Pick an article that relates to this week’s topics – Effective Interpersonal Communication Skills and Joining Existing Teams, Projects and Organizations
Summarize the main ideas, arguments, positions, and findings
Critique the article’s contribution to the week’s topic
Explain why you chose the article and what you learned from reading it
Article review should be a minimum of 500 words and follow APA formatting guidelines.
Please discuss the following topics. Use only 75-words max per topic to discuss and present your answer to the point (do not add unnecessary information)Discuss how cloud computing has changed how companies budget for software solutions.Define scalability and discuss how the cloud impacts it.Define virtualization and discuss how the cloud impacts it.Discuss how Web 2.0 has driven the growth of the web.Note the below points: You are required to use at least 4-peer reviewed sources to answer the above questions. Each question answered must have the in-text citationNo Plagiarism/SpinBot/Synonymic words pleasePlease read the instructions carefully
Cloud Computing Discussion
Read the scenario below and complete the assignment that follows.Scenario17-year-old Peter broke into a home, stole approximately $10,000 worth of jewelry and electronics, and consumed a bottle of wine before he fled the scene in a stolen car. The police stopped Peter after noticing him swerving, speeding, and then slowing down on the interstate highway. During the stop, police saw the “loot” stashed in the back seat of Peter’s car and suspected he was involved in more than driving while intoxicated. Peter was properly arrested and booked on the charge of driving while intoxicated.The police believe Peter’s fingerprints will match those discovered at the burglary scene and are likely to charge him with burglary and larceny as well as grand theft auto. Peter’s parents have been contacted, and are debating whether he should retain counsel because they are struggling financially. To complicate matters, Peter fully admitted to the charges before his parents were contacted. Since it is Peter’s first time in the juvenile justice system, neither he nor his parents know what to expect. What is likely to happen? Will Peter have to go to court or trial? If so, what can he expect in the court process?Scenario adapted with permission from: McGraw-Hill Instructor Resources for Bohm, R. (2018). Introduction to criminal justice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. InstructionsResearch the juvenile justice laws/policies in your community or state and write a 525- to 700-word response to Peter’s parents. Explain the process Peter might go through in the application of criminal justice in your community or state.Note: You may wish to use Figure 13.1, “The Formal Juvenile Justice Process,” on p. 488 of your textbook to guide your research.Address the following in your paper:Identify the city/state laws you are researching.Describe 2 or more procedures police may use in processing Peter’s case and explain why you selected these procedures. Address some or all of the following questions in your response:What steps might the police take in their investigation?Will Peter be charged with a crime(s)? If so, what crime(s) could Peter be charged with?What options do all parties (Peter, his parents, and the police) have related to intake, processing, and custody or release?Identify 2 or more potential court proceedings Peter may face and explain why you selected these proceedings. Address some or all of the following questions in your response:What legal and financial rights can Peter and his family pursue?Is Peter likely to go through informal or formal court proceedings? Explain your reasoning.Describe court procedures if Peter’s case goes to trial. Include any details related to these procedures.If Peter goes through a disposition hearing, what will that entail? Describe the type of justice the judge may administer.Predict 1 potential post-court outcome. Explain the rationale for your prediction with relevant details. Address the following question in your response:What will life be like for Peter after he has exited the court system?Cite 1–2 sources.
GCU Juvenile Justice Juvenile Judicial Laws in The State of Illinois Case Study
Write a narrative essay addressing the four questions or statements listed below. Your essay must follow APA format, include a minimum of 1,200 words, and 3 scholarly resources.Why is corporate governance an important concern for companies that are pursuing the social responsibility approach? How does it improve or change the nature of executive and managerial decision making?What characteristics of the board of directors usually lead to effective corporate governance? List and explain challenges that have contributed to the cause of corporate governance failures.What is the rationale for government to regulate the activities of businesses? How is our economic and social existence shaped by government regulations?Compare the costs and benefits of regulation. In your opinion, do the benefits outweigh the costs or vice versa? What are the advantages and disadvantages of deregulation?
UNAHVS Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Business Organizations Essay
Compare and contrast the three different levels of health promotion (primary, secondary, tertiary). Discuss how the levels of prevention
Compare and contrast the three different levels of health promotion (primary, secondary, tertiary). Discuss how the levels of prevention help determine educational needs for a patient. As you begin to explore this week topic, can you provide one example of health promotion that includes all three levels of prevention with rational. Must be APA 7th edition. At least two references, one need to be peer-reviewed article
Rhetorical Analysis of Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”
assignment writing services Rhetorical Analysis of Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”. Rhetorical Analysis of Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Internet takes away a person’s desire to learn. Very few people think and feel that technology is wrong. In Nicholas Carr’s essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, he mentions the dangers that will come forth in future generations based on the risks of the open webbed internet. Carr gets through the dangers of Google by abusing the use of ethos, pathos and logos. Carr opens his essay with an act from 2001: A Space Odyssey and ends his first paragraph with a computer saying, “I can feel it.” He then begins the next paragraph with, “I can feel it, too.” Carr’s point of repetition was to have his readers obtain a connection with computers. In today’s society there is not much of a gap between people and computers. In the essay, Carr first addresses how the Internet is changing people’s ability to comprehend. While technology is helpful to most people because of its fast responses to boundless information, it is still changing the way a person thinks correctly, effecting a person’s ability to learn things. Carr claims that the Internet is making people lazy with a shorter attention span and therefore they become slower at reading and writing, producing a shallow approach to thinking. Carr seems to conclude that computers are more advanced in brain power than humans, and dependence on computers is taking away the power of the human brain to think properly. Within the essay, Carr discusses that computers have positive outcomes for users in today’s society. However, when he mentions, “But that boon comes at a price,” his tone immediately changes from grateful to troubled. This change in tone shows that Carr is beginning to create a deeper connection between computers and society. One of Carr’s counterarguments in the essay is when he mentions that it is a good thing that people can text because the receiver needs to read the information sent, forcing users to read and write. Carr also mentions that reading a text is not the right kind of reading, so it is not so good. Carr’s audience is believed to be anyone using technology. Carr’s focus are those audience members who are too involved in their screens, but anybody who uses the Internet can be. Carr also makes his essay enjoyable for kids and teens by including the text of A Space Odyssey. In order to grasp the reader’s attention, Carr enhances his writing by using ethos in order to associate with the reader. Carr states that the Internet is causing people in society to become more impatient because the Internet is a loop to get information fast instead of researching in various books. He tells the reader that what he writes is about himself as well. Therefore, he is a firsthand witness of the fact that all of these things are true because they happened to himself. Carr adds in his essay that “the Net is becoming a universal medium” for him, showing the reader that he is just like them, taking advantage of the Internet. Carr adds his own information to gain a trust with his reader by using ethos. Carr lifts his argument even more because he gives not only examples of himself but of different bloggers as well. For example, he writes about Scott Karp, who has been excessive about reading, but now that the Internet is readily available, he finds it more and more difficult to immerse himself in a book. Carr shows that he is not the only one experiencing this change in society, thus gaining the trust of his readers. Carr supplies logos in his essay too, by referencing different studies and experiments. For example, he mentions a study performed by University College London scholars about online research habits. By mentioning this experiment, he showed his argument to be even more true because the results the scientists received proved to people that because of Google, today’s society skims over proper sources more than ever before. Carr adds to his logos by including historical events as well. For instance, he writes a comparison between a clock and the Internet although they do not have much in common. The clock causes us to stop what we are doing and be in the moment of listening to the time on the clock. When the clock was invented, it changed the way people thought, and a person’s attention became focused more on time as a measure of tasking than the task itself. The clock years ago was the new technological creation and one sees how that changed minds. Therefore, in present time it supports the fact that the Internet changes minds as well. But Carr should not be focusing on the old technology but on what the new technology brings, because people are in a different society now and the current societal needs demand a certain amount of technological savvy. Carr uses pathos in a way that elicits a sense of fear in his readers. He writes about how Google is ruining the natural intellect of people’s minds. Carr lingers to say that “the human brain is just an outdated computer that needs a faster processor and a bigger hard drive” (800). By examining the human brain and comparing it to a computer, the author suggests that the Internet is slowly taking control over us and making us into robots. When Carr mentions that brains are outdated, he alludes to the fact that computers are on a higher level than the brain itself. Carr includes Richard Forman’s opinion, that we will all become pancake people. But this statement is not necessarily true. Although technology specifically focuses on the internet giving a person unbounded access to information, a person doesn’t use the internet for the purpose of accessing all that it has to offer but uses it as a resource to find information needed or looks it up out of interest. The internet is believed to help people gain knowledge at a much faster pace and create less stupidity on specific topics. Technology is also super helpful in communication. People in this society are more advanced in different cultures and languages because they can communicate with people all the way across the world. From Carr’s personal experience he thinks people drown in the amount of information that the internet has to offer but the claim is unrelatable because perhaps it focuses on older people but society that was born in this generation has no problem and is definitely not overwhelmed. Although relying too much on the Internet will change the way society thinks and reads, it can also have some advantages that Carr should have mentioned. When this generation uses the Internet, it fastens the pace of wanting information. When people are in this mindset it can have a new process of learning things. It can expand the knowledge and turn the mindset into a growth. To help surpass this message, Carr goes into great length of explaining through pathos ethos and logos. Carr uses ethos in a way to purely connect to the reader and focus on the fact that he is merely a human being just like them. The way he uses logos in his writing is through referencing experiments and historical innovations. Carr establishes pathos by using the emotion of fear to get the reader’s attention to stop using the Internet as often. Carr, tries persuading his readers with his argument too hard. While readers can agree that the Internet distracts a person from reading and concentrating, Carr goes too far to say that its racking our brains, messing them up and turning us into computed robots. Therefore, Carr’s article is more opinion based than just an argument, he did not talk equally about how the Internet could be a good thing. Works cited Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Norton Field Guide to Writing. Richard Bullock, Maureen D. Goggin, Francine Weinberg, 2019, 789-802. Rhetorical Analysis of Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”
Compounding Of Offences Under Criminal Procedure Law Essay
The compounding of offences is an act on the part of the victim whereby he/she decides to pardon the offence committed by the accused and request the court to exonerate him of all charges. The compounding of an offence does not mean that the offence has not been committed; it only means that the victim is willing to pardon it, or has accepted some form of a solatium as some form of compensation or redressal for what he has suffered  . This, however, does not mean that there can be no composition without the passing of any consideration or gratification. All that the law requires is that there must be some arrangement between the parties settling their differences  . The compounding of offences should not be confused with plea-bargaining, which is against public policy. Section 320 of the CrPC is exhaustive as to the law of compounding in India. Section 320 is almost a verbatim reproduction of S 345 of the 1898 Code of Criminal Procedure, with the addition of some new provisions. It contains- The persons who may compound The criminal offences that may be compounded, either on the volition of the complainant or in certain cases with the additional backing of the court. The stage of the criminal proceedings at which the composition is sought to be made. Compounding of offences terminates the legal proceedings against the offender and the offender is entitled to an acquittal. When the law has allowed the compounding of offence as per the protocol laid down by the CrPC, there can be no question of such compounding being opposed to public policy within the meaning of Section 23 of the ICA, 1872. Any agreement between an injured person and the offender to terminate criminal proceedings where recourse has not been had to this section immediately falls foul of Sec 23 of the ICA as it does not possess the sanction of the law. Except for Section 320, the concept of negotiated settlement of criminal cases is not permissible, as it is settled law that a case has to be decided on its merits alone and not on the basis of plea bargaining . The Rationale Of Compounding Of Offences- Ordinarily it is the state that has the right or power to punish offenders, although individuals might be directly and personally aggrieved by the commission of the offence. Criminal law regards the punishment imposed by the law at the instance of the state on the offender as the proper and sufficient satisfaction, not only for the society as a whole but also for individuals personally aggrieved by the offence. But in the case of certain offences the law permits the aggrieved person himself to receive satisfaction other than actual punishment in the substitution of the punishment. It is for such offences, which can be labelled as offences which are not very grave or serious in the eyes of a reasonable individual, that the law allows the offences to be compounded. The express policy of the law of Section 320 is to promote friendliness between the parties so that peace is restored  . The rationale of compounding can be better understood through an analysis of those cases where compounding is not permissible. Offences under Section 143, 147 and 148 of the IPC are not compoundable under any circumstances, because the legislature views them as offences concerning persons other than those immediately involved; such cases cannot be concluded because of a reconciliation of the immediate parties involved as they are not private offences .but offences which affect the public at large  . From an assessment of this, it is not difficult to understand the basis of the classification of compoundable offences, offences compoundable with the sanction of the court and offences not compoundable at all. It is the degree of wrong done to the state by the commission of the offence that appears to be the basis of the distinction between compoundable offences and offences compoundable only with the permission of the court. The petty wrongs done to citizens, which do not seriously affect the interests of the community or the state are compoundable by the injured party without any reference to the state. The next class of offences, where sanction of the court is necessary to compound, consists of cases where the injury to the state is recognised, but the state considers it expedient in given cases, on the basis of the discretion exercised by a judicial authority, to permit the aggrieved party to compound the offence. The Distinction Between Withdrawal And Composition- Although the end effect of a withdrawal and a composition is essentially the same i.e acquittal of the accused at any time before a judgment is passed, there are certain differences between the two. Firstly, a withdrawal must be by intimation to the magistrate holding the trial whereas in several instances enumerated in Section 320(1) composition can be effected without the permission of the court. Secondly, withdrawal is a unilateral act of the complainant alone whereas composition presupposes some kind of arrangement between the complainant and the accused  . Thirdly, on withdrawal of the complaint the magistrate can award compensation to the accused but compensation cannot be awarded when a case is compounded. In a nutshell, whether the petition praying that the case be struck off the file is a withdrawal or a composition, is to be judged from the fact whether the accused consented to it or not. The Settlement Of Disputes At Sebi Incorporating The Concept of Compounding- At the Securities and Exchange Board of India, in Administrative/Civil enforcement actions  before the Securities Courts or the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), a settlement may be reached between the regulator and a person (Party) who may prima facie be found to have violated securities laws. Such a settlement is known as a consent order and through the process of compounding the accused pays compounding charges in lieu of undergoing consequences of prosecution. It has been stated through SEBI circulars that such an arrangement provides flexibility of wider array of enforcement and remedial actions which will achieve the twin goals of an appropriate sanction, remedy and deterrance without resorting to litigation, lengthy proceedings and consequent delays. Scope Of Compounding In The CrPC Certain Permissible Actions Within The Ambit of Section 320- If the accused brings to the notice of the courts that there has been an agreement between the two parties, then the complainant is questioned by the magistrate and on his affirmation of the claims made the accused is acquitted. In case of a disagreement between the parties as to whether the composition took place or not, although there is no provision for the same, the magistrate will initiate an evidence-finding enquiry to determine the veracity of the accused’s claims  . The controversy over whether an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 could be compounded with conflicting judgments of the Madhya Pradesh  and Andhra Pradesh High Courts  has been resolved by the Parliament when it amended Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, making all offences under the Act compoundable. A matter may be compounded at any stage under this section before a sentence is pronounced and a magistrate cannot refuse to accept a petition of compromise even if it is filed at a time when the judgment was being written  . Actions Which Outside the Scope of Section 320- A compromise has the immediate effect of acquittal so as to deprive the magistrate of his jurisdiction to try the case, the subsequent withdrawal from it by either of the two parties can neither affect the acquittal nor revive the jurisdiction of the magistrate to proceed with the case  . It has been held that the discretion granted to magistrates must be exercised by them with caution, especially in those cases where the offences are of a serious nature  . A composition has the effect of acquittal only in respect of the offence which has been compounded, and not of any other offence or offences for which the accused is charged in the same case  . It is established law since pre-independence that the compounding of offences is a judicial act, the discretion of which lies with the magistrate, and the police has no authority to interfere in these matters, and the magistrate should not take the opinion of the police in such matters  . It has been held in the case of Mangilal V. State  , that acquittal under Section 320(8) can follow only when it was a lawful compromise not made under coercion or duress or other similar circumstances vitiating the compromise. If the accused is charged with two offences, one of which is compoundable and the other is non-compoundable, a composition in respect of the compoundable offence will not acquit the accused of the non-compoundable offence  . Contentious Areas In The Implementation Of Section 320 Ambiguity in the law over the compounding of certain non-compoundable offences- One set of decisions suggests that Section 320 (9) is very explicit in its understanding and the HC, under the exercise of its statutory jurisdiction cannot vary or amend this statutory provision under Section 482. Those offences not mentioned in the section cannot be compounded, as the section is exhaustive of the law of composition  . Thus, the composition of one offence will not bar prosecution for a distinct offence which the accused might have been charged with on the same facts  . Another set of decisions hold that in the matrimonial disputes between husband and wife, it is the duty of the court to encourage genuine settlement between them and after the initiation of proceedings under Section 498-A of the IPC, if the wife wishes to settle the dispute, then her petition to quash proceedings under Section 482 should be allowed as Section 320 does not affect or limit the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings  . There have been very many instances where non-compoundable offences have been compounded by Indian courts on the reasoning that natural justice would demand in those cases that the offences be compounded in light of the peculiar facts and circumstances. As an illustration, an offence under Section 307, which is neither listed under 320(1) nor 320(2), was allowed to be compounded by the Supreme Court in Mahesh Chand V. State  . The Malimath Committee Report The suggestion of pre-trial sittings. The Committee is in favour of giving a role to the victim in the negotiation leading to settlement of criminal cases either through courts, Lok Adalats or Plea-bargaining. The Committee is of the opinion that there should be pre-trial sittings, which would in turn facilitate compounding of offences. This calls for the court to adopt a more interventionist and authoritative role than has been traditionally observed in identifying the issues for trial and in securing the proper preparation by both parties to deal efficiently with them. This in turn requires adequate preparation, not only by the parties and their advocates, but also by the Judge with the benefit of sufficient time out of court in which to do it. Provisions for such pretrial sittings have been made in several countries. The suggestion of an arrears eradication scheme The committee also suggested the setting up of the arrears eradication scheme, whereby the services of the appointed judge, ideally a dynamic problem solving person, could be utilized for the compounding or quick settlement of cases. The committee feels that plea-bargaining is a very viable alternative when it comes to the quick settlement of cases where the accused is penitent, and its usage and success in the USA suggests the same. Also it is felt that Section 360 of the CrPC (Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition) is underutilized. The caveat would be that unlike the USA where it is available for all offences, it not be extended for offences against women and children. Also it has to be well administered to prevent misuses, so that the taint of legalizing a crime not be attached to it. Another recommendation as part of the arrears eradication scheme is that part time courts may also sit on holidays. Part time courts can conveniently be assigned compoundable cases for settlement. The benefit of compounding of offences recommended by this Committee is advised to be extended to pending cases as well. A concerted effort should be made to dispose of the cases by compounding or settlement wherever that is permissible in law, it has been suggested. If the compounding offences is there in the statute even under old Cr.P.C. there is no reason why, when the accused is not let off but he is sentenced for a lesser sentence plea bargaining should not be included in the Criminal Justice System, so that the object of securing conviction and also reducing the period of trial can be achieved and reduced pendency can also be achieved in ‘one go’. Primary recommendation with regards to compounding of offences However, the Committee is of the view that in addition to the offences prescribed in the Code as compoundable with or without the order of the court there are many other offences which deserve to be included in the list of compoundable offences. Where the offences are not of a serious character and the impact is mainly on the victim and not on the values of the society, it is desirable to encourage settlement without trial. The Committee feels that many offences should be added to the table in 320(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Committee further recommends offences which are compoundable with the leave of the court, may be made compoundable without the leave of the court. These are matters which should be entrusted to the Committee. In certain cases, the committee has suggested that certain acts be given only a minor punishment as meting out imprisonment leads to social stigma, which can further lead to more offences by that individual. Hence even in this regard of the reclassification of offences into major and minor offences, the compounding of offences plays a major role. Specific recommendation to address the ambiguity over section 498-A Section 498-A of the IPC is provision which is intended to protect the wife from being subjected by the husband or his relatives to cruelty. But what has bothered the Committee are the provisions which make this offence non-bailable and non-compoundable. As this offence is made non-bailable and not compoundable it make reconciliation and returning to marital home almost impossible This view of the Malimath committee finds support in the judgment of the Bombay HC in the case of Suresh V. State  where the learned judge recommended that the parliament amend article 320 to include 498 A in the list compoundable offences. Reasoning of the committee The woman victim lodges an F.I.R alleging commission of offence under Section 498A, her husband, in-laws and other relatives of the husband would be arrested immediately. If she has no independent source of income she has to return to her natal family where also support may not be forthcoming. Her claim for maintenance would be honoured more in default than in payment especially if the husband has lost his job or suspended from his job due to the arrest. Where maintenance is given, it is often a paltry sum. (Thus the woman is neither here nor there. She has just fallen from the frying pan into the fire.) Even when there is a divorce, or reconciliation, the criminal case continues as Section 498A is non compoundable. If the wife feels that she was very impulsive when she made the complaint, and she wants to withdraw it, there are several legal obstacles in the way owing to the offence being non-compoundable.- She may change her mind and get into the mood to forget and forgive. The husband may realize the mistakes committed and come forward to turn a new leaf for a loving and cordial relationship. The woman may like to seek reconciliation. But this may not be possible due to the legal obstacles. Even if she wishes to make amends by withdrawing the complaint, she can not do so as the offence is non compoundable. The doors for returning to family life stand closed. She is thus left at the mercy of her natal family The committee’s conclusion This section, therefore, helps neither the wife nor the husband. The offence being non-bailable and non-compoundable makes an innocent person undergo stigmatization and hardship. Heartless provisions that make the offence non-bailable and non-compoundable operate against reconciliations. It is therefore necessary to make this offence (a) bailable and (b) compoundable to give a chance to the spouses to come together. The committee report mentions at several places that the list of compoundable offences be enlarged, for the purposes of speedy justice and its belief that such modes of settlement of cases do not offend any principles of criminal lawâ€¦although it fails to mention what these offences are. All these recommendations have been incorporated into the crpc through the latest amendments. Conclusion
In our last discussion, we’re going to change it up a bit. There is no initial opinion question, but rather a library scavenger hunt for trending technology that impacts health care finance and budgeting. Below are the specific instructions. This last discussion needs to begin no later than Wednesday. Instructions to LearnersThis final discussion is based on what you have learned in your research and readings during this course. Use the library to research two articles and make your initial post no later than Wednesday. In an initial post share two (2) articles from the Excelsior library discussing a new trend of interest to you (such as smartphone apps, iPads or other mobile technology, robotics, nanotechnology, automated care, telemedicine, etc.) that influences some aspect of health care finance (revenues, expenses, billing, coding, etc.). Be sure to provide the full citation and permanent link, so your classmates and instructor can also check it out. Where appropriate, please feel free to include related websites in addition to the article. Librarians can help you locate the article’s permanent link.Provide a brief synopsis in your own words, including why you chose this trend and what its implications are for health care finance at the organizational and patient level. You might even ask your classmates questions concerning the technology’s impacts on finance!As you respond to your classmates’ posts on their technologies, share other implications that you may see and/or experiences you may have had with that particular technology.Please be sure to justify your responses with your readings, as well as your experiences where appropriate. Remember, you are scheduling your professional staff and NOT patients. Remember that an active discussion is the key to an interesting and engaging online course, so start early. Please do not attach any files to the discussion threads.Consult the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. It is recommended that you write your post in a document first. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to make your initial post, click on “Reply.” Then copy/paste the text into the message field, and click “Post Reply.” To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post.EvaluationThis discussion will be graded using a rubric. Please review this rubric prior to beginning the discussion. You can view the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. All discussions combined are worth 25% of your final course grade.
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service