Get help from the best in academic writing.

4-1 Small Group Discussion: Evaluating Study Designs

4-1 Small Group Discussion: Evaluating Study Designs. Paper details This is a group activity. For more information on groups, please see About Group Work. For this small group discussion topic, you and your group will be assigned by your instructor to read and discuss one of the journal articles you consulted in Module One regarding a public health issue. You will examine the article to determine the type of study design that was used to address the issue and why it was appropriate in the particular case. To complete this assignment, review the PHE 327 Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric Sampling: How Will You Go About It? In this course, the journal tool will be used for reflection. Journal activities in this course are private between you and the instructor. Overview: One of the most important things public health professionals do in conducting research is sampling a population. For this journal task, you will watch two videos about sampling and begin to think about how you will sample the target population to address the research question you have proposed for your final project, the research concept paper. Prompt: Watch the following two videos:  Reasonable Samples  Random Sampling: How Many Fish? Keeping your target population in mind, address the following in your journal assignment:  Sample Size: What sample size might you use to collect data on the target population? For instance, will you seek to sample individuals or groups within the target population sharing similar characteristics? Explain your reasoning.  Sampling Frame: How might you go about gaining access to your sample population? Reference the videos and the work you have so far done on your final project (in Milestones One and Two) to support your answers. You will build upon t Bronx Health Education Project for West African Immigrants : This article explores using health education to address immigrants’ diet and health. As you read the article, consider what kind of research question the authors asked. Was it descriptive, rational, or causal? THIS IS THE ARTICLE AND INSTRUCTON FOR THE DISCUSSION POST.4-1 Small Group Discussion: Evaluating Study Designs

Operations Management: Discussion concerns the article

Operations Management: Discussion concerns the article. I’m trying to study for my Management course and I need some help to understand this question.

The discussion concerns the article “Deming-based lean six sigma management as an answer to escalating hospital costs,” by H.S. Gitlow and A. L. Gitlow, The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2013, pp. 6-9.
This article is important because it will help you understand the difference among various approaches to ensuring quality in a service organization.You have two options.
The first (and best) option is to base your answer on your past or current employer (even an internship or part-time job such as fast food restaurant).Did this employer follow the management by objective approach to managing quality or did they follow the Deming-based approach to managing quality.Include a thorough description and state why the approach they took corresponded to one of these management styles.
The second option is to find an article that compares these two approaches (management by objective versus Deming’s process oriented approach).Summarize the contents of the article, being as specific as possible.Which method do they prefer?Why? Do you agree with their conclusions? Why or why not?
Use 150-250 words in your initial post.If the first option is chosen, there is no need to find an article.
Operations Management: Discussion concerns the article

who am I Essay

term paper help Provide an introduction to lifespan development. Without giving away the individual you chose, provide details of the individual, such as birth place, life growing up, and what made this individual pursue psychology and lifespan development. Write in either first or third person (NOT BOTH). Use phrases such as: “This individual…” (third person) or “I was born…” (first person) Share theories and concepts that helped make this individual well known, whether in their time or currently. Provide a conclusion on the individual’s life, and share (at the end) who you chose to write about, thus answering the question “who am I?”

1-2 page short paper with a force field analysis for operations management

1-2 page short paper with a force field analysis for operations management.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:  Describe the impact of change in an industry of your choice.  Identify key obstacles/opportunities that necessitated the changes and the nature of changes made in the related industry.  Assess the enabling factors and the inhibiting factors that drove the change. Guidelines for Submission: This short paper should adhere to the following formatting requirements: It is submitted as a Word document, 1 to 2 pages (not
including title and reference pages), double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. All APA citations should reference the course
text and at least two additional resources. The business plan is for prepared sushi to be provided at Starbucks. I need to identify key obstacles/opportunities that necessitated the changes and the nature of changes made in the related industry. The assessment
should include a section on both the enabling factors and the inhibiting factors that drove the change. The force field analysis technique can be used to help
illustrate this concept.force field analysis link:….
1-2 page short paper with a force field analysis for operations management

How Revenge Lead To Tragedy In Hamlet English Literature Essay

In the play Hamlet, the main theme is revenge turn the whole story into tragedy. Whoever involves to the revenge plan has end up death. Hamlet, the prince of Denmark, wants revenge on his uncle, who killed Hamlet’s father and took over the crown and married the Queen, Hamlet’s mother. Hamlet has a revenge plan. In order to do that, he accidentally kills Laertes’s father. In turn, Laertes wants revenge his father’s death by killing Hamlet. Moreover, the King of Norway was killed by Hamlet’s father in battle. The prince of Norway also wants revenge on Denmark. The story has a complicated relationship. Therefore, it has full of revenge powder in every corner. Since someone light it up, everyone die. The funeral of Hamlet’s father and the wedding of Hamlet’s mother and uncle were so close together. The leftover food from the funeral was used for the marriage. Hamlet was unappreciated the marriage between his mother and uncle. He thought that was not respecting his father at all. Until the visiting of the ghost, Hamlet’s father, the ghost tells Hamlet that his uncle is a murderer. His uncle killed Hamlet’s father. Hamlet wants revenge his father’s death. However, he does not know the ghost is saying the truth or not. He does not want to kill innocent people. The murderer is the one who now wears the crown. Since Hamlet does not like his uncle, he cannot do a thing about it. But now, he notices that his uncle should be the murder. He decides he must kill his uncle to revenge his father death. Unfortunately, Hamlet stabs through a curtain and kills an innocent person, Polonius, because he thinks that is his uncle hiding behind the curtain. This is the first innocent person die because of the revenge. Ophelia, Polonius’s daughter and Hamlet’s ex-girlfriend, becomes crazy because she has so many bad things happened to her in a short period of time. She kills herself afterward. She is the second victim between the revenge. Laertes wants revenge for his father and sister now. Because of Hamlet’s madness and murder, the king has an excuse for him to send Hamlet away from him. He sends Hamlet to England and escorted by Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, with a note to England to kill Hamlet. However, Hamlet finds out about it. He changes the notes so that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are killed in England. Two of them are the third and forth innocent deaths between the revenge. Upon Hamlet is returning to Denmark, the King notices Hamlet is still alive. He decides to use Laertes’s want for revenge in order to kill Hamlet. He sets up a duel for Laertes and Hamlet. If Laertes does not kill him with the poisoned sword, he will have a glass of wine with poison for Hamlet to drink it. Nevertheless, the queen drank the poisoned wine without knowing it. She is the fifth victim. Laertes killed Hamlet with the poisoned sword. Hamlet killed Laertes with the same poisoned sword, and he finally kills the King with the same sword too. Three of them die because of the revenge. Horatio is the only one who is not involving the revenge. He is the only character survive in the story to the end and follow the order of Hamlet to tell his story. The revenge of the death of Hamlet’s father ended up in tragedy. Hamlet’s uncle should be the only one revenge but it brings seven deaths with him. The mistake that Hamlet made cannot be acceptable. If he did not kill the first innocent person, Polonius, he may not end up die and bring these all into the tragedy. Since Hamlet killed Polonius, he brought everyone into his revenge. However, the death of Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, and the Queen were died for nothing. In the end of the story, Fortinbras, the princes of Norway, does not pursue revenge. He is the only one who has lost someone but does not die himself. The play Hamlet tells us that extremes pursuit of revenge causes tragedy. As far as Hamlet gets to kill his uncle to revenge his father, he brings eight deaths including himself. However, when Laertes reaches to revenge his father’s death, he ends up death too. It shows that revenge lead to tragedy. If the tragedy did not happen, the revenge would be continuing as long as someone wants revenge. More victims would be involved until the end of everyone dies.