View this interactive discussion scenario and answer the question(s) posed at the end of the presentation.
The video link includes a notes tab which provides the transcript to the video.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.
I am only able to attach 5 pages, so I will included the rest after tutor is selected along with rubric and quiz results.
Need 2 responses done on 2 classmates.
1st one classmate
Jared Hassel posted Feb 13, 2020 9:43 AM
In my “How Creative are You” assessment, I scored a 53. Which tells me that my creativity is a “work in progress” but I’m on the right track. In my “Do you have Project Management Skills” assessment I scored a 61. That tells me that I can handle simple projects well and the outcomes are normally good. The issue lies in complex projects, where I wouldn’t have good control over issues and could get back negative outcomes. I have some improvements to make but I’m on my way to being a good project manager.
If I were Mike, I’d look at all the environmentally friendly investments again and try to judge how much they would grow in our changing society. Everyone is looking for a better way to be environmentally friendly and improve their carbon footprint. I would settle on the best performing stock out of the environmental ones and put most of my funds into that. I would then pick one of the top performing stock overall and put some funds into that one. Diversifying stock options is beneficial in case one stock doesn’t perform as well as you would hope.
Week 6 Discussion
Jeffrey Kresch posted Feb 12, 2020 10:02 PM
Though I only scored a 65 on my decision-making assessment, which places me in the OK but not great range, I should be able to help Mike reach a decision in time to save him from tax liability. Seeing as how this inheritance is a one-time event in Mike’s life, it is definitely a nonprogrammed decision that requires a great deal of thought (Bauer & Erdogan, 2018). In looking at which decision-making model to use for Mike’s problem, he’s already done enough work to make the bounded rationality model the most useful choice in my opinion. The overwhelming number of alternatives would take too much time and would likely lead to analysis paralysis using the rational decision-making model, and I don’t have enough experience with financial advising to use the intuitive decision-making model (Bauer & Erdogan, 2018). That being said, the bounded rationality model will effectively limit the options while giving me time to consider creative ways to maximize Mike’s passion and financial gain. My score of 66 on the creativity-assessment indicates that I should be able to help Mike find a creative solution.
However, one thing I will have to watch for in this particular scenario is framing bias. Because I am a person that values the environment over money, any option framed in a way that is environmentally friendly would be more attractive to me and could sway my decision (Bauer & Erdogan, 2018). Luckily, Mike’s values also align with mine in this aspect, which could truly make the decision the more logical one. Even though the environmental options aren’t as aggressive as the less environmentally friendly ones, they would be a 2-fold win for Mike due to still improving his financial situation, but also by aligning with his passion. The less environmentally friendly options could potentially make him more money or could make him money faster, but this could be counter balanced by reinvesting a larger portion of his gains from the environmental options back into more shares of those companies. Because I could adjust the amount of his investment to make similar amounts of money with environmentally friendly options and feel good in my heart about the decision to do so, if I were Mike, I would choose the environmentally friendly investment option. Not only because it satisfies the criteria set forth by Mike, but also because it is built on sound logic and avoids the many biases we reviewed in this week’s material.
Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2018). Human relations in administration (4th ed.). Asheville, NC: Soomo Learning. Available from http://www.webtexts.com
6-3 Discussion: Making Decisions
Using others’ words: When is it plagiarism? When is it fair use?
The examples below draw upon the following passage
Using others’ words: When is it plagiarism? When is it fair use? The examples below draw upon the following passage from the 1985 book, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, by media critic Neil Postman. Television has achieved the power to define the form in which new must come, and it has also defined how we shall respond to it. In presenting news to us packaged vaudeville, television induces other media to do teh same, so that the total inofrmation environment begins to mirror television. Respond to the following two prompts/questions: 1. When people plagiarize, they present someone else’s words or ideas as if they were their own. Which of the examples below would be considered plagiarism? Which would not be considered plagiarism? Explain. If you’re not sure, that’s fine. Just explain why you’re uncertain. (Note that we are not concerning ourselves with APA or MLA in this discussion. Pretend you are encountering the examples in a newspaper or magazine, where academic citation style isn’t even used.) 2. This set of examples has been used by many different instructors. Teachers (both K-12 and higher ed) participate in a culture of sharing that is intended to benefit students and normally isn’t considered plagiarism. Politicians, too, often present words that they did not themselves author. Everyone is aware of the role of political speech writers, and thus this practice is not considered plagiarism. Can you think of other situations where one person presents the words of another without citation, and the practice is not considered plagiarism? What is the difference between the situation you have in mind, or the situations described above, and that of plagiarism that appears in the work of an individual author (whether a student or professional author)? If you can’t think of a response to #2, or it seems to you that your example has already been well-covered by your peers, then you can respond to the following prompt instead: Do a little web surfing to learn about a public official or some other prominent person who confronted charges of plagiarism. Summarize the incident and describe any debate surrounding it. **This week, please write a subject line for your discussion contribution following the guidelines in this reading on “microstyle.” Reply to at least one classmate. Explain or explore any differences between his/her response to #1 and your own. You may also–or instead–want to comment on a classmate’s response to #2. Original passage as it appears in Postman’s book: “television has achieved the power to define the form in which news must come, and it has also defined how we shall respond to it. In presenting news to us packaged as vaudeville, television induces other media to do the same, so that the total information environment begins to mirror television.” Example 1: Television has achieved the power to define the form in which news must come, and it has also defined how we shall respond to it. In presenting news to us packaged as vaudeville, television induces other media to do the same, so that the total information environment begins to mirror television. Example 2: According to media critic Neil Postman, television has achieved the power to define the form in which news must come, and it has also defined how we shall respond to it. In presenting news to us packaged as vaudeville, television induces other media to do the same, so that the total information environment begins to mirror television. Example 3: According to media critic Neil Postman, “television has achieved the power to define the form in which news must come, and it has also defined how we shall respond to it. In presenting news to us packaged as vaudeville, television induces other media to do the same, so that the total information environment begins to mirror television.”
online dissertation writing Manipulation. Paper details write a four page research paper on a common theme, I have chosen manipulation that is inherent in Henrik Ibsen A Doll’s House and Williams Shakespeare’s Othello. Must include at 4 to 5 for scholarly sources for support both a work cited and a bibliography are Required. MLA format, OutlineManipulation
Los Angeles Mission College Cause of Hyperthyroidism Is Graves Disease Essay
Los Angeles Mission College Cause of Hyperthyroidism Is Graves Disease Essay.
Teacher reviewed and wants to be explained more it my already 5-7 pages needs MLA format and revised slightly due to 43 % plagiarism from last person that could not revise for me (no response) Please need helpResearch Paper (50 points)Students will be required to research and write a paper on a topic related to a human disease (a syndrome or condition is OK if students can describe enough relevant pathophysiology) of interest to him/her. The paper is to be a minimum of five pages double-spaced and typed. The objectives and guidelines will be discussed in class. A rubric is available online. You MUST cite all sources using a reference page and using IN-TEXT citations! Turn-it-in.com plagiarism checking will be used and any paper that has a similarity score greater than 20% will be considered plagiarized. REMEMBER: PLAGIARISM WILL GET YOU NOTHING BUT A 0!!!!
Los Angeles Mission College Cause of Hyperthyroidism Is Graves Disease Essay
Individual Project 3
Individual Project 3. I need help with a Academic question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.
Describing a Qualitative Data Coding Process, code and summarize your classmates’ responses to the virtual interview question posed in the earlier Unit 2 Discussion Board 2: Capturing Qualitative Data Virtually.
To create the transcript for analysis, copy and paste each of your classmates’ responses into a Word document.
Provide the results of your coding process, using a diagram to present your findings. Your diagram could be in a matrix format (table) or a concept chart (node network). Refer to your assigned readings on diagramming or other resources explaining how to graphically display qualitative findings.
Your submitted report should include the following:
Description of your coding process
Topical coding scheme (list of topics; code book)
Diagram of findings (topics and themes)
Brief narrative summary of findings referring to your graphic diagram
Appendix with coded transcripts in one of the following formats:
A Word document showing color-coded codes
A Word document using the comments function to indicate codes
An output file from qualitative software
DELIVERABLE LENGTH: 4–6 pages, not including the Appendix
Individual Project 3
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service