APA Format three references Discuss: Patient Health Questionnaire Review PHQ – 9 Depression Scale from this link (https://aims.uw.edu/resource-library/phq-9-depression-scale) to

APA Format
three references
Discuss: Patient Health Questionnaire
Review PHQ – 9 Depression Scale from this link (https://aims.uw.edu/resource-library/phq-9-depression-scale) to learn about Patient Health Questionnaires.
Complete the Patient Health Questionnaire from this link (https://www.slideshare.net/carlosFmartinez/phq9-depression-questionnaire?from_action=save) yourself. Please do NOT attach your questionnaire to the discussion board. You are also not required to share any of your personal information from the questionnaire in the discussion.
Original Post
1. Why do you think the Patient Health Questionnaire is such a validated tool when assessing mental health?
2. Give a scenario of when you would consider completing a PHQ on a resident.
3. Is there a time when giving a PHQ may be inappropriate?
[supanova_question]

Will AI leads to mass unemployment

Will AI leads to mass unemployment.

Description Essay 3: Argument strategy proposal Due Monday, Dec. 3 In this essay you will write a proposal for transforming your Toulmin argument into a Rogerian argument or other form that deals with normal, non-rational responses to evidence. Very important: This is a proposal for a Rogerian argument, not an actual Rogerian argument. Your target audience will be people who know what you know about your Toulmin argument and share the same conclusion. Think of them as a group of people who are trying to get out the same message to a wider audience. Your goal is not to support the same conclusion that you supported in that argument. Instead, your goal is to point out the things that might get in the way of that message–things we have learned in this class about why facts are often misinterpreted and usually fail to convince people to give up false beliefs. You will need to explain one or more concepts from the class (see list below) and then argue for a strategy to use the Rogerian argument when arguing for your conclusion (from the Toulmin argument). Example: Toulmin essay conclusion: The MMR vaccine does not cause autism. Proposal essay audience: People who know the MMR vaccine does not cause autism and who know that Wakefield is responsible for that misinformation. Proposal essay claim: “We should use Rogerian strategies of argumentation to help parents understand that the MMR vaccine is safe.” Proposal essay premise 1: “Parents who believe the MMR myth will react to counterevidence with the backfire effect.” Proposal essay premise 2: “Using a Rogerian argument will reduce the backfire effect and encourage parents to be open-minded about counterevidence.” Requirements for proposal essay: Identify either an alternative conclusion to the one you supported in your Toulmin essay. This could be either a counterargument (such as Jenny McCarthy’s response to Brian Deer) or a misinterpretation of facts (such as Rachel Quigley’s article about Robert Sapolsky’s stress vaccine). It could be the counterargument identified in your Toulmin argument, or it could be a new one. Cite a specific source that misrepresents or disagrees with your position. Then fully, fairly, and sympathetically explain its argument. Identify and discuss one concept from the class that may explain why people may misunderstand or reject your argument. The concepts we have covered include (but are not limited to) the backfire effect, the illusion of knowledge, cognitive dissonance, false-positive pattern recognition, seizing & freezing, heuristics, ideological conformity, confirmation bias, and any logical fallacy. Cite a source to help explain the concept. Use at least one of the assigned readings OR one of the peer-reviewed studies described in one of those readings to help explain this concept. Lecture slides from class will not count. Find the original publication. Describe how your Toulmin argument could be converted into a Rogerian argument. Cite a source to help explain the potential effectiveness of such an argument. You can use Maxine Hairston’s (1976) article, Cook & Lewandowsky’s (2012) “Debunking Handbook,” or a similar source to explain how to overcome cognitive biases. Use one of the sources from assigned class reading or a similar source to help explain at least one cognitive bias that might hinder the reception of your argument. The essay should be 4-5 pages and include an additional reference list.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

Statement of Purpose for Law Department

APA Format three references Discuss: Patient Health Questionnaire Review PHQ – 9 Depression Scale from this link (https://aims.uw.edu/resource-library/phq-9-depression-scale) to Statement of Purpose for Law Department.

Background info: 1- chemical engineering degree 2- the law department of an oil company 3- targeted degree with law department is Juris Doctorate

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

Music;Compare and contrast the background music of Star Wars vs Mario cart video game. Things to include in this essay:how diegetic and non-diegetic music is used in your chosen films.

Music;Compare and contrast the background music of Star Wars vs Mario cart video game. Things to include in this essay:how diegetic and non-diegetic music is used in your chosen films..

Compare and contrast the background music of Star Wars vs Mario cart video game. Things to include in this essay:how diegetic and non-diegetic music is used in your chosen films.
How leitmotifs (Links to an external site.) are used in your chosen films.
how the five elements of music are used in your chosen leitmotifs. Cite specific timings in the film, for ex. 1:05 – 1:55.
how the functions of music in your chosen films, for example: “The music at 7:55 – 8:35 reflects emotion: a sad, lonely, romantic melancholy.”
notable biographical information of the composer(s) of your chosen films and compare the composers in terms of any notable biographical information re the composers, and any relevant historical details surrounding the film and the score, including when it was released.
Also, needs to be a annotated webliography.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

Reflexive Essay

Reflexive Essay.

For this essay choose two different works (theater and cinema) from chapters 7 and 8 of the book, “Perceiving the Arts: An introduction to the Humanities” (pages 164-205) and craft a reflexive essay based on your initial response and thoughts to your selected pieces. •Consider the two pieces that you chose for this essay. How do they specifically help illustrate your responses to the questions listed below? What attracted you to these specific pieces? What did you learn from studying them? Did they meet your expectations? How and why did you relate to them? °What aspects of plot or character attracted or engaged you? °What one thing did you learn that you did not know previously? How does the film you selected compare or contrast to movies you typically watch? °What was your reaction to the selected theater piece? Was it easy to understand? Did you relate to it in a real world sense? °Has the knowledge you gained changed your perception or understanding of film or theater? °What one lesson would you share with a peer about your understanding of Each area (cinema, theater). DO NOT simply outline or summarize the material you covered. Share your ideas and what the selected art means to you. Your essay should reflect what you learned, your opinions and your world view. *Paper must be typed in Microsoft word *should be at least 3 pages (750 words) *Writing should use formal language and include correct spelling and punctuation. *Use APA Style for formatting and citation.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

Prompt: Analyzing the Rhetoric in Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus Essay

Prompt: Analyzing the Rhetoric in Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus Essay.

1: Rhetorical Analysis of Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus *5-7 pages; 12 point font; Times New Roman; 1” margins; double-spaced Good argumentative writing requires solid rhetoric, which is the result of careful decisions about word choice, sentence craft, paragraph construction, audience, voice, context, and style. As we’ve been observing, rhetorical situations are comprised of several facets: exigency, rhetors, audience, and constraints. Good rhetoric also employs a proper mixture of ethos (reputation), pathos (emotion) and logos (logic). Douglas Rushkoff’s book Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus is an argumentative exploration of wealth distribution, class, and technology. Your Task: You have been developing your own definition of effective rhetoric. You will now be using that definition to examine and judge Rushkoff’s Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus. You are asked to apply your critical reading skills and perception as to what good rhetoric is, to Douglas Rushkoff’s Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus. In your opinion, how good is the rhetoric in Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus? The first part of this essay asks that you define for yourself what you consider to be persuasive rhetoric. Remember, everyone’s perception of what comprises good rhetoric is going to differ so don’t worry if your version is different than those of others. We are primarily concerned with your view of good rhetoric in this essay. What makes an argument effective for you? Why? How well does Rushkoff meet your standard of solid rhetoric? You must support your claims with textual evidence from the book. It may also be helpful to declare what you believe Rushkoff’s goal was in writing his book; that way you can declare how effectively he reached his goal. Once you have established what you consider to be solid rhetoric, explain how well(or not well) Rushkoff makes his main points. In may also be helpful to analyze the “rhetorical situation” of the book within Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus. That is, analyze the constituents—exigency, rhetors, audience, constraints—involved in the books’ rhetoric. What is Rushkoff’s motivation for presenting his argument? Who is Rushkoff’s audience? What methods/rhetors does Rushkoff assemble, to carry out this argument? What constraints are Rushkoff faced with in creating his argument? And, how effectively does Rushkoff utilize Aristotle’s appeals: logos, pathos, and ethos when attending to the rhetorical constituents? The evidence you provide must use properly cited quotes from the book. Along with using quotes, you must demonstrate an understanding of the quotes you are using. Along with Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus, you are welcome to use any readings we’ve used in class to help support your claims. You’re also welcome to use outside readings for these claims as well. Your success on this essay will rely on your ability to make substantiated claims about the rhetoric in Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus with regards to the definition of good rhetoric that you laid out. You must demonstrate an understanding of the reading along with an ability to formulate your own takes on the book’s efficiency in delivering an argument.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

Wellness Interventions

Wellness Interventions.

Description Wellness-Intervention Part 1 dedifine wellness and how it can be used in counseling. Provide an example Part 2 of paper, define models of counseling and how they can be use in counseling. Provide example Part 3 of paper, define interventions and how it can be used in counseling, provide example using it with a client

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]