Get help from the best in academic writing.

assignment you have to read the Wife Of Bath Prologue from The Canterbury tales by Chaucer, I attach the directions please read the directions first before doing it, I will not release payment if is not what I asked, there is also a rubric on how I will be grated, Zero plagiarism.

For this assignment you have to read the Wife Of Bath Prologue from The Canterbury tales by Chaucer, I attach the directions please read the directions first before doing it, I will not release payment if is not what I asked, there is also a rubric on how I will be grated, Zero plagiarism. Please turn in by 4:00pm 11/28/2021
In this class, you have the opportunity to receive credit for attending Live Chats or reviewing the chat archive. This opportunity is available once per week. To receive these points, you can either: Attend the Live Chat session. or Review the archived chat session and submit a 200-word summary of the content. The archive review summary must meet the expectations described below.  Summarize the content of the chat. Some ideas for what to include are a description of what information was covered and how you will apply this information to your academic or professional work. Label the document “Chat Credit” with the date the Live Chat was presented. A summary must be submitted within 1 week of the Live Chat to be considered for credit. Your instructor has the discretion to determine whether to award the points. A summary must meet each of these guidelines. Points are awarded on an all-or-nothing basis. To submit your summary, head to the assignment list and select Unit 5 – Extra Credit Chat Summary. View the Individual Project Demo for guidance on how to submit your chat summary as an Individual Project via the Virtual Classroom or the CTU Mobile app.
FINAL EXAM. Paper details   OVERVIEW: For this final, we are going to do something a little bit different. Rather than answering the traditional test questions in a typical test format, I would like us to reflect on what we have read and answer a series of questions that draw on our personal experiences in the class and with the novels we have read ( the bluest eye and the virgin suicide). You may answer the questions in a separate Word or Adobe document and then submit your answers. The grading system for this exam is very simple: Write a thoughtful answer, and you will earn full credit. Less thoughtful answers will earn slightly fewer points and responses with no thought or obvious effort will earn a failing grade. All answers are based on interpretation and personal experience. Be honest and have fun with this.I am looking forward to reading your answers. Each question has a possible value of 20 points. 1. How did the novels we discussed this semester help to inform or change your interpretation of the genre? 2. Describe an instance in this course where you struggled with a problem or concept, and initially believed you had the wrong idea, but then later realized you were on the right path. In this instance, in what ways was a struggle or mistake valuable to your eventual understanding? 3. Which of the critical perspectives did you most enjoy from the course, and why? Choose one passage from either of the novels and explain how this passage is best exemplified through your critical perspective. (You may find it easier to focus on a specific scene and begin by describing that scene.) 4. Formulate a research question related to one of the novels we discussed that you would like to answer. (You do not have to answer the question. Just ask a good question whose answer is unknown to you, and doesn’t have an obvious answer based on what you know from the course.) 5. Reflect on your overall experience in this class by describing an interesting concept or idea that you learned, why it was interesting, and what it tells you about reading and analyzing literature.FINAL EXAM

Bowie State University Importance of Effective Communication in the Workplace Memo

Bowie State University Importance of Effective Communication in the Workplace Memo.

After reading the assigned articles, write a response to the prompt below. Use your time wisely to be sure you have addressed the assignment thoroughly. Before submitting your work, please proofread for correctness (spelling, grammar, complete sentences, and clarity of expression). This writing should highlight your best writing effort. Include the following information in the top right hand corner of your paper:NameClass/SectionPrompt:The authors all highlight the importance of effective communication in the workplace. write a memo to him/them expressing your support of or disagreement with his/their beliefs. Use specific examples from the articles to support your position. Your memo should display your best writing effort.Make sure that you use the following format To: Author’s NameFrom: Your Name (Include your signed initials)Subject: Provide a Clear, Concise Subject of Your DocumentDate: Today’s DateDO NOT write in the Write Submissions text box! I cannot grade something written there. Use Microsoft Word as the application to submit your memorandum
Bowie State University Importance of Effective Communication in the Workplace Memo

Character Analysis in the “Survivor” Show Essay

help writing Introduction Survivor is a show that revolves around two teams of individuals competing between themselves and each other, with the ultimate goal of winning 1,000,000 dollars (“Survivor,” 2017). Despite the fact that the premise of the competition introduces a disruptive element into the game, the team aspect of the game is evident in both the survival and the contest elements of the episode. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the 1st episode of the 23rd Season of Survivor and apply Belbin’s Team Roles model to three characters participating, namely Ozzy Lusth, Benjamin “Coach” Wade, and John Cochran. Belbin’s Team Roles Belbin’s model identifies 8 archetypes that are unlikely to be found in pure form in real practice. These types include 4 extravert and 4 introvert roles, namely the following (Driskell, Driskell, Burke,

Use Of Strategic Human Resource Management

Strategic means planning and human resources management refers to the planning or maintaining the employees in an efficient way to achieve the organisational goals. Human resource deals with effective recruitment, development, compensation and utilization of human resource by an organisation. Strategic management is a distinctive approach to human management which seeks to achieve competitive advantage with a highly committed workforce using structural and personal techniques. This includes mentoring and training of employees which will help the new employee in getting used with company policies and the current project which he in. Training, rating, assessment and investigating the employee performance will make him a consistent performer. In today’s world both small companies and large companies follow strategic HR management. Strategic human resource management is aligned with the company’s objective, the planning and other things are done to achieve the mission, vision and objective of the organisation. They have a wide focus on company’s future. Startegic human resource management also focuses on employee issues and also organisational issues such as quality, culture, value and employee required for future needs. It is an overall framework which determines the shape and delivery of every individual strategy. Strategic HRM is based only on HRM principles and both are done in a planned way putting the future at its focus with the organisational goals, policies and action . Human is the great assest in an organisation, the skills, knowledge and ability of eaxch and every individual should be utilised in an efficient way to create an value, strategic human resources is a key to business strategy, employee management, business and employee performance. 1.2 Purpose of Strategic Human Resource Management Company profile Dell Perot Systems Dell is an American multinational information technology corporation based in Round Rock, Texas, US that develops, sells and supports computers and related products and services. Bearing the name of its founder, Michael Dell, the company is one of the largest corporations in the world, employing more than 96,000 people worldwide. Dell had 46,000 employees as of Jan. 30. About 22,200 of those, or 48.3 percent, were in the United States, while 23,800 people, or 51.7 percent, worked in other countries, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. They are the third largest PC maker in the world. Dell is listed at #38 on the Fortune 500 (2010). Fortune also lists Dell as the #5 most admired company in its industry. Dell has grown by both organic and inorganic means since its inception-notable mergers and acquisitions including Alienware (2006) and Perot Systems (2009). May 3, 2010, Fortune magazine listed Dell as the 38th largest company in the United States and the 5th largest company in Texas by total revenue. It is the 2nd largest non-oil company in Texas (behind AT

PHI 208 Ashford University Wk 1 Ethical Climate Change Initiatives Questions

PHI 208 Ashford University Wk 1 Ethical Climate Change Initiatives Questions.

Ethical Question[WLO: 4] [CLOs: 1, 5]Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read Chapter 1 of the textbook. This chapter will introduce you to the basic form and subject matter of ethical reasoning and assist you as you select an ethical question, examine the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempt to defend an answer to the question. Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper as they contain very precise and specific instructions on both the content and format requirements. You should download the provided outline and use that to structure your paper, as well as consult the assignment guidance and modeled example for additional help. Finally, before submitting your assignment please use the checklist to ensure that you have completed all of the requirements.OverviewThis course has three written assignments that build upon one another and are designed to take you step-by-step through a process of writing a paper that identifies an ethical question, examines the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempts to defend an answer to that question using strong moral reasoning.This first written assignment is a six-part exercise comprised of the following sections:Ethical QuestionIntroductionPosition StatementReasons in Support of Your PositionOpposing Position StatementReasons in Support of the Opposing PositionThe assignment should be 500 words, written in essay form, with six clearly labeled sections as indicated below, and include a title page and reference page.Part 1: Ethical QuestionBefore writing the paper, you will need to spend some time thinking about the specific ethical issue you want to focus on throughout this course.Begin this task by viewing the list of approved ethical topics and questions provided in the Week 1 Announcement titled: “Written Assignment Ethical Topics and Questions List.” Take some time looking over the list and browsing through some of the material in the corresponding chapters of the textbook in which each topic is addressed and decide which to focus on.Once you have done this, choose one of the ethical questions associated with that topic. If you wish to do so, you may formulate your own ethical question, but it must be on one of the topics listed in the announcement. Be sure to carefully study the provided questions and model your own question after them in terms of specificity and ethical focus.”Place the ethical question under the Part 1: Ethical Question heading at the top of the paper.Part 2: IntroductionIn this section of your paper, you should introduce the topic and question at issue by doing the following (not necessarily in this exact order):Explain its relevance and importance.Define any key terms and concepts.Provide any relevant context and background information.Briefly reference an idea, quote, or analysis of the issue that you have found in one of the required resources on the topic. Required resources include the textbook chapter focused on that topic (6, 7, 8, 9, or 10), the “Primary Sources” listed at the end of Chapters 6-9, and the “readings listed under “Further Reading” at the end of each section in Chapter 10.The introduction will be the longest section of this assignment and should be at least 300 words in one or two paragraphs. Place the introduction material under the Part 2: Introduction.Part 3: Position StatementYour work on the introduction section has likely unearthed various positions one might take on the ethical question you have chosen. In this section, you will formulate a position statement.A position statement is a one sentence statement that articulates your position on the issue and directly answers the question you have raised. For example, if the question was, “What is a physician’s obligation with respect to telling the truth to his or her patients?” a position statement might be “A physician may never directly lie to a patient, but it may be moral for a physician to withhold information if the physician reasonably believes doing so directly benefits the patient.” A different position statement might be: “A physician may use any means necessary, including lying to a patient, if the physician believes that will produce the best overall results.” However, the following statement would not be a sufficient position statement: “A physician must always respect the rights of his or her patients.” The reason this is not a sufficient position statement is that it does not directly answer the question concerning truth telling.Think of the position statement as the strongest claim you would make if you were a prosecuting attorney making your opening statement to a jury, where you want to state precisely and directly the position you want them to believe.Place the position statement under the Part 3: Position Statement heading.Part 4: Reasons in Support of Your PositionNow that you have articulated a position on the issue, write a short paragraph—just a few sentences—that presents and explains one or two of the strongest reasons in support of your position statement.You want your supporting reason to explain why someone should support the position you are taking on the ethical question. A supporting reason is a consideration that helps to show why your position is stronger than another position.One way to approach this is to imagine yourself in friendly conversation with someone who does not necessarily agree with your position (perhaps they disagree, or perhaps they are undecided). When you state your position, they might ask why you think that; the kind of response you would give is a supporting reason.Supporting reasons can include many things including, but not limited to: an appeal to moral principles such as duty, justice, fairness and equality; the positive or negative effects of certain actions on policies; or a summary of facts, statistics or evidence and an explanation of how they support your view.Place the supporting reason(s) under the Part 4: Reasons in Support of Your Position heading.Part 5: Opposing Position StatementNow that you have provided reasons to support your position statement, in this section you will take a step back from all of that and articulate a statement that expresses an opposing or contrary statement.Think of the opposing position statement as the strongest claim you would make if you were the defense attorney making your opening statement to the jury immediately after they have heard the prosecutor’s statement.Place the opposing position statement under the Part 5: Opposing Position Statement heading.Part 6: Reasons in Support of the Opposing PositionIn this section, write a short paragraph—just a few sentences—that presents and explains one or two of the strongest reasons in support of the opposing position statement.A strong opposing reason is a reason anyone would need to consider, even if they do not agree with the opposing position.In other words, do not simply contradict claims that you make in Part 4, especially factual claims! You should strive to identify and articulate considerations in support of the opposing position that you think are accurate and true, or at least plausible, even if you still believe your own position has the most support overall.If the reason(s) in support of the opposing position are ones you consider obviously false or indefensible, you should look for better reasons.Put yourself in the position of a defense attorney who has to make the best possible case to the jury in defense of his or her client.Place the opposing reasons under the Part 6: Reasons in Support of the Opposing Position heading.In your paper,Identify the ethical question.Introduce the topic and question.Formulate a position statement.Explain the strongest reasons in support of the position statement.Formulate an opposing position statement.Explain the strongest reasons in support of the opposing position statement.The Ethical Question paperMust be 500 to 600 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource.Must include a separate title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedFor further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)guide.Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
PHI 208 Ashford University Wk 1 Ethical Climate Change Initiatives Questions

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: