Get help from the best in academic writing.

Adam Smith: An Inquiry Into The Nature essay help online free Human Resource-Management

He was also able to witness the popularity of foreign merchandises imported from the colonies such as tobacco and cotton. This gave him the material he needed for the ideas he later had. Adam did very well in school and won a scholarship to study at Oxford.

However, he was not fond of the school. He was very critical of it. He says that incentives must be created by the students for their teachers. He didn’t connect with the lessons and the teaching style of the teachers. He also did not improve of the needs of the students.Smith began is intellectual career when he was asked to lecture at Edinburgh in English and the philosophy of law. Afterwards, he went to the University of Glasgow, where he taught logic, moral philosophy, literature, and public policy.

It was his lecturing that provided the foundation for much of his later work. After much traveling and tutoring students, Smith went back to Kirkland. This was when he started his book, The Wealth of Nations, which he devoted all of his time towards. He worked on it from 1773 to 1 776, and when it was finished, it met immediate success. Graveside. Mom). The book offers descriptions of what builds nation’s wealth and is today an essential work in economics.

The book reflects the beginning of the industrial revolution and touches upon the topics on the division of labor, productivity, and free markets (wick/ the_wealth_of_nations). In Smiths time period, people saw national wealth in terms of a countries stock of gold and silver. Importing goods was seen as damaging because it meant that the wealth they had must be given up to pay for the goods.They favored exporting goods because they usually got things in return. Smith disagreed. He believed importing was just as good as exporting. He said that nobody would trade if they expected to lose from it.

The buyer profits, and so does the seller. He thought imports are just as valuable to us as our exports are to others. Smith said that trade increases our prosperity just as much as agriculture and manufacturing does. Like said before, the nation thought its wealth was based on its quantity of gold and silver, but what it’s really based on is its total production and commerce.Today, that is known as gross national product (admits. Org). After Smith published The Wealth of Nations, he was appointed to be the Commissioner of Customs.

The position gave him huge political power and enabled him to put many of his ideas into action. He became an important voice on other issues, including trade restrictions on Ireland (graveside. Com). He had a strong belief in competition, and called it “the markers invisible hand. ” He therefore opposed any government intervention into business affairs.He said that trade restrictions, minimum wage laws, and production regulation were all harmful to a nation’s economic health. Because of his beliefs, he made a new policy.

The policy was called laissez-fairer. This laissez-fairer policy of a non- intervening government remained popular throughout the Victorian Era and still plays an important part in our present-day economic policy. Capitalists supported Smith’s policies and they suggested that child labor laws, maximum working hours, and factory health codes caused a violation Of their rights.Smith, though, was not an apologist for the capitalist class. He favored anti-monopoly laws, and his support of competition remained firm because it encouraged economic growth which he felt would benefit all members of society. He said that as long as markets grew, a demand for labor would increase and it would prevent business owners from exploiting their workers. However, he failed to realize that the process of arbitration would mess up the labor market.

His optimism about economic growth seemed to ignore the possibility that capitalists might take the benefits of expansion (Victorianism. Org).The exact meaning of Laissez-fairer is it’s “an economic environment in which transactions between private parties are free from riffs, government subsidies, and enforced monopolies, with only enough government regulations sufficient to protect property rights against theft and aggression. ” Laissez-fairer is a French word which translates to “let them do,” “let it be,” “let them do as well,” or “leave it alone. ” It was a political as well as an economic doctrine. The function of the state was to maintain order and security and to avoid interference with initiative of a person to pursue his or her own desired goals.

Philosophy Question

Directions: Some people base their moral beliefs on religious tradition or authority. For some religious persons, something is good or bad because God (or a religious text) has said that it is good or bad, and that is enough of a reason for regarding one thing as being good and another thing as being bad (Divine Command Theory).
For others, it might be that nature was created by God with a set or orders, values, and purposes built into it. Anything that follows and fulfills these values/purposes is good, and anything which deviates from them, or does not fulfil these values/purpose is defective/bad (Natural Law Theory). (Note: this does not describe all the possible ways that religion can influence moral thinking!!)
I want you to take the position of a religious person or a non-religious person in your paper.
If you take the position of a religious person, I want you to:
Tell me why you believe certain actions to be good and other actions to be bad. Is it because God says so? Is it because these things are naturally good or naturally bad? Or is it because of another reason?
If it is because God says so, I want you to include a discussion of the Euthyphro Dilemma in your paper: How would you try to resolve what seems to be ethical subjectivism on God’s part if things are good or bad simply because God says so?
If it is because God ordered nature to be a certain way, I want you to consider the Rachel’s objections to Natural Law Theory: How would you answer these objections?
If it is for another reason that isn’t Divine Command Theory or Natural Law Theory, explain to me how you derive all or some of your moral ideas from your religion, and how they can be defended as being truly right.
If you take the position of a non-religious person, I want you to:
Tell me where your moral ideas come from and how they can be defended. Are they based on laws derived from reason? Are they based on your personal preferences? Or do they come from something else? If so, how can they be argumentatively defended as right or wrong (if they can be defended at all)?
Consider a point of morality which you would disagree with a religious person on. It might be where their morals come from, or it could be a particular moral idea (such as whether same-sex relationships should be permissible or not), or a way in which moral practices are defended or criticized as right or wrong.
How would you argue your views against that of the religious person you disagree with? In a friendly and civil way, how would you try to persuade this person that you are likely right in your beliefs and they are likely wrong in theirs (or, if you want to be more forceful in this matter: why you must be right, and why they must be wrong)?
Finally, I want you to consider whether it is possible for your point of view and the religious point of view to exist peacefully and respectfully of each other. If so, why? And if not, why?
In order to get the full amount of points with this assignment, it needs to be completed with:
At least 2 full written pages (“full page” means that the text has to reach all the way to the bottom of the page)
And it needs to be written in 12 point font, and the lines need to be double-spaced. AND THERE CAN’T BE ANY EXTRA SPACES BETWEEN THE PARAGRAPHS! That is, don’t make the paragraphs double-spaced and then quadruple-space the spaces between those paragraphs!
you don’t have to included any external sources. But if you do, then be sure to cite your them. You don’t need to include a works cited page or bibliography page, but be sure to cite your source in a footnote. Give me the author, title, and page number of the source if it’s from a book, magazine, journal article, or newspaper, or give me the author (if you can find it) and the url address if it’s from an online source.