How contaminated were/are fish and other seafood items as a result radiation from this accident? (i.e. Is it safe to eat the local fish? How about fish from other areas of the Pacific?) Find and summarize the methods and results of 3 primary research articles or scientific literature reviews. Each summary should be no more than 3 sentences as shown below. A full reference for each article summarized must be provided as shown below. Completely made up example to show formatting: Researchers tested the levels of cesium-137 in some species of fish caught at 10 different locations along the coast of California. Results showed that no samples contained cesium-137 attributable to Fukushima at a level above that which considered safe by the EPA. Thus, there does not appear to be a threat to humans in consuming this fish species.
Reference: Cure, M. and Curie, I. 2017. Analysis of cesium-137 levels in the tissues of some random fish species that Dr. Reber made up. Journal of Hypothetical Science 1:44-4
Explicate this poem, “Unharvested” by Robert Frost:A scent of ripeness from over a wall. And come to leave the routine road And look for what had made me stall, There sure enough was an apple tree That had eased itself of its summer load, And of all but its trivial foliage free, Now breathed as light as a lady’s fan. For there had been an apple fall As complete as the apple had given man. The ground was one circle of solid red. May something go always unharvested! May much stay out of our stated plan, Apples or something forgotten and left, So smelling their sweetness would be no theft.As discussed in class, explicating a poem involves a detailed analysis of the text, anexplanation of how the details contribute to the meaning and effect of the poem as awhole. You need to look up and think about each reference or unusual term, and besure you understand each line. Your essay should include a statement of what youthink the poem’s meaning or “message” is, and why you reached that conclusion, basedon the specifics of the text. You can organize your essay any way you choose; for example, you do not have tostart off with a summary of what the poem means. What you must do is account for allparts of the poem, and show how each of them relates to the others and adds to theoverall effect.* * * * *Your essay should be approximately 1,000 words in length; it cannot be less than 800words or more than 1,200. Format the essay in accordance with the instructions postedon MyLearning (“Format for Essays Submitted in Response to the WritingAssignments”).Be sure to provide concrete examples from the poem; when you use quotations, cite tothe specific line numbers. If you use any source other than the text of the poem,provide an appropriate citation to that other source. At the end of the essay, provide alist of the work or works cited, using the MLA format and including a ref
Lynn University Unharvested Poem Analysis
Complete 2 Student Success Discussions 9 (TRIDENT)
Complete 2 Student Success Discussions 9 (TRIDENT). I’m studying for my Communications class and need an explanation.
Have you ever been stereotyped based on your appearance or group membership? If so, what was the stereotype and how did it make you feel?
Have you ever unintentionally perceived or treated a person in terms of a group stereotype rather than as an individual? What assumptions did you make about that person? Was that person aware of, or affected by, your stereotyping?
This course is considered to be an important course for our students at the University. Therefore, your feedback is important in evaluating whether modifications should be made.
What did you like best about this course?
What do you think would improve this course?
Complete 2 Student Success Discussions 9 (TRIDENT)
Hands-on Activity5B: DNS Request and DNS Response
i need help writing an essay Hands-on Activity5B: DNS Request and DNS Response.
PurposeThis activity will help you see how your computer sends a DNS request for a Web site you never visited, before it can create an HTTP request packet to display the Web site on your browser. We will use WireShark for this activity.You must use your own computer at home to complete this assignment.Directions1. In your command prompt, type the command – ipconfig /all – to find your computer’s IP address and DNS Server. Write these information down.2. Go back to your command prompt and type – ipconfig/flushdns . This command will empty your DNS cache,3. Launch your WireShark and enter/type – ip.addr==xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx (use your computer’s IP address that you obtained in step 1) in the Filter to capture packets sent and received by your computer only. Look at Figure 5-25, p. 157, to see the Filter box.Take a snap shot of this screen. Open a new WORD document. Copy/paste this screen shot to the document.4. Start packet capture in WireShark.5. Open a browser and visit www.ietf.org6. Stop packet capture after the Web page is loaded. Take a snap shot of this screen, and copy/paste in the same WORD document created in step 3. This screen shot should be similar, but not identical, to Figure 5-23 on page 157. Remember each computer has its own unique setting.7. Write a short essay (3 – 4 paragraphs) describing your project results and explain the contents of your screen captures. Answer the 3 questions in the Deliverables, page 157. The 2 screen shots and answers to these questions are important subsets of this project.8. Upload your WORD document in Blackboard using the submit link below. GradingThis assignment is worth 50 points and will be graded for completeness and accuracy. I will look for 2 screen captures and answers to the 3 questions on the Deliverables, page 157. I will look for 3-4 paragraphs which describe your project results.
Hands-on Activity5B: DNS Request and DNS Response
Essay On The Impact Of Organ Donation
Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp The Impact Organ Donation Has on the United States and Iran’s Survivability An innovation that has developed the standard of human survival is organ donation. According to the Cleveland Clinic, “Organ donation is the process of surgically removing an organ or tissue from one person (the organ donor) and placing it into another person (the recipient). Transplantation is necessary because the recipient’s organ has failed or has been damaged by disease or injury.” Organs and tissues that can be transplanted are determined by the donor’s medical history. Although organ donation is highly beneficial and has an immense impact on human survival, not all countries are as advanced in organ donations like the United States. Iran and some second world countries (third world countries also) are not only lacking advancements, but also some people living there do not believe in western technology due to their religion. By these people declining and not believing that organ donations are acceptable, benefits like an extended life are taken away. Even though Iran’s culture and scientific advancements play a major role in why their rate of survivability is lower than the United States, economic factors in organ donations also play a critical role. Studies have verified several situations of organ donations to work out well and some situations not as much. At the end of the day, organ donations may seem morally correct to one and not to another. The United States is more accepting to organ donations; therefore, the U.S. has developed a much higher standard of human survival. The question being answered in this paper is how has organ donation impacted the United States and Iran’s survivability? Throughout the paper, organ donation will be inspected through the economic perspective to better understand the impact organ donation has on the United States and Iran’s survivability. The first place we will inspect the economic impact of organ donation is the United States. The United States, for the most part, is in favor of organ donations. As we all know, humans should all have the equal opportunity to healthcare. However, in the United States, when it comes to organ donations, whoever can purchase the organ gets it. Now, this can only happen if the donor and recipient are a match along with several other requirements. Economically, living donors in the United States have the upper hand. They possess the ability to put the price they want on the organ they are donating. Patients in need of the organ then have to compete for the organ. Patients start to bid and whoever has more money gets the organ. People that have been waiting on the list for years may have their life practically taken away from them because they aren’t financially able to pay for the transplant. Putting a price tag on one’s life seems unfair. Costs of an organ donation first depends on the type of organ that is being donated. “Giving an organ costs on average $5,000, but can be as much as $20,000.” (Revere, 2014). The only way to speed up the process of donating an organ would be if the person donating the organ is a family member. Now doctors may see organ donations differently than donors and recipients do. According to Dr. Alan L. Glass, M.D., there are about 5,000 patients waiting for a heart; however, across the nation there are about 2,500 heart transplants a year. This means that about 15-20 percent of patients will die waiting. Doctors encourage people to become donors because not only will organ donations save possible lives, it will also bring doctors more income by performing more operations. The wait patients must go through also gives the doctors a challenge by trying to keep them not only alive, but also still remain a nominee for the possible organ in the future. In Iran, organ donations work quite differently. Just as many people are in need of an organ, however their chances of actually having the transplant take place is minimal. Many people living in Iran do not believe organ donations are morally correct causing very few operations to take place. However, the few that believe it is okay rarely get their request granted. Over time, Iran has been able cut down their wait list. Reducing the wait list caused the price of obtaining an organ like a kidney to drop. According to Rachel Kaplan, a kidney cost $4,500 in Iran. This might not seem too bad; however one must take into consideration the fact that people living in Iran typically do not earn as much money annually compared to the average American. Donors in Iran tend to have a different thought process compared to donors in the United States. Iranian donors typically donate their organs in thought of the financial benefits. They do not take into consideration the possible health risk with donating. Most of the recipients in Iran are not even eligible for an organ due to health issues. This is mostly caused by the less developed living conditions people live in. Organ donations still have had an overall increase on Iranian people’s survivability. Even though organ donation has impacted both the United States and Iran in their own unique ways, they both have been impacted in a positive way which has increased people’s survivability. The United States and Iran can improve in the process of organ donations by making it more obtainable for the financially unstable. Although making organ donations more obtainable for the financially unstable would be a positive factor for the most part, donors and doctors would lose money because of this. Lacking organs could be later solved in the United States by 3D printing. In Iran, 3D printing will not be available for a while because they are not as advanced as the United States. However, once the United States becomes familiar with the 3D printing of organs, they can help Iran in creating artificial organs by possibly supplying them with some money. Maybe one day in the future organ donation will be conveniently acceptable for people throughout the whole entire world. References Bramstedt, Katrina. (2014). Buying and Selling Organs Would Create an Economic Class War. The New York Times, Pages 1-1. Cleveland Clinic. (2016). Organ Donation and Transplantation. Cleveland Clinic, Pages 1-1. Fry-Revere, Sigrid. (2014). Why should donating an organ cost so much? CNN, Pages 1-1. Healthcorps. (2016). Organ Donation: A Doctor’s Perspective. Healthcorps, Pages 1-1. Kaplan, Rachel. (2016). How much does a kidney cost in Iran? Arutz Sheva 7, Pages 1-1. Nathan, Howard. (2003). Organ donation in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation, Pages 1-13. Larijani, Bagher. (2004). Ethical and legal aspects of organ transplantation in Iran. Science Direct, Pages 1241-1244. Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp
Cognitive Behavior Group Therapy and Yalom’s Therapy Model Essay
Table of Contents Theory Group Membership Aims and Objectives Process Structure Conclusion Reference List A number of approaches have been developed by various theorists and psychologists in order to help at managing psychological disorders. Cognitive behavior group therapy and Yalom’s therapy model are considered to be one of the most reliable approaches to evaluate problems within dysfunctional emotions and behaviors. In this paper, these two models will be analyzed and evaluated in terms of their similarities and differences: the essence of Yalom’s model and cognitive behavior group therapy model, their objectives and structures, and group membership. Theory Cognitive behavior group therapy, also known as CBGT, is an approach that is used during the group therapy in order to treat different variants of social phobia. CBGT is one of those models, which can be used in treatment under certain inpatient settings (Christner et al., 2007, p. 509). Yalom’s therapeutic model assumes that interpersonal interaction is essential for the success of group therapy. Yalom himself suggested that change through group therapy is a complicated process that is facilitated by interplay of human experiences, which he considered as the therapeutic factors. The theory of cognitive behavior group therapy is based on the ability to conceptualize information for each member of the group and the group as one whole. It is necessary to identity the problem that causes psychological problems and working on the problem so as find workable solutions based on the problems. This model utilizes the Socrates’ way of knowledge unlike the Yalom’s model because the therapists have a desire to know much about the client using the technique of questioning. It is also based on educational model of doing things with the assumptions that all behaviors and attitudes adopted by individuals are all acquired through learning process (Montgomery, 2002, p. 34). In cognitive behavior group therapy, the goals of the entire process are set in accordance to the existing problems. It is then that thinking behaviors that are at the center of the behavior problem are modified. On the other hand, Yalom based his practice on the importance of therapeutic factors in finding solutions to psychological problems. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Some of the factors include instilling hope in the patients in order to help them manage their own problems. Therefore. in terms of theory, the two models are different in their own fundamental principles that guide their functionality to the patients. Group Membership The two models tend to be joined by the fact that both of them place much emphasis on the importance and relevance of here and now theory in group therapy. Concerning group membership, I can note that with cognitive behavior group therapy it can be applied to a group of people only. Membership is limited to the one therapist to provide services to a number of clients. This can even be done over computer programs. In cognitive behavior group therapy, emphasis is not put much on the number of members attending the sessions with the therapist. It works because the interaction between the therapist and the patients, and the patient and the patient actually matters in the success of the approach. To a greater extent, cognitive behavior group therapy is a collaborative process between the patients and their therapist. In other terms, if there is no cordial relationship between the two, then the approach cannot work at all (Yalom and Leszcz, 2005, 153). This is unlike the case in the Yalom’s therapy model; whereby the whole thing is a group affair whereby the larger the numbers the better the clients benefit because they need each other’s experience so as to find solutions to psychological problems affecting them. Therefore the number of clients attending the sessions in this model really matters to the success of the approach. Yaloms model does not need so much the collaboration between the client and the therapist. In terms of composition of members it is clear that Yalom’s model uses certain criteria in the selection of membership. For instance, exclusion criteria are often used in the selection process (Yalom and Leszcz, 2005, p.153). Inclusion criteria are also adopted in the model, basing on the level of motivation between members. This is unlike the situation in the cognitive behavior model. But overall, both models of behavior change have membership and the involved members, who attend the therapy sessions for them to find solutions to their psychological problems. We will write a custom Essay on Cognitive Behavior Group Therapy and Yalom’s Therapy Model specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Aims and Objectives Looking at the aims and objectives of both models, it is vital to underscore the fact that both models aim at improving the behavior of the clients through the psychological processes (Callahan, 2004, p.502). They therefore help the client to overcome psychological problems that threaten their existence in the world. Cognitive behavior group therapy model can be looked at to be targeting a patient-therapists communication and patient-patient communication as well in order to help solve psychological problems within the group and provide them with a chance to fight against their social phobia. The Yalom’s model can be considered to be focused on creating a group environment to facilitate sharing of experiences between the clients in order to learn from each others experiences and solve their own psychological problems. Process Structure In terms of process and structure of the models, it is important to point out that Yalom’s model is organized in the way that the groups form the basic structure of the model. The clients with psychological problems are involved in certain group activities for their own benefits. Group participation in this model is greatly enhanced by creating the necessary cognitive structures and further clarification of misconceptions (Callahan, 2004, p.502). However, in this model, group cohesiveness is emphasized because of the benefits, which are inherent to the group members. According to the proponent of this model, cohesiveness is a precondition for the success of the therapy, because it determines the functionality of the other therapeutic factors. Some of them are doomed not to work if this precondition is not adequately addressed. This structure is not the same as that of cognitive behavior group therapy, whereby group cohesiveness is not a precondition for the success of the therapy. In this approach, the members do not enjoy the love and warmth of the other group members. The sense of belonging and unconditional acceptance in not found in the process of cognitive behavior group therapy because lack of this cohesiveness. In group therapy and Yalom’s model, the clients in groups are likely to reach high levels of self-awareness unlike in the other case. This is through such important techniques like feedback that mainly imparts on the life of others, who are in the same group. This cannot be the same in the cognitive behavior group therapy (Corey 2005, p.461). Furthermore, in Yalom’s model form of therapy, patients are thoroughly questioned and after the one discovers what he needs in life. It enables one understand a reality on issues such as death, this form obesity form according to enable one to understand how freedom and responsibility go hard in hard. Yalom includes one specialist and an individual faced with a problem. One person is thoroughly questioned unlike for CBT where we can have a group of people therapy 6- 10. Not sure if you can write a paper on Cognitive Behavior Group Therapy and Yalom’s Therapy Model by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More According to there is no fixed life for an individual. In Yalom’s form of therapy, the individual with a problem is the only one who meets with the therapist unlike for the CBT whereby we can have a group that can consist of six people or more. Another difference is that in Yalom’s model, one is asked questions and the help he gets depends on the evaluation made by the therapist (Corey, 2005, p.153). In terms of process, it is important not to overlook the fact that, in both models, the feedback is provided and is quite essential for the personal development of each client. There is also the issue of giving out to receive in both models in the sense that in Yalom’s model one has to understand the value of giving before having the intrinsic drive to share out experiences with others and at the same time gain from others. In the cognitive behavior model it becomes inevitable for the client to be willing to give out information after a cordial relationship is established with the therapist (Corey, 2005, p. 490). In both models, there is the imparting of information to the clients. This is normally through instructional methods, giving of advice and making suggestions to the clients. In both models, there is evidence of the therapist instilling the aspect of hope in the clients. This is very essential to keep the clients in the process of therapeutic change. Without hope in the process, most clients would fall out before they archive the desired results. In Yalom’s model, faith is itself a therapeutic process and can facilitate change in the behavior of the client. Conclusion In conclusion, it is important to note that the two models of psychiatry under consideration share things, which are in common and differ in a number of areas as it has already been mentioned. The success of each of them remains attached to the commitment of both the client and the therapist in the process. The interpersonal process within a group has had a considerable impact on me personally. Firstly, I have gained a lot in terms of self-awareness from both the group and even from the outside. From inside the group, I was able to interact with all the group members, and we had a very cordial relationship that facilitated openness to one another. I could not believe hearing what some of my friends were revealing to me. From this interaction, I can say that I have been able to discover more about myself as an individual than I used to be in the past before the therapy. Outside the group, I managed to open up well to inside the group and was able to discover much about my behavior. During the therapy, I was involved in numerous group discussions too much, and it turned out to be very useful to me. These group discussions were very free, and everybody was willing to give out his/her own contribution; such activities were actually too exciting, because as it was necessary, each shared own experiences and emotions (Christner, et al., 2007, p.359). It was very easy to respond to the questions from the group members and ask them more questions that helped to disentangle some mysteries. Through this kind of feedback, it was so easy to find solutions to some of the behavior problems that I had. Another important issue to mention is all about the appearance in the group activities. I can say that my presence in the group was easily noticeable by other group members. Through the processes in the therapy, I also understood better what is actually required in terms of the group process. Now, I better comprehend the issues, which are important for the success of the entire process: they are the composition of the group and proper selection of its members. Now, I am in the better informed position concerning the issue of group organization that should be planned on a high level (Christner, et al., 2007, p. 150) and participation of the members and this have had an impact on my organizational skills. I am also able to form a group in the same setting and help the members go through the process successfully in order to get solutions to their psychological problems. The theory that I have learnt concerning psychological problems was easily applied in my real life situation. By this, I mean that I experienced instances of rising anxiety within me. For instance, when there was an intense argument within the group members concerning an obvious issue. I was feeling anxious and I have gradually been able to manage the anxiety by applying the theories I have learnt toward the end. I never clued with any one in the group and other with me in the result of understanding of own feelings, values, and anxiety. During the group activities, I cannot fail to mention that I managed to express emotions that I have not experienced in the past. For example, there is a group member, who gave out a very strong revelation, and I can tell that I was really feeling for her just because of what she has had to go through. The way, she brought out the story, got into me so much that I was feeling that I was the one going through the same situation. My experience helped me to comprehend one simple idea that has been already suggested by many other scholars: interpersonal-psychodynamic group therapy is considered to be a really powerful means and approach for those, who want to improve own life and get rid of past problems (Callahan, 2004, p.491). In general, I can conclude by noting that the group therapy, I went through, has greatly impacted on my life in a very positive way as far as psychological development is concerned. I have achieved self-improvement by means of the process of interaction with both the group members and outside the group. Reference List Billow, R. (2005). Bion Today. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 55(4), 613-23. Callahan, K. L., Price, J. L., and Hilsenroth, M. J. A Review of Interpersonal-Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy Outcomes for Adult Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 54(4), 491-519. Christner, R. W., Stewart, J. L., and Freeman, A. (2007). Handbook of Cognitive-Behavior Group Therapy with Children and Adolescents: Specific Settings and Presenting Problems. New York, NY: Routledge. Corey, G. (2005). Theory and Practice of Counselling and Psychotherapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole. Joyce A., S., Piper W.E., and Ogrodniczuk J. S. (2007). Therapeutic Alliance and Cohesion Variables as Predictors of Outcome in Short-Term Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 57(3), 269-97 Montgomery, C. (2002).Role of Dynamic Group Therapy in Psychiatry. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8(1), 34-41. Yalom, I. D. and Leszcz, M. (2005). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service