Get help from the best in academic writing.

Anna Letitia Barbauld’s "Rights of Woman," 1792, is not a feminist poem

Anna Letitia Barbauld’s "Rights of Woman," 1792, is not a feminist poem.

I’m working on a english discussion question and need a sample draft to help me understand betterSome guidance for discussion: not everyone has to answer every one of these questions. Early participants in the conversation can start with the initial questions and later participants should read what others have said and respond to my questions later in this prompt, or follow up questions that I might post in an announcement, or questions I post as part of the discussion.Anna Letitia Barbauld’s “Rights of Woman” makes a highly ambiguous argument.The speaker appears to advocate for women’s assertion of agency and authority, but then in the last two stanzas of the poem, seems to suggest something else altogether. She advises “Woman” to “abandon each ambitious thought” because “separate rights are lost in mutual love.”What does this conclusion mean? How do the metaphors in the poem point to this conclusion?Finally, what is the relationship between Women and Empire in this poem? Over what do women seem to reign in this poem? Does the speaker seem content with women’s scope of empire?How does the poem resonate today?As you answer these questions, please make sure you do the following:1. Quote the poem2. Re-read your post and correct any grammatical errors3. Remember to respond to another studentRequirements: precise and make sure all punctuations are in place
Anna Letitia Barbauld’s "Rights of Woman," 1792, is not a feminist poem

The Financials”.

The Financials”This week’s discussion is worth 90 points and it is part of your Course Project.Before you get started on this exercise, you will need the textbook (Chapter 16 – The Financials), the Business Plan Financials Guide and Excel document, and the NAB Company Portfolio.This Assignment has two sections: The Excel document and the written portion of the financials (sources and use of funds, plan assumption, and break-even analysis) as described below.Section I: The Business Plan financials (Excel document)Using your NAB Company Portfolio and the first year of your business plan for the company, you will complete all the worksheets in the Excel document in order, so that you can complete the Income Statement, Cash Flow Projections, and Balance Sheet sections from the Business Plan Financials spreadsheet. Notes: The setup and marketing worksheet should already be completed from Assignment 2.Use the instructions provided in the Business Plan Financials Guide to help you complete this document, as well as the NAB Portfolio (pages 4-8).To submit: Attach the completed Excel worksheet to the discussion thread (click on the Add Content button under the Post button to access the attachment option when you are ready to submit, attach your document and then click submit) Section II: Financial section of the business plan (compose as a Word document and paste in the discussion window) You will have 3 headings as outlined below:1.Sources and use of funds: Outline the funds you have currently (see portfolio pages 4 and 8) and the ones you intend to raise (you need to raise funds per the portfolio page 4). Explain how you plan to use the funds (a clear plan for how you will use the money).Before addressing this section please review: Sources and Use of Funds section on page 312 of your textbook-Sample plan on page 325 for an idea on how to address this section.2. Plan assumptions: The Financial plan must be based on decisions and facts. Investors want to know if this plan is realistic. In this section you will outline your plan assumptions.Before addressing this section please review: The setup and assumptions sheet in your Excel document. Sample plan in your textbook page 326Assumption sheet in your textbook page 313. Article about the 5 key assumptions of your business plan. Break-even analysis: The break-even point is the point at which you make enough money in revenue to pay your expenses, but no profit (or loss). In this section, clarify what the break-even number is for year one (average). You will extract this information from the Break-even tab in the Excel document.Before addressing this section please review: Page 314 in the textbook, which covers the break-even analysis.The BrkEvn (Break-Even) worksheet in your Excel document. You would have calculated this there.Notes: You will use the Excel document in Assignment 3 and 4. You will use the written portion of your Financials in Assignment 4.
The Financials”

The Baroque visual arts created in Catholic regions demonstrated:

The Baroque visual arts created in Catholic regions demonstrated:.

The Baroque visual arts created in Catholic regions demonstrated:aReligious fervorbCalculating reasoncIntrospection and isolationdSomber repentance
The Baroque visual arts created in Catholic regions demonstrated:

Animal Testing: a Long, Unpretty History Essay

essay help online Table of Contents History of Animal Testing Animal Testing Is Cruel Animal Testing and Its Types Laws and Animal Testing Animal Testing Is Ineffective Examples of the Ineffectiveness of Animal Testing Alternatives to Animal Testing Conclusion References In general, animal testing is allowed all over the world. Some countries impose certain restrictions on that matter, some – do not introduce any restrictions at all. However, even those countries that have certain laws prohibiting tests on animals do not take into account the fact that animals are living creatures and must not suffer for the sake of an experiment. Moreover, in most facilities and laboratories, animals are kept in cages, thereby having absolutely no freedom. Most of the experiments performed on animals bring them suffering, lead to disability, and even death. This inhumane treatment of animals does not justify any cause (Haugen, 2000). Thus, the main reason why these experiments must be stopped is that, according to the statistics, the majority of them are ineffective and inaccurate. History of Animal Testing Animal testing has a long history. Considering the fact that animals are living creatures, medical experiments on them were already conducted at least three thousand years ago. The first records mentioning the experiments on animals date back to the fourth century BCE in Ancient Greece (Murnaghan, 2017). Thus, in ancient times, it was a widely adopted practice to perform dissections of animals in order to understand how to make surgical operations on humans. Since the 18th century, with the development of medicine, the frequency of animal testing has significantly increased. Moreover, if a couple of centuries ago, there were only single experiments that were performed by separate scientists, now, it has developed into the large industry that catches animals in the wild and uses them as guinea pigs (Scutti, 2013). Thus, although there are many innovative technologies that can serve as better alternatives to animal testing, people are still reluctant to change the current state of affairs. Despite animal testing being rather an old practice, ethical considerations on that matter also occurred quite a long time ago (Scutti, 2013). For example, in the 17th century, a psychologist Edmund O’Meara stated that animal testing was unnecessary, as it often gave inaccurate results. In this respect, he provided an example regarding vivisection that, as he claimed, placed the body of an animal in an unnatural state, in which it endured a lot of pain that was both cruel and gave false results. The first animal protection law was established in Great Britain in 1822. A significant milestone in the history of animal protection legislation was the introduction of the Cruelty to Animals Act in 1876 in Great Britain. This law was promoted by Charles Darwin who, despite being a biologist and a scientist, was against vivisection. In the 1860s, the movements against animal testing occurred in the USA. As a result, Henry Bergh established the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) in 1866. After that, the American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) was founded in 1883 (Haugen, 2000). Thus, the end of the 19th century was the time when many articles were written, and campaigns were started calling for terminating the experiments on animals. However, at the beginning of the 20th century, the tendency of releasing laws about animal protection changed. Unfortunately, the efforts of antivivisectionists to promote their campaigns to make the US government to ban animal testing failed due to the overall support of such experiments by the public, which was assured by the organizations who performed these experiments that animals were kept in good conditions, bred well, and injected with anaesthetics in those operations that could cause them much pain. Therefore, only in the 1960s, the efforts of antivivisectionists were partially justified, with the release of the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act in 1966 (Haugen, 2000). Nevertheless, that law was more focused on the welfare of animals in laboratories rather than on the prohibition of animal testing. Nowadays, there are a great number of organizations that advocate for stopping using animals in the experiments. Although the overall effectiveness of their campaigns is quite low, they have managed to achieve some positive results concerning the problem of animal testing (Murnaghan, 2017). Additionally, considering the current tendency of the active development of various technologies that can easily substitute experiments on animals, there is hope that soon the animal testing industry will cease to exist. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Animal Testing Is Cruel The first argument against animal testing is that it is simply cruel. People must understand that animals are the same living creature as them and can feel both psychological and physical pain in the same way as humans. Thus, in the case of experimenting on animals, the ethical and humane aspects of the issue must prevail and give people a stimulus to seek for other ways of studying diseases that can be much better. Animal Testing and Its Types First of all, it is necessary to describe the types of animal testing in order to understand the degree of the cruelty of these experiments. In general, animal testing is the process of experimenting on animals where they usually undergo various medical procedures which cause them suffering or even death. These experiments are usually aimed at finding a cure to some disease that humans and certain animals have in common or at exploring how a biological organism works. During the experiments, scientists usually keep animals in cages and use them in laboratories where they harm them on purpose (“What is animal testing,” 2016). Moreover, there are certain kinds of experiments that cause animals a lot of pain, and, in many of them, animals die. The most common type of an experiment on animals is feeding them with certain substances and injecting them with experimental medications. After the procedure is completed, scientists observe the effects that these substances have caused. In fact, the result is often unpredictable, and animals can die a horrible death with much pain. Another type of experiments is exposing animals to toxic substances and radiation. These experiments are primarily aimed at discovering the effects that radiation and certain chemicals can have on a biological body. Similarly, such experiments make animals suffer (“What is animal testing,” 2016). Moreover, if animals survive after such experiments, the damage that radiation and chemicals have caused to them is often permanent, and they will live the rest of their lives suffering. One more type of experiments on animals is dissecting animals while they are still alive. Certainly, during this operation, they are under anesthetics, but it does not justify the result that they get after the procedure is completed. The main reason for these experiments is to find out how the internal parts of the biological body work. This operation usually involves removing internal organs, pumping out blood, and excising parts of tissues, which makes animals cripples afterwards. Additionally, there is one more type of an experiment that is usually practiced in laboratories. This is a psychological experiment that involves placing animals in situations and conditions which cause them to feel fear, anxiety, or depression. Such experiments are usually aimed at identifying the principles of animals’ behavior and comparing it to that of humans (“The five worst animal experiments,” 2014). Nevertheless, after these experiments, animals usually become very aggressive and cannot normally function in their animal “society”. Laws and Animal Testing According to most religious laws, animal testing is forbidden, as they are defined as the same creatures as humans. Certainly, animals are not as smart as humans, and their perception of reality is different, but they have similar bodies and experience similar feelings. Therefore, before making horrible experiments on animals, humans must think what it would be like if they were experimented on (“The Muslim view on animal,” 2017). Thus, animals have the same right to live their full lives as humans. Although human laws impose a certain restriction regarding the experiments on animals, they are not enough, as they still allow people to torture them in the experiments. According to European legislation, all vertebrate animals including reptiles, fish, birds, and mammals and only some invertebrates such as octopuses are considered “animals”, on which it is prohibited to experiment (“Treatment of animals,” 2016). In the USA, the situation is worse and such creatures as mice, amphibians, birds, fish, and rats are not defined as “animals”, and scientists can freely perform any experiments on them that they want. The system of experimenting on animals has grown into a multi-million dollar industry that has many facilities and laboratories around the world. They also have special facilities aimed at breeding animals specifically for testing. In these facilities, animals usually live in bad conditions being imprisoned and forcibly fed. Using wild-caught animals is prohibited in Europe and in some other countries, but it is allowed in other countries of the world. It is usually forbidden to use such domestic animals as dogs and cats in experiments, but, unfortunately, not in all countries (McKay, 2016). Even monkeys that resemble humans the most are often used in experiments. We will write a custom Essay on Animal Testing: a Long, Unpretty History specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In terms of animal suffering, The EU even introduced a scale which measures the degree of suffering experienced by animals in a particular experiment. Thus, they distinguish between “minor”, “moderate”, and “severe” suffering inflicted on animals. For example, in 2012, in the UK, more than 60% of permissions were granted by the British government allowing animals to be undergone from moderate to severe suffering. Reportedly, approximately 75% of the experiments were performed without injecting the animals with anesthetics. Moreover, quite a big percentage of those experiments required animals to die (Scheler, 2017). For instance, the tests for various vaccines and chemicals resulted in the death of more than 50% of the animals involved in these experiments. Animal Testing Is Ineffective The second argument against animal testing is that it is often ineffective, as the results received from the experiments can be inaccurate. There are many reasons for this, but, the most important point is that in such science as medicine, the information must be reliable; otherwise, there is always a risk that a particular medicine will cause unpleasant effects in humans or even be life-threatening. Examples of the Ineffectiveness of Animal Testing Despite being cruel and inhumane, the experiments on animals often turn out to be ineffective. The main reason for this is that the animal organism either responds differently to many life-threatening diseases that humans suffer from or is completely immune to them. For example, animals do not suffer from most heart diseases, some types of cancer and HIV, they do not have Parkinson’s disease and the majority of psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia. However, some of these diseases can be artificially induced in them for the sake of an experiment that allegedly shows how these diseases can be cured in humans. Thus, the most important argument is that in these experiments, people usually do not take into consideration other factors that are inherent only in humans and affect the behavior of diseases (“Cruelty to animals,” 2017). These factors include socio-economic conditions, genetics, psychological issues, and personal experience. Indeed, according to the statistics, quite a great number of experiments on animals, that were promising in terms of finding a cure to some diseases, turned out to be ineffective for humans. In this respect, the end does not justify the means, as animals suffered for nothing. As a result, animals’ lives along with the time and money were wasted, and no effective treatment was developed (“Arguments against animal,” 2016). In addition, as it can be seen, after the decades of animal testing aimed at finding a cure for Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, AIDS, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, and cancer, there is still no reliable cure and effective treatment for them. Thus, according to the statistics, the majority of experiments on animals that show promising results, turn out to be ineffective when it comes to humans. Moreover, the experimenting on smaller animals such as rabbits, mice, and rats showed an even lower rate of success, primarily because their organisms differ from that of a human (Scheler, 2017). Additionally, statistics show that only 20% of experimental drugs used on animals are effective in humans. In terms of testing the safety of drugs, only 45% of experiments work for humans. According to the overall results of the experiments on animals conducted all over the world, approximately 120 million animals are used in them, and only about 30 new medications are approved every year, which is far from being efficient. The investment of the U.S. drug industry in the experiments equals $50 billion each year, but the approval rate has not changed since the 1960s. Among those drugs that are approved, not all of them are completely effective for everyone due to different individual reactions (McKay, 2016). Overall, for the last 20 years, only five percent of experiments performed on animals resulted in a successful approval of treatments. Sometimes, animal testing can be dangerous even for humans. A vivid example is a drug called Vioxx that was used for arthritis. After successful experiments on monkeys and on some other mammals, this drug was approved for human usage. However, Vioxx turned out to be dangerous for humans causing more than 300,000 heart attacks all over the world, almost half of which resulted in the lethal outcome. Another example is fialuridine, a Hepatitis B drug that was prohibited for having caused liver damage resulting in five deaths. However, this drug had been several times tested on animals before. One more illustrative example is a monoclonal antibody treatment (TGN1412) that was tested on human volunteers. As a result, it caused an allergic reaction, after which the volunteers were hospitalized (Haugen, 2000). However, this drug had been used on monkeys several hundred times before, and no side effects were identified. Alternatives to Animal Testing Banning animal testing does not necessarily mean that the development of medications that can provide treatment for incurable diseases will stop, as there are always alternatives, which can improve progress in medicine and add humaneness to the science. Thus, with technological developments in the sphere of science, the number of alternatives to animal testing is increasing. In this respect, the main problem is that most people are reluctant to use new technologies (“Animal testing 101,” 2016). Instead, they tend to stick to more conservative and traditional methods that certainly involve animal testing. Not sure if you can write a paper on Animal Testing: a Long, Unpretty History by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Another obstacle in the process of adoption of these new methods is bureaucracy. There are a lot of organizations and charities that advocate for the prohibition of animal testing, and they can accelerate the process of implementation of these innovations. In terms of the alternatives, there are several of them that are very effective. The first alternative is growing cells and other organic material in laboratories. Nowadays, almost any type of a human cell can be created in a laboratory. These cells are used in the creation of special devices that are called “organs-on-chips”. These devices can be used for experiments instead of animals. There were already several successful experiments conducted on these devices that involved observing the behavior of diseases and the effects of drugs (“Alternatives to animal,” 2016). Additionally, cell cultures are now the primary focus regarding the development of treatment to such diseases as cancer, AIDS, kidney diseases, and sepsis. Another alternative to animal testing, which is not new though, is human tissues. Human tissues that can be provided by volunteers or extracted from dead bodies can be used in some kinds of experiments. Moreover, there are many operations such as cosmetic surgery, biopsy, and transplants that can serve as a reliable source of human tissues. Using brain tissues from dead bodies has also lead to a better understanding of such diseases as Parkinson’s disease or multiple sclerosis. One more alternative to animal testing, the importance of which has been increasingly growing for the past several decades, is computer models. Indeed, the most powerful contemporary computers in the world are able to simulate many processes that would occur in a human body after taking a particular experimental medication. These virtual experiments are primarily based on the already existing data about a particular disease and its behavior in the human body and on mathematical, chemical, and physical laws integrated into this program of simulation (“Alternatives to animal,” 2016). Certainly, now, computer sphere is not powerful enough for complex virtual experiments, but taking into account the rate of its growth, it will be soon. Conclusion Thus, as it can be seen from the statistics, animal testing is cruel and in most cases, not effective. Therefore, it must be banned, especially now, when there are many innovative technologies that can be used as alternatives. Moreover, these alternatives have already shown great promises in being much more efficient than animal testing. Fortunately, the current tendency shows that these alternatives will be adopted in the near future, thereby bringing the end to violent experiments on animals. References Alternatives to animal testing. (2016). Web. Animal testing 101. (2016). Web. Arguments against animal testing. (2016). Web. Cruelty to animals in laboratories. (2017). Web. The five worst animal experiments happening right now. (2014). Web. Harm and suffering. (2017). Web. Haugen, D. M. (2000). Animal experimentation. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press. McKay, M. (2016). The cruelty of lab animal testing. Web. Murnaghan, I. (2017). Background and history of animal testing. Web. The Muslim view on animal testing. (2017). Web. Scheler, S. (2017). Everything you need to know about animal testing. Web. Scutti, S. (2013). Animal testing: A long, unpretty history. Web. Treatment of animals. (2016). Web. What is animal testing? (2016). Web.

‘Up from Slavery’ Booker T. Washington, Summary

The book “Up from Slavery”, is about a nine-year-old slave named Booker T. Washington who lived on a plantation in Virginia. Booker T. Washington describes his childhood as a slave as well as the hard work it took to get an education. Booker T. Washington shares details of the changes he went through from a student to teacher. He also outlines his experience as an educator and how helped with the development and opening of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama. Booker T. describes the progress of when Tuskegee started having classes small shacks to now having classes in new buildings. The last chapter, describes Booker T. career as a public speaker and civil rights activist. Booker T. mention the Atlanta Cotton States and International Exposition in 1895 which made him well known nationwide. He ends his story with several acknowledgments he had received for his work which includes an honorary degree from Harvard. In addition to, there were two significant people who made a visit to Tuskegee, President McKinley and General Samuel C. Armstrong. Booker T. was a nationwide leader for the development of African Americans in the post-Reconstruction South. He pushed for the economic and industrial improvement of Blacks while helping Whites with voting rights and social equality. His mother was the plantation cook where they lived. It did not have glass windows and the doors barely hung on uneven hinges. There were large cracks in the walls that let in cold air in the winter and humidity in the summer. The floor was the stripped to the ground. Booker T. had no reminiscence of playing games or sports. He regretted it because he believed he would have been a more useful man if he had. However, because he was a slave he dedicated his life to work. He cleaned yards, carried water, and took corn to the mill. Moving corn to the mills was the hardest jobs he had ever done. While at work, Booker T. heard two men chatting about a school for African Americans people which would be opening in Virginia. Booker T. learned that not only was the institute famous, but openings were offered to help cover the cost of room and board and the students would be taught a trade. Booker T. felt like this could be a great chance. He was fixed on going to the Hampton Normal and Agricultural Institute in Virginia. Booker T. left the salt mines to get a job at the General Lewis Ruffner, the owner of the mines. He wanted to continue to make money. General Lewis wife was a very strict boss. A lot of young men had quit or had got fired because they didn’t meet her values. Booker T. would walk around all night and beg for a ride until he had reached 82 miles to Hampton. He did not have any money to pay for a place to sleep so he walked around the city of Richmond until he found a place to sleep. Booker T. had saved enough money to reach Hampton. He believed he had a surplus of 50 cents. When he reached Hampton, he was impressed by the beauty of the school building. He believed that his life would have new meaning. He stood before the head teacher hoping to enroll but he didn’t make a satisfactory impression on her. His clothes were dirty and his appearance was rough. The teachers at Hampton helped to provided Booker T. with fresh clothing because the institute had strict rules. All students attending had to have clean clothes and shiny shoes. Booker T. was also given an extra set of clothing that was sent in barrels from up North. Booker T. slept in a bed for the first time that had sheets on them. He was unaccustomed to sleeping on sheets for the first several nights. After watching the other boys for a while, he picked up on how to make his bed. Booker T. was one of the youngest adolescent boys in the school but that didn’t stop his determination. Even as Booker T. attended school at Hampton Institute, he learned a significant lesson about education that would be with him for a long time. One of the lessons was being clean was a vital part of a person’s self-confidence. He also learned that even though if a person had an education, it did not put them directly above blue-collar labor. Booker T. believed education should be well rounded and that a people should learn to enjoy labor. He also learned to be more independent and valuable to others in his surroundings. In addition to, Booker T. thought that people should not be selfless but lead by example. Booker T. Washington later take all his left lessons to the Tuskegee Institute where he became a principal. In the month of May, 1881, General Armstrong accepted a proposal from a group of philanthropists who recommended that the principal for the new school be an African American in the little town of Alabama which would be called Tuskegee. At the time of the request, people assumed that there would not be an African American man that would qualify for the position. Nevertheless, to the shock of the founders of the Tuskegee Institute, Booker T. Washington was recommended for the position where he would be accepted at the school. Shortly after Booker T. Washington made it to Tuskegee, the founders and Booker T. agreed that the school would open on July 4, 1881, Independence Day. Booker T. thought the goal of the Tuskegee Institute would be the source for people who could work hard, learn a skill, and make a living. He also thought people should learn the meaning of hygiene and religion. Booker T. wanted the graduates to go all over the country and be a model to all they met. Reading, writing and arithmetic was taught. But a greater value was placed on the skills and everyday living. Booker T. hope students would know that working as a laborer was not an embarrassment. As a part of all the students training, they were expected to do all the work at the institute. In 1893, Booker T. Washington married his third wife, Miss Margaret James Murray, who had graduate of Fisk University in Nashville, Tennessee. Portia his daughter was a dressmaker. She had a passion for music. Portia later was hired as an instructor at Tuskegee. His son Booker T., Jr. learned the brick mason’s trade. He wanted to become an architect one day. Ernest, the youngest son wanted to be a doctor. He decided to gain experience in a doctor’s office. His biggest guilt was he couldn’t spend more time with his family. Twenty years later, the Tuskegee Institute has incorporated a lot of land built by the student. All the manufacturing departments demonstrated skills that permitted students to get careers once they graduated at the institute. Washington died in 1915 as one of the most popular black men in the world. Booker T. had dinners with the President of the United States, as well as dining with royal families in Europe. Washington was an intellectual man who tried to do the best for African Americans. He wanted to have an education that would allow them to live ideal lives. A number of black leaders in America today, such as Alan Keys, hope to go back to Washington’s structure of educating the “head, hand, and the heart.” The Tuskegee Institute has improved since Washington’s time. While the school was built to help African Americans to learn a skill, it now supports students to earn a college degree. Washington’s assessment on integration consisted of living by example. Washington felt if black people could demonstrate white people they could act sophisticated and be an asset to the community, all the races would finally get along. Washington felt like the government could make people like one another by making it legal. Washington believed African Americans had to prove themselves as equals.

BMAL 560 LU Religious Beliefs Impact Our Decisions About Business Ethics Questions

BMAL 560 LU Religious Beliefs Impact Our Decisions About Business Ethics Questions.

BMAL560 Personal Worldview and Business Ethics Assignment Rubric CriteriaLevels of Achievement Content 70%(70 points)AdvancedProficientDevelopingNot present Points Earned Business Ethics Portion(Includes areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics and timeliness)35 points34 to 35 points Superior work in all areas – Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, timeliness, and writing style.Specifically:Clear evidence of the “Building Your Worldview Home” article information is entwined within section 1. Clear, logical flow to paper.Parameters of assignment were met—1-2 pages, submitted on timeMajor points are supported by the “Building Your Worldview Home” article and 2-3 business articlesPaper brings clarity to the issues being discussed31 to 33 points Good work in most areas – Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics, and timeliness.Specifically:Evidence of the “Building Your Worldview Home” article information is entwined within section 1. Logical flow to paper.Parameters of assignment were met—1-2 pages, submitted on timeFor the most part, major points are supported by the “Building Your Worldview Home” article and 2-3 business articlesFor the most part, paper brings clarity to the issues being discussed 1 to 30 points Fair work in most areas – Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics, and timeliness.Specifically:Information is written minimally and in a less than clear fashionBasic instructions and requirements for the assignment are only minimally followed.0 points Failing. Student demonstrates insufficient work in one or more of the following areas:Specifically:Information is unfocused; concepts are not addressed in a clear wayOne or more categories are missing Personal Worldview Portion(Includes areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics and timeliness)(35 points)32 to 35 points Superior work in all areas – Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, timeliness, and writing style.Specifically:Appropriate information is supplied under each question as demonstrated by specific analysis of his/her thoughts to the various questions that are posted and the issues that are discussed. Advances the thought process of the selected topic by linking his/her comments from the initial answer provided before reading the articles to how his/her ideas might have changed after reading the articles.Organizes essential information in a logical and orderly array of categories, and communicates ideas succinctlyThe information provided is concise and provides the most relevant, highest quality information possible. 29 to 31 points Good work in most areas – Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics, and timeliness.Specifically:For the most part, appropriate information is supplied under each question as demonstrated by analysis of his/her thoughts to the various questions that are posted and the issues that are discussed.Clear communication of ideas, with minimum vagueness and ramblingAdvances the thought process of the selected topic and links ideas from initial answers to how those answers might have changed after reading the articles.Organizes information in a logical array of categories 1 to 28 points Fair work in most areas – Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics, and timeliness.Specifically:Information is written minimally and in a less than clear fashion.Basic instructions and requirements for the assignment are only minimally followed. 0 points Failing. Student demonstrates insufficient work in one or more of the following areas:Specifically:Information is unfocused; concepts are not addressed in a clear way.One or more categories are missingSubmission is plagiarized in significant ways Structure 30%(30 points)AdvancedProficientDevelopingNot present Grammatical issues, sentence/paragraph structure20 points17 to 20 points Minimal to non-existent grammatical/spelling/structure errors 13 to 16 points Between 2- 3 grammatical/spelling/structure errors 1 to 12 points Between 4 -5 grammatical/spelling/structure errors 0 points6 or more grammatical/spelling/structure errors APA formatting10 points9 to 10 pointsMinimal to non-existent APA format errors 7 to 8 pointsBetween 2-3 APA format errors 1 to 6 pointsBetween 4 -5 APA format errors 0 points6 or more APA format errorsTotal Points/100Instructor Comments:
BMAL 560 LU Religious Beliefs Impact Our Decisions About Business Ethics Questions

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service