Get help from the best in academic writing.

associated with synthetic cannabinoids can drive prospect cannabis users from finding the right medicine.

Idea/subtopic: How stigma associated with synthetic cannabinoids in the past for example when potent synthetics were being sold on the illicit market and even legal market and were branded “bath salts” could persuade a prospect medical cannabis user (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) that that’s the only cannabinoid that is for them when there’s a much less potent cannabinoid that provides the same physical health benefits as delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol at the same or lower price.
Idea/subtopic: How the head high associated with cannabis can be habit-forming and lead to future drug use which a user should know and be presented cleaner, less reactive, and less potent alternatives to cannabis if they’re looking for the medicinal effects.

The setting, theme and plot of desiree’s babe

The setting, theme and plot of desiree’s babe.

 Description How would you describe the way setting and plot interact in this story? Why do you think that the narrator suggests the answer rather than provides it? What is the effect of Chopin’s restraint on how the reader learns about the deaths of Désirée and her baby? How does it shape our understanding of Désirée’s suicide? Describe the picture of marriage that Chopin creates in this story, and the way it seems to trap Désirée within a hopeless path of despair.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

If selected to own and operate a Delivery Service Partner, what personal and business goals would you hope to achieve by starting your company?

associated with synthetic cannabinoids can drive prospect cannabis users from finding the right medicine. If selected to own and operate a Delivery Service Partner, what personal and business goals would you hope to achieve by starting your company?.

If selected to own and operate a Delivery Service Partner, what personal and business goals would you hope to achieve by starting your company?

Financial freedom –

Professional growth –

Flexibility –

 

What three words would you use to describe the culture you would foster at your company? Explain why you chose each word to represent your company’s culture.

Change/Adaptability; –

Results Orientation –

Teamwork –

Please describe your leadership style

I lead by example –

 

Please list and briefly describe your current involvement in the community (i.e. social, public, private, and professional organization)?

I was previously involved with two programs before traveling. I was involved with a youth football program for my county that help young boys to stay active and productive during summer break. During these few months we organize various team events in order to buy supplies and gear as well as ask for volunteers to help during our organized championship matches. I’m also involved with the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) on a small scale welcoming new member and helping to plan functions as needs be.  I’m not able to stay involved much recently due to my work taking me overseas but I planned on continuing as soon as I possible can.

 

 

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Project #2 Rough draft

Below is the prompt and directions for a essay I am required to write. I’ve attached “The New Jim Crow” and The world and me” below in order to complete the assignment.
During this project, we learned that a rhetorical analysis examines aspects of the rhetorical situation (writer, audience, purpose, context) and explains how the appeals, tone, and other rhetorical characteristics work together to create a certain effect. Remember that, while your analysis may touch on the ideas (content or topics) of a text, a rhetorical analysis essay’s main goal is to construct and develop an interesting argument that illuminates the effects of writers’ rhetorical choices: How does a writer’s tone affect the character of their argument? How do their choices regarding ethos, pathos, and logos, affect the targeted audience? In constructing a rhetorical analysis, the writer (that’s you!) identifies and critically analyzes the rhetorical strategies the author uses in order to comment on the effectiveness of the text.
Having learned about the rhetorical situation and rhetorical concepts like ethos, pathos, and logos, your job in this assignment is to compare and contrast the methods of persuasion used by M. Alexander with those used by Ta-Nehisi Coates in the assigned excerpts from The New Jim Crow and Between the World and Me. (Length Requirement: 1,200-1,500 words.)
To review this genre’s conventions, review the UNC Writing Center’s page on compare/contrast essays (Links to an external site.), which is fantastic as usual and offers methods for addressing one of the challenges of this assignment: illuminating something new for your readers. As we have learned, merely pointing out examples of ethos, pathos, or logos in the texts is only a jumping-off point; you must develop these discussions to explain the significance of your observations, or you will leave your reader wondering why they are slogging through the essay. Remember that you should be advancing a thesis, and your thesis should incorporate some of the vocabulary and themes we read in Elizabeth Browning’s chapter on rhetoric (linked below for review). In sum, the challenge of this assignment (aside from the criteria noted in our Project 2 Rubric) is to demonstrate significance in your thesis and achieve analytical depth in your analysis.
Start by providing context with a brief discussion of the subject/topic that the two genres are focusing on. Include the title of each piece, the genre type, and the author (or authors) of each in the introduction; and identify the thesis/purpose, either implied or stated, in each genre. However, your thesis should compare/contrast two texts and should ideally articulate an interesting revelation about how the rhetoric is working, one that a casual reader may not have previously noticed. Remember that you are comparing and contrasting two texts, so your paper will be different from the following example, but this instructive, well annotated example (Links to an external site.) will help you review the useful rhetorical analysis techniques we have learned during this project. (Links to an external site.)
If you would like suggestions in terms of process, I think the following general sequence works well for this paper:
Step 1: Do some close readings of these two excerpts in order to understand the content of each author’s arguments, as well as how they are constructed. Be sure to annotate. After you have a solid grasp on the authors’ main arguments, narrow your focus to two or three passages, two or three main arguments that you believe you understand well. These will be the passages you use to develop and support your thesis. Remember that you are not writing an essay that agrees or disagrees with the authors’ arguments. That sort of writing has its place, but in this project, you are writing a much more nuanced piece: You are using a rhetorical analysis to illuminate something for your reader about how the arguments function.
Step 2: Carefully reread Elizabeth Browning’s wonderful chapter on Rhetorical Analysis (Links to an external site.). What aspects of Browning’s chapter seem most relevant to you as you analyze the passages you’ve decided to focus on? Use Browning’s chapter and your knowledge of rhetoric to discuss which strategies of persuasion Alexander and Coates employ in their work. (Be sure to employ the vocabulary you’ve acquired throughout this project.) How do these strategies affect their readers? In what ways are they similar? Different? Do some free-writing, and develop close reading analyses of your chosen passages. It may help to review the close reading analysis techniques we learned during Project 1.
Step 3: Examine your free-writing and other notes, and begin to organize your thoughts. Create a simple outline that features (at least) your thesis statement followed by a list of your topic sentences arranged in a logical manner. Failing to create at least a very basic outline before you start drafting is similar to trying to build a house without a blueprint. It’s probably gonna look pretty bad, and it will likely fall apart. Now, start writing.

Power and Purpose of Faustian Bargain through the centuries

Purpose: Use a literary argument to explain why the Faustian Bargain has survived through the centuries and is still popular in our own contemporary culture.
Assignment: Why has the Faustian Bargain or idea of selling one’s soul to the devil for different reasons with the expected consequences continued to remain popular in many cultural contexts through the centuries? Some have argued that this story has universal appeal, speaking to all people, all cultures, all ethnicities, throughout all centuries. Defend or deny this claim, explaining why you think readers are interested (or not interested) in this story and/or why readers relate (or do not relate) to the characters and events. How might this argument support Tolkien’s theory of Story Soup. Write a 400-word response in APA format agreeing or disagreeing with the above argument. Use specific sources from the text/film to support your assertions.

Provide strategic recommendations to the CEO of Campbell Soup Company.

Provide strategic recommendations to the CEO of Campbell Soup Company..

2) Final Exam Question: As of March 2019, you have been hired as a consultant to provide strategic recommendations to the CEO of Campbell Soup Company. What would you recommend the company to do to enhance its competitive advantage?

Final exam case: See attachment

3) Grading criteria

1.    Identification of key strategic issues and underlying causes: Exceptional analysis of case conditions and probable causes. (up to 10 points)

2.    Analysis of the key issue: Demonstration of a deep understanding of the relevant theories, frameworks, and concepts; Insightful and logical connection with the issues. (up to 20 points)

3.    Formulation and evaluation of alternative solutions: Systematic assessment of each alternative based on relevant criteria and supported by specific data or facts. (up to 20 points)

4.    The recommended course of action: Effective and specific recommendations, solutions, and plans of action (what, how, who, when). Bear in mind that
your solutions need to be realistic and workable rather than being off-the-top-of-your-head suggestions. Also, be sure that the company is financially able to carry out what you recommend (up to 25 points)

5.    Discussion of the potential outcome: Discussion of the suggested strategy’s impact on future decisions as well as financial consequences. (up to 15 points)

6.      Writing style: Consistently contains accurate and proper grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation; citations and references. (up to 10 points)

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/