Get help from the best in academic writing.

Big Liam O’Grady admission essay help assignment help

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of Big Liam O’Grady By: Charles Baker Maurice Walsh’s short story The Quiet Man introduces a few interesting characters, but one I found very intriguing wbas a man named Big Liam O’Grady. Big Liam was one of the main characters who played a huge role in the story. Big Liam may have played the “Bad guy” role in this story, but even the worst villains can have a good trait or two. From reading the short story, you notice that Big Liam really sticks with harrassing and provoking his enemy, Shawn Kelvin.

By continuously provoking throughout the story, showed perserverence. Big Liam Constantly was trying to get Shawn Kelvin to fight him, again and again at different parts in the story. For relentlessly trying to fight Shawn, and even during the fight, showed Big Liam’s perserverence. Another trait that helped pursue his perserverence was his boldness. Liam was never afraid to make a scene or put on a show. Big Liam was ready to fight Shawn in public in many encounters in the story, which shows Liam’s boldness.

Now, as we stated, Big Liam was the enemy of the story, and as most “Bad guys” have, are bad traits. Big Liam O’Grady was pretty much an all around bad person in general. Liam was conceited, very selfish, and had the temper to drive you wild. All big Liam thinks about is himself. He feels as if he could boss everyone around because of his size. Other than himself, the only thing he loves is money. Liam doesn’t share either. He feels the more the merrier should be the way of life for him. He goes crazy over two hundred dollars Shawn Kelvin throws in a fire.

Liam’s temper shows everytime he is around Shawn. He is practically a ticking time-bomb around Shawn. Big Liam thought of himself as the boss, and a tough guy, all because of his size. It describes Big Liam in the story as “A great raw-boned, sandy haired man, with the strength of an ox, and a heart no bigger than a sour apple. ” It’s said he was “A man of iron. ” His size and Strength was what made Big Liam who he was. Although Big Liam may have been big and strong, his weaknesses got the best of him. His money obsession controlled his life.

Big Liam could not love a woman, but could only love her money. As I mentioned, Liam falls apart when Shawn burns his money. His money weakness was uncontrollable. Also, although Liam was of great size, his actual fighting skill was weaker than that of Shawn Kelvin. Liam may have had power, but skill he did not. Kelvin’s experience and skill outmatched Liam’s three to one. As I’ve pointed out, Big Liam’s strength’s was his size, power, and intimidation factor. He was bigger than most, and definitely stronger than most, which made most scared of him.

He thought of himself as a “Tough guy” because people would cower in fear of him just for his size. Big Liam thought of himself the same throughout the story. Tough guy until the end. He was constantly acting tough and continuously wanting to fight. Liam was the same from beginning to end. I am sure, even though it is not stated in the story, Big Liam changed and matured once he lost his fight with Shawn Kelvin. I’m sure he realized that he’s not as big and bad as he thought he was.

Once losing what he thought was a sure win, he should realize that the world doesn’t revolve around him, and or money. The Quiet Man would not have been a story without Big Liam. Liam was the only true bad guy, troublemaker, and enemy, in the story. Big Liam caused the conflicts throughout, again and again. Liam brought the David and Goliath effect to the story. Big man loses to smaller fellow. The one with the sure size and strength advantage is out-witted by a smaller, more skilled intelligent follower. Without Big Liam O’Grady, this is no story.

Could the United States have stayed out of World War I?

1-Could the United States have stayed out of World War I? Why or why not? Did the United States’ involvement make the situation in Europe better or worse? (300 words)
2-Please respond to two classmates.(at least 100 words each).
In my opinion, the United States could not have stayed out of the war, because of the many neutral rights violations shown by both the British and Germans. As it was a neutral right for the United States to sell weaponry and goods to countries at war, the way the British seized some of those goods was very shady and unjust by having the US cut through their country and taking the material intended for Germany. While Germany could have done a little better at making sure what type of ships they were attacking, in the point of secretary of state William Jennings Bryan, I would have to agree that it was the responsibility of the American people to not board a ship of a country that was at war. After Wilson said all the things he said in the letters and letting the Germans have the decision of the US joining the war simply by attacking by U-boat one more time made it inevitable as well.
I believe the United States’ involvement did make the situation a little better because after another German U-boat attack Wilson asked Congress for a declaration of war and Germany was trying to end it as quickly as possible. Wilson’s idea of peace without victory had a great influential impact on trying to end the war.
Overall it does not look like the US could have stayed out of WW1 with the policies we had put in place at the time. We wanted to be able to trade with both sides of the war, but due to the advances in blockade technique with mines and Uboat usage, along with the unrestricted submarine warfare, which violated our neutral rights, it seems like the US being pulled into WW1 was inevitable. Had the US not been sending supplies to either side of the war, I doubt we would have been involved very much at all. Our involvement in WW1, I do believe, made the situation better for the pure fact that it helped end the war faster, and in a war of attrition, every second before the war ended was another life lost. The way the league of nations and treaty of Versailles were handled after the war by the US was exceptionally poor, though. WW1 was such a mass loss of life that seemed unavoidable with how tensions had been rising in Europe, and I think that is what it should be remembered for. Objectively there were very few good guys involved and so many young men that were sent into the meat grinder that was trench warfare.
if you are able to access The Gilded Age
A History in Documents
by Janette Thomas GreenwooD
you can use it as a source (unit 4)