Get help from the best in academic writing.

Adidas’ Management vs Nike Essay

The restructuring of Adidas was primarily aimed at eroding the market share of Nike. This plan involved the acquisition of companies whose products could be aligned with those sporting goods that were offered by Adidas. However, this approach did not achieve the synergy among businesses because Adidas could not raise its effectiveness or improve the quality of products. To a great extent, this plan failed to differentiate the products of Adidas. One may examine the differences in performance between various business units of Adidas in order to elaborate this response. Overall, the management of Adidas was extremely concerned about the growing market share of Nike that clearly became the leader of the sporting goods industry. In response, Adidas attempted to diversify its products and acquired such companies as Solomon and Reebok. However, the new divisions did not consistently display good financial results. For instance, many consumers were disappointed with Reebok’s failure to improve quality and styling of its products. As a result, its revenues declined during the period between 2007 and 2008. The main problem is that these acquisitions did not add much value Adidas. More likely, they made the company more vulnerable, especially at the time of the global economic recession. In this case, much attention should be paid to the process of differentiation. The management of Adidas had to show that their company could offer products which were superior to those ones of Nike in terms of quality or price. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More However, they did not pay much attention to this issue. This is why Adidas failed to become more competitive than Nike and their restructuring plan did not make the company more efficient.

Strayer University Wk 3 HR Management Tough Conversations Case Discussion

Strayer University Wk 3 HR Management Tough Conversations Case Discussion.

HR Management Week# 3 Assignment Tough ConversationsImagine you are the HR manager at a company, and a female employee came to you upset because she felt a male coworker was creating a hostile work environment by repeatedly asking her out on dates even after she said “no.” What would you do?Write a plan for how would you approach your conversation with each employee, including the most essential topics to cover. As you write your plan, think about what your goals are for this situation and how each conversation will help you achieve those goals.You will create and submit your assignment by using the ecree link. Just click on the link, and start writing. Your work will be saved automatically. You’ll see some feedback on the right-hand side of the screen, including text and videos to help guide you in the writing process. When you’re ready, you can turn in your assignment by clicking Submit at the bottom of the page.Click the assignment link to start your assignment in ecree. Please note that ecree works best in Firefox and Chrome.Write a 5–7 paragraph paper in which you:Write a plan for the conversation you would have with the employee, based on the concepts found in your textbook. What are the most important points you would need to cover in this conversation, and why?Write a plan for the conversation you would have with the employee’s male co-worker, based on the concepts found in your textbook. What are the most important points you would need to cover in this conversation, and why?Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.Include at least one reference to support your paper.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Create a plan for approaching tough conversations with employees, including a rationale for the most essential topics to cover.
Strayer University Wk 3 HR Management Tough Conversations Case Discussion

archetype analysis

help me with my homework archetype analysis.

I’m working on a writing question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Archetype AnalysisundefinedIn Rachel Monroe’s Savage Appetites, she outlines four archetypes of women in connection to true crime: the detective, the victim, the defender, and the killer. In this assignment, you will explore your own identification (or dis-identification) with Monroe’s archetypes in terms of your own relationship to true crime. In essence, this assignment is a hybrid of personal narrative and literary analysis, resulting in a cohesive argument.undefinedYou do not have to identify with any of the archetypes. You are encouraged to challenge, reframe, question, or otherwise interrupt Monroe’s framework. For example, you might partially identify with all four archetypes in different ways in different moments, identify with none of them and introduce a fifth archetype, find shortcomings with Monroe’s definition of an archetype and offer your own angle on that archetype, respond in the hypothetical (“If book X had done A & B, then….”), or any other approach that authentically speaks to your understanding of, perspective on, and engagement with true crime.undefinedTo demonstrate your argument, you will provide a sustained and complex engagement with and close reading of Monroe’s book and at least two other books from our class, one of which must be something you did not write about in either the literature review or the definitional argument; you will draw from a minimum of four secondary (scholarly/critical) sources to augment your analysis, one of which must be a peer-reviewed journal article. Additional evidence can come from any genre, either from our class or not, including podcasts, documentaries, social media, trending stories, personal experiences, and other mediums of “true crime” broadly construed. undefinedYour identity—your background, your race/class/gender/country or state of origin/etc—occupies an important place in this assignment. With this in mind, careful use of first person is a must, as is artfully constructed anecdotal evidence. At the same time, the assignment calls for complex analysis of true crime texts and the manner in which you engaged with these texts. Therefore, the assignment demands a sophisticated and nuanced blend of scholarly and personal writing.undefinedI recommend you go back through your notes to see how you responded to certain moments in the books we read. Look at your live tweets. Think about how you position yourself when reading the news. Really reflect on where you see yourself, how you feel connected or disconnected to the stories told in true crime, when you felt moments of resistance, camaraderie, guilt, identification, pain, resentment, fear, anger, optimism, and other important responses to this complex genre.undefinedtl/dr: where are you in these true crime texts? You may use work from previous assignments—in-class worksheets, live tweets, critical reflections, major assignments, etc—revised and adapted to this assignment. You may also use any of the sources previously used in your written work, but, as noted above, one of your primary texts must be something you did not write about in the previous two major assignments (the literature review and the definitional argument).
Technical requirements:Final: minimum of six pages, double-spaced; worth 15%.Format: MLARubric for ARCHETYPE ANALYSIS Paper (20 points possible) Content (4 points) writer offers a thesis that is insightful and interesting, generated from a meaningful engagement with the material and original thought.writer advances their argument using substantial close reading of primary texts and anecdotal evidence relevant to the claim.writer grounds their argument and analysis in a clear understanding of scholarly, cultural, and historical context. Complexity (4 points)claims move beyond the obvious and avoid binary thinking. primary and secondary sources are represented in their full complexity, without ignoring grey areas or aspects that are inconvenient for the argument being made.personal experiences are integrated carefully and meaningfully into the argument, allowing for complexity and retrospective analysis.writer acknowledges caveats and counterarguments in advancing their claims.COHESION/Arrangement (4 points)paper is grounded in a precise, complex claim which is stated early in the paper.each paragraph makes a substantive contribution to the development of that claim.writer moves smoothly from point to point.personal experience is used in a precise way in combination with literary analysis and careful argumentation, not used for the sake of it or as meandering filler.STYLE (4 points) writing is dynamic, varied, fluid, and distinctive with an original voice and memorable phrases. writer avoids subjective, hyperbolic, and imprecise phrasing.writer introduces primary and secondary sources with helpful signal phrases and in a way that makes clear how these sources augment, challenge, or advance the claim being made. Clarity (4 points)writing is almost error free and easy to follow.writer uses MLA format correctly.essay seems polished and not rushed or thrown together.
archetype analysis

Role Of Editors And Editing Styles Film Studies Essay

In the early Stages, editing was done, with the help of mechanical equipment that appropriately put together linearly edited reels. The digital revolution and technological advances have magically simplified the post-production process. With various types of easy, interactive software applications, editing is not restricted to professionally trained editors and apprentices, but also made it possible for film students, amateurs and one-time users to edit their own film or video productions. With technology advancing in the speed of light-years, editing in film and TV production has gained a pivotal role. This research paper focuses more on editing styles, and the role of editors in film, and also about various editing techniques used in the film. This Paper focuses on the study of editing and about the various techniques and different features of editing. This research is also focused on the role of editing in film making like how editing make the film more effective. So this dissertation is concentrated on definition of editing types, how editing differ in various film genre, Importance of camera a shots and angles Study about editing The paper states that how film get life in the editing room. Also how editing makes the film more effective This research helps to study the editor’s mind and how the editors are playing with the shots to make the film better. The dissertation makes every one to understand the basic concepts and importance of editing in filmmaking Editing is an art we can play around it. The editing has its own principles. The editing has its own reason for every cut and every transition, effects and all. In the editing room the film has rearranging by the sequence, scene, shot, take we can see all this aspects detail in following research. Introduction Chapter 1 | Introduction Editing is one of the challenge aspects in film making. The films are getting their full forms in editing room. In the process of film making editing plays the major role. I will say that editing is the backbone of the film. Most of the people will compare the filmmaking process to the birth of the baby. Regarding this example the filmmaker is the father of the film but the editor plays the role of the doctor who makes the baby born safely to the world. The film is the huge aspect when the concept is rising from the creator mind and till it delivered to the people it crossing various levels. Once the film enter inside the editing room are in editing level that’s the turning point of the film. The flow, tempo, screenplay, and more things are getting entered in side the film like the ingredients in the cake Most of the people think that the editor will do the rearrange the shots in order. Of course the editor will do the rearrangement, but he do lot of things more than that to make the film better to the audience. Every editor is differing from one another and every editor has their own way of editing style. In the film making the producer, the writer, the director, the cinematographer the actor and the editor plays the key role. The other people also contribute a lot. The editor role starts once when the production begins. He will be making a rough assembly of shots. Thus how the editor begins in the film making. When production get over the editor starts his assault with film. He plays with the shots to find the continuity and the connectivity between the sound and the visual of the film this will create the dramatic way of filming. It makes the film more effective. The editors are very important to make a film more emotions. He makes the audience to forget the cut of the shots. Thus he achieves his goal. The editor, the director and the producer are the three points to make the triangle called film. Here the editor has to know the thoughts of the director and the producer. The other two the same they all have to read the other two people this make the edit in rhythmic way. Mark berger who was the re-recorder mixer on apocalypse now states that “learning about the techniques of postproduction is similar to learning about the techniques of classical music” (Declan mcgrath -editing

SDSU Graduate-level and Undergraduate Research Discussion

SDSU Graduate-level and Undergraduate Research Discussion.

I’m working on a writing discussion question and need support to help me understand better.

!) How is conducting graduate-level research different from the research you did in your undergraduate program? Provide specific examples.The DQ response must be 150-200 words and have at least one citation in APA format.2) Write a 100-word response to the student in first person. Talk about how you agree and add your own thoughts. Make sure it’s respectful.Student’s response: Conducting graduate-level research is completely different than our undergraduate program, when researching in an undergrad program, we typically don’t have much interest in the subject itself but we still do the work and get over it. For example, in one of my undergrad class we had to do research on police work, I didn’t care for it too much and we didn’t have to go in-depth with our research, all we did was grab basic information and that was it as well as putting the paper in any formate we wanted for example MLA format. But, at a graduate level, we are researching more intensively based on what we will be working in toward our future careers. Based on the program and area of interest we choose, we have the advantage to study more in-depth that will incorporate into our future jobs. In a graduate program, research will help us critically and logically think more than in an undergraduate program, we typically have more tools to use and much more advantage to do our research. Reference: ReferencesFish, L. A. (2013). A Comparison of Undergraduate versus Graduate Student Perceptions and Performance using Online Homework in Introduction to Operations Management Courses. Business Education Innovation Journal, 5(1), 58–66.
SDSU Graduate-level and Undergraduate Research Discussion