further contest that scientific data is not qualified as being absolute knowledge but a conditional one that relies on correlations between reasons and effects. He goes further to divide knowledge into two categories; absolute and conditional. Hobbes argues that the process to reason falls under the category of conditional knowledge. Hobbes regards man as being selfish and unruly and as a result has to be forcefully governed by a supreme power. In this kind of tyranny, it is almost impossible to control opposing interests hence lacking a legal command to distinguish right or wrong. However, man possesses innate rights to shield themselves from harm. This therefore mean that man lean towards the basic laws of nature intended to avoid the state of ‘war’. It is this law of nature that govern human reason according to Hobbes. Each of the above philosophers provides solid and valid arguments on the ability of human to reason. It is evident that Plato, in his Republic theory, posits that humans are capable of reasoning and discover the universal, objective, moral and political truth. This is because man rely more on reason to make judgments and in most cases, he is able to make solid and sound verdict. Hobbes on the other hand posits that man is not capable of ascertaining the political truth through his reasoning as he often lean toward the natural law to influence his reasoning. Theory Of Community And Its Take To Human Reason Community has been known to bring together people and create a harmonious bond. It can be argued that the theory of community hence integrates solidarity, trust and commitment. The community share a common interest and is therefore a very important theory that helps to establish a middle field between Hobbes and Plato’s theories. It is believed that community was preceded by state of nature. The state of nature is used to illustrate the hypothetical form that came into existence before the government. The state of nature makes a huge contribution on human reasoning. In Hobbes work, De Cive, Hobbes describes the state of nature as one that liberalizes man. Plato on the other hand relies on the theory of community to argue that the people share a mutual interest and can therefore reason. It is therefore important to conclude that both Hobbes and Plato agree on the ability of human beings to reason but only differ on the extent of reasoning and whether or not it is absolute. The theory of community therefore gives a fair play in determining the degree of reasoning described by both philosophers. Conclusion It is arguable from the theories above that human nature is capable of reasoning and ascertaining the universal, objective, moral and political truths. Though Plato and Hobbes take on different view to determine the threshold of human reasoning, it is evident from both their arguments that reason forms a strong basis in both their theories. It is not in dispute that humans indeed reason. The only discrepancy is that though both acknowledge the fact that reasoning indeed exist, it is the ability of humans to make sound decisions based on their reason that has been put to test. It is therefore conclusive that human reason can facilitate the discovery of universal, objective, moral and political truths. Reference List Kellogg, R. (2002). Cognitive Psychology. California: Sage Publications Ltd. Velasquez, M. (2008). Philosophy: A Text with Readings. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. We will write a custom Critical Writing on Plato’s Republic and Hobbes’s Leviathan Philosophical Comparison specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More