analysis paper & strategic plan

Los Angeles Valley What Michelle Alexander Thinks About Ban the Box Discussion

Los Angeles Valley What Michelle Alexander Thinks About Ban the Box Discussion.

I’m working on a sociology question and need support to help me understand better.

find the answer to the following 3 questions and provide your personal opinion on these matters. You won’t be graded on your opinion, but rather, in the thoughtfulness of it. Explain why you think what you think, and how this information impacts your views. For each question, write at least 100 words. What does Michelle Alexander think about “ban the box”? Do you think it should it be banned?According to Michelle Alexander, how have mandatory minimum sentences affected our prison population? Do you think mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses make sense?What did the Corrections Corporations of America do? Why did they do this? Is this good for society?
Los Angeles Valley What Michelle Alexander Thinks About Ban the Box Discussion

Internet Shopping Essay

write my term paper Internet Shopping Essay. Introduction The advent of internet shopping in the late nineties created a revolution in the retail industry. Benefits that were previously inaccessible to the masses became a reality. Today, buyers can get the latest I-Pad from Apple at the click of a button. They can purchase the latest designer-colognes from Paris, even if they live in New York. One, therefore, wonders whether online shopping will replace traditional shopping. Through a contrast and comparison of these two shopping channels, it can then be possible to answer the latter question. Comparisons and contrast Some of the most advent supporters of online shopping are environmentalists. Many of them assert that online shopping eliminates the need for consumers to transport themselves to a physical store. This saves on fuel charges and paper. Similarly, traditional shopping from a supermarket or in a mall can also save on plenty of energy costs. Customers can get everything they require under one roof, thus eliminating the need to transport themselves from one point to another. This saves on fuel and other charges that emanate from physical movement of people for shopping. On the other hand, these two channels differ in terms of their environmental-friendliness. Individuals can use the Postal service to ship their online commodities. Since the postal service is bound to come to a certain neighborhood anyway, then fuel costs can be minimized. Such economies are unavailable in traditional brick and motor stores. Furthermore, one can buy multiple items from distant locations and save volumes of fuel. Traditional retail stores would require one to drive physically to the concerned store, even though it might be located all the way in China. Both types of shopping avenues provide buyers with a certain level of comfort and ease. Customers go to online stores in order to avoid the overcrowding and hurling that is synonymous to traditional stores. This is quite helpful during the holiday seasons. Buyers can transform their shopping into a pleasant experience by simply avoiding these crowded areas. Similarly, some customers go to traditional stores in order to enjoy a different type of comfort. They approach these physical stores in order to access immediate help from sales persons concerning certain items. Shopping from traditional stores allows retailers to consult about the features of a certain product and this causes them a certain level of ease and comfort. On the other hand, traditional retailers cannot offer the same level of comfort that online stores can. In online shopping, buyers simply have to select an item and pay; everything else is handled by the internet firm. Conversely, shoppers from physical stores have to plan for their transportation to and from the brick and mortar store. If the products they are purchasing are bulky, then they must make special arrangements to carry the item to their homes. All channels of shopping furnish customers with information about the features of products. It is possible to know about the sizes, features, and costs of products in online and traditional shopping. Conversely, the dependability of the information differs substantially depending on whether one is using online shopping or traditional methods. Many customers have complained about misleading information or unavailable information in online stores. Buyers who need advise about using a certain product or need to inquire about its capabilities in traditional stores can easily get this information from sales persons. On the contrary, one cannot get this information easily from internet forums. Some websites may have contact numbers or e-chat forums; however, these are not available in all of them. Online shoppers only have pictures and product descriptions to know everything they need to know about a product. This method may work for certain types of products that have low prices and minimal modifications. However, the same approach may not work for expensive and highly customizable products such as cars or houses. Few customers would buy houses based solely on a product description or picture they saw; many would want to see the spacing and features in that house. Automobile purchasers would also need to test-drive items before they can walk away with them. In this regard, internet channels fall short because they cannot provide personalized information or experiences. It is possible to compare prices in these two avenues. One can walk from shop to shop and find the best offers in one’s location. The same thing happens in internet shopping. One can visit a number of websites and compare the prices offered by these entities. In contrast, it is much easier to compare prices on the internet than in physical locations. If a store was located in a different city, it would be impractical to drive all the way to that store simply to find out what their prices are. Therefore, online shopping is superior in this regard. These two platforms are both vulnerable to theft or fraud. In physical stores, criminals may organize a massive robbery and this can cause substantial losses to the concerned entrepreneurs. Alternatively, customers may shoplift or get away with non payment in physical stores. Similarly, theft can occur in online stores when an alleged retailer either purports to sell non – existent products or sells counterfeit or inferior goods to clients. The main difference between these two types of channels is that in physical stores, customers do most of the stealing. Furthermore, they use relatively simple methods to carry out these activities. On the other hand, the internet has created a new breed of wrongdoers. Most fraudsters are fake sellers rather than buyers. A number of them tend to use very sophisticated methods to lure their ‘clients’ and defraud them. It takes a lot of intelligence and security measures to guard against these individuals. Therefore, buyers must be wary of these challenges when they select online shopping as their preferred method of purchasing. Cases of missing information exist in these two approaches. A customer may purchase something from a brick – and – mortar store, and this item may not be easily examinable at the retail store. This may make it easy to find flaws in it. For example, someone may purchase a television set from an electronics shop, and when the buyer gets to his or her house, he or she may find that the keys on the remote control do not work as stated. Similarly, one may buy a book from Amazon and find that it has several missing pages. These issues occur because sellers may have hidden certain information about their materials. On the flipside, it is easier for retailers to hide information about their products on the internet than in physical stores. Many online customers often complain about the hidden costs that come with internet purchases. Shipping costs and other miscellaneous charges may hide the true price of a certain commodity on the internet. Furthermore, even the process of purchasing an item on the internet is never as short as retailers claim. One must register, enter a series of personal details, read the privacy policy, and enter details about one’s credit card information. It may take a phone call or an e-chat to find out about certain order details. Therefore, what should have taken fifteen minutes ends up taking forty five or fifty minutes. There are more loopholes on the internet to facilitate missing information as compared to traditional shopping Conclusion Internet shopping still has a series of flaws that physical shopping does not. Nonetheless, the convenience and flexibility offered by this method are unrivaled in brick and mortar stores. It is likely that these two methods of shopping will continue to complement each other in the future as the pros and cons of one method are neutralized by another. Internet Shopping Essay

The Enlightenment Revolution

The Enlightenment was an intellectual revolution in the thought domain in the 18th century. During the early modern era in the Europe, it was the third significant movement after the Renaissance revolution and the Protestant revolution. The Enlightenment took a new world-view for people to change the world. It emerged from the scientific revolution and was pushed to the top by intellectual thinkers. The thinkers of the Enlightenment developed the Enlightenment by their works, which changed not only the traditional religion and views of the world, but also the societal system and political institution. There is no doubted that the Enlightenment was one of the greatest social progress in the human history. The scientific revolution between the 16th and 17th Centuries was the one of most fundamental factors that the Enlightenment emerged in the 18th century. It was a movement focusing on astronomy and physics. “About the middle of the second century C.E., when the Greek scholar Claudius Ptolemy composed a work known as the Almagest” (Bentley et al., 2003, p.659), the world was not as same as past. More astronomers bravely proposed their ideas about the universe which not only challenged traditional scientific theories but also shook devout religious beliefs. It was these theories that led to the appearance of scientific revolution. In the scientific revolution, Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), who “elaborated the experimental method and formulated the law of inertia” (McKay et al., 2006) respectively. Basted on accurate observation and mathematical, great physicist Isaac Newton published his famous Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Kepler, Galilei and Newton all got progress by denying the theories of predecessors .Their theories developed the knowledge about not only the natural world, but also people self. As Bentley and Ziegler (2003) described, “his(meaning of Newton) work suggested that rational analysis of human behavior and institutions could lead to fresh insights about the human as well as the natural world”, all the scientists, contributed to the scientific revolution, which liberated the thought of people from religion and prepared the emergence of Enlightenment. In the Enlightenment, there were a lot of great thinkers. The most intelligent and influential thinkers included John Locke (1632-1704), Baron de Montesquieu (1689-1755), Voltaire (1694-1778) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. They were actively engaged in coming up with their own views about the social development and political democracy. And the entire attempt they did was help to shape a better world. As McKay, Hill and Buckler said: “John Locke was the pioneer of empiricism. He insisted that all ideas are deriver from eminence. Montesquieu was renowned for The Spirit of Laws, which discussed a separation of powers. For Voltaire, he sharp criticized of dark reign of the Catholic Church and feudalism, and believed in natural rights. He also affirmed that people are essentially equal. Rousseau was passionately committed to individual freedom but attacked rationalism and civilization”. (McKay et al., 2006) Even though all of opinions from intense thinkers were consumed by a desire to explore and build an advanced society, there were also some differences with their theories. For instance, Locke and Voltaire had different views on religion. Lock approved of religion “but only with respect to vital issues that lie beyond the reach of reason; to allow any further extent to non-rational religious convictions would leave us at the mercy of foolish and harmful speculations” (Kemerling, 2001). But Voltaire opposed completely to religion. Locke was often seen as the modern founder of the concept about political freedom. He considered that the government’s authority can only be based on the basis of support from people. In the book Two Treatises on Government, he claimed that “people have the right to overthrow its regime when the government against the theory he put forward” (Kemerling, 2001). For Voltaire, he against the monarchy, and supported deistic God, advocated the freedom of thinking and speech. Montesquieu was the supporter of the separation of powers doctrine. He devoted himself to seek a way to “establish a science of politics and discover principles that would foster political liberty in a prosperous and stable state” (Bentley et al., 2003, p.662). Based on the theory of Locke, Montesquieu created separation of powers, which had a great influence for the modern institution of democracy. One of common points between Voltaire and Montesquieu was that they all admired the English enlightened absolutism. Both Voltaire and Montesquieu looked forward to establish a political institution just like England did.Rousseau’s most important work was The Social Contract, which discussed “the two fundamental concepts: the general will and popular sovereignty” (McKay et al., 2006, p.612).He believed an ideal society was established between people but not the government and contract. Except supporting individual freedom like other Enlightenment thinkers, Rousseau came up with a theory to attack rationalism and civilization (McKay et al., 2006, p.612), which was so characteristic and pioneering. As a great pioneering movement in the thought domain, the Enlightenment had a cumulative effect to the whole world. The thinkers were strongly criticized the feudal dictatorship and Catholic Church, described the future rational kingdom, and also provided a preparation for blueprint to achieve dominance in ideology and theory. Furthermore, these thinkers not only made the adequately prepared for French Revolution, but also spanned beyond the national boundaries to make significant and far-reaching effects. The most obvious impact was that it had a far-reaching impact on the political system of United States and its constitution in 1787. Meanwhile, Enlightenment thanking also have a cumulative effect to political system around the world. It gave impetus to modern civilization process and provides a model for political system in other countries, not only “west countries, like German, Italian, Spain and Russia” (McKay et al., 2006), but also Asian countries, like China and Japan. In the course of the 18 century, the Enlightenment was a rational revolutionary focused on social institution and political system. It was one of mentality emancipatory innovations for people. The romantic thinkers came up with a lot of valuable theories, such as the concept about political freedom by John Locke, separation of powers by Montesquieu, natural rights by Voltaire and theory of Social Contract by Rousseau. Those romantic and critical theories dedicated to discovery more scientific and elaborate laws for human society. What the most cumulative effect of the thinking was it made out a blueprint for modern political system, which became the cornerstone of civilized evolution. It is certain that the Enlightenment will never be forgetting as a movement for political democracy and social development in human history.

Discussion Forum 5

Discussion Forum 5. I’m stuck on a Business question and need an explanation.

Main Thread – Due Sunday of Week 5 by 11:59pm (Eastern Time)
Minimum of 500 words in the body Minimum of 2 sources from the literature in addition to course texts Use the following outline:  Introduction  Process: Deciding on a Competitive Approach – no less than 200 words  Strategic Thinking: Deciding on Competitive Scope – no less than 200 words  Geographic Scope  Production / Distribution Scope  Decision Model: no less than 100 words  How do my decision models aid / hinder this, why  What decision models are being considered, why  Conclusion Include an Annotated Bibliography of the 2 additional Sources: Minimum of 250 words in annotation Summary of Key Points Evaluation of the Quality of the Publication Evaluation of the Quality of the Author(s) Where this fits into the discussion
Discussion Forum 5