As is, it contains multiple errors such as the White side being allowed to move nine consecutive times and Queens castling. Dodgson wrote his defense in 1887, admitting that his adherence to the rules of chess are lax and that the book is based on a demonstration of moves, not a full game.
Taylor goes on to theorize that the game serves as a metaphor for life, with Alice, a pawn, searching for knowledge, which lies at the eighth square when she becomes a queen. This bears resemblance to, but is not necessarily in conjunction with the metaphor of growing up. In any case, until Alice reaches the eighth square, she has a limited view, and is only able to visualize the things that happen directly around her. It is rather abrupt, then, when Taylor begins discussing the Red and White Queens as two factions, the Rationalist faction, and the extreme High Church Party.
According to Taylor, the Red Queen demonstrates multiple parallels to demands of the dogmatic Church which remains rooted in tradition more for show than anything else. The White Queen represents, Dodgson mused, was gentle and stupid with a bewildered air that suggested imbecility. In her crooked guise, Taylor believes she represents the Protestant side of the Church of England, attempting to re-interpret religious ideas. So, if the two Queens are opposing sides of the Church, Alice must be a compromise.
She represents the thing that both Red and White sides have been overlooking. Taylor simplifies it as love, but it may be better understood as the True Church. The reason people came to gather and worship together in the first place. It is here that Taylor’s essay ends, without a proper clarification of his points, instead spiraling into yet another allegory concerning the black and white kittens of Dinah, Alice’s black and white cat.
GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN COMMUNICATION 2 Running head: GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN COMMUNICATION 1
GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN COMMUNICATION 2
Running head: GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN COMMUNICATION 1
Grammatical Errors in Communication
Grammatical Errors in Communication
In all harmony and perfection, the criminal justice sector depends entirely on how cases, situations, and occurrences are presented. As such, it is always important for a person dealing with such cases to be fluent in criminal justice language. Cases which lack competence when it comes to presentation and documentation may lead to misconceptions or wrong judgment. The use of grammatical cues ensures that the case is spot on. It does not require a genius to be perfect in grammatical presentation, but rather the correct choice of grammatical presentation.
For instance, if a person wants to present a case in court about mugging, they will need to pay attention to how they write their case. As such, if they fail to pay attention, they will mislead the people who are arguing the case. As such, that person will not be able to be perfect in how they argue the writing. For a person who intends to be perfect, they must adhere to these rules and make sure that they are perfect. That way, their presentation should be perfect.
In criminal justice, the kind of language a person uses should be in line with the topic they are representing. If the grammar waivers, they will not be able to tell whether or not what they are having is correct. In that way, there will be a perfect way of presenting the ideas. It will be hard to fail in the case. As such, grammar and general language helps to enhance the effectiveness of the topic being presented. It will be highly professional to be aware that the information they are dealing should be perfect.
Johnson, W. A., Rettig, R. P., Scott, G. M., & Garrison, S. M. (1999).The criminal justice
student writer’s manual. Prentice Hall.