Get help from the best in academic writing.

address one specific question about each study/task

address one specific question about each study/task.

Activity. Morality Read carefully the brief description of each study. Then answer the question that follows this description. Make sure you always justify your points. Your answers will be graded based on how solid and clear your points are (in most cases, there are no right or wrong answers). 1. LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES RELY ON DIFFERENT SETS OF MORAL FOUNDATIONS (Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009, Study 1) People on the political left (liberal) and political right (conservative) have distinct policy preferences and may also have different moral intuitions and principles.Participants across the ideological spectrum rated whether different concepts such as purity or fairness were relevant for deciding whether something was right or wrong.Items that emphasized concerns of harm or fairness were deemed more relevant for moral judgment by political liberals than conservatives, whereas items that emphasized concerns for the ingroup, authority, or purity were deemed more relevant for moral judgment by political conservatives than political liberals. Question: What do you think that these findings mean? What do they reveal about the role of culture in deciding whether something is right or wrong?Make sure you justify your points. [Write a minimum of 4-5 sentences] YOU CAN INSERT ANSWER HERE Reference: Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. 2. A DISSOCIATION BETWEEN MORAL JUDGMENTS AND JUSTIFICATIONS (Hauser, Cushman, Young, Kang-Xing & Mikhail, 2007, Scenarios 1+2) The principle of the double effect suggests that acts that harm others are judged as more morally permissible if the act is a foreseen side effect rather than the means to the greater good.Hauser and colleagues (2007) compared participant reactions to two scenarios to test this principle.In the foreseen side effect scenario, a person on an out-of-control train changes the train’s trajectory but the train kills one person instead of five. In the greater good scenario, a person pushes a fat man in front of a train, killing him, to save five people.While most participants (89%) judged the action in the foreseen side effect scenario as permissible, only a small proportion of participants (11%) judged the action in the greater good scenario as permissible. Question: What do you think that these findings mean? What do they reveal about how we decide whether something is morally reprehensible or not?Make sure you justify your points. [Write a minimum of 4-5 sentences] YOU CAN INSERT ANSWER HERE Reference: Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Kang-Xing Jin, R., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind & Language, 22, 1-21. 3. MORAL TYPECASTING: DIVERGENT PERCEPTIONS OF MORAL AGENTS AND MORAL PATIENTS (Gray & Wegner, 2009, Study 1a) Gray and Wegner (2009) examined the attribution of intentionality and responsibility as a function of perceived moral agency–the ability to direct and control one’s moral decisions.Participants read about an event involving a person high on moral agency (an adult man) and a person low on moral agency (a baby). In one condition, the man knocked over a tray of glasses, resulting in harm to the baby. In the other condition, the baby knocked over the tray of glasses, resulting in harm to the man. Participants then rated the degree to which the person who committed the act was responsible, how intentional the act was, and how much pain was felt by the victim. The adult man was evaluated as more responsible for committing the act than the baby. Likewise, the adult man was rated as acting more intentionally than the baby.Finally, when on the receiving end of the act, the adult man was viewed as feeling less pain compared to a baby. Question: If we were to run a similar study in various cultures, do you think that we would find similar findings or that the differences between the two conditions would be stronger in some cultures than in others? Make sure you justify your points. [Write a minimum of 4-5 sentences] YOU CAN INSERT ANSWER HERE Reference: Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505-520.
address one specific question about each study/task



The reading reflection covers Guha’s 63-124 and the Martinez Alier article. It is due Thursday prior to lecture.You must discuss these two questions in your reflection:1. Put Guha (Page 63-124) in dialogue with Martinez Alier to discuss what environmental justice is and how it differs from other kinds of environmentalism.2. Why, according to Martinez Alier, is it important to consider environmental justice and economic degrowth together?Before you start doing this assignment I hope you can read the entire assignment requirement and the required text I posted below and follow it to make sure we would not need to revise basic issue later.The article has an PDF attachment and MAKE SURE to list the exact page number when you reference his words AND try NOT copy but rewrite it in your own words and understanding.Use one or more of the tips from the “Response paper tips” file under our weekly modules to critically engage with this article. Feel free to bring in your own knowledge base, including what you have learned so far in class, or draw comparisons with the previous readings and lectures.

SOCI200 Sociologists research

online assignment help SOCI200 Sociologists research. I’m studying and need help with a Sociology question to help me learn.

Sciences, such as biology and chemistry, often confine their research to the laboratory.

Discuss why sociologists do so much of their research outside the laboratory.
Why is this type of research (outside the laboratory) necessary?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of research?

At least 350 words long
must cite at least 1 source in current APA format. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, and scholarly articles.
Textbook: Tischler, H. (2014). Introduction to sociology (11th Ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
SOCI200 Sociologists research

Week 5 Volkswagen Beetle Ad Campaign Discussion

Week 5 Volkswagen Beetle Ad Campaign Discussion.

For your next campaign critique you will be critiquing the VW ad campaign. Remember, you should use the chapters in Twenty Ads That Shook the World as well as Adcult to help you answer these questions. There are also presentations, videos, and additional readings each week that will help you write your critique. What were the important environmental factors (such as the economic, cultural/societal, legal/governmental, or business opportunities) that gave rise to a particular campaign? Who were the major players in the creation and execution of the campaign, product, or idea? How was the campaign, idea, or product “disruptive” for its time? What current advertising campaign or ad do you believe uses some of the principles used in the campaign you critiqued? Briefly explain why. Your paper should be 1 page typed, the answers numbered, and should be formatted using MLA.I have attached the text that is needed to answer the questions. Please only use this text.
Week 5 Volkswagen Beetle Ad Campaign Discussion

Big Five Personality And Adolescents Daily Development Psychology Essay

According to J. Belsky’s (1984) process model of parenting, both adolescents’ and parents’ personality should exert a significant impact on the quality of their mutual relationship. Using multi-informant, symmetric data on the Big Five personality traits and the relationship quality of mothers, fathers, and two adolescent children, the current study set out to test this prediction. Adolescents’ agreeableness and parents’ extraversion emerged as predictors of relationship warmth, whereas parents’ openness emerged as a predictor of low restrictive control. In addition, some gender-specific effects emerged. Overall, parents’ and adolescents’ traits equally predicted the amount of relationship warmth, whereas adolescents’ unique personality more strongly predicted the amount of restrictive control. The predictive power of adolescents’ personality increased with age. Personality characteristics that affected relationship quality were partly shared between parents and their adolescent children. Findings support Belsky’s (1984) notion that both parents’ and children’s personality predict the quality of their mutual relationship, though the relative predictive power of children and parents depends on the type of outcome variable and the age of the children. (Denissen, J. J. A., van Aken, M. A. G.

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service