Investment Avenues in Capital Market with Special Reference to Derivatives.
Futures contract, Financial market, Financial markets, Investment, Stock market, Operational risk, Capital market
A study on Investors Preferences towards various investment avenues in Capital Market with special reference to Derivatives. by Dr. K. Bharathidasan Institute of Management, (School of Excellence of Bharathidasan University), Tiruchirapalli. Introduction: In India, generally all capital market investment avenues are perceived to be risky by the investors. But the younger generation investors are willing to invest in capital market instruments and that too very highly in Derivatives segment.
Even though the knowledge to the investors in the Derivative segment is not adequate, they tend to take decisions with the help of the brokers or through their friends and were trying to invest in this market. This study was undertaken to find out the awareness level of various capital market instruments and also to find out their risk preference in various segments. Need for the study: ? To educate investors who are risk averse for trade in derivatives ? Awareness about the various uses of derivatives can help investors to reduce the risk and minimize the losses
The potential of financial derivatives to mitigate many of the problems associated with direct property investment is examined. “Derivatives, risk and regulation: chaos or confidence? ” by R. Dixon, R. K. Bhandari said that there has been an extraordinary increase in the use of financial derivatives in the capital markets. Consequently derivative instruments can have a significant impact on financial institutions, individual investors and even national economies. This relatively recent change in the status of derivatives has led to calls for regulation.
Using derivatives to hedge against risk carries in itself a new risk was brought sharply into focus by the collapse of Barings Bank in 1995. The principal concerns of regulators about how legislation may meet those concerns are the subject of current debate between the finance industry and the regulators. Recommendations have been made and reviewed by some of the key players in the capital markets at national and global levels. There is a clear call for international harmonization and its recognition by both traders and regulators.
There are calls also for a new international body to be set up to ensure that derivatives, while remaining an effective tool of risk management, carry a minimum risk to investors, institutions and national/global economies. Having reviewed derivatives and how they work, proceeds to examine regulation. Finds that calls for regulation through increased legislation are not universally welcome, whereas the regulators’ main concern is that the stability of international markets could be severely undermined without greater regulation.
Considers the expanding role of banks and securities houses in the light of their sharp reactions to increases in interest rates and the effect their presence in the derivatives market may have on market volatility. Includes the reaction of some 30 dealers and users to the recommendations of the G-30 report and looks at some key factors in overcoming potential market volatility. “Management’s disclosure of hedging activity: An empirical investigation of analysts and investors reactions” by JenniferReynolds-Moehrle.
Writing …
I need support to write a document about “Zoom/Teams and Open Source Conference Systems and their privacy issues “the document should focus only on the comparison between the solution of the privacy issues in each paper in Zoom/Teams and Open Source Conference Systems and it should at least 7 pages.
The responses should be seven pages in length, not including the title or reference pages and using APA style guidelines,
The references should not before 2019 and not in the list below:
Aiken, A. (2020). Zooming in on privacy concerns: Video app Zoom is surging in popularity. In our rush to stay connected, we need to make security checks and not reveal more than we think. Index on Censorship, 49(2), 24-27.
Botha, R.,