Table of Contents Introduction Book reviews Northanger Abbey Maria or the Wrongs of Woman Conclusion Works Cited Introduction In the first four centuries after the inception of writing, it happened that paper writing stood out as the major component of communication, in that it transcended through space and time. It bore much acclaim in terms of the consequences it be held. As such, many believed it to shape popular opinion, belief systems, broadened understanding, and embodied a sense of belonging, the sensitive issues, the remembrance and ultimately the characteristics that defined the norms and taboos. In a nutshell, its overall effect was the shaping up of a people’s mindset therefore guiding a nation towards the realization of set goals and objectives (Kelly 17). In the process, societal behavior change was for a time attributed to this, but then again these kept on changing. A people’s attitude and perceptions towards specific things in their lives kept changing or revolving, yet the writing in the books remained constant. This was a quagmire to the thinkers and philosophers of the romantic period, and it remained among the readers, writers and philosophers alike on how these kept shifting. In the romantic period, fiction writing attracted a big chunk of the populace, and such it proved a way in which the ideas of the writers and authors alike filtered into the minds of the people- majorly the middle working class. These enticed them a big deal because it provided a mirror with which to see oneself through, as such to a big extent shaped their dreams and aspirations. The relationship between the working class in the society and the romantic era was that the working class lived a liberal life, rapidly changing though retaining much of their culture carried over time through means such as folk song and others. As then, a person’s access to education was motivated by factors either within the person or external such as parents, society or relative and the rest. The middle class people were handled or spoken to suspiciously by their age mates, as such, chauvinism aside all authors proved that readers, both men and women alike read what they could come across, as such they were heavily reliant on what they wrote; fiction or non-fiction (Kelly 19). Book reviews Both stories embrace mother-daughter relationships, and bring out the heroines in them are survivors and examples that need to be emulated as they have stood out in the midst of the tyranny matted upon them by the men in their lives, be they fathers, husbands and sometimes even brothers. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More These men treat the women as mere property which can simply be traded upon to meet their needs; others view them as servants in the home, in this regard easily coerced or seduced into doing something. The story in the books have met criticism time and time again, the major ones being that General Tinley’s position in Northanger had been exaggerated, and Eleanor’s objection to be part of the make-up of a fictitious tale. Moreover, in modern times, the events at Northanger are too archaic to have a place in the minds of the common folk since much has changed and the woman has been to a great and by a bigger margin emancipated. Northanger Abbey In this Gothic tale, we are narrated for the story of a woman who is really loved and appreciated, yet lost and silent. Mrs. Eleanor Tinley, as she is called in the book is the pillar with which the book is embedded upon. In the story, the General sends an invitation to a lady; Catherine. He intends that she comes to stay at his abbey; this is against the backdrop of his determination to convince her to give up her intended inheritance to his young son. On the other hand, Eleanor also wishes to have Catherine around as the General states of this: “I know how much your heart is in it” (Austen 139). In the narrative, Catherine has a loving, kind and open heart that is full of affection, and this takes up Mrs. Tinley’s. Following the demise of her mother, Tinley had been secluded totally by society, as such with Catherine’s arrival and the kindness within compounded the trust that forged forth real friendship (Spacks 157). The narrator posses to reiterate that the chronic suffering she is undergoing is as a result of the demons that dwell within such a home as Northanger. In due course, time would unveil a totally different character in the General’s attitude and demeanor. The nice and tamed General would turn out to create scenes that at the very least irritated and more often demanding. This upsets Eleanor to the core, as a result she ends up revealing how she was used in place to lie that the General together with her were absent from home (Baker 94). We will write a custom Term Paper on Book reviews: Northanger Abbey Maria or the Wrongs of Woman specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The other opinion on this change of attitude from the General is that this abrupt unforeseeable change in behavior from apparent display of kindness, care and love to cold hearted hostility is pretty much a sign of the wrong characters in men. The tempers and tantrums thereabout is a foreground to how men behave in marriage, and such they hit a crescendo to which they do not listen to the women even when the least of manners and common sense on their part dictates so. The hostility wears Eleanor down to the point that she breaks the news to Catherine that she has been expelled and is expected to leave home the following day. The one aspect in the narration that highlights the experience of the woman in Northanger Abbey is that of one character, Isabella Thorpe. In the specific instance Henry forgives his brother towards Isabella, he says of her, “She had a heart to lose…she would have met with a very different treatment” (Austen 98). Catherine’s reaction to Henry’s judgment points out the impunity therein, and his bias to the feminine characters. A critical focus on the novel reveals how Austen hones her writing prowess by the use of ‘orphan’ in a manner contrary to what is often advocated for by Gothic novelists. Furthermore, the term’s inclusion exhibits an affectionate nod portrayed by the novel’s entertainment value. In her context, Austen portrays Catherine as a voracious reader hence she will have probably read entirely all the Gothic narratives from Thorpe’s list as at the time of her departure from Bath. As such, with the Gothic-like reception expected at Henry Tilney’s home- a clue from Tilney, Catherine’s imaginations become ecstatic to the adventure. Therefore she expects “with solemn awe to afford a glimpse of its [Northanger Abbey] massy walls of gray stones, rising amidst a groove of ancient oaks, with the last beams of the sun playing in beautiful splendour on its high Gothic Windows” (Austen 161). This could probably be a typical description about any kind of Gothic edifice. For Catherine, she encounters a reality of how Northanger Abbey is like contrary to what her fantasy Gothic texts had conditioned her to anticipate. As such: From the lodges of modern appearance to a smooth level road of fine gravel, without obstacle, alarm, or solemnity of any kind, and from her observations of the profusion and elegance of modern taste that existed in the modern furnishings to the windows which, though the form of them was a Gothic- they might be even casements- but every pane was so large, so clear, and so light! To an imagination which had hoped for…..painted glass, dirt and cobwebs (Austen 162). Not sure if you can write a paper on Book reviews: Northanger Abbey Maria or the Wrongs of Woman by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Austen description depicts a thoroughly modernized picture of Tinley’s residence contrary to the expected. As such, the context evokes disappointment from both Catherine’s and a reader’s point of view, the “real Northanger Abbey was quite devoid of Gothic features” (Austen 162). Maria or the Wrongs of Woman Around the year 1792, in London a proposition to the French assembly was made by then newly launched Talleyrand’s new education system. It simply agitated for the male members in the society or the boys to be educated. This was the motivation behind Mary Wollstonecraft’s writing, so that he could point to society that once again it was a wrong footing for the society to be vindictive of the woman in a matter which they were to play a key role. Her theory, simply put, stated that “if woman be not prepared by education to become the companion of man, she will stop the progress of knowledge, for truth must be common to all” (Wollstonecraft 28). In her work, she injected the energy and zeal to like minded individuals throughout the sexual divide- both male and female. She implored her experience, intelligence and sentiments in her quest to exorcise the ghost that was segregation along sexual lines. She found fault with what the religion and society dictated then about the female companion, as such brought to life the agitation that both philosophy and the applicability of the practice at hand, would transform a specific society with a big margin. In Maria, Wollstonecraft underscores the then culture and feelings directed toward women specifically one portrayed as strong and, dwelling through misfortunes of her horrid husband. She hopes that a reader would echo her assertion towards the evils that bedevils a woman at the hands of these men. As such, she says: The wrongs of woman, like the wrongs of the oppressed part of mankind, may be deemed necessary by their oppressors: but surely there are a few, who will dare to advance before the improvement of the age, and grant that my sketches are not the abortion of a distempered fancy, or the strong delineations of a wounded heart (Wollstonecraft 27). The tone of the book is set upon Maria’s own experience, foregrounding at the end with her demise. These two coincide, though the book was published after she had passed away by her husband, it still brought out much of what the author had intended to pass across. It begins with her imprisonment by the husband who goes ahead to get custody of their child. George Venables, the husband has her confined in a filthy asylum and befriends an attendant in there. In contrast, she is a low class lady, impoverished to say the least yet. It comes to her knowledge that Maria is not of unsound mind, and therefore decides to bring her books to read. In the books, there are writings that are made by another inmate, and they start communicating, fall in love and finally meet (Sunstein 210). As they spend time together, they get to share the tribulations in the lives they lead and thus forge a common bond. Darnford, for instance opens up that her life had been socially and morally wrong, and he happened to find himself locked up in the asylum after a binge. The doctors had refused to set him free ever since. Jemima too opens up to them, explaining how much of a bastard she was when she had been born. Her mother passed when she was much of a toddler, worsening her grave situation and position in society even more. She ended up a laborer in her own father’s house and then vacated the place for another job. Her master mistreated her, denied her food and forced her to have intercourse with him. The result- she was pregnant with her master’s baby, the wife threw her out. She aborts the baby because she cannot even sustain a single soul that is her own self and instead opts to become a prostitute. After the demise of the man who had been keeping her, she ends up at the asylum, as the attendant that she was. In subsequent chapters till the end, she reveals to her daughter via written narratives how her father and mother loved her eldest brother more than any of their children. She also goes ahead to explain to her how the brother in return dictated over them, harassed and beat them up. In order that she saves her skin from her tattered life and hopeless future, she seeks refuge from a neighbor with whom she falls in love with the son, George Venables. His general profile was presentable, likeable and respectable by all around town, but his real character was a philanderer. Marriage is portrayed as a prison; the women are the permanent inmates. As of this she says: “Was not the world a vast prison, and women born slaves?” (Wollstonecraft 27). It is after marriage and the lovers are fully settled that the horrors of the union start to haunt. It is the woman on the receiving end as she is subject to the whims of her husband, and such they are not valued as complete human beings. They are not separate from slaves, the fact that Maria was almost valued at $ 5000 is proof enough that the woman would only serve in purpose that they service their men. In the book, the narrator tells of disastrous marriages and the feminine gender- irrespective would be the one being abused, heckled, beaten up and abandoned (Wollstonecraft 20). According to the author, “Men who are inferior to their fellow men, are always most anxious to establish their superiority over women” (Wollstonecraft 95). This, she believes is a truth to eternity. Social classification is also evident, and by far much defines the difference in the manner in which the different classes of people are treated by society. Maria belonged to the upper middle class; accordingly society respected her much, and handled her with much higher esteem. Jemima, the asylum attendant belonged to the lowest ranked in their society as it then was, she was a low class, but then society rarely drew the line between these classes of people among the women as it was woven gist that was chauvinism. The result of this was that both women in the two very classes of people underwent the same ordeals (Taylor 59). Conclusion In reading the above texts, the major theme projected is the ‘discovery of the female persona’. The ability in women to practice feminism and to enjoy being women, to flag off any attempts to be easily swayed in decision making, rejecting bad advice and fending of bullying from their male counterparts. The women personalities should know the limits to their responsibilities, and how much should be required of them when and how, aside of course from them drawing the line to what is, in their judgment- right or wrong basing on their evaluation and aspirations. In many an instance, sexual expedience has been used to define the thin societal membrane that has sieved women off their functionality in society. The books reiterate that male guarantors who base on the gullibility of their female counterparts are condemned. Works Cited Austen, Jane. A companion to Jane Austen studies. West Port CT: Greenwood Press, 2000. Print. Baker, William. Critical companion of Jane Austen. New York: Penguin, 1944. Print. Kelly, Gary. English Fiction of the Romantic Period. London: Longman, 2008. Print. Spacks, Meyer. The Female Imagination: A Lit-erary and Psychological Investigation of Women’s Writ-ing. New York: Knopf, 1975. Print. Sunstein, Emily. A Different Face. The Life of Mary Wollstonecraft. Denver: MacMurray, 2009. Print. Taylor, Barbara. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print. Wollstonecraft, Mary. MARIA or the Wrongs of Woman. London: Verso, 2001. Print.
Rasmussen Distinction between High Art and Low Art Paper
Rasmussen Distinction between High Art and Low Art Paper.
CompetencyIdentify strategies for comparing, contrasting, and evaluating various art forms in their indigenous contexts.InstructionsThere has been some controversy in your workplace lately over the appropriateness of certain employee displays. You work in a large agency, so disagreements were bound to come up due to the diversity of ideas and approaches among your colleagues. To help ease the recent tension, your boss has directed you to create workplace art guidelines for the office as a whole. As a team leader in the Creative Department, you are a qualified and obvious choice for the task. The guidelines are intended to help your co-workers better understand what art is and what it is not.Your boss has given you authority to use your discretion in generating the guidelines, provided you accomplish a few basic things. To begin, you are to include a very brief overview of art and its role in the world and workplace. Your boss calls this the preamble. Next, you are to address the core question of how to evaluate art. Your boss phrases the question this way: What instructions can you provide to help your co-workers ascertain whether their chosen exhibitions will be welcome in the office?After your boss ends the meeting, you reflect on the tricky question your boss has posed. The one thing you’re certain of is that settling on a good answer will not be easy. Still, you agree with the idea of the project: there need to be rules in effect to minimize conflict. As your brow furrows in concentration, you begin to write down a few questions that you think are essential to answer as part of your process:How should the distinction between high art and low art be explained to non-experts?How does context, such as different employee roles or different times of year, affect the analysis?Which displays should be unequivocally permitted/not permitted in the office?What specific qualities should your co-workers look for in the “art” they want to display?As you finish jotting down your thoughts, your boss pops back in with a final directive: “Keep in mind that what position you take in regards to various art forms is much less important than the production of concrete guidelines steeped in reasoned explanation.”
Rasmussen Distinction between High Art and Low Art Paper
You are asked to plan a health promotion program, discuss the implementation, as well as outline the evaluation process. Essay
essay helper free You are asked to plan a health promotion program, discuss the implementation, as well as outline the evaluation process. Please propose a community or a population you want to design a health promotion program for. In a 5 to 8 page paper, you will address all required areas of the case. Your task for this case study is: 1. Please describe the health and quality of life problems that this community or population group is facing. Which health problem seems the most important? 2. Please choose one health problem for your project. What behavioral factors influence this problem? Which of these behaviors are more important and which are more amenable to intervention? Which behaviors would you intervene on based on these considerations? What environmental aspects seem to also affect the health issue you selected? 3. What are the predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors for the health behaviors you identified for question 2? What are the enabling factors related to the environmental influences you detected for question 2? 4. What policies, resources, and circumstances can facilitate or hinder intervention on the factors you identified for question 3? 5. What data sources did you use to answer questions 1-4? If you were doing a project in real life, and this would be a comprehensive plan, how would you gather your needs assessment data? What would be your primary and secondary data sources? Use at least 4 academic journals as sources
JHU Building Critical Path Network Using the Given Template and Background PPT
JHU Building Critical Path Network Using the Given Template and Background PPT.
I’m working on a management exercise and need support to help me study.
Calculate the Critical path network and draw on the PowerPoint images Use the provided CPM Network** to complete the following1 Critical path2. Node numbers3 Durations4 Earliest / Latest start and finish for each activity5 Float for each activity6 Major milestones***7 Total time to complete this delivery order ***Note: A milestone is a significant point in the project. Highlighted at the event (node), a milestone is often identified after the completion of a major event (review, submission of a significant deliverable, completion of a major test/demonstration, …). It is a point where the Project Manager assesses the current state of the project before progressing forward. Background reference (for time durations of CPN)1. Perform independent research on each of the five candidate IR sensors (2 weeks each for the Red-Eye series, one week each for the others).2. Perform a trade study to down select to two IR sensor candidates (1.5 weeks).3. Develop performance models for both IR sensor candidate sensors (6 weeks each). Note: These should be done separately but can be accomplished in parallel.4. Develop a CONOPS to determine how IR / optical sensors are to be used on the X-65B (8 weeks).5. Use the CONOPS and IR sensor performance models to develop / run independent performance simulations (4 weeks each). Note: These should be done separately but can be accomplished in parallel.6. Use the outcome of your simulations as an input for a technical review to down select to a single IR sensor (preparations – 2 weeks).7. Hold the IR sensor review and down select to a single IR sensor (1 day)8. Perform research on the Eagle-Eye 2000® optical sensor (4 weeks).9. Develop a performance model for the Eagle-Eye 2000® (2 weeks).10. Update the performance model for the Tiger-Eye 1000® optical sensor (1 day).11. Use the CONOPS and performance models to develop / run independent performance simulations (Tiger-Eye 1000® – 2 weeks, Eagle-Eye 2000® – 5 weeks)12. Use the outcome of your simulations as an input for a technical review to down select to a single optical sensor (preparations – 2 weeks).13. Hold the optical sensor review and down select to a single optical sensor (1 day). Please note that the IR sensor review and optical sensor review must be held separately but can occur in parallel. Page 2 Module 4 Assignment Building a Critical Path Network Management of Systems Projects Version 005_00b Revision14. Design a common prototype hardware integration package to allow the selected IR / optical sensor to be mounted in the X65B. This mounting package must be designed in such a way to mount either the selected IR or optical sensor (dual use) (10 weeks). Note: This includes the development of a prototype to be used for hardware integration package testing (item15).15. Test the hardware integration package and make required modifications (2 weeks).16. Build three hardware integration packages (2 weeks total). 17. Design software to integrate the selected IR sensor with the X-65B mission computer (12 weeks).18. Code IR sensor integration software (4 weeks).19. Perform IR sensor software integration testing with the IR sensor and the X-65B simulator (3 weeks).20. Design software to integrate the selected optical sensor with the X-65B mission computer (13 weeks).21. Code optical sensor integration software (2 weeks).22. Perform optical sensor software integration testing with the optical sensor and the X-65B simulator (3 weeks).23. Install IR and optical sensors on the X-65B (2 days each – this can be done simultaneously, if required). 24. Perform final IR payload integration testing with the X-65B aircraft and make required changes (2 weeks).25. Perform final optical payload integration testing with the X-65B aircraft and make required changes (2 weeks).26. Develop test plan for X-65B live sensor testing (sensor independent – not dependent on selected sensors) (12 weeks).27. Using the test plan, perform required hazard / safety analysis (3 weeks).28. After completing the hazard / safety analysis, attain live sensor testing approval (6 weeks).29. Perform X-65B live sensor tests (both sensors simultaneously) (2 weeks).30. Develop live demonstration* plan, based on the outcome of the X-65B live sensor tests (1 week).31. Make final changes to sensor payload configurations, based on live sensor tests (2 weeks).32. Hold live demonstration* review (everything must be ready before this review occurs) (2 days).33. Perform a practice series of dry run demos in preparation for the formal demonstration* (1 week).34. *Perform live sensor demonstration (1 day).35. Perform “hot wash” meeting after demonstration (1 day).36. Write final close-out report, based on “hot wash” meeting (1 week).
JHU Building Critical Path Network Using the Given Template and Background PPT
Wilkes University Philosophical Theories on Ethics Discussion
Wilkes University Philosophical Theories on Ethics Discussion.
(N.B. Please read instructions thoroughly before beginning to answer
Please select three (3) of the following essay questions, and respond to them in the form of a brief
essay of approximately 500-600 words. Make sure in each that you are not just stating your
positions on the questions, but giving the reasons or arguments that you think support those
positions, too. You will be graded not on whether you get the questions “right,” but on the quality
of your arguments. Do not do more than 3 – extra answers will not yield extra credit. Choose the 3
to which you can provide the best answers, and write on those and those only.
A few things to note:
• This exam is entirely open-note. You are free to use any notes or course material to aid you
in developing your answers.
• This is a take-home exam. To turn it in, simply attach
your answers to an email message to me, just as you have for past writing assignments.
• Make sure that you avoid plagiarism – there is no reason for you to use outside sources to
answer any of these questions. You may make use of my lecture notes to help you
understand the relevant ideas, but be sure to reformulate things in your own words, just
as you would if you were sitting this exam in person in a classroom.
• You should feel free to reach out to me if you have any clarification questions. I will try to
help you understand what the questions are asking as much as possible, but I will
(naturally) not give you direct help in answering them.
(Look at the next page to see the exam questions.)
Here are the possible questions:
(1) Explain how you think a Kantian and a utilitarian would respond to the case of Baby
Theresa, discussed in Rachels’ “What is Morality,” pp. 1-5? (See Unit 1 for a PDF of this
reading.) Explain not just the position they would take, but the reasons and arguments they
would present for taking it.
(2) What would John Stuart Mill think about Robert Nozick’s “Experience Machine” thought
experiment (from Unit 2)? Would Mill think that we should plug in to it, or not? What
would his arguments be?
(3) Is Todd May right to think that Aristotle’s virtue ethics is also a form of “altruism” in his
sense? That is, does Aristotle’s virtue ethics demand a kind of selfless moral perfection of
us, as Kantianism and utilitarianism do?
(4) What would a Kantian say about Todd May’s ethics of “decency”? On what key points
would the Kantian agree and disagree?
(5) Imagine Peter Singer responding to Todd May’s claims about the ethics of charitable
giving. On what key points would he agree and disagree? (Look at Singer’s “Famine,
Affluence, and Morality” in Unit 4, and chapter 3 of May’s A Decent Life.)
(6) Is this statement true or false? Support your answer with arguments: “None of the three
major theories is really true or false. They’re just different ways people might prefer to live.
The disagreements between them mean nothing more than the disagreements between
people about which is their favorite ice cream flavor, or pop song
Wilkes University Philosophical Theories on Ethics Discussion