This assignment requires you to critically analyze a selected empirical study in a peer-reviewed journal related to Social Cognitive Development. Students will complete 3 Article Critiques throughout this course.
PURPOSE: These Article Critiques will allow you to apply principles of critical thinking and analyze common errors in logic as they evaluate research literature, which is a key element of the student’s program outcome. Hence, you will learn how to aptly consume and disseminate empirical research. These assignments can serve as a building block to help students explore literature related to their Final Research paper.
1. Select an empirical study in a peer-reviewed journal (published in the last 3 years).
2. Systematically read and challenge the article’s validity. Ask scholarly questions, such as:
a. What was the purpose of the study?
b. What variables were under consideration and how were they measured?
c. Was it a valid form of measurement, why or why not? For example, if they used standardized measures did they have good reliability and validity?
d. What about the method used, was it most appropriate why or why not?
e. What are some criticisms of the study? What were some strengths of the study?
f. What are some threats to internal and external validity?
g. What group or groups can the findings be generalized to?
h. What are potential future areas of study? Identify a gap in the literature!
3. Each Article Critique must be 4 pages, including the following:
a. Introductory Paragraph: Summarizes the purpose of the research, including the research questions/hypotheses. Explain the overall method, results, and conclusions (in 2–3 sentences).
b. Body: Provide critique of the article. Noting the below strengths and weaknesses :
i. Research questions/hypotheses
ii. Research methodology including design, measures (think about different types of validity, reliability), participants (think about generalizability), procedures, ethics, etc.
iii. Results including analyses, clarity of findings, tables/graphs/figures.
iv. Discussion including whether the results validate the author’s conclusions/interpretations/recommendations, the major limitations, and what other alternative explanations for the findings might exist.
c. Conclusion: Include your judgment on the adequacy of the research, given the preceding scholarly questions and critique.
4. The instructor will be focusing on the content of this assignment writing and less on proofreading. You are expected to proofread each assignment for clarity, grammar, and spelling. In addition, the Liberty University Online Graduate Writing Center can help with overall writing and flow.
Each Article Critique must be in current APA format and include:
1. Include a title page, abstract, references page(s), in addition to 4 pages of critique.
2. Proper APA use of subheadings.
3. Avoid first and second person pronouns and be sure to use past tense when describing completed research.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via Turnitin.
Instructions Complete both Part A and Part B. The overall assignment length of 2500 words is divided into 2000 words for Part A and 500 words for Part B. Part A: Completed Story Present your completed story (2000 words), which has developed from your work following through from Assignment 2. (original story is provided in additional materials with marking feedback to make the story better) Please consider carefully the guidance that is given for completing and presenting this travel story in the relevant Study Guides. Part B: Reflection Write a reflection (500 words) for your completed story, including its form and content, and the process of constructing it.
Essay Help “>Essay Help
a grant application.
articles only 3 years old related to Social Cognitive Development a grant application..
the final paper will be in the form of a grant application. You may select the grant topic that was related to your Letter of Inquiry. The grant application can also be related to the current or future job interests of the student. Here are a few examples of previous final exam papers: a grant for a new Adult Day Health program, funding for a feasibility study to develop a PACE program, support for a grandparent mentoring program, and a grant to expand the County Ombudsman program. Several of these grant proposals have been funded for as much as $100,000.00! The Final Paper/Grant Application should include: A brief introduction of the topic with 3 or more relevant references from peer reviewed journals (not websites or lay magazine articles). This introduction should be approximately 350 to 700 words long. Do not use material from websites. An explanation of how the proposed project will add something beneficial to the community. This should be approximately 400 to 500 words long. A discussion of how your program is different from existing programs in the community. This should be approximately 300 words long. An outline of your proposed project with the timetable for completion of the project. This should be approximately 800 to 1200 words long. A description of how you plan to evaluate the success of your program. This should be approximately 150 to 250 words long. A detailed budget for your proposal with an explanation of each item. The Final Paper/Grant Application format should be: 2000 to 3000 words in length. DO NOT SEND PAPERS (GRANT PROPOSALS) SHORTER THAN 2000 WORDS OR LONGER THAN 3000 WORDS WITHOUT EXPLICIT APPROVAL OF THE INSTRUCTOR. Please proofread your paper before sending it out! Use APA style with references as appropriate. Size 12 font in Arial, Cambria, or Times New Roman. Double-spaced.
Essay Help “>Essay Help
ACMB01 – Researched Review Essay: Science Fiction, Social Change, and “The Shell”
ACMB01 – Researched Review Essay: Science Fiction, Social Change, and “The Shell”.
“Every shell is a life journal, made out of the very substance of its creator, and left as a record of what it thought, even if we can’t understand exactly what it thought. Sometimes interpretation is a trap. Sometimes we need to simply observe.” (Hopkinson 44) Prompt: Regardless of format, science fiction opens imaginative space for asking important questions about what is, and what could possibly be. In particular, theatrical science fiction allows for such interrogation in communication – and in communion – with others; in a highly digitized and fragmented world (a world envisioned in science fiction’s past), theatre remains an (increasingly rare) space where performers and audience share space. Directed by Nikki Shaffeeullah and running from March 14-16 and 21-23, 2019, the University of Toronto Scarborough’s TAPS production of “The Shell” (an adaptation of Nalo Hopkinson’s short story, “Message in a Bottle”), presents the audience with challenging ideas about art, ability, and possibility, while also opening contemplative space around the intersection of science fiction, social change, and audience experience. Moreover, as in the artistic installation within the story’s narrative, this production does all this within a fictional world that looks much like our own, but which holds rich and deep secrets hidden amongst the rubble. Instructions: For your final two major writing assignments for the course, you will compose a literature review (due March 24th, 2019) and related researched review essay (due April 5th, 2019). These two assignments are connected: the resources you address in your Literature Review will become the sources you engage for the Research Essay. Review this document: https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/assignments/playreview/ This will help you think through the general structure and approach you should take in the assignment. Like an argument essay, a research project provides a thesis and supports that thesis through research, observation, and analysis. A researched review essay will bring together multiple sources that address a common theme (or set of themes) relevant to the thesis you want to support. The thesis is based in the research you’ve done, demonstrating how this research shaped your understanding of “The Shell”. Note that the play must be referred to and properly cited in your essay; if you draw on the short story, “Message in a Bottle”, this should be referred to and cited, as well. Themes: There are a variety of themes for exploration in “The Shell”, and you are welcome to identify themes that you find particularly interesting, and to develop a research trajectory in line with that interest. Here are some possible examples of themes: • Science fiction in theatre • Imagining social change through science fiction • Science fiction and gender • Race and colonialism • Art as a political tool • Theatrical adaptation (of non-theatrical works) • Theatre and community • Theatre and audience reception • Theatrical arts as dynamic/community-based vs. Static, product-based arts This is not necessarily an exhaustive list of themes, and some of these themes can be addressed in connection with each other, when appropriate. It is not advisable to try to take on all of these themes. If you would like to re-watch the director’s introduction to the play, to see how she works with such themes, it is viewable here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LDJ5kBUdzg&feature=youtu.be Details: Length: 1200-1500 words, including a separate Works Cited page. Do not include a title page. Sources: Your research essay should bring together no fewer than 4 academic sources. Many or all of these sources should carry over from your literature review. Format: Your essay must follow MLA 8 guidelines for both citation and page layout (formatting). A complete resource for MLA 8 essay formatting and citation is available here: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/. Incorrect formatting and/or citation will result in a deduction of up to one full letter grade.
Essay Help “>Essay Help