Get help from the best in academic writing.

Based on the literacy example explored in class and the lesson plan you’ve selected for the Key Assignment, use

Based on the literacy example explored in class and the lesson plan you’ve selected for the Key Assignment, use the Trajectory Analysis Chart.doc Download Trajectory Analysis Chart.docfor your lesson and submit it here. to: 1.Identify related standards above and below the relevant grade level standard 2.Differentiate your objective based on the standard and blooming verbs. You take the grade level that you are completing your field experience in, whatever lesson area you are in. You will need to go to the Iowa Standards, find the Iowa Standard and then find the standard above and below that. GRADE – KINDERGARTEN
Table of Contents Introduction The US human rights and democracy strategy Democracy in Central Asia The US assistance programs Conclusion References Introduction “I want to speak to the people of Central Asia. The United States believes that liberty, dignity and justice are within reach of everyone in this region. We are fully committed to partnership in helping you to realize this vision. We seek peace and security. We seek economic development and prosperity. We seek democratic values and human rights that unite all free nations in trust and in respect”, (Condoleezza Rice, US Secretary of State, 2005). Historical experience shows that when a foreign-policy era ends, the institutions, mindset, and interest groups that characterized the old era tend to persist into the new era, with inertia that often endures far longer than the institutions’ utility (Overholt, 2008). Any analysis of the US relations with Central Asia must be undertaken with historical consciousness of the caricatures that arise and suddenly collapse. America’s relations with Central Asia continue to rely on principles that are a legacy of the Cold War. However, after the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington, the US changed its relations with the Central Asia. These were deadly occurrences with severe impacts for Central Asia. When the US initiated war against terror on Afghanistan in the year 2001, its interest in the neighboring countries such as Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan increased (Crosston, 2006). In the subsequent years, the US activated Tajikistan foreign policy. Tajikistan relations with the West and Asian countries improved with a diversified foreign policy. The country’s participation on the war against terror enabled it to reach out to the world. Tajikistan participation in the war against terror reduced its relations with Russia. Tajikistan started weighing its relations with the aid and cooperation of the leading nations. The US embarked on a task in ending terrorist groups wherever they were to be found. It had to create democratic states so that terror groups will not find breeding sites in which to reemerge. In short, official US foreign policy to the Central Asian region has always been three-fold: preventing the spread of terrorism, providing tools for political and economic reform and instituting the rule of law, and ensuring the development of energy reserves. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The US human rights and democracy strategy The American political philosophies on human rights rest squarely on the institution of democracy. The US Bureaus for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, (DRL) have responsibilities of supporting democracy worldwide. The institution believes that democracy is the only national interest that helps in securing all other rights. The US believes that countries with democracy promotes peace, prevent aggression, promote economic growth, protects US citizens, open their markets, fight terrorism, crime, prevents humanitarian chaos, and uphold human rights. The DRL promotes the US diplomatic, foreign policy on spreading democracy. The institution has the responsibility of aiding new states to form and implement democratic principles. It also advocates for democracies worldwide and assist other countries in promoting their own democratic principles. At the same time, the institution identifies and denounces countries which deprive their citizens free and fair democratic processes. In this context, the US is promoting a strategy for respect for human rights in a moral and self-justified manner for the benefit of the US security. The US believes that countries, which have gross violation of human rights, are mostly likely to create chaos and disrupt peace and security in their regions. Consequently, this results into massive ill that can have gross consequences for the US. The US supports this ideology by relying on its National Security Council Strategy. In reference to human dignity, the strategy highlights issues such as the rule of law, regulation of state powers, promotion of justice, freedom of speech, religious and ethnic tolerance, freedom for worship, respect for women, and respect for private property. These are the guiding principles and policies on which the US interacts with the world community. These interactions form the main objective of the US foreign policy. The engagements derive their support from American strategy of holding regimes accountable to their actions under the norms of universal human rights banner. The strategy also promotes the respect for human rights. Further, it dwells on freedom from torture, free press, freedom of expression, rights to children and women and security of minority groups. America also aims to promote the rule of law, combat culture of impunity and seek accountability. The US foreign policy is perfect in relation to promotion of the fundamentals rights of persons. However, there is a general problem in implementation. Another problem lies in gauging the results. This is because it might need up to two generations in order to see the tangible consequences (Fukuyama, 2006). We will write a custom Research Paper on US Foreign Policy in Central Asia specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The US has adopted a diplomatic approach of emphasizing the basic generational quality of its reforms in the region of Ferghana Valley. However, critics believe that these declarations are false promises because the US does not fully involve and implement its policy in the region. They believe that there will be no results, not even generational if the US cannot implement its policy (Jonson, 2006). What comes out is that the US is philosophically engaging Central Asia but with no real, productive implementation of policy. The US declares it principles with regard to human dignity, law and accountability but ignores them if any ally, in the war against terror does not follow them. The US has not changed the culture of impunity, particularly in connection to terrorism. Surprisingly, the DRL assertively declares the historical developments of the US foreign policy in creating democracy across the globe. The records show that there were 30 countries recognized as democratic by the year 1974. Progressively, this number had reached 117 by the year 2005. This is American legacy of spreading democracy. However, the reality suggests otherwise. Central Asia is a crucial example of this reality. The region has been slow to adopt changes after the former Soviet Union left it. The region experiences domination of the superpowers that have the absolute power and control over it. At the same time, it remains isolated politically and economically (Gleason, 2003). Before the terrorist attacks of 9/11 in the US, Central Asia was not significant to America. However, after the incidences the region became strategic point in setting the US foreign policy in curtailing terrorism elements in Afghanistan and Iraq with a close watch on Iran. Despite Central Asia providing a strategic point to combat terror, the region has not experienced any real implementation of the US foreign policy and democratic principles. In reference to these points, the US is ignoring the principles that drive its foreign policy. These are the core of its human rights agenda and democracy focus. However, the reality shows that this policy is impotent. Observers believe that failure to implement the policy will finally return to disturb America in its war to combat terrorism. Democracy in Central Asia After the 9/11 attacks, the US has focused its war on terror in Central Asia using three-piece ideals. There have been deliberate efforts to promote democratic principles, develop civil society groups and promote the rule of law. Further to this, there is a fourth ideal of war on terror in promoting democracy. The US insists that their partners in war against terror must also demonstrate a positive willingness to manifest a positive change within their societies. The US has repeatedly stated that they cannot turn a blind eye on atrocities in favor of fighting terror. According to Powell, former Secretary of State, these ideals of promoting foreign democracy reinforce each other. There are mutual relations between international war against terror and promotion of democracy within the allies’ domestic societies. This is the foundation of philosophy of democracy. Not sure if you can write a paper on US Foreign Policy in Central Asia by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More America learned this harsh lesson when it disengaged from Afghanistan in the early 1990s. The notion is that the US cannot leave alone countries to develop into breeding places for terrorism and extremism. In order to prevent Central Asia from becoming a breeding ground for terrorism and extremism, the US foreign policy is promoting stability, prosperity and full integration of the region into the world community. However, no major progress is noticeable (Chomsky, 2004). The US has significantly and consistently increased its aid to the Ferghana Valley. This is because the region has cooperated enthusiastically in fighting terrorism. However, with reference to the other three ideals of promoting democracy, there has been less progress made. In any case, the civil society, principles of democracy and the rule of law are declining in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. However, government agents lauds the progress made, and remarks thus more work to be done (Carothers, 1999). The Wonka Vision notes there is nothing wrong with ignoring the experienced reality of false democracy while promoting the fantasy of emerging democracy. This is tantamount to naïvely ignoring long-term goals in support of short-term favors. The US has been actively involved in fighting terrorism and developing energy reserves, but has ignored the development and promotion of democracy in Central Asia. The US assistance programs After the fall of the Soviet Union in Central Asia, it became obvious that the US would provide funding to the region to act as a stabilizing element during the transitions. True to this, the US has focused its funding programs on economic and political transformation, combating nuclear proliferation, legal and judiciary aid, promotion of free press and development of parties (Adams, 2003). Though there are incidences of financial assistance increments, there is very little on the ground to show for it. The US ambassadors continue to account for achievements in Central Asia as generational transition, which varies significantly from country to country in the region. However, they claim that the USG assistance programs continue to aid in promotion of good rule of law, independent press, growth of civil society and human rights. Most of these aids go in building security apparatus for law enforcement necessary in war of combating global terror. At the same time, the financial assistances go in addressing internal issues that may create conflicts, extremism or emergence of other failed states. The critical point to note is that American aid in Central Asia is purely to promote American agendas. The US uses this funding aid to help in state planning, development of institutions capacity, stabilization and reconstruction of the region from conflicts to strife, which will lead them to a path of democracy, peace and open market economy (Andrew, 2005). Critics argue that the American aid in Central Asia is funding short-term American national interests and projects. According to them, this is fundamentally not right. Critics further notes that ever since the 9/11 attacks, the US has reduced its funding to allegedly questionable states, but has increased its funding to the Central Asia. They believe that the aid programs are rewards for the region for cooperating in war against terror, but not for promotion of democratic principles. To them, cooperation and war on terror in Central Asia is putting Americans’ security at risk in the future (Callahan, 2003). Conclusion Central Asia strategic relevance only became useful to America after the 9/11 attacks. The current development of the US foreign policy in Central Asia shows a deadly disparity with potentially risky consequences. The problem is that America is not supporting its verbal commitment of democratic ideals with the implementation of its foreign policy in Central Asia. A closer look at the types of projects America is funding after the 9/11 reveals that they are not in the direction of implementation of democratic policy but towards the issues of a trans-national security with questionable achievements. There is an exceptional division between philosophical framing of the US foreign policy and the reality of implementing the programs. According to the US, democracy is not only essential for freedom but also for security. For instance, the words of former Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice in the year 2005 reflect philosophical reasoning in confrontation, and implementation of foreign policy in Central Asia. Americans believe that democracy is the priority solution to terrorism and fundamentalism. The US foreign policy in Central Asia may be cultivating severe consequences for its security in the future by failure to implement what it believes in promoting. References Adams, L. (2003). Cultural Elites in Uzbekistan: Ideological Production and the State: In The Transformation of Central Asia: States and Societies from Soviet Rule to Independence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Andrew, B. (2005). The New American Militarism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Callahan, P. (2003). America’s Foreign Policy: Theories of America’s World Role. New York: Longman Publishing. Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Chomsky, N. (2004). Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance. New York: Henry Holt
‘Pinjar’, produced by Lucky Star’s Entertainment Ltd. and directed by Dr. Chandraprakash Dwivedi, is a movie set in the Indian subcontinent where the fight for freedom from the British colonialists is at its climax. The film is based on Amrita Pritam’s novel of the same name and is a winning attempt at recreating history. ‘Pinjar’ (meaning ‘cage’ or ‘skeleton’) revolves around the story of Puro, a young girl from a Hindu family living in Amritsar. In search of a suitable bridegroom for their daughter, the family journeys to their village of Chattovani where they settle the marriage of Puro with Ramchand, who is from the village of Rattovall. As per tradition, an exchange must take place and so, Puro’s brother is engaged to Ramchand’s sister, Lajjo. All is bliss for Puro until an unfortunate incident changes her life forever, when she is tragically kidnapped by Rashid, a Muslim man who carries her away on his horse while she is on a trip to the fields. Puro, hysterical and frantic, begs Rashid to return her to her distraught family. Rashid explains that Puro’s abduction was a result of an ancestral family dispute. Puro’s ancestors had rendered the Muslim family homeless over a loan default and kidnapped a woman from their house to dishonor them. Rashid was made to swear upon the Holy Quran by his uncle and cousins to avenge their kin and regain their honor. He tells Puro that her family will refuse to accept her now and henceforth, she will always remain an outcast. He confesses that he is remorseful but helpless, and that he has loved Puro since the first moment he laid eyes on her. Puro refuses to believe him and escapes back to her house one night where her hopes are shattered. It is an extremely emotional sight as her own parents tell her it is best if she returns else the Muslims would reside to slaughtering their whole family. Furthermore, she has spent the night in another man’s house. Nothing can change the fact that she is now a stain on their honor. Hence, Puro returns to Rashid. Back in Rattovall, Ramchand is offered Rajjo’s (Puro’s sister) hand in marriage but he refuses on ethical grounds and so Rajjo is married to Ramchand’s cousin. Puro’s brother Trilok marries Lajjo as promised. Meanwhile Rashid marries Puro and takes her away to live in Sakkadali. There, she miscarries Rashid’s child and leads a miserable life. Her arm is forcefully tattooed with the Muslim name ‘Hamida’. She continues to dream of her fiancé Ramchand and even tearfully encounters him in the fields on a trip back to the village. With time she also learns that deep down Rashid is a good man and that his repentance is genuine. At this point politics takes a turn as the partition is announced and riots break out all over. Ramchand’s village falls in Pakistan and he and his family, excluding a misplaced father, are forced to join a refugee group journeying to India. On the way however, the migrants are attacked by a gang of thugs and Lajjo, Ramchand’s sister is tragically kidnapped. The group proceeds to settle for a night near Sakkadali. Puro visits the camp and meets Ramchand who is distressed and asks for her to look for Lajjo. Puro promises not to let him down. Puro travels from house to house in Rattovall, pretending to be a salesgirl. Finally she manages to find Lajjo, held captive in her own house by Muslims. With the help of Rashid she manages to rescue her and the climax of the movie approaches as Ramchand and Trilok both await at the Wagah border to take Lajjo with them to Hindustan. There is a tearful reunion of two pairs of brother and sister. Trilok embraces Puro and presents her with the choice of returning with him to her relatives, since Ramchand is ready to accept her. It is here that Puro, withstanding the opportunity of a reunion with her family, chooses to remain with Rashid and bids her brother farewell forever. The movie underlines a large number of issues in a non biased way, using the partition theme in its entirety. It depicts the turmoil resulting from the partition, where millions of families were displaced and innumerable women were kidnapped and raped. Hindu-Muslim relations around the tentative period circling 1947 are a chief subject of the film. The large difference of opinion regarding the partition is largely depicted. ‘Pinjar’ shows that many Hindus and Muslims genuinely believed that they were a stronger force together and that the partition was an attempt to disunite the Indians. Considering the period in which the movie has been set, one also realizes that the communal hatred was largely a manifestation of the patriarchy and had roots too deep in the minds of both Hindu and Muslim men. The enmity was ancestral and was a matter of honor, more for the male community. It was the men of Rashid’s family who considered it a matter of utmost importance to avenge their ancestors and it was Puro’s brother who set fire to Rashid’s crop. All feuds and disputes, it seems, are created and propagated by men. It is here that women become a tool of honor and dishonor and the principle target of all patriarchal games. One such victim is the kidnapped Puro. In a particular moving scene, she asks Rashid how she could possibly be held responsible for a crime her grand-uncle committed. Amidst the partition chaos, Lajjo was prey to similar tragedy, as were hundreds of other girls. Particularly appalling is the scene where Puro is rejected by her family when she returns. The intolerant thinking of the society is all too apparent as the girl is asked to return to her kidnapper. Nothing is above family honor and image. The decisions fate makes are accepted without question. In a certain dialogue, Puro, after hearing the story of a gang raped girl, goes as far as saying that to be born a woman is nothing less than a curse. The society is blindly cruel to those with whom fate is unfair. This attitude changes only when the violence becomes large scale and affects all. When Lajjo says that she cannot return home out of shame, Puro tells her not to worry, since the partition atrocities have opened everyone’s eyes. People are accepting their kidnapped girls with open arms. It is also apparent that a change of general thinking was also underway at this point in time, especially among the young, as is seen in Trilok, who is an ardent participant of politics and is sometimes even scorned by his father for overly supporting the Congress. Had he been present in the house when Puro had returned, he would surely have not let her go back. He kept the search for his sister alive till the very end. Ramchand is another enlightened youth. A school teacher, he believes all religions to be one in essence, and displays high morality in his willingness to accept Puro as his wife even after her abduction. While in Sakkadali, Puro sympathizes with a female tramp who roams the village. She has developed an understanding for societal outcasts. Eventually the tramp dies during childbirth as she conceives form rape. Puro adopts and raises the helpless baby but later on is forced to give up the child under pressure of the males of the village council. They claim the baby since he is from a Hindu mother and ignore Puro’s pleas to keep the infant, making it a matter of religious honor. Certain scenes of the movie show that Hindu – Muslim accord was not as unattainable as has generally been perceived. In a depicted anti-partition demonstration, the speaker tells the audience that Hindus and Muslims have been living in one country for decades and there is no reason why they cannot continue to do so. Another interesting character is that of the Muslim Rashid. After the unforgiveable sin he commits, his character unfolds as one of an essentially just and ethical man who is deeply in love with Puro. When his farm is burnt down by her brother, he refuses to take revenge understanding that the act was simply a reaction to a sin he has committed. He pleads in front of the Hindu elders to keep the child his wife has raised and agrees to save Lajjo in an attempt to gain respect in the eyes of Puro. This shows that despite the widespread communal hatred many men were troubled by their conscience and were capable of making moral decisions. The movie depicts the trauma of young Puro with utmost accuracy, great amount of credit going to Urmila Matondkar’s excellent acting. Her character represents an ill-fated partition-era female. She plays the complete woman, being daughter, sister, wife and mother. However she never accepts her marriage or her life. She is a skeleton, a ‘Pinjar’, existing but not living. The climax of the movie shows Puro being offered acceptance back to her family which she dramatically rejects. As to why she did so, that has been left a semi mystery for the viewer. We may assume that that Puro renders essentially feminine behavior, eventually learning to love her husband. She could not muster the courage to be disloyal to a man who had been a good husband for so long. Puro found solace in rescuing Lajjo and is probably incapable of further upheavals in life. She has a husband, a home and is content. She knows where she belongs and her life at this point is beyond repair. On a lighter note, the movie has beautifully portrayed the bond between parent and child and amongst siblings. The right to the customs, rituals and beliefs of that particular time has been effectively illustrated. The simplicity and familial camaraderie of that eon are nothing less than charming.
According to Van den Cate, the world no longer consists of closed national economies. Accordingly, all countries have opened their borders to international trade. For that reason, the idea of a borderless economy is now real (Van den Cate). Additionally, the need to open economies to foreign investments has resulted into internationalization. Consequently, developing countries’ local industries are now fully liberalized (Van den Cate). However, local companies now face competitive pressure from domestic and foreign rivals. Therefore, for the less developed countries, international trade is an opportunity as well as a threat. Accordingly, internationalization can either expand or restrain the possibilities of a developing country. This essay discuses the impact of internationalization on developing countries. According to Banerjee and Nikolaos, internationalization has led to the development of local firms in developing countries. As these firms exploit new markets elsewhere, they expand and grow. This growth leads to developing countries’ economic growth. Consequently, firms accrue benefits from economies of scale. Additionally, firms from developing countries are able to spread their risks when they enter an international market. Furthermore, internationalization has also brought new skills to developing countries (Banerjee and Nikolaos). These skills are within the workforce that comes with foreign investment or trainings offered to the locals. Moreover, through internationalization, a developing country increases its possibilities of accessing new technologies and ideas. In addition, these countries are also able to promote their brands to new audiences (Banerjee and Nikolaos). For that reason, their companies and brands gain regional or worldwide recognition. However, most developing countries believe that internationalization give them a raw deal. For instance, most of the developing countries rely on few goods as their main exports. On the other hand, their counterparts from the developed countries have multiple goods on their export list. For that reason, a developing country accrues less benefit from exports than a developed county. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Additionally, developing countries cannot control prices of their goods and services in the international market. Prices of goods in the international markets are controlled by major economic powerhouse. For instance, the dollar determines the pricing of imports and exports in most instances. Consequently, the economies of developing countries are at the mercy of the dollar. Furthermore, since developing countries’ economies are not based on manufacturing, they import manufactured goods from developed countries (MissNikki). However, prices of the manufactured goods increase all the time. As a result, the economies of these countries are stretched due to overspending on these goods. Moreover, trade barriers stand on the way of developing countries that try to export manufactured goods (MissNikki). Quotas and tariffs are some of these barriers. Quotas limit the amount of a good produced by these countries. This clearly indicates that all decisions relating to international trade are made by the developed world. From a developing country point of view, internationalization has serious flaws. For that reason, there are trade problems between developed and developing countries. Moreover, these problems are preventing developing countries from getting the most out of the international trade. The main problems include trade barriers, imbalances in exports and imports and pricing of goods and services. Nonetheless, internationalization provides new opportunities to a developing country. These opportunities include access to new markets, skills, technologies and information. Therefore, if exploited well, these opportunities can increase a developing country’s gains from the international market. Works Cited Banerjee, Diptesh and Nikolaos. 2010. Internationalization Process in Developed and Developing Countries. Web. MissNikki. 2010. Trade Issues between Developed and Developing Nations. Web. We will write a custom Essay on Internationalization on Developing Countries specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Van den Cate, Roel. “The Impact of International Trade on Less Developed Countries”. Business Intelligence Journal 2.1 (2009). Print.

MGMT 205 AU Philosophical Schools & Business Ethics Facebook Oversight Discussion

MGMT 205 AU Philosophical Schools & Business Ethics Facebook Oversight Discussion.

Your assignment is to write two short essays (2-3 pages each, total 4-6 pages, double spaced)
addressing the prompt below.PROMPT
In Part I of the course, we have surveyed three prominent philosophical schools. These schools
provide alternative conceptual lens to analyze contemporary problems in business ethics.
• Utilitarianism
• Deontology
• Justice
Choose any two of the following business ethics cases. The URL links provide illustrative
examples of recent news reports on these widely publicized cases.
Amazon: Anti-Union Blitz…
Facebook: Oversight Board and Donald Trump

My Pillow: CEO Claims of Election Fraud

WeChat: Censorship of Political Content…
Tesla: Response to Covid-19…
For each of your selected cases, write a short essay (2-3 pages each, total of 4-6 pages, double
spaced) applying the philosophical schools to the ethical problems raised in the case.
For example, what conclusions would you draw from an application of the Justice School or
Deontology Schools to the Amazon or Facebook cases? What would the Utilitarian School lead
you to conclude about the My Pillow, WeChat, or Tesla cases?
In your essays, be sure to (1) specify the selected cases, (2) identify the philosophical schools
you are applying to those cases, and (3) incorporate those schools in your analyses of the ethical
issues arising from the cases.
While writing your essay, please use the following guidelines:

Cite referenced works, inserting the citation in the appropriate location in the text
(e.g., Kant, “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”, pp. xxx-xxx)

Use double-spaced type in 12 point font with standard margins

Paginate the essays

Include a title sheet with your name

Save your essays in a single MS Word file (not PDF)

Upload the file to the Blackboard assignment folder labeled “EXAM #1”
MGMT 205 AU Philosophical Schools & Business Ethics Facebook Oversight Discussion

2 questions about Sociology

assignment helper 2 questions about Sociology. I need help with a Sociology question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Hi please answer these two questions below, make sure it is about a paragraph long each. Use the paper attached below for the quotes. You need to use the same quotes attached below in the paper but explain the rest in your own words when answering the questions.
1. What is Global Stratification? please quote from the textbook
2. Compare and contrast World System Theory with Neocolonialism. What are some strengths and some weakness of these two theories? Please quote the textbook and apply one theory to a country of your choice
2 questions about Sociology

The Spell: HECATE Go to a crossroads, there has to be 3 paths, and you assign each path a choice

The Spell: HECATE Go to a crossroads, there has to be 3 paths, and you assign each path a choice regarding a specific question or decision you want to make. Then you ask the question out loud and drop a key into a bowl of water and swish the bowl a little to make the key spin and move. Whichever way the key points (the end that would go into a lock) is the right choice. The spell should ideally be done in the evening or at night, after the evening star rises. After you get your answer you should leave an offering for Hecate. A lot of modern witches leave dog food as an offering because dogs are her sacred animal and dog food is pretty harmless to the environment. An alternative is to recite the Orphic Hymn to Hecate (can be found online) as an offering. Option 1: PT1: Who is Hecate and what does she do? Why in the spell do you perform it at the crossroads? Why at night? What is her connection to dogs? Why is she called upon to help with this spell? PT2 : Do the spell and reflect upon what you did and why. How did you feel? What was the purpose of the steps you took? How easy/hard was it to perform. Look at at least one theoretical model to help you answer these questions.

Grossmont College Prehistory of Homo Sapiens Article Discussion

Grossmont College Prehistory of Homo Sapiens Article Discussion.

11.10 Discussion Board: Homo SapiensWhen we think of modern humans we often think of specific physical features along with cultural and linguistic attributes that define us. There are many things that we were not able to cover in this class that relate to our species. For this discussion board I would like you to look for a news article that specifically dealt with the prehistory of Homo sapiens. Your goal is to look for a news article that introduced a new discovery and for you to share it with the class. You will receive points for the following items:Give a short summary of the news article.Briefly explain what the discovery was about.Cite your news article.This is separate partYou will have to do the following for points: you only have to do 1 ted talk and give a summary about the videoGive me a summary of what was discussed.Tell me how it relates to the class.It will be worth 3 points. (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) confused and have questions please ask me I will explain
Grossmont College Prehistory of Homo Sapiens Article Discussion