Get help from the best in academic writing.

BIO 130 Cuyamaca College Unit 4 Energy Lecture Discussion

BIO 130 Cuyamaca College Unit 4 Energy Lecture Discussion.

BIOLOGY 130: Pre lecture unit 4CHAPTER 4.1 (91-96) AND LECTURE SLIDES: ENERGYDefine the following termsTermDefinitionATPCatabolicAnabolicEndergonicExergonicEntropyMetabolismMetabolic pathwayThermodynamicsAnswer the Following Questions:1) In the box below draw a simple diagram of anabolic and catabolic2) What are the two laws of thermodynamics?3) What are the two types of energy? Give an example of each type.4) Describe the ATP-ADP cycle. Draw a diagram below5) How is the ATP cycle used to couple endergonic and exergonic reactions?BIOLOGY 130: Pre lecture unit 4PAGES 97-102 AND LECTURE SLIDES: ENZYMES Define the following termsTermDefinitionEnzymeSubstrateActive siteAnswer the Following Questions:1) What are properties of enzymes?2) What is meant by induced fit or lock and key? Refer to figure 4.83) What type of energy do enzymes reduce?4) What may influence enzyme mediated reactions?5) What is denaturation?6) What is a competitive inhibitor? Noncompetitive inhibitor?7) What is feedback inhibition?
BIO 130 Cuyamaca College Unit 4 Energy Lecture Discussion

Definitions “The process of planning, implementing, and controlling the efficient, cost effective flow of raw materials, in-process inventory, finished goods and related information from the point of origin to the point of consumption for the purpose of conforming to customer requirements.” Logistics is defined by The Council of Logistics Management What is Reverse Logistics? We refer to the term “reverse logistics” as all activity associated with a product/service after the point of sale, the ultimate goal is to optimize or make more efficient aftermarket activity, thus saving money and environmental resources. As equally as Logistics deal with the set of events that move the product to customer, the reverse process moves the product at least on step back in the supply chain. The objective is to regain the value or proper disposal, when the product returns in the opposite direction. The sold goods get returned due to improper quality control measures leading to damage, recalls, hazardous materials and obsolescence., It involves collection, transportation disposal of returned , damaged /surplus goods through reuse, resale, or repair. Importance Of Reverse Logistics. Reverse logistics responsiveness and quality has a direct
Ideological differences were a key factor in making the civil war an inevitable event. However it was not an ideological split over the belief of slavery being right or wrong which caused the armed conflict. To suggest otherwise would be an inaccurate interpretation. While it may be true that abolitionist agitation provoked a negative southern reaction and caused southerners to become radical in their defence of slavery, abolitionists were a rather insignificant minority. The majority of Northerners were moderates and not necessarily concerned about the moral aspect of slavery. In reality, the North differed very little from the South in their attitude towards white supremacy. It was differences in economic ideology that was the fundamental difference between North and South which necessitated each side resorting to armed conflict. Ideological extremists on both sides served to widen the gulf between the North and South. Abolitionists in the North provoked the South into a defensive position regarding slavery. That resulted in a redefinition of slavery in the Southern ideology. Slavery had started out as a “necessary evil” but was eventually transformed into an “ultimate good.” That transformation created something known as the ‘magnolia myth’. Southerners now defended slavery arguing that it was better than the capitalist system in which workers were nothing more than an exploited unit of labour. They argued that slaves received food, shelter, health care and even old age security. The North remained staunch in its defence of free labour and capitalist ideology. Thus the two sides developed distinctly different ideologies that were opposed to each other. The actions of radical abolitionist John Brown did the most to provoke Southern paranoia about Northern intentions toward the Southern way of life. The Harpers Ferry incident had the effect of reinforcing the siege mentality of the South. As North and South moved further apart ideologically, they inevitably came closer to war. The actions of Northern extremists such as John Brown was all the evidence the South needed for them to believe that the North wanted their destruction. The South therefore, felt the need to defend itself from attack. In addition to ideological differences that made war inevitable, there were also important economic differences that made peaceful reconciliation unlikely. By the end of the eighteenth century economic superiority rested with the industrialized North; the South was experiencing growing doubts surrounding the viability of growing cotton. There had been a drop in the importation of slaves and a steep decline of the southern economy. If the economy had continued to decline, slave labour would have eventually died out on its own; there was little need for slave labour. That all changed with the invention of Eli Whitney’s cotton gin in 1793. Slavery was revived because cotton production had become profitable again. So profitable in fact that the South would defend it militarily if needed. Historian James M. McPherson termed the South’s move to leave the union as a “counterrevolution” which they undertook in order to preserve their economic system, which they feared would be destroyed by a “revolution” signalled by the election of Lincoln. It is my opinion that Southern secession was an inevitable step for the South to take in response to what it saw as the ultimate threat to their way of life. However, due to the North’s core belief that national preservation and the will of the majority superseded the South’s right of free government and self-determination, it necessitated the very revolution which the South sought to avoid. In 1854, Senator Stephen Douglas’ economic proposal of a trans-continental railroad set the stage for a conflict which signalled the end of political compromise. The Kansas-Nebraska act which was a direct result of the economic conflict overturned the Missouri compromise. The ‘bleeding Kansas’ incident heightened tensions on both sides and provides further evidence to suggest that the inherent economic conflicts could not be contained through political diplomacy. The sections had all ready resorted to arms to solve their differences and it was merely a matter of time until the violence escalated into a civil war. The different economic structures of the North and the South were a fundamental division that made conflict inevitable. The South was staunchly anti-tariff and was therefore incompatible with the North which needed tariffs to protect their new industries. Failure to compromise in regards to the tariff of 1828 and the issue of protectionism were important factors in the growth of sectionalism which necessitated war. The underlying conflicts between the North and the South were finally fully exposed as a result of a failure of compromise in the political arena. The failure of American leadership in 1846-1861 was epitomised by key events such as Senator Douglas’s Kansas Nebraska act of 1854 and the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision of 1857. Both of those events overturned the previous Missouri compromise that stood for nearly thirty years and thus once again brought the two opposing nations head to head. The Wilmot proviso bill which proposed to eliminate slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico as a result of the Mexican war was a clear signal to the South that the North was plotting against its way of life. Thus the Southern mindset became increasingly locked in a persecution complex which they justified by evidence of a ‘Northern conspiracy’ to destroy their economic institutions. The Wilmot proviso bill was one such piece of evidence – even though it was not passed. The election of Lincoln was the final straw with which the South believed the Northern conspirators would gain the upper hand and bring about the destruction of Southern institutions. Had compromise been utilised more frequently the war may have been postponed but not all together avoided. The opposing Nations of North and South had an uneasy balance of power in the House of Representatives ever since the very formation of the bicameral legislature. Tensions since then until the onset of war arose over whether the new territories would become free or slave. However, the uneasy balance had been preserved for the most part by compromise, thus as historians Charles and Marry Beard stated “the balance of power might have been maintained indefinitely by repeating the compensatory tactics of 1787, 1820, and 1850; keeping in this manner the inherent antagonisms within the bounds of diplomacy.” However as they pointed out, there were inherent antagonisms within the system and therefore one side would inevitably have to declare its side victorious in one way or another – war was inevitable. Charles and Mary Beard also saw the American civil war in terms of a class conflict and renamed the war the “second American Revolution.” For the Beards “the resort to arms in 1861 precipitated by secession was merely a façade for a more deeply rooted conflict.” They felt that the civil war “was a social war, ending in the unquestioned establishment of a new power in the government, making vast changes in the arrangement of classes, in the accumulation and distribution of wealth.” This interpretation holds a great deal of accuracy when put in to context with the opposing forces in the civil war. On one side was democracy and on the other side was a form of landed aristocracy. With that in mind it is easy to see – to an extent – the correlation between the US Civil War and European revolutions such as the French Revolution and much later the Russian Revolution. However not all countries had a revolution during the nineteenth century and thus it by no means makes an “American social revolution” inevitable. However the unique political landscape of America did make unavoidable a confrontation between old aristocratic values and new liberal values. The way the country had been divided over the issue of slavery allowed the conservative South to distinctly separate itself from the modernised North, yet the possibility of conflict always existed because they were bound together by one constitution. The Case Against the War Being Inevitable: The case for the war being an avoidable conflict stressed the fact that Americans had lived with the issues that eventually led to the outbreak of war for generations. Thus historians who adhere to that theory claim that there was a strong possibility for a compromise to be found, using as a basis for their argument the evidence of the numerous pre-war compromises which alleviated sectional tensions. Revisionist historians account for the breakout of the Civil War by asserting that the vital instrument of compromise was neglected by a “blundering generation” in the events leading up to the Civil War. The theory of a “blundering generation” holds validity to an extent. However this very theory in itself destroys the idea that the war was an avoidable conflict, for it only highlights the extent of the serious divisions in the country which could not be resolved irrespective of how many compromises either side conceded. The core issues such as that of free labour contradicting slave labour still remained. One side would have to destroy the ideals of the other in order to finally put to rest the dividing issues. Only then could the States be truly united. It could also be argued that revisionist historians writing in the 1930s and 1940s lacked accurate historical context because they “examined the causes of the Civil War at a time when war as a means of solving problems was not considered to be a sound solution.” They saw war as a great evil whereas in the nineteenth-century, war was seen as a justifiable means of solving problems. Thus in the eyes of nineteenth-century politicians, armed conflict would have been seen as an inevitable step in order to advance their political ideology once an opportunity arose. In the case of the American civil war, Southern secession was the opportunity seized upon by the North. The lack of a strong anti-violence movement in the events leading up to the civil war strongly suggests the acceptable nature of war in order to resolve issues and illustrates the extent to which sectionalism had grown and divided the country into two separate nations. Hence one could argue that the very nature of nineteenth-century global politics made the civil war an inevitable event. Avery Craven and James G. Randall were two of the most prominent revisionist historians who challenged the inevitability of the Civil War. However their anti-war thesis was dismissed by Arthur M. Schlesinger who proposed one key question which they had not taken into account “: if the war could have been avoided, what course should American leaders have followed?” Schlesinger provided three possible alternatives: “that the South might have abolished slavery by itself if left alone; that slavery would have died because it was economically unsound; or that the North might have offered some form of emancipated compensation.” Schlesinger found all three alternatives to be completely unviable. In conclusion, the civil war was an inevitable occurrence; too many factors leading up to the civil war had the effect of exacerbating the fundamental differences between the North and the South. Lincoln as well as many other statesmen believed that the country could not continue to exist as two nations under one government. In some form the two incompatible ideologies had to settle their differences. However, because the differences were so fundamentally important to each section, political compromise would have ultimately led only to one side’s economic and social ideology being wiped out; both sides were unwilling to let their institutions be damaged by the other. Eli Whitney’s invention changed the stakes as it revived a dying institution and set it in place as king of the southern economy without which the South felt it could not survive. The North and the South did not develop along similar economically or ideologically. That created an inherent instability in America. At some stage the two opposing sections would inevitably come into military conflict once all compromises were exhausted.

Rasmussen College Finding the Shape Activity Plan

Rasmussen College Finding the Shape Activity Plan.

I’m working on a writing report and need support to help me study.

For this assignment, use the form Acitvity Plan to create an activity plan for a group of children. You will need to fill out the form completely, playing special attention to:The age group that is being planned for to ensure the plan is using DAPThe objective for the activityThe rationale for why you are planning the activityThe adaptations that will be included to support diverse learners once you have created your plan, provide a 1-2 page reflection on the plan itself. This is the time to go into detail about each section on the plan using materials from the course to support your thinking. Please submit both your planning form and reflection paper using an APA formatted title and reference pages as well as in text citation where appropriate.
Rasmussen College Finding the Shape Activity Plan

MWH 105 NYU Depression Diagnosis and Best Practices Essay

essay writer free MWH 105 NYU Depression Diagnosis and Best Practices Essay.

In a 500-750-word essay, select one holistic treatment modality and one conventional best practice that mental health professionals could use for treating a patient with depression. Outline the details of each and how they together would benefit the patient. Include at least two scholarly sources.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/pearson/2013/mindbody-health_the-effects-of-attitudes-emotions-and-relationships_ebook_5e.phphttps://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=79862390&site=ehost-live&scope=sitehttps://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=63591487&site=ehost-live&scope=sitehttps://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=91745334&site=ehost-live&scope=sitehttps://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=96349&xtid=48957
MWH 105 NYU Depression Diagnosis and Best Practices Essay

Art of Love by Ovid Report (Assessment)

Art of Love by Ovid Report (Assessment). In spite of the fact that Ancient Greece collapsed long ago and its ruins remain silent now, the art that the Greeks have created live together with us, stepping from one epoch into another. It is unbelievable how the ancient masters of poetry and fine prose managed to penetrate a human’s soul and steal all the secrets from it into a papyrus. Still, there are some questions from the ancient Greeks that need answering, and the poets are silently await for the readers to come up with the ideas of their own. Shall the great appreciate those tries? Ovid’s Art of love is a very special piece of prose – in fact, it is even doubtful whether one should treat Ars Amatoria as prose or poetry, such refined and elegant the language of the book is, and so inspired the author seems, – and a very sophisticated one. Ovid himself claimed the book that he wrote “a poem and an indiscretion” (Young 232) It is impossible to evaluate it from the modern point of view. Otherwise the ambiguities are inevitable. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that the criteria for the evaluation should be applied to the times when the book was created and the materials that do not fear the grip of time, the eternal questions of people’s spiritual qualities and character. With such an approach, it is reasonable to start first with the concept of love that Ovid was interpreting according to his understanding of the subject. The most evident thing about his idea of love is that it should know no boundaries indeed. This is incomparable to the ideas of the modern world since the Ancient Greek times suggested much more freedom in the questions concerning love than even the today liberal society does. In his understanding, love is something that should be shared in each and every way one feels to, and its essence is to give joy to people. These include the advice for men on how to steal women from their rivals, and how to make a lot of women to fall in love with a man at once. The genre merging between a burlesque satire on didactic poetry and a number of witty things to be told in the company of men, it represents a perfect specimen of the ancient Greek sense of humor and their ability to find the sensual pleasures where they only could, indulging into the essence of life with all their nature. It cannot be doubted that Ovid speaks not only the wits that he addresses to the literary attempts to dictate the false morals to the citizen. The didactic poetry of the times of Ovid could not hold any water, and its pathetic attempts to settle the things the way the government of those days wanted to impale on every person in the country. The second criterion to evaluate Ovid’s piece of prose is, as you might have guessed, is the one of its importance as a rebellious book. This criterion expands the previous topic. Understanding that the advice of the kind that Ovid suggested could not be taken as the actual ones, people could not help seeking the reasons that underlay the book, and they soon found them. The impact of the false morals that the empire was feeding people with was dusted away completely by the wits and the sarcastic comments of Ovid, with his power of words that could explode the state in its basis. This was far more serious than simply exercising extraordinary views of love. The idea of people living their life completely free and without being peeped at by the all-seeing eye of the emperor and his guard and multiple false prophets was so scary to the dictator that he decided it was a threat to the whole state. Ovid was counted for a traitor and exiled for good. However, if taking a contemporary look on Ovid’s attempts to make people freer, this will seem rather innocent writing, and, also, a talented one. The masterpiece of the humorous and a book with a lot of hints to catch and search a clue for, Ars Amatoria is the book that was bound to survive through the centuries. As Singer put it, And so on, as Ovid fights fire with fire. Unlike Lucretius, he has no doctrinal bias against erotic images and would never think of blaming them for the ravages of love. By quickly portraying Venus in the mechanical transferal of seed, Lucretius destroys the amoral imagination. But Ovid, like any other theorist in the arts, finds it indispensable. In turning against a particular woman, he merely frees it to act more constructively with someone else. (143) As it can be seen, Ovid does not change the idea of love with the idea of lust, but, on the contrary, expresses the spirituality that was rather unusual for the times he was living in. Claimed to be “a forerunner of Shakespeare and Milton” (DeMaria 415), he created the literature that astounded people with its refinement and subtlety. However, these views are not shared by all critics, Sometimes Ars Amatoria is considered a novel to be very careful with, and be cautious about the ideas that it exposes, understanding that they might turn false, especially for those young and indecisive. Thus, Chaucer’s research of Ovid’s Ars Amatoria suggested that the meaning it conveyed was not to be taken into consideration as a complete guide to people’s souls and moods: Chaucer’s reevaluation of Ovid thus finally provides the real “remedial amoris”. Instead of looking for a temporary, fragile cure for an entangling passion, Chaucer repudiates carnal love. Ovid tells pupils that to remedy love, one must pretend his lover is fat even though she is not, or that he must go to her house unexpectedly and see how unattractive she is without makeup. Further, he advises that when one is already exhausted and disgusted by the sexual frenzy, he should contemplate the blemishes and flaws of his lover’s body. Chaucer seems no remedy here, or in any, if the Ovidian techniques suggested by Pandarus or trampled by Troilus. (Calabrese 79) Thus it can be easily seen that Ovid was closer to the modern views than Chaucer was, in spite of the fact that the former lived a thousand years earlier than Chaucer. This is something to think heavily upon. Is it that modern society has approached the Golden age or has it become entangled in their own misconceptions? The thirds idea that the poet was trying to convey with such an unusual experiment of his, putting a poetic word in a piece of prose, was the concept of the beauty that the Greeks were so concerned about. The ideas of saturating oneself with love were the interpretation of the concept of making one filled with love and with the beauty of the world that surrounded people. This was something that the Greeks were to begin and the rest of the civilizations to catch up with. The chase has been long and wearing, it is still going on, with people so inattentive to the beauty that is slipping through their fingers, but the Greeks were the first to start the chase. To see and to be seen, in heaps they run, Some to undo, and some to be undone (Ovid 22). In spite of the fact that the book was proclaimed a forbidden read and the author was exiled from the country once and for all, the story that he created still remains one of the most famous books about love is ever written. The approach to the subject and the shape that the story took was so unusual that people could not stop reading it even though it was forbidden. The wit and the live way of telling people about the true evaluation of love and feelings is something that will stay in people’s minds and hearts for good. Works Cited Calabrese, Michael A. Chaucer’s Ovidain Arts of Love. Tallahassee, FL: University Press of Florida. 1994. DeMaria, Robert, Robert Duncan B. Classical Literature and Its Reception: an Anthology. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ. 2007. Ovid, Heyford, Thomas, Stapleton, Michael L. Thomas Heyford’s Art of Love. The First Complete English Translation of Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. Lansing, MI: The University of Michigan. 2000. Print. Singer, Irvin. The Nature of Love: Plato to Luther. Cambridge: MA. 2009. Print. Young, Robin V. Poetry Criticism: Experts from Criticism of the Works of the Most Significant and Widely Studied Poets of World Literature. Lansing, MI: The University of Michigan. 1991. Print. Art of Love by Ovid Report (Assessment)

Sexual Harassment in The Workplace Essay

Sexual Harassment in The Workplace Essay.

HelloWhat I need from you is to reply on a The article on the summarization of the article with the Pacific concepts the concept is sexual harassment for the attachment Number 1 you will find the post that I need you to reply too. And also I will provide you with the link for the news clip and for the attachment number 2 I have taken pictures of Three posts and three replies each of them had on reply so we can get a better example of an idea of what I reply should be like it shouldn’t be very long but should be from 6 to 8 sentences. And for the attachment number 3 there there are a schedule for grading the reply post so I need you to take I’ll look at it so you know how you will be graded on. Now I will give you the details of how to do a post reply to someone it starts from part two part2 Details: Partially Analyze Someone Else’s Posted News StoryUse one or two class concepts to analyze a small portion of someone else’s posted news story. Reply to someone else’s posted news story.At the top of your reply mention the class-concept(s) you are going to use in your analysis and define them!Use a You MAY NOT use general concepts like “ethics” or “global business”. Instead, use more specific concepts or theories (e.g., fairness in the workplace, trade inhibitors, etc).Pick ONE instance, action, or situation WITHIN the story and write 3-5 sentences analyzing how your chosen class concept(s) can be used to explain what is going on.Your analysis must have the following: The concept(s) you use must be related to the topic of the discussion.Your Part 2 must be ORIGINAL TO THE THREAD – A thread includes all posts replying to a posted article. This means you may not post about the same class concept as someone else in the same news story– although you MAY use the same concept to analyze some other situation in someone else’s posted news story!Please see the rubric (posted with the discussion on Canvas) for more information, and let me know if you have any questions.
Sexual Harassment in The Workplace Essay