In both accounts, each of the two historical men have many ideas that they could agree on, but also some they may debate about because of their two different perspectives. But in the end, each of the two give a vivid description of the American culture back In the colonial era. One viewpoint that Franklin and De Destructive seemed to agree on In the American culture is the equality of men and women. Both Franklin and Destructive stated that they believe in somewhat equal rights for women, but their different eras did not share the same agreement.In The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, Franklin is telling the reader about how he would have heated debates with a man named John Collins. During one particular debate, Franklin and Collins were arguing over If women should be given the same amount of schooling and learning as everybody else.
Franklin said that John Collins, “… Was of opinion that It was improper. And that they were naturally unequal to it” (Franklin 1 1 This opinion by Collins illustrates and shows how women were treated as lower class citizens and that they were not as important to society as men were.On the other hand, De Destructive observed women’s equality in the United States differently. He knew that women may not hold the same offices as men and may not have all the same rights, but he also noticed that women were very Important to the society.
He even states In his work, Democracy In America, that, “… Though their [women’s lot Is different, they consider both of them [men and women] as beings of equal value” (Destructive, Alexis De). This statement capitalizes on the idea that women are important and equal in their own way.From reading both pieces of literature, one can see the two different perspectives of the American Culture; meaning how women were seen in society. In addition to the varying outlooks on women’s rights; Franklin and De Destructive also had different views on how money Influenced the way citizens lived.
From Franklins point of view, how one manages their money characterizes that person as a whole and shows whether they honor themselves or not. He believes one should control his/ her money and not the other way around. Personally, Franklin was interested in having enough money to do the things he wanted.For example, in his autobiography he says, “[l] proposed to my Brother, that if he would give me Weekly Alfa the Money he paid for my Board, I would board myself. He Instantly agreed to It, Fund for buying Books” (Franklin 6). Franklin did things to please himself and honor himself instead of letting money take over his life. He knew it was essential to make money, but he focused on more important things in life; like reading in his case.
De Destructive saw a whole different society when he came to America. He noticed how the wages a citizen made and how wealthy they were controlled their lives to high degrees.Money had the power to up and move a whole family from a rural, farm life, AAA life in the city where the father would be performing a Job that he had no skill in. De Destructive even describes some of those situations and says, “These men have generally but little education and industry, with but few resources; they stand, therefore, almost at the mercy of the master” (Destructive, Alexis De). He is saying that a family’s income could practically put them at the mercy of the company’s boss because money is what runs the lives of the average American family.Therefore, Franklin and De Destructive saw that money was important, but Franklin did not let none control his life while De Destructive only observed how wealth took over American lives. Another focusing point that both Franklin and De Destructive played a major role in or mentioned a lot about was slavery in America.
Franklin really did not speak out against slavery until at an older age. Growing up, his family owned slaves and Franklin even published advertisements about slave auctions in his newspaper, the Pennsylvania Gazette.Eventually, once the constitution was ratified by congress, Franklin became an avid supporter in the abolition of slavery. In his later years he came vocal as an abolitionist and in 1787 began to serve as President of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery. Once in an address to the public, Franklin speaks about slavery and says, “Slavery is such an atrocious debasement of human nature, that its very extirpation, if not performed with solicitous care, may sometimes open a source of serious evils. All in all, Franklin seemed quite against the idea of slavery. De Destructive picked up on a lot of the same things that Franklin pointed out and noticed that the “white” race or the European race saw themselves as the upper class people to everyone else when he stated, “Among these widely differing families of men, the first that attracts attention, the superior in intelligence, in power, and in enjoyment, is the white, or European, the MAN pre-eminently so called, below him appear the Negro and the Indian” (Destructive, Alexis De).
De Destructive also goes on to say that even if slavery was to be abolished, then the whites will never accept the black race as an equal class. De Destructive also spoke from the black stand point and stated that, “If liberty e refused to the Negroes of the South, they will in the end forcibly seize it for themselves; if it be given, they will before long abuse it” (Destructive, Alexis De). Both Franklin and De Destructive seemed to see the calamity in slavery, and they both foresaw the negative impact it would leave on the American nation as a whole.The point of view both Franklin and De Destructive have on religion is very similar. De Destructive has many views on the religions in America and how people practice them, but he sums it all up when he states: I have neither the right nor the intention f examining the supernatural means that God employs to infuse religious belief into the heart of man. I am at this moment considering religions in a purely human point in the democratic ages upon which we are entering (Destructive, Alexis De).What this is saying is that humans all have their own opinions on religious views and which one they are supposed to believe in.
As long as they are practicing their own way and communicating with God, then De Destructive said he has no right to Judge. The same goes with Benjamin Franklin and how he followed his own system in worshiping and following God. Franklin believed in God and communicated with him on a daily basis through prayer. But on the contrary, he never attended church services or subscribed to any customs of the other religions he encountered (Quakers, Moravian, Dunker).He even states in his autobiography, “Thou’ I seldom attended any Public Worship, I had still an Opinion of its Propriety, and of its Utility when rightly conducted, and I regularly paid my annual Subscription for the Support of the only Presbyterian Minister or Meeting we had in Philadelphia” (Franklin 70). Franklin was all about communicating with God in his own way, according to his own yester. Franklin and De Destructive saw the American culture in a similar way; People’s views on religion should be their own opinion and no one else’s.
The work ethic exemplified by Franklin and described by De Destructive is very similar in the matter of how they will do whatever is necessary to make a living. Franklin is a prime example because he moved from place to place, country to country, always in search of work. In some cases he was denied work, like when he states in his autobiography, “… By going round to every head master, who accordingly refused to give me work” (Franklin 16). This further shows how he was very persistent and never gave up; showing how Franklin had a great work ethic.
De Destructive also speaks of the same type of work ethic that the men of the United States showed. He states that men would work to their full ability in whatever Job they were given in order to provide for their families. No matter if they had to pack their belongings and move to the city, Men were determined to work, and work hard. De Destructive mentions that men were always looking for their chance when he states: A similar observation is likewise applicable to all men living in democracies, whether they are or or rich.
Answer the following questions fully: 1. What is an implicit premise? How could we find it? Give an example of Essay
Answer the following questions fully: 1. What is an implicit premise? How could we find it? Give an example of an argument with an implicit premise. Then make the argument explicit. 2. What is a complex argument? Find a complex argument on your own (or you can make one on your own), and try to challenge the others to analyze it. 3. What is the most interesting thing you have learned in this chapter? Why so? What is the most difficult thing you have learned in this chapter? Why so?
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service