Get help from the best in academic writing.

Apology by Plato (in the Five Dialogues)

Socrates was charged with impiety (speaking out against the gods) and corrupting the youth. How does Socrates address both charges against him? And how do you think Socrates did in his defense? Do you think Socrates defended himself successfully against the two charges? Why or why not? Please make sure to clearly explain the charges and Socrates’ responses. This assignment is primarily exploratory and analytical. It is designed to show your understanding of the texts we are reading in class, and also to show your understanding of the issues and questions raised in these texts. Basic Specifications Be sure to respond to all parts of the topic question and to all questions raised in the topic description. The result should be an essay composed of paragraphs (i.e., not isolated sentences or sentence-fragments). Do not copy the topic question onto your paper. Your answer to each topic question should total 1-2 pages typed single-spaced and with one inch margins all around, or the equivalent (500-1000 words). Shorter papers will not be accepted. Please also number the pages in the paper. Submit your paper in either .doc, .docx, or .pdf format. Do not submit your paper by email. I would even suggest keeping an electronic copy and/or a hard copy of your paper. In responding to the topic you have selected, consult and discuss material only from the texts that we have read as well as your own notes. The entire content of the paper must NOT be merely a summary of what this philosopher(s) says. It MUST also include your own reasoning, made explicit in writing. If you choose to agree with this philosopher(s), you must include your own assessment of whether they have made valid arguments, provided sufficient or compelling evidence for the points they made, or have made some other contribution to your understanding of the topic. You should also explain why you concluded that philosopher’s arguments or positions were compelling or valid (or not). Include reasoning, not unsupported opinions. Be sure to reference the primary texts that we are using. Do NOT use outside sources unless stated otherwise. You will need to show what you think the philosopher(s) mean by what they say and demonstrate that by direct quotations. Show what in the text supports the reasoned inferences you make about the philosophers’ meanings. Quotations must not make up more than twenty percent of the paper. Your reasoning, analyses, and arguments are central to this paper.  Make sure you use proper citations. Use footnotes, endnotes, or in-text annotations whenever you quote a source. If you are not sure of how to use footnotes/endnotes or parenthetical annotations, how to cite a text properly, or how to write a bibliography/reference list, consult the online MLA Style Manual, or Chicago Manual of Style. If you prefer to use another standard method of documentation (APA style, for example), that is fine too.

Aging families;write a research paper on how the family has aged over time and the ways it has changed

Aging families;write a research paper on how the family has aged over time and the ways it has changed.

how the family has aged over time and the ways it has changed

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[600 words] Discussion – Epidemiological Methods

Apology by Plato (in the Five Dialogues) Assignment Requirements
Your course faculty will provide you with topic/s for the Week 2 Discussion Board. You will need to check the NR503 course Announcements for the topic/s document for this Week 2 Discussion Board regarding screening.
Next, choose a diagnostic or screening method (related to your choice from the list of health issues above).  You may use one of the following web sites to locate a screening tool, a scholarly article, or a tool from a professional web site of your choice (for example, from the American Psychological Association).
Reply to the following prompt:Describe the diagnostic or screening tool selected, its purpose, and what age group it targets.
Has it been specifically tested in this age group?
Next, discuss the predictive ability of the test. For instance, how do you know the test is reliable and valid? What are the reliability and validity values? What are the predictive values? Is it sensitive to measure what it has been developed to measure, for instance, HIV, or depression in older adults, or Lyme disease? Would you integrate this tool into your advanced practice based on the information you have read about the test, why or why not?

You should include a minimum of two (2) scholarly articles from the last five (5) years (3 is recommended).
Respond to a minimum of two (2) individuals, peer and/or faculty, with a scholarly and reflective post of a minimum of two (2) paragraphs of 4-5 sentences. A minimum of one (1) scholarly article should be utilized to support the post in addition to your textbook.
Your work should have in-text citations integrating at a minimum one scholarly article and the course textbook. APA format should be utilized to include a reference list. Correct grammar, spelling, and APA should be adhered to when writing, work should be scholarly without personalization or first – person use.
TOPIC: COVID -19
U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
SAMHSA-HRSA (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Scholarly
13
22%
The student actively stimulates and sustains inquiry by making reflective insightful comments, asking thoughtful questions and/or engaging in a scholarly discussion.
The student expresses a clear idea of the topic under discussion and sustains inquiry in order to explore relevant issues.
The student recognizes values or values conflict as things that form the assumption basis of arguments and recognizes when it is important to acknowledge these values.
The student recognizes the accuracy, logic, relevance, or clarity of statements.
The student asks clarifying questions and knows when clarifying questions need to be asked.
The student distinguishes fact from opinion.
Application
20
33%
All components of discussion prompt addressed (met) in initial posting.
The student’s writing conveys an understanding of significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by integration of course and weekly objectives, as well as readings from text and articles.
All posts should make correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point.
Information and knowledge are accurate.
The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, or evidence from the course and/or weekly objectives.
All postings integrate scholarly sources to support points consistently.
Interactive Dialogue
10
16.6%
Responds to ideas in a way that advances discussion with engagement, depth, rigor, and application.
Interacts with a professional tone and is able to express opinions with ownership and without judgement.
Chooses to include professional experience to the discussion board mindful of appropriateness and boundaries. Experience is integrated as it supports the discussion board topic and utilizes scholarly references to support overall topic.
43
72%
Total CONTENT Points= 43 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
APA
12
20%
In text citations are formatted per APA current ed.
Reference list is formatted per APA current ed.
Spelling, grammar, and scholarly tone are per APA current ed.
Spelling / Grammar etc.
5
8%
Posts should utilize correct spelling and grammar (sentence structure and avoidance of slang or casual language) .
17
28%
Total FORMAT Points=17 pts
60
100%
DISCUSSION TOTAL=60 points

Teaching & Instructing Skills

Teaching & Instructing Skills.

Teaching & Instructing Skills 1000 word Essay

 

Paper details:

Question 1 (Weighting: 5) Your answer should not be more than 1,000 words. You will lose marks for copying from the notes or other materials. You must write in your own words. Your marks will improve if you use original ideas. List elements of the communication process, using a teaching situation you are familiar with as an example. Question 2 (Weighting: 2) Explain why training is important for a prospective teacher/trainer. Question 3 (Weighting: 3) Explain the significance of effective listening, using a teaching situation you are familiar with as an example. Question 4 (Weighting: 3) Explain three communication techniques appropriate to use in group training situations. Question 5 (Weighting: 3) Explain three communication techniques appropriate to use in multicultural training situations. Question 6 (Weighting: 8) Write one page on a situation where a breakdown in communication has occurred. Give your views on how to overcome these problems. Question 7 (Weighting: 6) Explain, briefly, what you think each of following phrases means: a. People are different; b. Empathy; c. Knowing yourself helps you understand others.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/