Get help from the best in academic writing.

Ashford University Implementation of the Americans with Disability Act Essay

24 Hour Essay Help / By
Ashford University Implementation of the Americans with Disability Act Essay.

I’m working on a writing report and need support to help me study.

I NEED A REALLY FAST WRITE THAT CAN COMPLETE THIS EASY PAPER IN 4 HOURS, 5 HOURS TOPS!!!…SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FULL INSTRUCTIONSSubmit a 7- to 10-page paper (exclusive of Title page and References) that includesthe following: Part 1—Introduction:o Provide a concise summary of the principles of Section 504, ADA, and IDEA thatadvance a just educational experience for students with exceptionalities. Part 2—Case Law:o For each of the five selected pieces of significant special education case law, conciselysynthesize how it supports one or more of the three foundational statues (i.e., Section504, ADA, and IDEA). Part 3—Reflection:o What is an issue related to issues of diversity and special needs that currently intereststo you?o How might you prepare an advocacy plan to offer solutions to address the issue?o What principles from one or more of three foundational statues or special educationcase law could you use in an advocacy plan to justify your recommended solution(s) toaddress the issue? (Note: You will have the opportunity to build on this issue to developyour Course Project in this course).Cite relevant, scholarly resources in each of the three sections of your paper.
Ashford University Implementation of the Americans with Disability Act Essay

The term human-wildlife conflict attempts to explain the complex relationship between humans and animal species. Globally, this is an issue that is steadily increasing due to human population expansion leading to fewer habitat options for many animal species, which consequently leads to more conflict over space and resources. This hugely affects the livelihoods of humans, with potential impacts including crop damage, property destruction, physical injury to people, and livestock loss which may contribute to more severe food poverty in certain areas. However, this undeniably has significant impacts on the wildlife involved. This is because many people respond negatively and retaliate with violence to prevent individuals from causing further damage, meaning that species are targeted and killed. This is significant because of the conservation crisis that we are currently experiencing meaning that many of the animals attacked are already endangered and in danger due to other anthropogenic reasons. An example of this issue is the human-elephant conflict that is currently occurring across the globe. This is becoming a more severe problem as elephants are sizable individuals that are being forced into smaller areas due to land loss and lack of resources, meaning that they often resort to crops that are planted by farmers. Elephants, as previously mentioned, are a large species, meaning they require a great amount of food in a day, and tend to cause much damage to the land through uprooting. Land users often refer to this as ‘crop-raiding’, and this evidently causes anger, and even fear, within agricultural farmers who frequently lose their supplies. Not only do they lose their crops, but they can also become injured, or even killed. Elephants are a severely endangered species, and this conflict with people means that many more are killed per year due to retaliation from humans. According to the World Wildlife Fund, 50-120 elephant individuals are shot and killed per year in Kenya, and many others are poisoned in Indonesia when raiding palm oil plantations. Furthermore, new mitigation strategies must be put in place to decrease the effects of this human-wildlife conflict whilst simultaneously protecting the threatened species involved. It is important to note that even though the complexity of these conflicts means that multiple elephant species are in danger, this essay will be specifically focusing on Asian elephant individuals. A key example of a mitigation scheme for this human-elephant conflict is known as the chili method. Elephants have an acute sense of smell meaning that they can be sensitive to certain unpleasant smells within the environment, such as hot chillis that can be used as a deterrent when placed around borders. This acts as an irritant to their sensitive respiratory tract area, meaning that the individuals are repelled from important cropland, consequently moving onto other areas and causing less damage to agricultural land. This can be used in a variety of different forms, with the most frequently used methods being bricks (dung and chili mixture which is burnt to create smoke), sprays, fencing, and growing chilis around crops. These all have different success rates due to varying costs and benefits for each method. A study that demonstrates this varying success is written by K. Chelliah et al in 2010, which aimed to see the effects of chilli ropes on elephant species. This study is based in India and involved creating a mixture of chili, tobacco powder, and waste oil in order to apply to ropes surrounding agricultural fields. The study area chosen consisted of three different areas (Wyanad Wildlife Sanctuary, Hosur Forest Divison, and Buxa tiger reserve), and the experiment lasted for 3 months. The results of this study showed a clear difference between the behaviors of both genders, with females being far more likely to be repelled by the chili scent compared to males. Interestingly, the researchers of this study believe that the elephants displayed avoidance behavior simply due to physiological barriers due to a new or unusual obstacle. A concern with this is that the deterrent will become less efficient with time as the rope becomes more familiar and less of a threat to the elephant individuals. An issue with using chili ropes is that the grease can easily be washed away, meaning in areas of high rainfall this could be a very time-consuming process, as well as revenue being lost due to fewer chilis being sold. However, a study was written by Osborn and Rasmussen in 1995 and revealed that when using chili in the form of an aerosol can (containing 10% oleoresin capsicum), there was a 86% success rate meaning that the majority of individuals were affected by the chili, suggesting that this can be an effective deterrent method. On the other hand, land users may see this as a time/energy consuming method as the dispersal of chili is not as strong as other methods such as smoke. Environmentally, this may not be the most friendly method as aerosols harm the environment due to the chemicals and gases released into the atmosphere. A more sustainable option for this may be chili bricks, as it uses readily available dung which is highly abundant, as well as recycling organic materials, meaning it is cheap and easy to use. A study that demonstrates the effectiveness of this method is written by Rocio A.Pozo et al in 2017. This involved mixing chili and dung to create two briquette types; chili and non-chili. The results showed that the chili bricks did change the individual’s behavior and kept them away from crops, especially during the night. However, it did not reduce the number of elephants that passed over the area, meaning that they would still be in close proximity to local people and could potentially cause accidental land damage. This suggests a possible short term repellent solution, although it would not completely deter them away from the area. Also, an issue with this method is that in areas of high winds, the smell of the chili will be blown away and may not be passed in the right direction, meaning it will not be as effective in certain locations or time of year. This is also not as environmentally friendly due to the high levels of carbon dioxide that it releases into the atmosphere when burnt. Also, some local individuals may be concerned about potential fire hazards in certain areas if the conditions are very dry, as other areas could easily catch fire and spread throughout the land. Another example of a non-violent mitigation scheme to prevent human and elephant conflict is the use of beehives. This method involves placing multiple beehives on fencing that surrounds important crop areas, roughly every 10 meters, with mesh placed on the sides in order to prevent honey badgers or other predator species from causing damage. These hives are all connected to the same wire so that when an elephant touches it, bee movement is triggered. Beehives are used as a deterrent due to elephant individuals finding the sound and vibrations uncomfortable, so will modify their behavior and move away from the area. In addition, they also do not like the scent due to their sensitive sense of smell. A study that demonstrates the success of this mitigation method is written by A.Water et al in 2020. The aim of this study is to increase understanding of beehive fencing as a mitigation method, and specifically investigates the effect of Italian honey bees on Asian elephants in Kaeng Hang as this is an area with a high rate of human-elephant conflict in Thailand (Kitratporn
University of California San Diego Mr Johnson Ethical Dilemma Case Study.

I’m working on a science discussion question and need an explanation to help me understand better.

You should submit an initial contribution with your own analysis and opinion.Once you can see other students opinions, you should contribute to the conversation.Here is the situation:Dr. Howard Johnson is a tenured Associate Professor in the biochemistry department at a public university. He has been collaborating with a large, multinational pharmaceutical firm for the past six years. During this time the company has supported his research to the extent that they are the sole source of his funding. The research is widely respected and he receives multiple requests each year for seminars, review articles, etc. He anticipates that his promotion credentials for Full Professor will be forwarded to the University Committee in two to three years. As part of his research program with the company, he serves as an “external reviewer” in the annual evaluation of the Research and Development section of the corporation. In doing so, he signs a confidentiality agreement that covers the research activities discussed during the review.This year Dr. Johnson was inadvertently included in a discussion at the social gathering following the review where one of the corporate scientists revealed that they had been utilizing a widely recognized chemical synthesis to generate new compounds that could be used as antidotes to certain viral infections. Because of prior use and the obvious nature of the synthesis as presented in the literature, neither the process nor the compounds could be patented. Thus, as soon as word of this process leaks out, it would be available to any of their competitors.During the course of this conversation, he learned that in secret trials one of the compounds reduced the mortality of Rift Valley Fever by 90%. About 5000 lives are lost annually to this and similar viruses in East African countries.The strategic plan adopted by the company was to withhold the distribution of those compounds. Management decided that they could not afford to release this compound to a developing country which would amount to a purely philanthropic gesture until after they had time to develop the compounds for influenza and the common cold. This would require about five years to obtain all of the permits needed to market such an antidote in developed countries. Unless the market in developed countries could be reached the antidotes would not be economically feasible to develop. However, if developed tens of thousands of additional lives lost to influenza would be saved.Ethical Dilemma:Should Dr. Johnson break confidentiality and reveal the process?
University of California San Diego Mr Johnson Ethical Dilemma Case Study

750 to1250 word essay about The autobiography of Malcolm X as told to by Alex Haley

Follow the prompt please and no plagiarism because my teacher will know.Also the you are comparing these two books so you have to already read them or know about them at least to complete this essay.I need someone who has read this book before and very familiar with the reading to complete this essay.PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

HUM 101 GWU Visual Arts & Identities Rogier Van Wayen Historical Background Essay

term paper help HUM 101 GWU Visual Arts & Identities Rogier Van Wayen Historical Background Essay.

Formatfor Paper: Five single-spaced pages, one-inch margins, 12-point font.Type your name at the topof the first page, followed by the title of the paper beneath it(noseparatetitle page). Sources: Three scholarly sources, peer-reviewed, of the caliber of the Girgsby essay on Manet’s Olympia. Citations: Chicago Manual of Style, bibliography and notes style. If your sources do not correspond to the examples, choose the closest entry and do your best to conform: https://www-chicagomanualofstyle-org.proxyau.wrlc.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-1.html In this phase you will combine your visual analysis with historical research to understand the work in relation to its original social context. Politics, gender, race, religion, etc., will figure into this analysis in various ways. The historical aspects of the paper must rely on three scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in the form of books, book chapters, and articles from the Library catalogue and the art-history databases presented in class. Use the scholarly article you assessed together in class, by Grigs by, to gauge the kind of writing and analysis you should look for in these readings. After you conduct your research and digest its implications, revisit the thesis of your visual analysis. Have you changed your mind about what the artist/work is attempting to communicate? This is a moment for you to test your cultural assumptions. Your new thesis should indicate whether or not, and to what degree, your historical research bears out your initial assertions about your work. Do you stand by your original conclusions or have you changed your mind? Either way, explain why. I provided the previous visual analysis and historical research here.I think the focus of this paper is to find and understand the influence of the historical background on the author and works.
HUM 101 GWU Visual Arts & Identities Rogier Van Wayen Historical Background Essay

USF Implications of Consolidation of Agriculture in The United States Discussion

USF Implications of Consolidation of Agriculture in The United States Discussion.

I’m working on a economics discussion question and need an explanation to help me understand better.

RUBRIC AND ARTICLE ATTACHEDISCUSSION POST: 4 PARAGRAPHS RESPONSE POST: 2 PARAGRAPHS9 (I will send a comment to respond once you have completed a discussion postGuidance: This PR Newswire piece (see citation link below) focuses on research describing the long-run trend of consolidation in U.S. agricultural production. The author of the research (interviewed in the piece) discusses why farms have increasingly gotten larger and fewer in number. However, for your assignment, I want you to focus on the economic implications of this shift in farm size and number. Specifically, what market characteristics are changing with consolidation, and what is the impact on outcomes, such as output and price? Are there other factors that can either counteract or reinforce the effects of consolidation? You can choose to discuss U.S. agriculture as a whole, or focus on a particular sector (e.g. livestock) or product (e.g. corn). Also, while this short piece provides a framework for analysis, it is limited in information, so feel free to use–and cite (similar to format below)–other sources.Assessment: Your grade will be based on the following four-part rubric: IPT_Discussions_Rubric.pdf. NOTE: There are two deadlines: Tuesday, 4/27, 11:59 p.m.–Your discussion. Wednesday, 4/28, 11:59 p.m.–Response to discussion post of ONE (1) of your group members.Article: PR Newswire (2020). UMD researcher highlights trends in the consolidation of agriculture across the U.S. with 35 years of data. PR Newswire Association LLC [New York]
USF Implications of Consolidation of Agriculture in The United States Discussion

essay briefly discussing the history and evolution of the juvenile justice system. Include the following in your essay: A

essay briefly discussing the history and evolution of the juvenile justice system. Include the following in your essay: A minimum of three milestones in the evolution of the juvenile justice system. A minimum of three significant examples of the historical evolution of the juvenile justice system. Your opinion regarding the effectiveness of the current juvenile justice system. Provide rationale to support your position. Note: This Assignment requires outside research. Use at least two credible sources and discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used. You may consult the Library, the Internet, course materials, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in APA style.

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: